The Crowd (1928) Poster

(1928)

User Reviews

Review this title
84 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Depressing but fascinating
preppy-320 June 2003
Silent drama about John (James Murray) and Mary (Eleanor Boardman) meeting in NYC, falling in love and marrying. John wants to make it big--to be somebody. He looks down on those who, he feels, have failed. But, after marriage and two kids, he's still stuck in the same dead-end job and sees no way out. Then tragedy strikes and John starts to crack.

A failure when first released (it's easy to see why--it's very depressing) but now considered a masterpiece. The story is grim but the ending is happy and realistic. Murray and Boardman give superb performances (especially Murray during a scene with his son on a bridge) and King Vidor's direction is superb. The visuals in this film are decades ahead of their time. His use of the crowds and the individuals lost among them are just great.

Hard to describe but a definite must-see. Just don't expect a barrel of laughs.
36 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A great look at life in New York in 1928
craig_smith915 December 2000
This is easily on the best silent films that I have seen. I got caught up in the story right from the beginning. To a degree, this is a story of the great mass of people that make up "The Crowd." As is pointed out in the beginning, a story of a man who is indispensible to New York (as most think.) He isn't. He thinks he is better than those he works with and is constantly waiting for 'his ship' to come in (which doesn't). In the end he almost loses his wife because of that.

I really enjoyed the scene early in the movie when he and a friend are going to Coney Island with two girls and both stop to watch the girls go up stairs so they can look at their legs. Probably somewhat risque' in 1928.

The film really stands out for the editing. Especially when you remember that this was made in 1928. It is used to also give you excellent views of New York and life in 1928.

I will see this one again and again.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"The crowd laughs with you always, but it will cry with you for only a day"
ackstasis11 December 2010
The most remarkable thing about 'The Crowd (1928)' is that is manages to cover so much emotional ground. John (James Murray) is a young man who knew from an early age that he would become somebody special, that he would stand out from the crowd. At age 21, he travels to New York, the towering metropolis introduced via a montage of impressive high- angled shots that resemble Robert Florey's 'Skyscraper Symphony (1929).' John joins the accounting sector of a large insurance firm, and studiously assures himself that he need only work his way up. Years pass. John marries, has two children. It takes him five years to realise that he has become what he swore never to become: a member of The Crowd.

Vidor's message is a double-edged sword. Early in the film, The Crowd is something to be loathed: the camera, in a virtuoso display of technical brilliance, swoops down upon a seemingly-endless room of seated accountants, each man turning pages in mechanical unison. (Billy Wilder later paid homage to this scene in 'The Apartment (1960)'). But when John finally determines to break free from The Crowd, his world falls apart around him – he can't maintain a job, his wife threatens to leave him, he loses his dignity. The film's ending is intriguing in its ambiguity: John is absorbed into the crowds of a laughing theatre audience.

Is it a happy ending, an embracing of conformity? Is it ironic, an acknowledgment of mass delusion? Is Vidor integrating his character into the cinema audience? In 'The Bicycle Thief (1948),' a similar disappearance into the crowd is viewed as tragic, but here I'm not so sure. F.W. Murnau's 'The Last Laugh (1924)' told a similar tale, depicting the bleak prospects of a working-class doorman, played by Emil Jannings. UFA studio thwarted that film by enforcing a ludicrous happy ending that Murnau included only with a snide introductory title card. M-G-M also toyed with a happy ending to 'The Crowd,' but fortunately Vidor's version ultimately won out, a conclusion genuinely unsettling in its uncertainty, and sure to inspire discussion.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ordinary People
lugonian22 March 2002
"THE CROWD" (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, 1928), directed by King Vidor, is a story about the average man, a born dreamer who promises but doesn't deliver, and his struggle to succeed and fight financial ruin. While top-billing goes to Vidor's wife, Eleanor Boardman, the movie belongs to an unknown named James Murray, who, in his debut performance as a movie actor, gives a remarkable performance as an ordinary American man with high ambitions.

The story about this common man begins on the 124th birthday of America, July 4th, 1900, in which a doctor delivers a baby boy to the Sims household. The baby boy is named John. The next scene finds John, now age 12, sitting on a wooden fence with his buddies, all discussing what they want to be when they grow up. John tells the other boys that he has big plans for his future, that he's going to be somebody really big. Suddenly a horse pulling ambulance stops in front of the Sims home. As Johnny rushes to see what's wrong, he is told by his mother that his father has died. Before the fade-out, this scene follows the boy with the shock-filled face walking alongside his mother up a long flight of stairs to be his father for the very last time. Years pass. Now John Sims (James Murray), age 21, has left his small town existence for a new life in New York City with great ambition to succeed. He later obtains an office job by day and goes to school at night. One evening, Bert (Bert Roach), John's co-worker and friend, persuades him to skip his studies and go on a double date with him and Jane (Estelle Clark). John is introduced to Jane's friend, Mary (Eleanor Boardman). John and Mary become acquainted, and after spending the fun evening in Coney Island, John proposes marriage to her as they return home by subway. Against the advise of her brothers (Daniel G. Tomlinson and Dell Henderson), Mary marries John. Over the years John and Mary become the parents of two children, a boy called Junior (Freddie Burke Frederick) and a girl (Alice Mildred Puter). While all seems to be going right for John, his marriage starts to fall apart as Mary gets fed up with John's constant promises he fails to keep, the loss of one of his children followed by the loss of his job, and depression leading John to a brink of suicide.

While MGM is best known for producing top-notch films headed by top-named stars, "The Crowd" features none of those elements. Instead of heading the cast with box office draws as John Gilbert and Norma Shearer, who could easily have played John and Mary, director Vidor uses his actress wife, Boardman, and an unknown he picked from the crowd named James Murray, supported by actors not known for anything more than minor character parts, such as Bert Roach, Lucy Beaumont as Mary's mother; and a crowd of street extras. What makes this movie so remarkable today is that the leading players are so real. John and Mary could be anybody watching this film. And the best of all, they aren't faked with glamour and sophistication that best expresses MGM movies. John and Mary are just ordinary people going about their ordinary lives. They love, quarrel and make up again. And whether "The Crowd" was actually filmed on location in New York City or not doesn't really matter. The feel of The Big Apple is there from the early sequence in which John observes New York City from the Hudson River ferry to the family having a picnic gathering on the beach on Coney Island; as well as the camera panning through the skyscrapers of the big city which leads to that now famous shot to the overhead view of a gigantic office with rows of desks and white-collar workers in their nine to five jobs.

The characters of John and Mary Sims were presented on film once again by King Vidor in an independent film titled "Our Daily Bread" (United Artists, 1934) starring Karen Morley and Tom Keene in the roles originated by Boardman and Murray. While Morley and Keene almost physically resemble their predecessors, what a treat it would have been if Boardman and Murray reprised their roles in the talkie sequel which depicts the Sims couple (sans children) struggling through the Depression by starting a farming community. By then, Boardman retired from acting and Murray was, like the character he played in "The Crowd," a man with ambition who fails to meet with success. Murray's reported drowning death in 1936 remains a mystery as to whether it was suicide or accidental. It's no wonder why Murray was so good in playing John Sims. He was really starring in his own life story, and didn't know it.

"The Crowd" was one of 13 MGM silent features that premiered on New York City's public television station of WNET, Channel 13, September 28, 1973, on MOVIES, GREAT MOVIES, hosted by Richard Schickel, with movie accompanied by an original score produced for this series. It was also one of the movies I recall watching every time it showed mainly because of an ordinary story that succeeds in holding my interest from start to finish. It's still a remarkable even today, ranking it one of the best silent movies ever produced. Out of circulation for more than a decade, "The Crowd" was distributed on video cassette in 1989 with a new Thames Orchestra score conducted by Carl Davis. At the running time of 104 minutes, "The Crowd" currently plays on Turner Classic Movies on a shorter length of 93 minutes. It's been mentioned by TV hosts, including Robert Osborne of TCM, that "The Crowd" was not an initial success, but thanks to frequent revivals in recent decades, it has been hailed, rightfully, as a cinematic masterpiece. (****)
26 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
ALIENATION
kryan-18 May 2001
This wonderful silent movie depicts the individual who gets swallowed up by the uniformity of society yet also represents the yearnings and aspirations for the want of a better life. Our main character is forever waiting for his ship to come in and sadly it never does. King Vidors sweeping shot of the rows and rows of desks and the image of John being a faceless number in the crowd. Despite him thinking that he is better than others and it's only a matter of time before his situation improves. It sadly never does and he loses the respect of his wife. Perhaps if there is a moral to this movie, then it should be that life can be a bitter pill to swallow but we should take pleasure in the small things in life and recognise that we have to accept lifes disappointments which will inevitably occur. Don't let the year that the film was made put you off or it being in black and white. This movie will grab you by the throat and won't let go. A classic!
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the greatest of all American films.
bgrey51713 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"The Crowd" is King Vidor's experimental triumph, a snapshot of the common man that perfectly captured not only the exhilarating whir and unbridled optimism of the Roaring Twenties but also the cruel realities of life without a social safety net. Vidor conned his studio bosses into letting him make this little movie, with a comparatively small budget, in exchange for Vidor's future commitments to commercial, big-budget pictures that were MGM's bread and butter.

Vidor cast his wife, the beautiful Eleanor Boardman, as the plain Jane female lead Mary. Reports say Boardman was nonplussed at having to look so ordinary on screen, especially since she was the prototypical movie star -- snooty and obsessed with clothes and all issues of personal style.

For the hero, John, Vidor literally picked a face from "the crowd" -- a little-known actor named James Murray whose own life and ultimate fate eerily mirrored those of the character he played. A few years after "The Crowd," the troubled Murray was a suicide, jumping to his drowning death. While his character in the film doesn't kill himself, he does come awfully close -- his suicidal impulse to jump from a railroad trestle is aborted only for the love of an adoring son.

I would love this movie if for no other reason than the gorgeous tracking shot up the side of the skyscraper at the beginning, where we meet John at work, a faceless functionary at a giant, depersonalized corporation that seems to be model for modern corporate America.

This movie is worth seeing, even with the happy ending Vidor chose from seven he shot. Actually, I kind of like the ending -- John, Mary and son fade back into "the crowd"; it seems like the most logical and happiest fate they could hope to attain.

This is truly a great film.
35 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
David Jeffers for SIFFblog
rdjeffers13 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Monday April 18, 7pm, The Paramount, Seattle

"The Crowd laughs with you always …. but it will cry with you for only a day."

King Vidor's masterpiece, The Crowd, is a landmark of Hollywood's silent era. The delirious joy and horrific sorrow of Johnny Sims (James Murray) and his beautiful Mary (Eleanor Boardman) remains intimate and touching even today. Theatergoers in 1928 were shocked by the visceral impact of this film. It is a simple story of boy meets girl, boy marries girl, love and tragedy amid the humdrum routine of daily life in the big city, told with poetic beauty and startling realism.

Director Vidor and cinematographer Henry Sharp treat the viewer to breathtaking moments: The magical lights of Coney Island at night, the roaring grandeur of Niagara Falls and the terrifying enormity of New York City, where people thrive or are swallowed up. "The Crowd" is among the finest films produced by MGM's "Wonder Boy" Irving Thalberg during the silent era's golden age.

"So Real It Makes You Part of The Story.""

Barely one month after opening, King Vidor's The Crowd, came to Publix-Loew's Seattle Theatre (re-named Paramount in 1932) at 9th and Pine on Thursday, March 29, 1928. The stage show featured Jules Buffano and the Seattle Stage Band offering an updated jazz version of Gilbert and Sullivan's Mikado in "Paul Ash's New York Revue starring Bob LaSalle and the Kimawa Troupe." Also on the bill, The Darling Twins, eight Geisha Girls, the Seattle Grand Orchestra conducted by Arthur Clausen performing the overture "Rigoletto", with Ron and Don at the Grand Organ. Admission was 25c from 11:30 to 1, 35c from 1 to 6 and 50c after 6.
36 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Best
MizMonet871 August 2005
This has to be w/ out a doubt my favorite film of all time (althought Metropolis is a very close second). What King Vidor brought to the silver screen when he made this film was pure genius. Few films compare to this one. The Techniques used are way ahead of their time and reminiscent of few directors before him. Not even Griffith could obtain such amazing crowd footage as Vidor did. The story line is one that we can still relate to today, wanting to achieve our dreams but just falling short. Today it's called depression or something of the sort but then in an age of new development it was different. Not being able to achieve greatness wasn't uncommon but it felt that way. And the character in this film is no exception, I truly recommend this film to anyone who doesn't mind a good drama and to anyone who wants to see what life was like in the late 1920's.
40 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
King of Kings!
GeoPierpont2 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
After hearing and seeing so many references to the genius of Vidor's "The Crowd", I was anxious to appreciate all it's glory.

Not a disappointment, he cleverly utilizes Ninja camera tactics unparalleled in it's time and for many years to come. I found it fascinating that NYC even then, was so extremely crowded and the traffic horrific with both horse and automobile competing for lanes. The traffic cop was a very busy and quite agitated man, yielding no stop signs or lights, but yet averts complete chaos.

Portraying Mr. Sims as smug, privileged and above everyone else, we quickly realize he is obviously delusional. This trait was never more aptly portrayed at the family get together on Coney Island Beach. He sings joyfully how he is all alone, strumming his ukulele (zither??) while Mother builds a fire, cooks bacon and protects a frosted cake (!) while the children run amok. What happened to the typical simple picnic of sandwiches and cookies in the middle of all that sand? It was a noxious scene but alluded to Sim's total lack of responsibility and shirking of family duties.

So many dreams and opportunities lost but the ending, uplifting. Be aware the themes tackled here are extremely rare in silent films so try to look for the bright spots.

High recommend for the phenomenal glimpse of NYC in the 20's and the raw talent of a handsome extra.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A silent film that makes sound unnecessary
doc-5523 February 2001
This is the film I use in my Film History and Technique course to demonstrate to students accustomed to sound and color that these are not necessary for drawing an audience into the screen to share in the joys and sorrows of strongly drawn characters and scenarios, and in some instances may be a distraction. The class reaction is always positive. This ranks with Sunrise and The Last Laugh: filled with sentiment but managing to avoid sentimentality. King Vidor always gives us finely drawn human drama, but I regard this as his masterpiece. He shows us how humans like ourselves, seemingly crushed in the maelstrom of city life can endure both disappointment and tragic loss, to go on because it is necessary to do so. The performances are fine, but it is the hand of the director and the work of the cameraman that carry us along for two hours. The final scene, the first time I saw it, left me somewhere between relief and tears; and after four or five viewings that reaction is still there; it takes me a few minutes to shake off the spell.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Depression-era silent melodrama has some distinctive touches...
Doylenf3 June 2009
King Vidor has a knack for making stark melodrama seem real enough and this is even evident as early as THE CROWD, where his Depression-era hero (JAMES MURRAY) and his wife (ELEANOR BOARDMAN) struggle to make ends meet during the dark days of a marriage that begins with a sweet romance and almost ends in bitter despair.

Murray and Boardman make all of their touching scenes very realistic. He was obviously a natural talent who was discovered by King Vidor for this film and made the most of a meaty role, running the gamut of emotions from joy to sorrow with effortless ease and a certain amount of charm. Boardman too is very effective as the wife who stands by her man even though she realizes he will never rise above "the crowd," the way he always promises he will.

Ironically, in real life Murray couldn't handle his overnight success and a few years later was a skid row alcoholic whose life ended when his body was plucked from a river pier in Manhattan. His downward spiral is very similar to the character he plays in this film.

While the story has plenty of depressing elements, Vidor's direction keeps it a compelling study of a strained marriage that starts to unravel upon the death of Murray's baby daughter. A highly emotional scene between father and son toward the end--just when the man is on the brink of suicide--is as touching and eloquent as any scene in the film. In some ways, the film mirrors the kind of performance actors in this type of role have to sustain over all the highs and lows--the way James Stewart did so effectively in IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE. Murray's character is just as demanding and he plays it brilliantly.

For a silent film, much of the acting is more restrained than usual, but Vidor does seem to heighten melodramatic moments for maximum effect, as he would later on in films like BEYOND THE FOREST and THE FOUNDTAINHEAD.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Timeless
dchozenwan8 April 2006
I recently watched this silent movie and I was amazed by its timelessness.

People work everyday on an eight-hour job and has dreams to make it "BIG". In that way, he could stand out of "The Crowd". Eighty years later and people still go through the same routine. Any working person can symphatize with John Sims.

In my humble opinion, the movie is a precursor of the neo-realist movies produced in Europe during the post-World War II era. The movie, in a way, also prophesied the worse: The Great Depression. John Sims, who symbolizes the common man, found it difficult landing a stable job after he quit his previous one.

A great movie, I hope this one must be watched by the viewers of today.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Technically advanced, not much of a story at all
PresidentForLife6 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
No doubt this film deserves a place of honor in the way it is filmed. The crowd scenes, for one, are impressive, especially considering the technology available at the time. But the story is really not well though out. Sure, it's about the trials and tribulations of a young couple, but after an auspicious start the young man turns out to be a n'er-do-well, and his hapless personality is never really examined. Too much of the early parts of the film are spent dramatizing how normal and ordinary their early life is, then it all falls apart as he fails to hold down job after job for reasons that are never explored. He isn't a drunk, and he doesn't have PTSD from the war, so......what happened? Is he depressed? At the end, they all go out to watch a movie and laugh, in a particularly eerie crown scene. No wonder this movie wasn't popular ! !
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Overrated Depressing Silent Film
ccthemovieman-125 March 2007
Wow, every review I read in the mid '90s absolutely raved about this silent movie, calling it one of the best, if not THE best, of all silent movies. It's been called a "landmark in its era." Well, maybe so....but in this eras, this is a 104-minute silent soap opera that had very little to offer after a unique opening scene.

The movie began with the camera sweeping over buildings in New York City, then up one of the big structures, into a room and then to the desk of the main character of the movie, "Johnny Sims" (James Murray). Considering when this was made, kudos have to go out to photographer Cedric Gibbons and director King Vidor. There are some very nice shots in here.

I don't mind a story about a guy who doesn't want to be part of "the crowd," but in this case, he isn't aiming for high moral standards but more for social and material status, and blaming everyone else for his failures. When "Johnny" and his wife "Mary" (Eleanor Boardman ) don't attain that, and their marriage is pretty much a negative issue, the story becomes too much of a downer for me. It's not an appealing story, especially when you can't hear the dialog.

There are so many good, entertaining silent films, I can't see watching one that is depressing.
17 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
When my ship comes in.
dbdumonteil29 December 2001
Restored with a very nice score,"the crowd" hasn't aged a bit.The topic is as relevant today as it was in 1928.Do have a look at the first pictures of "the apartment" (1960) or the last ones of "working girl"(1988)and you'll know what I mean. John Sims tries to beat the crowd,this crowd that follows him everywhere,at work,in the streets,at the fair or on the beach.He doesn't even realize his condition :you should see him laughing at the people on the street,behaving like sheep.It's always someone else,his wife says,take a look at yourself.

The secondary characters are wonderfully depicted:the well-padded buddy,the mother and brothers-in-law always contemptuous,always putting John down.Lots of sequences are memorable,now comic,now tragic:the tiny flat where even the bed must be folded,the huge office where employees are doing the same job at the same time,where everybody acts alike when they leave their job,like some kind of ballet.

John Sims is the embodiment of the American dream,but it has an universal appeal.When he was born,his father promised he would have good prospects,he would become someone big.King Vidor does not show the relationship father/son cause the father disappears when John is still a boy,but we can easily imagine it.So Sims thought NY was depending on him,and he discovers that he will be a wash-out all his life.If it weren't for his little boy who still believes in him(Vittorio de Sica will remember it for his "bicycle thief",he would throw himself under a train.

The cinematography is prodigious;two examples : The father is dead, the boy is climbing a stair : stunning high angle shot,enhancing his awful pain. On the contrary,the skyscrapers are filmed from below,showing how lost a human being can feel in this steel and glass world .

A detail :the hysterical/historical joke at the fair will be used again by the Beatles themselves in their "magical mystery tour" home-made movie.

1928:the silent era was coming to an end but we had not heard the last of it.
40 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Undermining the American Dream
murrs2kool15 October 2003
What I find interesting in this depiction of one man's downward spiral and the effect it has on his family is that it is remarkable realistic, especially for a silent film. Then, just as today, the man caught in a web of disillusionment begins to take out his frustrations on his family, blaming everyone and everything but himself for his failure to rise above the crowd. King Vidor directed Murray and Boardman (his wife) in their scenes together with a degree of subtlety rarely seen in silent films.

What I find unrealistic about this story is the absence of substance abuse. Johnny Sims, unlike James Murray who portrays him, never drowns his sorrows or medicates himself in an attempt to escape the pain of self-realization. The only episode involving alcohol, where Johnny goes out to get some alcohol for his in-law dinner guests and ends up partying with a friend until very late in the evening is realistic, but limited to the one short scene.

It's almost difficult for me to conceive of someone being so frustrated and depressed, but not turning to alcohol or drugs, which of course, usually have the effect of making things worse, and quickly. Such was the fate of James Murray whose portrayal of Sims was a flash of brilliance in an all too short career. He was my Great Uncle and when he died, he was penniless, found in the Hudson River with no identification but my grandfather's business card. Producer Irving Thalberg agreed with King Vidor that James Murray was one of the great natural acting talents of his time. His own story parallels The Crowd in many ways. In fact, Vidor wrote a screenplay based on Murray's life that he titled The Actor. He was attempting to raise money to produce the film in the late seventies, but unfortunately, it was never made. Now that really is a shame. --Larry Murray
46 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A director's film before there really was such a thing
AlsExGal5 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
King Vidor must have had good standing with the powers that be at MGM, because as a director in the studio era he seemed to get to pick and shape his assignments more than most directors of that time.

King Vidor made this film to be an artistic achievement, even recruiting unknown actor James Murray - a member of "the crowd" you might say - to play the male lead, all with MGM approval. Murray plays John Sims, a representative everyman who all through life, up to the end of the film thinks he is going to beat "the crowd" and be somebody. He is born July 4, 1900 with his father saying "the world is going to hear from this boy". Unfortunately, John's dad dies when he is 12, and at 21 John heads to New York to make his success. He starts out at a desk amid hundreds of other desks doing simple mathematical clerical work for an insurance company - work that decades ago was replaced by computers. Unfortunately, John's career not only starts there, it ends there too, with only one 8 dollar raise in six years to show for it. What really stings is that John's playboy coworker Bert (Bert Roach) works his way up into management even though they both started work there at about the same time.

In one of his rare pieces of luck John does meet a girl (Eleanor Boardman as Mary) that he loves and who loves him back for what he is, not what he says he'll be. When John finally does win some kind of recognition - he wins a 500 dollar prize for coming up with the name for a new cleanser - it ultimately becomes the instrument of destruction for his entire family and any drive he has left.

The ending looks like it's a happy one - after John quits his job and can't make it at any other job he finds, almost losing Mary in the process, he finally resigns himself to accepting and keeping any job - one that he ridiculed when he first came to New York seven years before. The final scene has John and family enjoying a night of fun at the local vaudeville house in celebration of his new job, menial though it is, laughing with an auditorium full of people. What has really happened though is that John has finally surrendered his dream and is now happy being just one of the crowd - a bittersweet ending in my humble opinion.

This film blends vintage scenes of old New York of the 20's with themes anyone can relate to today - the drive to succeed, the likelihood that most by definition will not, beauty being in the eye of the beholder, and trying to hold a family together after a tragic and sudden loss. I highly recommend this wonderful film.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant critiques of "modern" life
planktonrules20 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is a brilliantly composed film, with the director (King Vidor) pulling out all stops to create wonderful images of the problems with modern life (at least, modern for 1928). While the actors do just fine, the real star is definitely the director! While he COULD have just shown crappy stock footage of the streets of New York filled with people, the montages he developed were hauntingly rhythmic and as highly reminiscent of METROPOLIS. He also makes the film in a semi-documentary form that follows one particular hard-luck family in the city.

The film COULD be seen as an attack on Capitalism or America, and while this might seem this way through much of the film, the movie's underlying sense of optimism despite the pressures of modern life make it a transcendent and non-preachy film.

Highly unusual, highly creative and full of wonderful innovation, this film is one of the best full-length silent dramas I have seen--and I've seen quite a few. A true work of art.

Interestingly, although the film has what I would consider a perfect ending, according to director Vidor, the studio had him shoot SEVEN different endings, as they were just not sure how to wrap up this powerful film!
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Stunning Silent Classic
evanston_dad12 February 2017
I had wanted to see "The Crowd," King Vidor's silent classic about navigating the anonymity of big-city American life, forever, but couldn't ever find it. It finally aired again on TCM and I got a chance to see it for myself. What a marvelous film, a perfect example of a silent film director knowing how to use a purely visual medium for utmost impact.

I've seen people debating the ending and whether it's happy or not. Apparently Vidor picked it out of six or so other options under pressure from the studio to end the film happily. But I think this was a case of a director subversively appearing to accommodate the demands of a studio while sticking to his guns. I personally did not feel like the ending of "The Crowd" was happy. Sure, we see the protagonist and his wife and surviving child laughing happily with others in a movie theater, but was I the only one who found the rows and rows of patrons, mechanically bobbing up and down like automatons, slightly disturbing?

"The Crowd" received two Academy Award nominations in the institution's debut year: Unique and Artistic Picture and Best Director (Dramatic Picture). The first award went to "Sunrise" (can't argue with that) while the second went to Frank Borzage (which I can).

Grade: A
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
pride
macmets-21 March 2009
This wonderful film is a classic tragedy. The hero's downfall is...his pride. He wouldn't take a job offered by his wife's family, even when their survival depended upon it. The direction is superb, the acting realistic, and the editing/cinematography years ahead of it's time. And then, a happy ending. Well, considering the year it was made it's hard to find fault with the studio. While watching this masterpiece a thought occurred to me that is anathema - turn it into a talkie. Cut out the cards and record the dialog. I think it would work. Not that I like remakes or colorization or any of that kind of stuff (I detest them) but this is one film that is shot and acted so realistically (for it's time) that I would love to see how it plays with modern sound. It's so good I think it would work beautifully.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a masterpiece about the all-American (by way of NYC) Blues
Quinoa198428 December 2008
I was not sure at first if I would agree with the majority of critics on The Crowd. The first several minutes of the picture were kind of hokey (how could they not being set in 1900 and 1912 "All-America" region and a boy) with touches of real greatness, such as that wonderful deep-focus shot of the boy walking slowly up the hallway to his dead family member. Then when it continued on with John (James Murray in his most memorable performance) as he does off as a young man to New York City, joins up as one of *many* drones at desks working for a firm, and then right away meets his bride-to-be Mary (equally memorable in her own right Eleanor Boardman), I was feeling the same way: some hokey bits scattered among some really, really brilliant cinema (the shots of the building, particularly the one that climbs up the one and then goes with in to that long tracking shot across the desks, are iconic in any cinema time period).

But then something thankful happened: I really got wrapped up with these characters. There's something that King Vidor is able to tap into, a simple and eloquent but bittersweet resonance about that fervent humping, if you will, of the American dream. All John wants to do is "something big", but he never knows what. He's a naturally charismatic guy, when he's "on", and even funny, almost in that kind of awkward Larry David sense (watch as he tries his "broken-arm" trick on his un-amused in-laws), and he's got a lot of bright ideas and catch phrases: one of them, when he finally gets the gumption to submit it, earns him and his wife and two kids $500... but then one of those random tragedies that happen in life (and movies like this) occur, and it sets John into a tailspin, both for himself and his wife and only son. There should be something big for John, but it's the unattainable thing that he'll at the least scratch at the rest of his life.

Doesn't sound like it will be a very happy picture, and at times the Crowd can be downright mournful. But it also deepens as a work of sublime and touching art as it goes along, as Vidor finds the resonance in this story: as in Sunrise a year earlier, Vidor paints a picture of a couple that look to the city as something of happiness, and it does provide some, but there's also for this story a thing of the city, the crowd(s), moving along with only so much pity or emotion for others (one of my favorite scenes is when John, sitting vigil by his dying daughter, gets incensed by the sounds and bustling and fire-trucks in the city down below and tries in vain to stop them for just one minute). The performances make this as rich an experience as a sound film, and unlike some other silent films it holds up for an audience used to the usual "talky" stuff. They're expressive in that powerful way silent film actors can be (just watch the two stars in the middle of a rising argument that includes flipping a cabinet open and closed, but one can almost hear what they might sound like. It's not just pantomime.

By the end, The Crowd reveals itself as a stunning achievement, one that is perhaps a little more dated in some respects than a Chaplin or Murnau but has that lasting impact as an all-American story. These people got the blues, and it can only get better before it gets worse and worse. That final scene in the theater, I might add, is one of those rare bitter-sweet endings that emphasizes the latter: the shot pulls up from the laughing crowd, all these faces and people looking for something escapist, and it's like for a moment Vidor turns the camera on his own audience without condescension. You're not alone, is perhaps the sad truth, but at least there's some light moments that make things alright.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Maybe For You, Not For Me
gavin69427 June 2017
The life of a man and woman together in a large, impersonal metropolis through their hopes, struggles and downfalls.

This is one of those must-see films, ending up on a number of lists and preserved by the Library of Congress. This is how I ended up seeing it, as the Library's films ended up on one of my personal lists.

The film mixes striking visual styles and moving camera cinematography – as well as hidden cameras in some of the New York City scenes, and subtle use of scale models and dissolves – influenced by 1920s German cinema and F.W. Murnau in particular. Unfortunately, although I admire the technique and the inclusion of a toiler, Murnau remains the superior director. Vidor is just an American imitator.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Silent Roller-coaster
Poison-River20 March 2005
The phrase 'A Real Roller-coaster Of A Movie' has become a cliché of late, but it more than adequately describes this silent masterpiece.

The opening 15 minutes themselves zing along with a tempo and fury seldom seen outside of Scorsese's 'Goodfellas', and the film manages to maintain this pace for most of it's running time. Whilst director King Vidor at least got an Oscar nomination, it's editor Hugh Wynn who is the unsung star of this picture. His montage shots of the bustle of an overcrowded New York at times recall the more modern Koyaanisqatsi/Powaqqatsi movies.

Unlike many other silent movies, the acting here is restrained(in contrast to the pace of the film). There's no flailing arms, wide-eyed stares and melodramatic posturing that often spoils silent works. Both James Murray and Eleanor Boardman put in excellent performances which accentuate both the joy and tragedy that befalls the couple.

I find the scenes where the couples happy marriage first appears to falling apart extremely similar to Carl Dreyer's 'Master Of The House'(1925), yet where Dreyer's film moves as if it were wading through molasses, Vidor's film still moves at an exhillarating pace.

All in all then, a very modern looking silent movie, and a richly rewarding experience.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Before billionaires such as Gates, Jobs, and Bezos . . .
tadpole-596-91825620 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
. . . invented computers, Corporate America had to employ Legions of Losers to add up tons and tons of numbers manually. THE CROWD documents the worthless life of one such dead-ender. "John" defines the term "office drone." He always is talking big, but even his once-duped wife punches him in his face, screaming "You bluff! You quitter! I'd rather see you dead!!" Fortunately, under the guidance of Leader Trump, Today's USA no longer needs to coddle such malingering malcontents as John. Professional working ladies now can have all the babies that they can afford, without needing to resort to turkey basters or cash-strapped Johns. Computers and robots can do anything that theses hang-dog Johns ever did, only better. Leader Trump recently has said that there's no legal need to recognize the fallacy of "Birthright Citizenship" any more. America's Corporate Class now is free to Make America Great Again by deporting ANYONE with less than a paltry half million in personal assets. For each of these broke bozos we get rid of, THE CROWD of World Millionaires will supply one or two proven foreign-born money makers worthy to enjoy our American Way.
0 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Big Dreamer Is Brought Low
disinterested_spectator13 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
In 1928, King Vidor made "The Crowd," a movie about John and Mary Sims, and then made "Our Daily Bread" in 1934, which is a movie about the same married couple. Different actors play the roles in the two movies, but even if they had been played by the same actors, the second movie really does not seem to be a sequel to the first, especially since the son they had in the first movie is inexplicably missing in the second.

"The Crowd" is basically about a man, John Sims, who thinks he will make it big in the big city. In fact, his father expresses those big dreams for him when he is born on July 4, 1900, as propitious a birth date as one could want. As a child, his life is compared, somewhat superficially, with George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. At the age of twelve, he expresses his dream of being big himself. That is the day his father dies, suggesting that our dreams have a way of being interrupted by the harsh realities of life.

An intertitle sarcastically announces that John has become an adult, and that he is one of the seven million people in New York who believes the city depends on them. That is a stretch, because a lot of people have no such illusions, but John certainly does. He ends up with a job in which he is just one of a thousand people. All in all, it is not a bad job: he works indoors, sitting down, no heavy lifting. He even has the opportunity to steal a little time from his boss trying to win a contest coming up with a good advertising slogan. And there is no overtime apparently, because at the moment the minute hand indicates it is 5 o'clock, everyone leaves his desk and heads for the exit.

Bert works in the same office with John, and he lines him up with a blind double date, where John meets Mary. Though Bert is a fun-loving guy, yet he is a better worker than John and eventually gets promoted. Furthermore, Bert is not contemptuous of other people the way John is, sneering at the crowd and remarking to Mary that most people are a pain in the neck. John sees a man juggling balls with an advertisement on the clown suit he is wearing. He points out that the poor sap's father probably thought he would grow up to be president. Much in the way that Stanton Carlisle (Tyrone Power) is destined to become the geek in a sideshow in "Nightmare Alley" (1947), so too is John destined to become the juggler in the clown suit as punishment for his derisive remark.

After kissing Mary a couple of times and seeing an advertisement ("You furnish the girl, and we'll furnish the home"), John asks Mary to marry him. They get married, but there is no home to furnish, only a small apartment with a Murphy bed, where John dreams about the big house he thinks they will eventually own. After a while, it all starts to get on their nerves, and they start quarreling, although John is the one who does most of the complaining and sniping. They almost split up, but then Mary tells John she is pregnant, and so they make up. They have a son and soon after that a daughter. And soon after that, they start quarreling again, with Mary growing weary of John's dreams about making it big while Bert actually got a promotion.

While at the beach, John starts juggling balls to amuse his children, recalling the geek motif of the juggler in the clown suit. Nevertheless, John comes up with an advertising slogan based on juggling balls, and it wins him five hundred dollars (about seven thousand dollars, adjusted for inflation). After John buys some presents, they call their children through the window to come and get the toys he bought them. Heedlessly, the children run across the street, and their daughter is run over by a truck and killed.

After a few months, John is still so upset that he cannot do his job. Even though Bert is now his supervisor and would probably be understanding, John quits before Bert can say anything, throwing a tantrum, flinging his ledger on the floor, and saying, "To hell with this job." Oddly enough, when he gets home, Mary is in a great mood as she prepares food for the company picnic. We have to wonder, if Mary has recovered well enough to think about having fun, why can't John at least go to work and do his job? In any event, John tries to get work elsewhere, but fails at one job after another, once again putting stress on the marriage. In some ways, this reminds us of "Penny Serenade" (1941) and "The Marrying Kind" (1952), two movies in which a marriage ends up on the rocks on account of the death of a child. Like those two movies, the idea is that a good marriage can ultimately survive such a tragedy.

Mary tries to make ends meet by sewing dresses while John hangs around the house depressed. Her brothers come by and offer John a job, but he turns it down because it is a "charity job." John leaves and almost commits suicide by leaping in front of a train, but ends up finding work juggling balls in a clown suit. He goes home to find that Mary is leaving him to go live with her brothers. He talks her into going to a show with him, having purchased the tickets with the money he made, and at the theater having a good time, they see his advertisement of the clown juggling balls in the program, suggesting that he might succeed again in the future.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed