Tom Sawyer (1930) Poster

(1930)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A perfect Depression-era film focusing on Mark Twain's fading golden age image of American small-town life, wistful and lazy, laced with homespun humor.
larry41onEbay17 March 2003
I feel so luck to have caught this rare film at CINEFEST the annual early & rare film festival in Syracuse, NY - March 2003. More film buffs should support these festivals and share their discoveries on the IMDB so other film fans can track these old titles down.

TOM SAWYER (1930, Paramount, D: John Cromwell) Was utterly charming, telling the story from Jackie Coogan's (Tom Sawyer) point of view and the now older `Kid' Coogan was perfectly cast. Junior Duncan (Huck Finn) was also a natural, an ironic side note is that Duncan would die only five years later in a car crash. Killed along with Duncan was Coogan's Father who was driving the car! Virtual gold mine Mitzi Green, played an innocent Becky Thatcher and stole ever scene she graced. It was fun to see Clara Blandick best known for her WIZARD OF OZ "Auntie Em" playing Aunt Polly. Where as Jackie Searl was so annoying as Sid Sawyer we didn't blame Tom for all the tricks he played on him. Rarer than the Technicolor, Selznick remake it was a big enough hit to warrant a sequel HUCKLEBERRY FINN. A perfect Depression-era film focusing on Mark Twain's fading golden age image of American small-town life, wistful and lazy, laced with homespun humor.
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mark Twain's Beloved Tom
lugonian18 January 2015
TOM SAWYER (Paramount, 1930), directed by John Cromwell, is a highly enjoyable 84 minute juvenile comedy-drama adapted from Mark Twain's beloved story and immortal character, best described during the opening credits inscribed on a hard-bound book cover, "Tom Sawyer, the Immortal Story of a Boy." Of the many kid actors who could have played such an important role, the logical choice for its time was none other than former child star of the twenties, Jackie Coogan. Coogan, a notable young actor of who gained immediate success appearing opposite the legendary Charlie Chaplin in THE KID (First National, 1921), soon became as legendary to the silent screen as Chaplin himself through a series of starring roles in films for First National and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. By 1930, it was time for the now adolescent Coogan to either retire from the screen or attempt in the new medium of talkies. And what a great start for he to be seen as well as heard in this classic literary title role of Mark Twain's beloved Tom Sawyer.

Following the title credits presented through pages of an open book, the film opens on a riverboat bound for St. Petersburg, Missouri, followed by scenery of the rural town, a couple of gossiping women and men gathering in the post office/ grocery store before the plot development of its basic main characters begin. Tom Sawyer (Jackie Coogan) is introduced as a barefoot boy orphan living in the home of his late mother's sister, Aunt Polly (Clara Blandick - Auntie 'Em in THE WIZARD OF OZ (1939), and his cousins, Mary (Mary Jane Irving) and little Sidney (Jackie Searle, a momma's boy and tattletale. Although the boy is clever in his ways of talking his way out of anything, he finds he can't talk his way out of the strict upbringing of Aunt Polly, who seemingly favors Sidney over Tom. Tom's best friend is Huckleberry Finn (Junior Durkin), an orphan as well as an outcast. One of Tom's favorite recreation is playing pirates with his friends and getting even with Sidney. With the character introduction underway, a series of events leading to the day and the life of Tom Sawyer immediately follow: Tom spending his Saturday afternoon painting a long wooden fence as punishment ordered by Aunt Polly, and smooth talking his passing friends to do the work for him, thus, taking credit for it; picking a fight with a dude boy named Joe Harper (David Winslow), who, after having "nuff," becomes his friend; Tom meeting and falling in love with a new girl in town, Becky Thatcher (Mitzi Green), whose famous line to Tom later on is, "Why did you have to be so noble" after getting punished by his teacher (Lucien Littlefield) for something Becky did; Tom and Hunk at a cemetery past midnight where they see three other men and witnessing a murder of a Doctor Rafferty; Tom, Huck and Joe playing pirates at Jackson Island where a few days later, return home where they attend their own funeral at the church after their supposed drowning; Tom in the courtroom on the witness stand testifying the innocence Muff Potter (Tully Marshall), and naming the real killer; the cave sequence where Tom and Becky separate themselves from the classmates where Tom comes face to face with Injun Joe (Charles Stevens), and some unforeseen dangers to follow.

Other members of the cast consist of Ethel Wales (Mrs. Harper); Charles Sellon (The Minister); and Jane Darwell appearing briefly as the Widow Douglas. The popularity to TOM SAWYER lead way for an immediate sequel, HUCKLEBERRY FINN (1931), with basically the same leading players, including Jackie Coogan himself.

With the most recent screen adaptation to TOM SAWYER (Paramount, 1917) starring Jack Pickford thirteen years into the past, it's surprising there weren't more Tom Sawyer movies produced in the silent era as there were years after the advent of sound. David O. Selznick produced an excellent retelling to Mark Twain's story as THE ADVENTURES OF TOM SAWYER (1938) starring newcomer Tommy Kelly in the title role. With that being close to a scene for scene remake to the Coogan version, it was also given the lavish Technicolor treatment as well. The story of Tom Sawyer would be told and retold many times after-wards, ranging from further theatrical and television adaptations, many with slight alterations, but often re-enacting basic factors lifted from both book and screen carnations.

Commonly shown on commercial television at least once annually during the 1960s and 1970s, TOM SAWYER slowly phased out of view after limited revivals on public television in the 1980s, turning this once renowned product into a now forgotten one, eclipsed by either the Selznick 1938 release or latter but newer adaptations as well. Regardless of its age, TOM SAWYER is still a timeless story the way Mark Twain intended it to be. While it lacks background music, super-imposing camera-work and good casting still make this a watchable item. It's also worth a look for the teen-age Jackie Coogan, years past his prime as a child star, and decades before his numerous television roles, especially that of Uncle Fester in the weekly comedy series THE ADDAMS DAMILY (1964-66). "Nuff" said. (***1/2)
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A forgotten early talkie
AlsExGal14 September 2021
This film was one of the big hits of the year 1930, and the first sound film version of the book, and yet it is never mentioned. So when it showed up on youtube I thought I'd give it a whirl. It actually is nothing to write home about. It is true to the novel, although it just does a sharp transition at points because there was probably no artful way to move between chapters of the book. Also, the performances are quite natural. And maybe THAT is the reason it was a hit with 1930 audiences. If you look at other films from the same year - and I've looked at a bunch of them - very few have such good performances. There are lots of holdovers in acting style from the silent era with all of the broad exaggerated expressions that go with that. That would improve greatly in just the following year, but for the time this film was in the theaters, it was like a breath of fresh air.

David O. Selznick's more polished Technicolor 1938 version has seemed to bury this one in obscurity, so that most people, when they think about a 30s version of Tom Sawyer, think of that version. But if this one ever comes your way it is worth watching if just for Jackie Coogan's last juvenile role. He played the same part in 1931's Huckleberry Finn and at that point was aged out of childhood parts.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Has charm, but dates badly
roberts-117 July 2003
The first sound version of Mark Twain's immortal classic does capture the charm of the story (who wouldn't want to be a little boy in the summertime again?). As a film adaptation, it also remains pretty faithful to its original source, and contains many of the book's famous segments (whitewashng the fence, the midnight visit to the graveyard, lost in the cave, etc.).

This early "talkie" of "Tom Sawyer" does suffer, however, from the stodginess and "creakiness" that many of the early sound films exhibit, due to the (at that time) primitive sound recording techniques (the "marriage" of sound and picture still wasn't totally perfected in 1930, and a number of films that year were still being produced in both sound and silent versions). This "creakiness" does indeed have a charm of its own (at least to die-hard fans, such as myself, of classic films), but modern audiences will probably find this 1930 version too slow and stagey. (A 1938 technicolour remake by producer David O. Selznick, entitled "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer", is really the definitive film version of this story).

A renowned child star, and later famous as "Uncle Fester" in the TV show "The Addams Family", Jackie Coogan performs well as Tom, but at 16 he was really too old for the role (Tom is supposed to be about 11 or 12; the 1938 version starred 12-year old Tommy Kelly, who was the perfect age). The remainder of the cast is also good (Jackie Searl in particular as Tom's obnoxious and detestable brother Sid), although like Coogan, similarly-aged Junior Durkin was also too old to play Huck Finn.

All in all, a charming "curio" for movie watchers, but won't endure as an acknowledged "classic".
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Down by the riverside
robert-temple-129 June 2011
Mark Twain's novel TOM SAWYER has been filmed many times for the cinema and for television. It was made into a silent film in 1917, and this film of 1930 was the second film of the novel, and the first sound version. Many more films of the story would follow. The action is set in the year 1850 in St. Petersburg (now known simply as St. Peters), Missouri, on the banks of the Mississippi River. As the film starts, we see an authentic paddlewheel river boat travelling along the River, past the wharves of the town, which still existed in 1930 (although what town was actually used for these shots is unknown; most of the action is simply filmed in a Hollywood studio). The DVD which I obtained of this rare film from vintagefilmbuff.com was of a severely faded print, which in many shots faded almost to invisibility, and which also had poor sound. This film is badly in need of digital remastering. At the time of release in 1930, and indeed for another 25 years afterwards, no literate American viewer would have been unfamiliar with the famous book and its episodes, and most would have read it. Although Mark Twain's lasting classics are HUCKLBERRY FINN (the central character of which also appears as Tom's friend in TOM SAWYER) and LIFE ON THE MISSISSIPPI, the far more accessible and appealing book of his at the time the film was made was TOM SAWYER, which contained a simple narrative of the antics and adventures of the mischievous and lovable scamp, Tom Sawyer, an orphan boy living with his maiden aunt, Aunt Polly. The many quaint exclamations by Aunt Polly in the film such as 'Stars above!', 'Botheration!', and 'Ain't nobody gonna tell me …' are perfectly authentic speech of the Old South, though they probably haven't been uttered since the 1950s. John Cromwell, who directed this film, was born in 1887 in Toledo, Ohio, and although he was therefore not a Southerner by any means, he was old enough to remember the era of Mark Twain's peak popularity vividly and have a feel for it. The film is mostly the story of the children of the riverside town. Tom himself is described as 'a child of nature', and he goes around barefoot with a tattered straw hat and ripped trousers, though he is a model of haute couture compared to his friend Huck Finn, the outcast boy, whose father is a hopeless drunk and who lives without a family in obscure poverty. If there had been a railroad in the town, he would have been described as coming 'from the wrong side of the tracks', since in Southern towns it was always the railway at the edge of the town which formed the boundary between the town itself and the depressing penumbra of impoverished outsiders living beyond it in tumbledown houses or shacks who were not accepted in the town's 'proper society' and were treated as social outcasts. The respectable people of the town of Tom Sawyer spurn Huck, but that does not deter Tom one bit from making him his best friend. Tom is played by Jackie Coogan, and Huck by Junior Durkin. Coogan does well, although Durkin is not particularly good and even succeeds in making Huck boring, which takes a lot of lack of talent to manage to do! This was Durkin's first film, aged 16, and he played Huck the next year in HUCKLEBERRY FINN (1931). By 1935 he had left the acting profession. Since Durkin was a New Yorker, casting him as Huckleberry Finn was an absurdity. He spoke wrong, he looked wrong, and he behaved wrong. The best child actor in the film was Mitzi Green, who played Becky Thatcher, the girl Tom has a crush on. Even though she came from the Bronx and also spoke wrong, everything else about her was perfect. Her facial expressions are priceless. She was only ten years old when she made TOM SAWYER. She went on acting until 1952 but died prematurely of cancer at the age of only 48. Coogan was 16 at the time of the film. Both he and Mitzi Green carried over, with Durkin, into the sequel HUCKLEBERRY FINN the next year. Coogan acted right up until 1984, the year he died, appearing in 138 films. This film is a low-budget production made without a great deal of care, but it conveys much which is authentic and charming, and gives us something of Twain's vision, if only because it is so unpretentious, just as life in that small town was also in those days gone by. Anyone who enjoys American nostalgia would find something in this film. And for those interested in Mark Twain, whose real name was Samuel Clemens, I can reveal that he claimed to be a direct descendant of the English regicide Gregory Clement, who signed the Death Warrant of King Charles I. Clement was a Member of Parliament and one of the wealthiest men in England in his day. He earned his fortune by trading in India, where he lived for years during the reign of Shah Jehan, who built the Taj Mahal. When next thinking of the fondness Mark Twain had of the simple life, which he recorded so lovingly in his writings, bear in mind that his ancestor was personally acquainted with the tyrannical and brutal ruler who built one of the most famous tourist monuments in the world, which is possibly the most extravagant ever constructed. Clement became so disgusted with monarchy as a result of the excesses of Shah Jehan and his Court, that he did not hesitate to join in cutting off the head of his own minor tyrant at home, the tiny tot (only 4 feet 11 inches tall), Charles I. Never cross a Clement or Clemens! Or should I say, regarding a Clement and a king, and you Mark my words: 'Never the Twain shall meet?'
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Coogan Best of the Sawyers - Tom Sawyer
arthur_tafero6 October 2022
Jackie Coogan, the well-known star of The Kid and several silent film efforts, hits a home run in this production of Tom Sawyer. He has just the right chemistry of naivte and worldliness to pull off what is really a fairly difficult role and make it believable. Mickey Rooney tried his hand at this role, and was not able to carry it off as well several years later. Mark Twain's character is brought to life with this wonderful Hollywood production which captures life along the Mississippi. If you want to see a REAL coming of age film for a change, this might just be the one you are looking for which the whole family can enjoy.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Take an early ride down the Mississippi, aka the Big River....
mark.waltz18 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Totally overshadowed by the 1938 David O. Selznick color version (certainly the best of the many versions of this classic Mark Twain tale), this early talkie is equally as memorable, just lacking the color of the remake. Jackie Coogan is outstanding as Tom with Junior Durkin (a child actor who died tragically young) excellent as Huck, and "The Wizard of Oz's" Clara Blandick (Auntie Em) quite memorable as Aunt Polly. Having been cast mostly in minor roles, it's nice to see her in such a major part, but sadly, she's been forgotten for this role because of May Robson's more larger-than-life performance in the 1938 version. Had there been Supporting Actress Oscars at the time of this, she might have well been nominated and gone onto a much different career. Jackie Searl makes an appropriately prissy Sid, while Mitzi Green (the Jane Withers of the early 30's) is cast totally against type as the blonde Becky Thatcher, complete with Nellie Olsen wig and a softer personality than normal.

The film is also a bit more detailed than the remake in certain aspects, giving little scenes to minor characters to give an authentic feel to the 1800's atmosphere of life on the Mississippi. The black and white photography also makes the scenes with Injun Joe (Charles Stevens) a lot scarier, especially at the graveyard and in the cave sequence towards the end. Lucien Littlefield (as the schoolteacher) adds humor to his character's staidness, while Tully Marshall is a perfect example of sadness and pathetic desperation as Muff Potter. Sadly unavailable commercially (but having been shown on some now long defunct cable channels decades ago), this is one film that really needs to see the light of day. It doesn't surpass the color remake, but certainly along side it doesn't become over-shadowed, either.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A faithful rendering of Mark Twain's classic!
JohnHowardReid18 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
A faithful rendering of Mark Twain's classic, well directed by John Cromwell. I particularly like the way whole passages of Twain's original dialogue have been integrated into the screenplay and the way Cromwell keeps his cameras moving during some of these exchanges. Cromwell, too, has a real flair for creating atmosphere and sustaining it at a consistent level throughout the film. Notice how he resists the temptation to turn the graveyard sequence into a James Whale feat of horror. One cannot imagine Walt Disney having such respect for his audience! Fine photography by Charles Lang, Jr.

Tom Sawyer dates only from its lack of background music although Cromwell tries to make up for this by using natural sound effects (Tom twanging the Jew's harp) and by keeping the story moving at a brisk pace. The screenplay is remarkably faithful to the original novel and retains all its major incidents and characters - as well as a large share of its dialogue.

Paramount has also wisely lensed the film on locations astonishingly similar to those described in the novel so that in atmosphere as well as story the film is supreme in its fidelity to its source. The cast too is well-nigh perfect. Coogan fits easily and naturally into the shoes (or rather feet) of Tom Sawyer and while he seems a little old for the part Junior Durkin brings a fair amount of conviction to the part of Huck Finn (of course, we do not see so much of him as he comes into his own in the sequel - as does Jane Darwell who has only two or three brief scenes here as the Widow Douglas).

Lucien Littlefield is inclined to over-act the part of the schoolmaster but Mitzi Green as the curled and beribboned Becky Thatcher, Jackie Searl as the obnoxious Sidney and Clara Blandick as harassed Aunt Polly are absolutely perfect. Oddly enough, Charles Stevens who would seem to have a role right up his alley as Indian Joe, is not wholly convincing, especially in his earlier scenes but Tully Marshall as Muff Potter gives a memorably realistic portrayal.

Cromwell often keeps his camera moving with tracking shots through the town following the boys as they converse or picking up snatches of conversation in the store as it darts from one corner to the other. He has chosen to play many of the scenes with restraint, probably in deference to his youthful audience. Even the graveyard scene with its rapid tracking shot through the broken and lopsided crosses at midnight is not played for horror and even the lost-in-the-caves sequence with the flight from Indian Joe reaches a speedy conclusion and altogether this sequence is on screen for less than a quarter of the time it occupies in the 1938 version.

Charles Lang's soft photography and musty, dusty sets created by art director Hans Dreier capture the atmosphere of the novel more realistically than the heavily romanticized 1938 film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed