A vampish actress comes between a happily married couple.A vampish actress comes between a happily married couple.A vampish actress comes between a happily married couple.
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
Featured review
Fascination is fascinating
Visually this is a beautiful film. BIP pulled out all the stops with this producing a real work of art. This is no quota quickie, this is a superbly made, well acted drama perfectly capturing the essence of the age.
In England, 1931 was essentially still in the 1920s. Whereas America boomed in the 20s then crashed in the 30s creating a radical new society, England never really recovered from the Great War in the 20s so The Depression didn't make as much of an impact here. Time stood still for us so watching this is an insight into an even older age where attitudes and ways of thinking (and ridiculous accents) were virtually Victorian.
The picture itself obviously feels very early thirties but its remarkably imaginative direction laced with symbolism, its natural and believable style of acting (not stagey) and its clever fluid camerawork makes this very watchable. The story is extremely simple and has been done a million times before: a married man has affair but it's presented so innovativly that, as the title suggests, it really is fascinating.
That surreptitious 'Victorian' morality manifests itself by telling us the importance of marriage. It's not preachy but we're shown that happiness depends on a wife being loyal even when her husband strays. The patriarchal norms of the time are heavily reinforced: husband makes a mistake - wife needs to sort it out. Woman of low morals seduces innocent husband - she will end up repentant and punished and the wife just has to accept all of this.
Marriage for a woman, happy or not is virtuous but independence and a career is almost indecent. Poor sweet Vera, played brilliantly by Dorothy Bartlam (whom I've never heard of) even offers to share her pig of of husband at one point and we're supposed to think that might be acceptable! In 1931 however what other choice would she have? A woman's place was in the home but the home was always owned by a man. There literally was nowhere else. Maybe society worked when it was like that - it seems wrong to us now but who are we to judge?
Before I go all feminist, one last observation: was Madeleine Carroll's character, the sexy actress Gwenda Farrell based on Glenda Farrell? Glenda had just debuted in LITTLE CEASAR so did someone over at BIP know her - Was this an in-joke - and did the real Miss Farrell know?
In England, 1931 was essentially still in the 1920s. Whereas America boomed in the 20s then crashed in the 30s creating a radical new society, England never really recovered from the Great War in the 20s so The Depression didn't make as much of an impact here. Time stood still for us so watching this is an insight into an even older age where attitudes and ways of thinking (and ridiculous accents) were virtually Victorian.
The picture itself obviously feels very early thirties but its remarkably imaginative direction laced with symbolism, its natural and believable style of acting (not stagey) and its clever fluid camerawork makes this very watchable. The story is extremely simple and has been done a million times before: a married man has affair but it's presented so innovativly that, as the title suggests, it really is fascinating.
That surreptitious 'Victorian' morality manifests itself by telling us the importance of marriage. It's not preachy but we're shown that happiness depends on a wife being loyal even when her husband strays. The patriarchal norms of the time are heavily reinforced: husband makes a mistake - wife needs to sort it out. Woman of low morals seduces innocent husband - she will end up repentant and punished and the wife just has to accept all of this.
Marriage for a woman, happy or not is virtuous but independence and a career is almost indecent. Poor sweet Vera, played brilliantly by Dorothy Bartlam (whom I've never heard of) even offers to share her pig of of husband at one point and we're supposed to think that might be acceptable! In 1931 however what other choice would she have? A woman's place was in the home but the home was always owned by a man. There literally was nowhere else. Maybe society worked when it was like that - it seems wrong to us now but who are we to judge?
Before I go all feminist, one last observation: was Madeleine Carroll's character, the sexy actress Gwenda Farrell based on Glenda Farrell? Glenda had just debuted in LITTLE CEASAR so did someone over at BIP know her - Was this an in-joke - and did the real Miss Farrell know?
helpful•20
- 1930s_Time_Machine
- Dec 9, 2023
Details
- Runtime1 hour 10 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content