Hank Azaria can raise up his voice in victory — most likely in a wacky fashion. Azaria, who provides a number of voices on the animated comedy institution “The Simpsons,” has prevailed in a lawsuit brought against “Leap Year” actor Craig Bierko over one of Azaria’s characters, sportscaster Jim Brockmire. Also read: Hank Azaria, Sherilyn Fenn Book Roles on Showtime’s ‘Ray Donovan’ Judge Gary Allen Feess granted Azaria’s motion for summary judgment in the suit last week, finding that the Brockmire character is copyrighted material owned by Azaria and How to Pictures, Inc. Azaria filed suit in 2012, asserting that Bierko had.
- 2/24/2014
- by Tim Kenneally
- The Wrap
There’s no doubt she’s made a lasting impact on the Country Music industry, and Shania Twain was recognized as the Most Beautiful Woman of 2013 by Country Weekly Magazine’s readership.
Though she hasn’t put out a new album in over a decade, the “Man, I Feel Like a Woman” songstress is still the obvious favorite in the genre.
Twain won out over big names like Reba McEntire, Terri Clark, and Lauren Alaina, while Gary Allen was the top dog in the male category.
Earlier this month, Harry Styles gushed over Shania via Twitter, and she happily responded, "Thank you for your sweet tweet, Harry Styles. You and One Direction are welcome to a Shania in Vegas show anytime!"...
Though she hasn’t put out a new album in over a decade, the “Man, I Feel Like a Woman” songstress is still the obvious favorite in the genre.
Twain won out over big names like Reba McEntire, Terri Clark, and Lauren Alaina, while Gary Allen was the top dog in the male category.
Earlier this month, Harry Styles gushed over Shania via Twitter, and she happily responded, "Thank you for your sweet tweet, Harry Styles. You and One Direction are welcome to a Shania in Vegas show anytime!"...
- 11/22/2013
- GossipCenter
Washington, Nov 20: Shania Twain has been named country music's Most Beautiful Woman of 2013 by Country Weekly magazine's readers.
The 'That Don't impress Me' hitmaker beat off competition from the likes of Terri Clark, Reba McEntire and Lauren Alaina, Contactmusic reported.
Meanwhile, singer Gary Allen was named the publication's sexiest man in another poll, beating out the likes of Luke Bryan and Toby Keith. (Ani)...
The 'That Don't impress Me' hitmaker beat off competition from the likes of Terri Clark, Reba McEntire and Lauren Alaina, Contactmusic reported.
Meanwhile, singer Gary Allen was named the publication's sexiest man in another poll, beating out the likes of Luke Bryan and Toby Keith. (Ani)...
- 11/20/2013
- by Abhijeet Sen
- RealBollywood.com
The 2013 ACAs air live Dec. 10 on Fox! See the full list of nominations and tell us who you’re rooting for.
If Taylor Swift wins any more awards, she’s going to need to buy a new house just to hold them all! The country queen is nominated for a whopping nine American Country Awards, pitting her against country giants like Blake Shelton, Miranda Lambert and Carrie Underwood. The nominees — which were announced Oct. 29 — will go head to head Dec. 10, during the live ceremony on Fox.
Artists
Artist of the Year
Jason Aldean
Luke Bryan
Florida Georgia Line
Blake Shelton
Taylor Swift
Artist of the Year: Male
Jason Aldean
Luke Bryan
Kenny Chesney
Eric Church
Blake Shelton
Artist of the Year: Female
Kelly Clarkson
Sheryl Crow
Miranda Lambert
Taylor Swift
Carrie Underwood
Artist of the Year: Duo or Group
Lady Antebellum
Little Big Town
Rascal Flatts
The Band Perry
Zac Brown Band...
If Taylor Swift wins any more awards, she’s going to need to buy a new house just to hold them all! The country queen is nominated for a whopping nine American Country Awards, pitting her against country giants like Blake Shelton, Miranda Lambert and Carrie Underwood. The nominees — which were announced Oct. 29 — will go head to head Dec. 10, during the live ceremony on Fox.
Artists
Artist of the Year
Jason Aldean
Luke Bryan
Florida Georgia Line
Blake Shelton
Taylor Swift
Artist of the Year: Male
Jason Aldean
Luke Bryan
Kenny Chesney
Eric Church
Blake Shelton
Artist of the Year: Female
Kelly Clarkson
Sheryl Crow
Miranda Lambert
Taylor Swift
Carrie Underwood
Artist of the Year: Duo or Group
Lady Antebellum
Little Big Town
Rascal Flatts
The Band Perry
Zac Brown Band...
- 10/29/2013
- by Andy Swift
- HollywoodLife
Nominations have been announced for the fourth annual American Country Awards, hosted by Trace Adkins and Danica Patrick on Tuesday, Dec. 10 live from Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas at 8 p.m. Et/Pt on Fox.
Taylor Swift leads all nominees with eight, followed by Florida Georgia Line and Blake Shelton with seven apiece. Voting is open at www.theacas.com starting Tuesday, Oct. 29 until Tuesday, Nov. 12.
The full list of nominees:
Artists
Artist of the Year
Jason Aldean
Luke Bryan
Florida Georgia Line
Blake Shelton
Taylor Swift
Artist of the Year: Male
Jason Aldean
Luke Bryan
Kenny Chesney
Eric Church
Blake Shelton
Artist of the Year: Female
Kelly Clarkson
Sheryl Crow
Miranda Lambert
Taylor Swift
Carrie Underwood
Artist of the Year: Duo or Group
Lady Antebellum
Little Big Town
Rascal Flatts
The Band Perry
Zac Brown Band
Artist of the Year: Breakthrough Artist
Lee Brice
Hunter Hayes
Randy Houser
Scotty McCreery...
Taylor Swift leads all nominees with eight, followed by Florida Georgia Line and Blake Shelton with seven apiece. Voting is open at www.theacas.com starting Tuesday, Oct. 29 until Tuesday, Nov. 12.
The full list of nominees:
Artists
Artist of the Year
Jason Aldean
Luke Bryan
Florida Georgia Line
Blake Shelton
Taylor Swift
Artist of the Year: Male
Jason Aldean
Luke Bryan
Kenny Chesney
Eric Church
Blake Shelton
Artist of the Year: Female
Kelly Clarkson
Sheryl Crow
Miranda Lambert
Taylor Swift
Carrie Underwood
Artist of the Year: Duo or Group
Lady Antebellum
Little Big Town
Rascal Flatts
The Band Perry
Zac Brown Band
Artist of the Year: Breakthrough Artist
Lee Brice
Hunter Hayes
Randy Houser
Scotty McCreery...
- 10/29/2013
- by editorial@zap2it.com
- Pop2it
Reality shows are all copies. Each has influenced the next, and now it’s just an blob of 15-minute-famous people competing in similar-enough formats. “American Idol” is interchangeable with “The Voice,” it just depends which music industry burn-outs are giving the advice. The dating shows are all copycats and Bravo is just following Z-listers around now. NBC’s “Love in the Wild” is a hilarious blend of “Survivor” and “The Bachelor,” with a little “Amazing Race” and Jenny McCarthy for good measure. It should just be called “Reality Show.”
The premiere of ABC’s “The Glass House” aired as scheduled on Monday night, despite CBS’s ongoing lawsuit that claims it borrows too heavily from its own summer ratings hit, “Big Brother.” Federal Judge Gary Allen Feess has, thus far, disagreed and denied CBS’ restraining order, essentially saying, “it’s not that new.” Both are reality shows in which contestants...
The premiere of ABC’s “The Glass House” aired as scheduled on Monday night, despite CBS’s ongoing lawsuit that claims it borrows too heavily from its own summer ratings hit, “Big Brother.” Federal Judge Gary Allen Feess has, thus far, disagreed and denied CBS’ restraining order, essentially saying, “it’s not that new.” Both are reality shows in which contestants...
- 6/20/2012
- by Jeff Leins
- newsinfilm.com
Federal Judge Gary Allen Feess has denied a request by CBS for a temporary restraining order to stop ABC reality show The Glass House, which now will air Monday night as scheduled. In a packed courthouse Friday, the judge said that if anyone would be hurt by a Tro, it would be ABC because the network would lose its investment in the show, the crew would lose their jobs, and the contestants would lose the time and effort they put into the show. Feess said he did not think the CBS argument that Glass House would violate the
read more...
read more...
- 6/15/2012
- by Alex Ben Block
- The Hollywood Reporter - Movie News
Reality television brings even more power to those with the remote control with the premiere of ABC's new series, "The Glass House" on Monday, June 18.
Quarried off from the world in a house constructed within another one's roof, this new series takes a spin on "Big Brother" by putting 14 players under complete surveillance in a home, living together with no access to the exterior community (or even sunlight for that matter). This time around, however, viewers control every aspect of the show, from what challenges players face, to who needs an attitude recharge, to who should go home for good.
Zap2It was invited on an exclusive visit to the set Thursday (June 8), where Executive Producer Kenny Rosen revealed the inside tricks to filming his new project, and gave a few insights as to why he believes the show will be a hit.
"I think we have a really good game,...
Quarried off from the world in a house constructed within another one's roof, this new series takes a spin on "Big Brother" by putting 14 players under complete surveillance in a home, living together with no access to the exterior community (or even sunlight for that matter). This time around, however, viewers control every aspect of the show, from what challenges players face, to who needs an attitude recharge, to who should go home for good.
Zap2It was invited on an exclusive visit to the set Thursday (June 8), where Executive Producer Kenny Rosen revealed the inside tricks to filming his new project, and gave a few insights as to why he believes the show will be a hit.
"I think we have a really good game,...
- 6/13/2012
- by editorial@zap2it.com
- Zap2It - From Inside the Box
This is shaping up to be quite the battle of the networks. About a month after CBS filed suit against ABC for allegedly ripping off Big Brother with its new Glass House reality show, CBS appears to have the ball in its court (for the moment), with a federal judge considering the network's request to shut down the series. So, what's the latest? On Friday, U.S. District Judge Gary Allen Feess refused ABC's request to wait until after Glass House began airing before deciding whether or not to grant CBS's request for a temporary restraining order to stop production on the show, according to Variety. ABC had originally asked the court to consider a "preliminary injunction on a...
- 6/9/2012
- E! Online
Update 12:15 Am – As expected, CBS filed an application tonight for a temporary restraining order to “cease production of, and refrain from broadcasting, the show Glass House until the trial of this matter…” The 37-page document also adds that “if the Court is not willing to order Defendants to cease production of Glass House at this time, CBS respectfully requests that, at a minimum, the Court order Defendants to produce the first taped episode of Glass House by June 15, 2012 to allow CBS’s counsel to evaluate its contents, and to allow the parties to address it in any further briefing regarding CBS’s request for a preliminary injunction.” Glass House, which CBS contends is a rip-off of its Big Brother reality series, is set to debut on June 18, 2012. Update 8 Pm: ABC has issued a statement slamming CBS‘ latest attempt to stop ABC’s new reality series Glass House. This is...
- 6/8/2012
- by NELLIE ANDREEVA AND DOMINIC PATTEN
- Deadline TV
Bella Swan has fought vampires, werewolves and her own rebellious uterus, but this week she won a major battle against her oddest foe yet: An online clothes retailer.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, Summit Entertainment has won the first round of a ongoing legal battle surrounding retailer B.B. Dakota's marketing of Bella's infamous blue jacket from the first "Twilight" movie. Turns out even Lady Justice is a big Twi-Hard.
Here's the quick background for you: Back in 2008, when "Twilight" first blew up pop culture, one of the breakout elements in the film was Bella's cool and versatile blue cargo jacket. Fans hoping to have a little bit of "Twilight" magic rub off on them flocked to pick up the cool coat, which was created by B.B. Dakota. Happy days for everybody, right?
View Gallery » Well, not exactly. See, Summit and B.B. Dakota apparently never had any kind...
According to The Hollywood Reporter, Summit Entertainment has won the first round of a ongoing legal battle surrounding retailer B.B. Dakota's marketing of Bella's infamous blue jacket from the first "Twilight" movie. Turns out even Lady Justice is a big Twi-Hard.
Here's the quick background for you: Back in 2008, when "Twilight" first blew up pop culture, one of the breakout elements in the film was Bella's cool and versatile blue cargo jacket. Fans hoping to have a little bit of "Twilight" magic rub off on them flocked to pick up the cool coat, which was created by B.B. Dakota. Happy days for everybody, right?
View Gallery » Well, not exactly. See, Summit and B.B. Dakota apparently never had any kind...
- 11/30/2011
- by Scott Harris
- NextMovie
Summit Entertainment successfully sues Bb Dakota over the marketing of a hoodie that was worn by Kristen Stewart in the vampire movies
From Drive's scorpion jacket to Back to the Future's Hoverboard and Potter's wands, movie merchandise is increasingly big business, even if not all of it is 100% legitimate. Now it seems even the makers of genuine items that have appeared on film may be restricted from using that screentime as a marketing asset in the Us. Summit Entertainment – the studio behind the Twilight films – has successfully sued a clothing company which produces a jacket worn by Kristen Stewart in the popular vampire-themed romance saga.
Us clothing brand Bb Dakota began selling the blue denim hooded jacket two years prior to the release of the first Twilight film in 2008, but only began marketing it as an aide to help young girls land "the hottest vampire in high school" after...
From Drive's scorpion jacket to Back to the Future's Hoverboard and Potter's wands, movie merchandise is increasingly big business, even if not all of it is 100% legitimate. Now it seems even the makers of genuine items that have appeared on film may be restricted from using that screentime as a marketing asset in the Us. Summit Entertainment – the studio behind the Twilight films – has successfully sued a clothing company which produces a jacket worn by Kristen Stewart in the popular vampire-themed romance saga.
Us clothing brand Bb Dakota began selling the blue denim hooded jacket two years prior to the release of the first Twilight film in 2008, but only began marketing it as an aide to help young girls land "the hottest vampire in high school" after...
- 11/30/2011
- by Ben Child
- The Guardian - Film News
Though the awards for this year's best cultural achievements won't be handed out until the calendar turns over, this week has built up a bunch of buzz for statuettes. The Grammy Awards announced their nominations on Wednesday night, and though there are a few strange moments on that list, it has kept everybody excited for the work of Taylor Swift, Lady Gaga and Beyoncé. Meanwhile, today sees the release of "Up in the Air," the new film directed by Jason Reitman ("Juno," "Thank You for Smoking") and starring George Clooney. The film — which centers around the life of a frequently-flying consultant who is brought in to lay people off — is already scoring a bunch of awards and is an early contender for a bevy of Oscars.
In order to properly prepare yourself for the funny, melancholy movie (which also stars Anna Kendrick, Jason Bateman, Danny McBride and Zach Galifianakis), we...
In order to properly prepare yourself for the funny, melancholy movie (which also stars Anna Kendrick, Jason Bateman, Danny McBride and Zach Galifianakis), we...
- 12/4/2009
- by Kyle Anderson
- MTV Newsroom
On March 27th, we wrote that "A long-simmering trademark dispute over who owns Famous Monsters of Filmland ended on Wednesday when a federal court in California issued a summary judgment against Ray Ferry, who had lost the trademark during a bankruptcy filing."
The ruling was actually a temporary injunction. Quoting from Philip Kim:
At the request of all parties involved, I would like to clarify that the ruling issued by Judge Gary Allen Feess was a “temporary Injunction” not a “summary judgement”. A request and advancement of this case would have needed to occur for a “summary judgement” venue. No “summary judgement” ruling has ever been issued for this case so the outcome of that ruling would be anyone’s guess.
Ray Ferry, Connie Beane and I, of our own volition, constructed a mutual settlement that best served the public and the fans.
We regret the error and have appended...
The ruling was actually a temporary injunction. Quoting from Philip Kim:
At the request of all parties involved, I would like to clarify that the ruling issued by Judge Gary Allen Feess was a “temporary Injunction” not a “summary judgement”. A request and advancement of this case would have needed to occur for a “summary judgement” venue. No “summary judgement” ruling has ever been issued for this case so the outcome of that ruling would be anyone’s guess.
Ray Ferry, Connie Beane and I, of our own volition, constructed a mutual settlement that best served the public and the fans.
We regret the error and have appended...
- 5/14/2009
- by Glenn Hauman
- Comicmix.com
A long-simmering trademark dispute over who owns Famous Monsters of Filmland ended on Wednesday when a federal court in California issued a summary judgment against Ray Ferry, who had lost the trademark during a bankruptcy filing. The mark was purchased for $25,000 by Phil Kim who has been trying to resurrect the brand, beginning with an FM website last May.
Famous Monsters of Filmland, in many ways, shaped the movies we are watching today. The likes of Steven Spielberg, John Landis, Peter Jackson and George Lucas were all fans of the magazines in the days before there were even books on the subject of movie monsters and filmmaking. The magazine’s influence was celebrated in the documentary film Fan Boys.
The 12-page document from Judge Gary Allen Feess of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (who you may remember from the litigation between Fox and Warner Bros.
Famous Monsters of Filmland, in many ways, shaped the movies we are watching today. The likes of Steven Spielberg, John Landis, Peter Jackson and George Lucas were all fans of the magazines in the days before there were even books on the subject of movie monsters and filmmaking. The magazine’s influence was celebrated in the documentary film Fan Boys.
The 12-page document from Judge Gary Allen Feess of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (who you may remember from the litigation between Fox and Warner Bros.
- 3/27/2009
- by Robert Greenberger
- Comicmix.com
20th Century Fox and Warner Bros are allegedly "close" to making a deal that will allow Watchmen into cinemas on March 6. According to The Hollywood Reporter, the two parties have held behind-closed-doors meetings over the weekend and yesterday to iron out the legal problems that have threatened the superhero epic's release. Judge Gary Allen Feess last month ruled that Fox still owns interest in the movie and has the right to distribute the first feature film based on Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons's graphic (more)...
- 1/13/2009
- by By Simon Reynolds
- Digital Spy
A glimmer of hope for "Watchmen" release has been lit up. In the latest update report related to the dispute between 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros., it has been said that on Friday, January 9, the attorneys for rival studios have told U.S. District Judge Gary Allen Feess that the settlement talks were in progress and thus, asked him to postpone the hearing for further discussions over the weekend.
Deeming the settlement discussions as "productive", Fox representative Lou Karasik told Feess that the delay would be "very, very helpful". New court documents revealed that both studios have conducted the settlement talks since last weekend, with concessions being made on both sides. Following the delay request, Feess agreed to push back the hearing to Monday, January 12. Still, he insisted that the trial date over the blocking of the film's March release is still set for January 20.
Earlier in the week,...
Deeming the settlement discussions as "productive", Fox representative Lou Karasik told Feess that the delay would be "very, very helpful". New court documents revealed that both studios have conducted the settlement talks since last weekend, with concessions being made on both sides. Following the delay request, Feess agreed to push back the hearing to Monday, January 12. Still, he insisted that the trial date over the blocking of the film's March release is still set for January 20.
Earlier in the week,...
- 1/10/2009
- by AceShowbiz.com
- Aceshowbiz
In yet another example of print publications migrating online, The New Frontiersman has opened up a web site. It's bare at the moment, but it's expected to go live on Monday.
And according to AP, things are progressing on the movie release front:
Attorneys for rival studios fighting over the release of the superhero flick told a federal judge on Friday that they're having fruitful settlement talks.
Attorneys for 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. asked the judge to delay a hearing Friday so those discussions can continue over the weekend.
U.S. District Judge Gary Allen Feess agreed to continue the hearing but says a trial over whether to block the film's March release is still set for Jan. 20.
Lou Karasik, who is representing Fox, told Feess that the delay would be "very, very helpful" to settlement discussions he deemed "productive."
Friday's revelation surprised Feess, who noted that Warner Bros.
And according to AP, things are progressing on the movie release front:
Attorneys for rival studios fighting over the release of the superhero flick told a federal judge on Friday that they're having fruitful settlement talks.
Attorneys for 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. asked the judge to delay a hearing Friday so those discussions can continue over the weekend.
U.S. District Judge Gary Allen Feess agreed to continue the hearing but says a trial over whether to block the film's March release is still set for Jan. 20.
Lou Karasik, who is representing Fox, told Feess that the delay would be "very, very helpful" to settlement discussions he deemed "productive."
Friday's revelation surprised Feess, who noted that Warner Bros.
- 1/9/2009
- by Glenn Hauman
- Comicmix.com
We're still not sure if we'll ever be able to watch Watchmen, but at least the sideshow is entertaining. With the release of the anticipated comic book flick in jeopardy amid a blistering battle between rival studios, lawyers for Warner Bros. and 20th Century Fox gave fanboys a glimmer of hope Friday, announcing that settlement talks were progressing nicely. Claiming it still held the movie rights to the famed Alan Moore graphic novel, 20th Fox filed a lawsuit last year seeking to block Warners from releasing the film. This, after director Zack Snyder had wrapped the $150 million project and Warners had set a March 6 release date. Last month, U.S. District Judge Gary Allen Feess gave Fox a...
- 1/9/2009
- E! Online
In a turn of events, in the special conference WB attorneys asked for today, attorneys for both sides of the Watchmen fiasco told Judge Fees today that "settlement talks have been productive."
{sidebar id=1}Attorneys for 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. asked a federal judge to delay a hearing Friday so settlement discussions can continue over the weekend.
The attorneys were originally asking for the hearing on Friday in order to move up the January 20th date in which Judge Feess was to hand down his ruling of whether or not Watchmen could be released on its set date of March 6.
U.S District Judge Gary Allen Feess agreed to postpone the hearing but says a trial over whether to block the film's March release is still set for Jan. 20.
Fox is suing to stop the release of "Watchmen," claiming Warner Bros. violated Read more...
{sidebar id=1}Attorneys for 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. asked a federal judge to delay a hearing Friday so settlement discussions can continue over the weekend.
The attorneys were originally asking for the hearing on Friday in order to move up the January 20th date in which Judge Feess was to hand down his ruling of whether or not Watchmen could be released on its set date of March 6.
U.S District Judge Gary Allen Feess agreed to postpone the hearing but says a trial over whether to block the film's March release is still set for Jan. 20.
Fox is suing to stop the release of "Watchmen," claiming Warner Bros. violated Read more...
- 1/9/2009
- by Stephanie Sanchez <stephanie@iesb.net>
- IESB.net
Attorneys for rival studios fighting over the release of Watchmen told a federal judge on Friday that they're having fruitful settlement talks, reports The Associated Press . Attorneys for 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. asked the judge to delay a hearing Friday so those discussions can continue over the weekend. U.S. District Judge Gary Allen Feess agreed to continue the hearing but says a trial over whether to block the film's March release is still set for Jan. 20. Lou Karasik, who is representing Fox, told Feess that the delay would be "very, very helpful" to settlement discussions he deemed "productive." Friday's revelation surprised Feess, who noted that Warner Bros. had been seeking to move up the Jan. 20 trial to next week, citing the...
- 1/9/2009
- Comingsoon.net
Warner Bros has asked the judge in the Watchmen copyright case to bring forward his decision regarding a potential release date delay. Judge Gary Allen Feess recently ruled that 20th Century Fox still owns copyright interest in the movie, which is based on Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons's comic book, and has the right to distribute the first feature film based on the work. He set a January 20 hearing date to determine whether or not to delay the movie while all rights issues are settled. However, Warner Bros has urged Feess to bring forward the court date, claiming that "time is critical" because they do not want to invest further millions in (more)...
- 1/8/2009
- by By Simon Reynolds
- Digital Spy
Warner Bros and 20th Century Fox have given a federal judge the power to decide over "Watchmen" fate. The bickering film studios decided to skip a jury trial.
The studios, who are involved in a legal fight over which of them has the distribution rights to the superhero flick, agreed to let a judge decide in two weeks whether Fox can block the movie's release date or Warner can release it on March 6.
Last month, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess ruled that Fox owns the rights to the film, advising both sides to either settle the issue out of court or prepare an appeal. However, since the companies are unable to settle, they now trust the matter to the judge to decide the film's fate on January 20.
Fox sued in February, claiming that they retain distribution rights to the film since producer Lawrence Gordon's option to...
The studios, who are involved in a legal fight over which of them has the distribution rights to the superhero flick, agreed to let a judge decide in two weeks whether Fox can block the movie's release date or Warner can release it on March 6.
Last month, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess ruled that Fox owns the rights to the film, advising both sides to either settle the issue out of court or prepare an appeal. However, since the companies are unable to settle, they now trust the matter to the judge to decide the film's fate on January 20.
Fox sued in February, claiming that they retain distribution rights to the film since producer Lawrence Gordon's option to...
- 1/8/2009
- icelebz.com
20th Century Fox and Warner Bros have decided to forgo a jury trial and let Us District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess decide the fate of Watchmen on January 20th 2009. And considering the fact that Fees has already ruled that Fox owns the distribution rights to the film, I don’t see the result being one that will satisfy fans. Basically, the judge will decide if an injunction should be issued to block the release of the film. Warner Bros has issued a statement saying that they “will continue to pursue all of our legal options to defeat Fox’s meritless claims and remain confident that we will ultimately prevail.”
THR’s legal expert Matthew Belloni says that “an injunction certainly isn’t a given here.” Belloni writes: “Under copyright law, a rightsholder still has to show, among other things, that it will be “irreparably harmed” absent an injunction, and...
THR’s legal expert Matthew Belloni says that “an injunction certainly isn’t a given here.” Belloni writes: “Under copyright law, a rightsholder still has to show, among other things, that it will be “irreparably harmed” absent an injunction, and...
- 1/7/2009
- by Peter Sciretta
- Slash Film
With a judge's ruling in hand, attorneys for 20th Century Fox are seeking a court order to delay the release of Watchmen, one of the most anticipated movies of 2009. U.S. District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess found last week that Fox "owns a copyright interest consisting of, at the very least, the right to distribute" the Warner Bros.-produced film, slated for March 6 release.
Read More >...
Read More >...
- 12/30/2008
- by Tim Molloy
- TVGuide - Breaking News
20th Century Fox is seeking an injunction to block the release of Warner Bros's superhero film Watchmen. A recent federal ruling concluded that Fox still owns copyright interest in the movie, based on Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons's comic book, and has the right to distribute the first feature film based on the work. Judge Gary Allen Feess urged Fox and Warner Bros to negotiate a settlement to avoid taking the dispute to trial, which would likely delay the planned March 6, 2009 release. However, Warner Bros has countered Fox's (more)...
- 12/30/2008
- by By Simon Reynolds
- Digital Spy
Things are not looking good for Watchmen at year's end. Christmas brought a surprise turn in the pending lawsuit, as the presiding Judge overseeing the trail, Gary Allen Feess, announced his finding that Fox does indeed own a part of the distribution rights for the movie adaptation of the bestselling graphic novel. Now, true to their word, Fox appears to be more intent on delaying the picture than making a profit from the movie. Variety has given an update on what they are calling the "Watchmen war," after lawyers from both sides met today with Judge Feess for a "status update." What is that status? Well, it depends on who you ask. Warner Brothers says the movie is staying put on its March 6th release date. The studio spokesperson seems quite adamant that the court will find in their favor, proving that Fox does not have any rights in this...
- 12/30/2008
- cinemablend.com
Jeff Jenson at Entertainment Weekly analyzes Judge Gary Allen Feess’ Christmas Eve ruling, clearly stating 20th-Century Fox has the copyright to The Watchmen film, granting them distribution rights.
"Fox owns a copyright interest consisting of, at the very least, the right to distribute the Watchmen motion picture," Judge Gary Allen Feess said according to Variety.
“In his ruling, Feess concludes that Gordon never properly presented Fox with the option to produce and distribute the version of Watchmen developed by director Zack Snyder,” Jensen wrote.
“He also makes it clear that neither Gordon nor Warner Bros. had bought out Fox’s interest before Warner Bros. went into production. Indeed, Feess’ ruling includes a rather sarcastic footnote blasting Gordon for his conduct in resolving this dispute. In section 3, Feess remarks that during Gordon’s deposition, the producer claimed he couldn’t properly recollect his contract with Fox.”
Jensen notes that the summary judgment,...
"Fox owns a copyright interest consisting of, at the very least, the right to distribute the Watchmen motion picture," Judge Gary Allen Feess said according to Variety.
“In his ruling, Feess concludes that Gordon never properly presented Fox with the option to produce and distribute the version of Watchmen developed by director Zack Snyder,” Jensen wrote.
“He also makes it clear that neither Gordon nor Warner Bros. had bought out Fox’s interest before Warner Bros. went into production. Indeed, Feess’ ruling includes a rather sarcastic footnote blasting Gordon for his conduct in resolving this dispute. In section 3, Feess remarks that during Gordon’s deposition, the producer claimed he couldn’t properly recollect his contract with Fox.”
Jensen notes that the summary judgment,...
- 12/29/2008
- by Robert Greenberger
- Comicmix.com
"Watchmen" are in turmoil. An L.A. judge has ruled that 20th Century Fox owns the distribution rights to the superhero flick, leaving Warner Bros. scrambling to settle in order to release the pic on March 6.
Judge Gary Allen Feess rules that Fox has the right to "Watchmen" and advises both film studios to reach a settlement or prepare an appeal before he issues a more detailed ruling. He issues the trial date on January 20.
As quoted by Variety, the judge said in his ruling, "Fox owns a copyright interest consisting of, at the very least, the right to distribute the 'Watchmen' motion picture."
"The parties may wish to turn their efforts from preparing for trial to negotiating a resolution of this dispute or positioning the case for review."...
Judge Gary Allen Feess rules that Fox has the right to "Watchmen" and advises both film studios to reach a settlement or prepare an appeal before he issues a more detailed ruling. He issues the trial date on January 20.
As quoted by Variety, the judge said in his ruling, "Fox owns a copyright interest consisting of, at the very least, the right to distribute the 'Watchmen' motion picture."
"The parties may wish to turn their efforts from preparing for trial to negotiating a resolution of this dispute or positioning the case for review."...
- 12/29/2008
- icelebz.com
Judge Gary Allen Feess handed Warner Bros. a legal lump of coal on Christmas Eve, as he issued a brief ruling indicating 20th-Century Fox has the distribution rights to Watchmen, according to Variety.
His five-page ruling said, “Fox owns a copyright interest consisting of, at the very least, the right to distribute the ‘Watchmen’ motion picture.”
Frees, over the fall, urged Warner Bros. and 20th to iron out their differences. He repeated the suggestion in the document, saying, “The parties may wish to turn their efforts from preparing for trial to negotiating a resolution of this dispute or positioning the case for review.” Warner is set to release the film on March 6, 2009.
Fox acquired the rights from DC Comics in the 1980s with producer Lawrence Gordon’s production company. When 20th lost interest, Gordon moved the project to Universal and Paramount Pictures before landing it with Warner, parent company to DC.
His five-page ruling said, “Fox owns a copyright interest consisting of, at the very least, the right to distribute the ‘Watchmen’ motion picture.”
Frees, over the fall, urged Warner Bros. and 20th to iron out their differences. He repeated the suggestion in the document, saying, “The parties may wish to turn their efforts from preparing for trial to negotiating a resolution of this dispute or positioning the case for review.” Warner is set to release the film on March 6, 2009.
Fox acquired the rights from DC Comics in the 1980s with producer Lawrence Gordon’s production company. When 20th lost interest, Gordon moved the project to Universal and Paramount Pictures before landing it with Warner, parent company to DC.
- 12/26/2008
- by Robert Greenberger
- Comicmix.com
The ongoing legal battle between Warner Bros. and Fox over the theatrical distribution rights to the upcoming Watchmen movie is continuing in California's Federal District Court with Judge Gary Allen Fees issuing a ruling on the 24th that Fox has a "right to distribute" the movie. Now before we go storming Fox headquarters with pitchforks and torches, this doesn't necessarily mean that Watchmen will a) be delayed, b) never see the light of day or c) be cut and edited down by Fox....
- 12/26/2008
- by Mike Sampson
- JoBlo.com
The seemingly never ending saga of Fox's sour-grapes lawsuit against Warner Bros over the rights ownership to Watchmen was given a further extension after the judge dealing with the case refused to rule on it Monday. According to Variety, Judge Gary Allen Feess announced that he could not make a ruling as the contract being cited in the case is too open to interpretation so a full trial is required. Feess has said that the case will be heard on Jan 20 due to his commitment to a criminal matter on Jan 6. Fox alleges that under the contentious contract, Larry Gordon never completely reclaimed his rights to the property when Fox abandoned their own attempts to get the movie off the ground and Warners picked it up instead, therefore they have no right to distribute the already-in-the-can movie. As we've brought up endlessly in these stories what should prove interesting in...
- 12/17/2008
- cinemablend.com
The eagerly awaited trial pitting 20th Century Fox against Warner Bros. over The Watchmen has been delayed from January 6 to January 20, according to Variety. On Monday, Judge Gary Allen Feess declined to “issue a ruling on whether Fox or Warner Bros. controls the rights to the project.”
The delay is a result of the judge having a criminal matter also scheduled for the 6th, which takes precedence over Hollywood behemoths. He declined both sides’ request for summary judgment regarding the rights, saying, “the contracts between Fox and Watchmen producer Larry Gordon are so open to interpretation that a trial is required.”
Warner insists the movie will still open, as scheduled, on March 6.
Watchmen has had a complicated history from when the rights were first sold to Fox in 1986. The rights have been with Warners once before, when Joel Silver and Terry Gilliam were attached to produce and direct, respectively. Universal...
The delay is a result of the judge having a criminal matter also scheduled for the 6th, which takes precedence over Hollywood behemoths. He declined both sides’ request for summary judgment regarding the rights, saying, “the contracts between Fox and Watchmen producer Larry Gordon are so open to interpretation that a trial is required.”
Warner insists the movie will still open, as scheduled, on March 6.
Watchmen has had a complicated history from when the rights were first sold to Fox in 1986. The rights have been with Warners once before, when Joel Silver and Terry Gilliam were attached to produce and direct, respectively. Universal...
- 12/17/2008
- by Robert Greenberger
- Comicmix.com
The trial over Watchmen is still on this January, but rather than commencing on January 6th, it's been pushed back two weeks to January 20th. Judge Gary Allen Feess set the new date Monday, saying he's required to adjudicate a criminal trial on the 6th. Uh oh...did someone steal more of O.J.'s memorabilia?
If you need to be brought up to speed on the story, we'll do our best. I mean, if it were that easy to explain, it probably wouldn't be going to court. So, Warner Bros. is releasing Watchmen in March 2009. Many years ago, however, Fox was developing the project but put the film in turnaround, at which point, producer Larry Gordon acquired the rights. Subsequently, he brought the film to Warner Bros.
Here's the tricky part, which Variety explains far better than I could:
"Fox's suit, filed in February, contends that it retains distribution...
If you need to be brought up to speed on the story, we'll do our best. I mean, if it were that easy to explain, it probably wouldn't be going to court. So, Warner Bros. is releasing Watchmen in March 2009. Many years ago, however, Fox was developing the project but put the film in turnaround, at which point, producer Larry Gordon acquired the rights. Subsequently, he brought the film to Warner Bros.
Here's the tricky part, which Variety explains far better than I could:
"Fox's suit, filed in February, contends that it retains distribution...
- 12/17/2008
- by Colin Boyd
- GetTheBigPicture.net
Looks like Judge Gary Allen Feess likes cutting it close. Well, that or he's enjoying this moment in the spotlight. While the trial for Watchmen was set to begin January 6th, Feess has pushed it back two weeks exactly to January 20th. The move doesn't necessarily favor either side -- Fox or Warner Bros -- as each party was hoping for a pre-trial summary judgment.
Watchmen Trial January 20th
Judge Gary Allen Feess gave two reasons for pushing the trial. First, he's got something else going on with a criminal matter and, second, he admits that the contracts between Fox and Watchmen producer Larry Gordon are so open to interpretation that a trial is required.
Watchmen Trial January 20th
Judge Gary Allen Feess gave two reasons for pushing the trial. First, he's got something else going on with a criminal matter and, second, he admits that the contracts between Fox and Watchmen producer Larry Gordon are so open to interpretation that a trial is required.
- 12/17/2008
- www.canmag.com
La federal judge Judge Gary Allen Feess has pushed the trial for "Watchmen" back two weeks to Jan. 20 after declining to issue a ruling on whether Fox or Warner Bros. controls the rights to the project. The new trial date was set on Monday. According to Variety, Feess noted that that he's required to handle a criminal matter on Jan. 6. and refused to make a pre-trial summary judgment -- as requested by both sides -- because, he said, the contracts between Fox and "Watchmen" producer Larry Gordon are so open to interpretation that a trial is required.
- 12/17/2008
- Upcoming-Movies.com
La federal judge Judge Gary Allen Feess has pushed the trial for "Watchmen" back two weeks to Jan. 20 after declining to issue a ruling on whether Fox or Warner Bros. controls the rights to the project. The new trial date was set on Monday. According to Variety, Feess noted that that he's required to handle a criminal matter on Jan. 6. and refused to make a pre-trial summary judgment -- as requested by both sides -- because, he said, the contracts between Fox and "Watchmen" producer Larry Gordon are so open to interpretation that a trial is required.
- 12/17/2008
- Upcoming-Movies.com
La federal judge Judge Gary Allen Feess has pushed the trial for "Watchmen" back two weeks to Jan. 20 after declining to issue a ruling on whether Fox or Warner Bros. controls the rights to the project. The new trial date was set on Monday. According to Variety, Feess noted that that he's required to handle a criminal matter on Jan. 6. and refused to make a pre-trial summary judgment -- as requested by both sides -- because, he said, the contracts between Fox and "Watchmen" producer Larry Gordon are so open to interpretation that a trial is required. Warner Bros. is still keeping their release date for March 6th for the Zack Snyder helmed film starring Malin Akerman, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Carla Gugino, Billy Crudup, Patrick Wilson, Jackie Earle Haley, Matthew Goode, Stephen McHattie, Matt Frewer, Niall Matter and Sonya Salomaa. ...
- 12/17/2008
- Upcoming-Movies.com
La federal judge Judge Gary Allen Feess has pushed the trial for "Watchmen" back two weeks to Jan. 20 after declining to issue a ruling on whether Fox or Warner Bros. controls the rights to the project. The new trial date was set on Monday. According to Variety, Feess noted that that he's required to handle a criminal matter on Jan. 6. and refused to make a pre-trial summary judgment -- as requested by both sides -- because, he said, the contracts between Fox and "Watchmen" producer Larry Gordon are so open to interpretation that a trial is required.
- 12/17/2008
- Upcoming-Movies.com
The legal battle over "Watchmen" won't be resolving any time soon. Initially set to be brought in front of the court on January 6, 2009, the trial date for the rights to the action adventure movie has been moved back two weeks to January 20, 2009. Variety reported that the new date was set by Los Angeles federal judge Gary Allen Feess on Monday, December 15.
The new trial date has been thrown out after Feess refused to issue a ruling on which side, 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. Pictures, has the control of the film's rights. Revealing that he has to handle a criminal matter on the original date, Feess reportedly also declined on making a pre-trial summary judgment, claiming that the contracts between Fox and "Watchmen" producer Larry Gordon are "so open to interpretation that a trial is required".
Despite the fact the the trial date has been moved even closer to...
The new trial date has been thrown out after Feess refused to issue a ruling on which side, 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. Pictures, has the control of the film's rights. Revealing that he has to handle a criminal matter on the original date, Feess reportedly also declined on making a pre-trial summary judgment, claiming that the contracts between Fox and "Watchmen" producer Larry Gordon are "so open to interpretation that a trial is required".
Despite the fact the the trial date has been moved even closer to...
- 12/17/2008
- by AceShowbiz.com
- Aceshowbiz
The Watchmen court trial has been pushed back two weeks to January 20th 2009, according to Variety. Los Angeles federal judge Gary Allen Feess also refused to make a pre-trial summary judgement, which was requested by both sides — Warner Bros and 20th Century Fox. The judge declared that he could not make a summary judgement because the contracts in question are so open to interpretation, and that a trial is required. All I know is that the trial date is slowly moving closer to the scheduled film release date in March. That can’t be good.
Meanwhile, Chud has seen the first 22 minutes of Watchmen at But-num-a-thon and came out surprised how much it looks and feels like a real movie, and not just “peed ramping and flashy money shots” as seen in the trailers. Devin says that the footage felt felt like “a calculated decision to convince...
Meanwhile, Chud has seen the first 22 minutes of Watchmen at But-num-a-thon and came out surprised how much it looks and feels like a real movie, and not just “peed ramping and flashy money shots” as seen in the trailers. Devin says that the footage felt felt like “a calculated decision to convince...
- 12/17/2008
- by Peter Sciretta
- Slash Film
According to Variety the 20th Century Fox vs. Warner Bros Watchmen case has been push back two weeks to January 20th. Judge Gary Allen Feess set the new trial date Monday, noting that he’s required to handle a criminal matter on Jan. 6. He also refused to make a pre-trial summary judgment — as requested by [...]...
- 12/17/2008
- by Liam
- Filmonic.com
A Los Angeles federal judge has moved the trial for Watchmen back two weeks to January 20 after declining to issue a ruling on whether Fox or Warner Bros. controls the rights to the project, reports Variety. Judge Gary Allen Feess set the new trial date Monday, noting that he's required to handle a criminal matter on January 6. He also refused to make a pre-trial summary judgment -- as requested by both sides -- because, he said, the contracts between Fox and Watchmen producer Larry Gordon are so open to interpretation that they require a trial. Fox's suit, filed in February, contends that it retains distribution rights to the graphic novel penned by Alan Moore and illustrated by Dave Gibbons. It claims that Gordon's option to acquire Fox's remaining interest in Watchmen was never exercised, thereby leaving Fox with its rights under a 1994 turnaround agreement. Warner Bros has denied Fox's assertions...
- 12/17/2008
- by James Cook
- TheMovingPicture.net
In a story that has had more twists and turns than the graphic novel it’s based on, the legal battle over the movie rights to Watchmen is in the final stretch. Gary Allen Feess, a federal judge, set a trial date of January 6th for the copyright suit between 20th Century Fox and Warner Brothers. The date is two months before the film’s scheduled release.
The comics readers, wary of anyone attempting to adapt Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' seminal graphic novel, was set ablaze once they saw the trailer in front of The Dark Knight. Unfortunately shortly after the trailer was released the fate of the film was almost immediately put in doubt when a federal judge's ruling allowed Fox to seek to block the release. Fox claims that the film infringes on their rights stemming from their attempt to adapt the acclaimed graphic novel in the early '90s.
The comics readers, wary of anyone attempting to adapt Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' seminal graphic novel, was set ablaze once they saw the trailer in front of The Dark Knight. Unfortunately shortly after the trailer was released the fate of the film was almost immediately put in doubt when a federal judge's ruling allowed Fox to seek to block the release. Fox claims that the film infringes on their rights stemming from their attempt to adapt the acclaimed graphic novel in the early '90s.
- 9/4/2008
- by Arthur Tebbel
- Comicmix.com
A court date for battle between Warner Bros. and 20th Century Fox over the rights to "Watchmen" has been set for Jan. 6, 2009, says The Hollywood Reporter. Zack Snyder's film is currently set for release March 6.
From THR: "With a March release date looming, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess said Fox should forgo any attempt to get a preliminary injunction against Warners to stop the release of the film because the issues were far too complex to be resolved on an interim basis, sources said."
More on the studio war here.
From THR: "With a March release date looming, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess said Fox should forgo any attempt to get a preliminary injunction against Warners to stop the release of the film because the issues were far too complex to be resolved on an interim basis, sources said."
More on the studio war here.
- 9/4/2008
- by Franck Tabouring
- screeninglog.com
(clockwise from top left) Prince of Persia set pics, Pussycat Dolls, Dragonball poster, new Bond photos, Dragonball trailer caps, Star Trek, Tmnt live-action and Eric Roberts's step-son The Dark Knight on DVD and Blu-ray on December 16? This rumor says so... Never fear folks, the Watchmen trial is set for January 6. Here's a snippet: With a March release date looming, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess said Fox should forgo any attempt to get a preliminary injunction against Warners to stop the release of the film because the issues were far too complex to be resolved on an interim basis, sources said. Instead, Feess told both sides to start building a factual record and start expedited discovery and depositions immediately. Eighteen new pictures from Quantum of Solace are now online. Set pics from Prince of Persia are online including a smashing good look at a dump truck. Hells yeah!
- 9/3/2008
- by Brad Brevet
- Rope of Silicon
Putting the studios' conflicting requests aside, a Los Angeles federal judge has set a January 6, 2009 trial date for 20th Century Fox's lawsuit over Warner Bros. Pictures' screen rights of "Watchmen". The decision on the trial date has been dropped by U.S. District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess on Tuesday, September 2 during a meeting between attorneys.
Since the trial date has been laid down, the rest of this year will be used for discovery and deposition proceedings. Various reports noted that Feess has also pointed that Fox should refrain attempts to get preliminary injunction as the case was too complex to be resolved in a short matter of time. Nevertheless, the studio could still ask the judge to permanently prevent Warners from releasing the movie after the discovery phase.
Earlier, it has been reported that both Fox and Warners have submitted a conflicting request for the trial date. While Fox...
Since the trial date has been laid down, the rest of this year will be used for discovery and deposition proceedings. Various reports noted that Feess has also pointed that Fox should refrain attempts to get preliminary injunction as the case was too complex to be resolved in a short matter of time. Nevertheless, the studio could still ask the judge to permanently prevent Warners from releasing the movie after the discovery phase.
Earlier, it has been reported that both Fox and Warners have submitted a conflicting request for the trial date. While Fox...
- 9/3/2008
- by AceShowbiz.com
- Aceshowbiz
There could be hope for a timely Watchmen release, after all. Sources close to the bizarre tug of war between Fox, who owned the film rights to Watchmen way back when (and maintains that, to a certain extent, it still does), and Warner Bros., who is producing the film without Fox's involvement, told the New York Times this weekend that Warner wanted an April court date and Fox wanted a June hearing. Neither of those things would help the film or its fans, since it was scheduled for a March opening.
Variety is reporting tonight that a Los Angeles federal judge has set a January 6th trial date, which is good news and bad news. The bad news is that it gives this expensive pissing match very little time to settle out of court, finding something that's amenable to both studios. The good news is that the court date is...
Variety is reporting tonight that a Los Angeles federal judge has set a January 6th trial date, which is good news and bad news. The bad news is that it gives this expensive pissing match very little time to settle out of court, finding something that's amenable to both studios. The good news is that the court date is...
- 9/3/2008
- by Colin Boyd
- GetTheBigPicture.net
Grab your calendar and circle January 6th. That.s the date when Watchmen goes to court, to decide whether or not you.ll ever be allowed to see it, according to Hr. The good news is that Judge Gary Allen Feess, presiding over the case, has instructed 20th Century Fox to forgo attempts to get a preliminary injunction against Warner Brothers, which would stop the release of Watchmen. That doesn.t mean the release is safe, it just means the judge isn.t going to block it yet. If things don.t go Warner Bros. way once the trial starts, it.s still conceivable that Watchmen could end up being flushed down the toilet. Don't be surprised if Warner Bros. at least pushes the release date back in the meantime, you never know how long something like this could drag on. At issue is still 20th Century Fox.s claim...
- 9/3/2008
- cinemablend.com
The battle between Fox and Warner Bros. over the rights to "Watchmen" took a big step toward resolution Tuesday when the federal judge presiding over the dispute set a Jan. 6 trial date for the case.
With a March release date looming, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess said Fox should forgo any attempt to get a preliminary injunction against Warners to stop the release of the film because the issues were far too complex to be resolved on an interim basis, sources said.
Instead, Feess told both sides to start building a factual record and start expedited discovery and depositions immediately.
Fox still could ask Feess to permanently enjoin Warners from releasing the film following the discovery phase.
Warners is set to release Zack Snyder's big-screen adaptation of the Alan Moore/Dave Gibbons comic series March 6.
At issue is whether Fox still holds the rights to "Watchmen.
With a March release date looming, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess said Fox should forgo any attempt to get a preliminary injunction against Warners to stop the release of the film because the issues were far too complex to be resolved on an interim basis, sources said.
Instead, Feess told both sides to start building a factual record and start expedited discovery and depositions immediately.
Fox still could ask Feess to permanently enjoin Warners from releasing the film following the discovery phase.
Warners is set to release Zack Snyder's big-screen adaptation of the Alan Moore/Dave Gibbons comic series March 6.
At issue is whether Fox still holds the rights to "Watchmen.
- 9/2/2008
- by By Leslie Simmons
- The Hollywood Reporter - Movie News
IMDb.com, Inc. takes no responsibility for the content or accuracy of the above news articles, Tweets, or blog posts. This content is published for the entertainment of our users only. The news articles, Tweets, and blog posts do not represent IMDb's opinions nor can we guarantee that the reporting therein is completely factual. Please visit the source responsible for the item in question to report any concerns you may have regarding content or accuracy.