The Ghost and the Guest (1943) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Should be taken lightly and enjoyed for what it is.
ChuckStraub9 October 2004
Although 'The Ghost and the Guest' is mistakenly described as a comedy/ horror movie, this film still has a lot going for it. I would say it is more a comedy/mystery movie. The setting is an old spooky house but there is never anything even remotely resembling terror. It's not hard to remember the date of this film. The terms used in the dialogue are from the 30s and 40s and I'm sure some of it will be lost with today's audience but much of it still brings a laugh. The film quality is not the greatest, and that does detract from the film. This movie does manage to keep your interest though and the comedy still comes through. The acting wasn't bad at all, and the strange assortment of characters was interesting. The plot is not believable but this is forgiven in the interest of comedy. It's a short, fast moving comedy that should be taken lightly and enjoyed for what it is.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Very standard stuff
planktonrules2 August 2018
About the only unusual and interesting thing about "The Ghost and the Guest" is that it was written by the comedian Morey Amsterdam. Apart from that, it's all a very standard film--with the usual cliches and a typical performance by James Dunn. In other words, it has B-movie written all over it...albeit a pleasant enough one to watch.

A couple (James Dunn and Florence Rice) just got married and arrived at a house they inherited. Unfortunately, it comes with a problem...a body. However, when the police arrive, the body has disappeared! They know who the dead man probably was...he was a man who recently was executed. But where is the body and why would it move?!

The film is very typical of the era, when many B haunted house and mystery movies were being made. Nothing offensive or awful here...just a typical higher quality PRC production.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A honeymoon to wild to forget.
michaelRokeefe5 October 2004
William Nigh directs this early 40's madcap comedy. Morey Amsterdam's screenplay is cleverly funny and somewhat witty. The 56 minute film is fast paced with hardly a scene wasted. Newlyweds Webster(James Dunn)and 'Jackie'(Florence Rice)spend their honeymoon in an old country home. Along with a nervous chauffeur(Sam McDaniel)the couple meets the town's executioner who has a fixation with nooses. Even before getting to settle in; a coffin arrives carrying the former owner and the spooked couple call the police. When the Police Chief(Jim Toney)arrives it is discovered the coffin is now empty. Before this situation can be dealt with along comes the believed "deceased's" next of kin and a gang of jewel thieves trying to find a fortune in diamonds hidden in the house. This all becomes fodder for Police Chief Bagwell's attempts at writing pulp fiction. Dunn's stupidity is somewhat funny; but McDaniel(the chauffeur)steals the show. Also in the cast are: Robert Bice, Eddy Chandler, Robert Dudley and Tony Ward.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Harmless Fun
exoticafan3 April 2003
Even though listed (when you can find it) in reference books as a "horror/comedy", the shiver quotient is woefully absent. This is essentially a screwball comedy with a highly capable cast, in the typical "scare-the-newlyweds-out-of-the-abandoned-house-to-get-the-treasure" movie mold.

Though dated by today's standards, most of the witty dialog (supplied by Dick Van Dyke's "Buddy Sorrell" Morey Amsterdam)brings a smile, with nary a straight man present. Florence Rice as bride Jackie seems to have a character that prefigures Lucy Ricardo, and husband Webster (James Dunn) attacks the role like Jack Haley. Chauffeur Harmony Jones (played by Sam McDaniel)seems the only sensible one in the bunch, wanting to return to New York where the only people wandering the streets are alive!

The pace is quick, with nary a moment to think of the ludicrous plot machinations (a police chief who has time on duty to write pulp fiction) and illogic (the newlyweds move into the wrong house which is not questioned until the end of the movie). A bit of macabre humor is added with the inclusion of a retired county executioner who constantly wants Harmony to try on a noose for size ("You have the perfect neck for hangin'!"); the racial subtext is not lost on the modern audience.

In all, a harmless and painless way to spend an hour.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Overall, a pretty lame comedy
Red-Barracuda21 August 2011
As is the way with many Poverty Row films from the time, the title for this one is very misleading. There really isn't any spooky goings on here. However, this film does contain a very specific staple from the time in that it is essentially about an old dark house with a villain hiding in it. I have no idea why these types of films were so popular at the time but there does seem to be a plethora of them. Normally it seemed to be a man in an ape suit hiding in the house but in this case it's an escaped convict. Otherwise, the film features the usual array of nonsense such as a large group of characters in a house, a cowardly comic-relief black character and secret passageways.

To be honest, it's not very good. Despite a short running time it doesn't really move very fast and the humour is only funny on occasion. There is an ongoing thread of 'humour' where a hangman neighbour keeps saying to the black character that he has a good neck for hanging. Yeah, that's right lynching was all a good laugh! I suppose it shows elements of some attitudes of the time. Other than this there are no outrageous moments. It's the usual succession of lame moments. There's no tension or thrills in case you were wondering. It's really a comedy first and foremost. And not a very good one.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
There were plenty of guests but no ghost!!!
kidboots12 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
James Dunn had been a personable leading man for Fox in the early 30s but by the 40s alcohol had taken a grip and he was almost unemployable. He still managed to make movies (his big comeback was as the heart- breaking Johnny Nolan in "A Tree Grows in Brooklyn") and he always remained likable. This was the last film for his leading lady, Florence Rice. After this film she moved on to radio and television. She was always the romantic interest - her roles were never meaty but she was pretty and wholesome and was often teamed with Robert Young.

Webster (James Dunn) and Jackie Frye (Florence Rice) are newly weds (although they don't act like it) and decide to spend their honeymoon at an old country farmhouse, which is to be their home. Webster is not too keen but Jackie has enthusiasm for both. They are accompanied by their chauffeur Harmony (Sam McDaniells) who thinks that milk comes from the milkman. The farm is giving Webster the heebie jeebies - there is a man tying a noose to a tree, bullet holes in the doors, a coffin is delivered and a group of strangers turn up. One has a nervous habit of crossing and uncrossing his fingers - add to the mix a policeman who writes detective stories for a pulp magazine and you have an interesting group of characters. Nothing is done to develop them, the group turn out to be a notorious gang of jewel thieves. Webster masquerades as Bobo Hutch from Pittsburg, to infiltrate the gang - but in the next scene that is forgotten about. The most entertaining part is the man who comes to the door at the end to tell the harassed pair they are at the wrong house!!!!
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Undercooked old house spoof that's kind of funny….but only kind of
csteidler17 January 2012
Midway through this picture, there's a scene where the two leads (James Dunn and Florence Rice) find themselves momentarily alone in their room. It's their honeymoon, and they've had nary a second to themselves the whole movie, until now. But—before they even have a chance to breathe, people start pouring into their room, one at a time and in groups, until virtually all of the characters in the movie are right there in the same bedroom. –It ought to be funny, in a kind of Marx-Brothers-state-room sort of way….but somehow, it's just kind of flat. This whole picture is that way: full of scenes and gags that seems like they ought to be funny, but just aren't.

The plot: Dunn and Rice inherit a house and decide to move right in, sight unseen. They bring along Sam McDaniel, who is apparently Dunn's valet and chauffeur. Mysterious doings are soon afoot; it seems the house was somehow connected with a recently executed convict and there may be some money around the place.

Various characters turn up at the house to investigate, make trouble, or just hang around —a retired hangman, a police chief who writes detective thrillers, a dumb blonde and a sinister brunette, a couple of gangsters….the usual assortment.

McDaniel, as chauffeur Harmony Jones, is the stereotypical frightened servant but somehow comes across as less dopey than any of the other characters; his wisecracks are occasionally clever. (He also advises Dunn on how to deal with married life: "Now take my wife, for instance. This morning I bawled her out for being so extravagant." What happened? Pause. "I'm giving up cigars.")

Dunn and Rice as the newlyweds bicker and flirt and do their best to generate some energy but are largely defeated by dialog and plot that are woefully short on surprises.

Certainly not the madcap laugh riot that it apparently aims to be, this picture is nevertheless mildly amusing and generally harmless enough. Call it a B picture that never rises above its budget.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bad direction, awful lead acting and cheapness turn what could have been an okay comedy/mystery in to a painful viewing experience
dbborroughs22 January 2006
A newlywed couple spend their honeymoon in their "new" house instead of going to California. They are invaded by the police, a retired hangman, an escaped prisoner, a band of crooks and several dead bodies, all looking for something, either the crook or the loot hidden somewhere in the house. a humorous mystery follows.(or not).

This is a bad movie.

Almost enjoyable it instead misses the mark and falls flat. Written by Morey Amsterdam it plays more as a series of loosely connected sketches rather than as a film as a whole. There are a good number of exchanges that have nothing to do with whats going on in the story (they are funny but belong somewhere else). There is humor but the acting by the two leads is so broad and over the top that the film becomes annoying rather than amusing. I kept wishing that someone would kill the happy couple so that I wouldn't have to do it myself. The whole film looks cheap and the sets appear to wobble as people pass by. The direction is a mess. Even allowing for a cheapness that often allowed for only one camera set up (count how many scenes are essentially done in one take) this film has been put together by someone who seems to know nothing about how people really behave. Look at the scene where the bride to be is yapping away on the phone with her friends; do people really stand around like that in real life as one of their number talks non stop on the phone? Its like the most annoying sitcom you've ever seen, only worse.

Bad. Bad. Bad. While not quite one of the worst films of all time, there are some funny bits, this is a film thats sure to induce sleep or pained screams in most people who see it. Avoid.
5 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dust off the Spooky Old House
wes-connors26 July 2009
"A newlywed couple decides to spend their honeymoon at their new home, an old country cottage. The couple, along with their chauffeur, find themselves in the middle of a mystery when they are beset upon by a series of guests. A former executioner, a coffin, a gang of jewel thieves, and the police make for an interesting honeymoon for our newlyweds," according to the DVD sleeve's synopsis.

Long before he worked on "The Alan Brady Show" (as documented on "The Dick Van Dyke Show") comedy writer Morey Amsterdam aka "Buddy Sorrell" scripted a few comedy movies. "The Ghost and the Guest" is a good example, albeit done dirt cheap. The tired "spooky old house" formula provides a sampling of the writer's one-liners, which sounded better elsewhere. Watch out for colliding actors.

*** The Ghost and the Guest (4/19/43) William Nigh ~ James Dunn, Florence Rice, Sam McDaniel
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Talent a Bit Wasted On This One
DKosty12328 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is a movie that could be so much better. It is obvious that this one was done on a very thin shoestring budget. Might be because it was during the war but then it also has to do with an unknown independent company in the big studio era.

The cast is pretty much the folks who are characters actors in bigger films. The company was too small to get stars. In fact, the script writer is more famous than the cast. Morey Amsterdam would write about 6 movie films in his career, none of which would be as well known as his role writing for the Alan Brady show on TV's Dick Van Dyke. He gets much better punch lines than the ones he writes here.

It is a pleasant short hour "B" picture which was certainly used to try to take peoples minds off the war newsreels in the theater. We have an old run down house that belongs to a crook who has the nerve to have himself delivered to the new owners - supposedly dead, but very much alive and willing to haun his way through.

The entertainment is enjoyable, though the copy I saw has an awful lot of very dark scenes that are difficult to see. At least this one stays into the haunts and a house with unlimited passages and a hidden treasure too boot. The police are on hand and the ghosts have more company than they want.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
An over-abundance of stupid jokes, racial stereotypes and idiotic characters.
mark.waltz17 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Fans of "George Washington Slept Here" and "The Egg and I" can skip this and go right to "Green Acres" for some intelligent humor in its similar tale of a New York couple who move into an abandoned farm house, apparently once a hide-out for criminals. James Dunn and Florence Rice, from the lower ranks of "A" studios, moved just to the lower ranks for this Z-grade groaner. They are joined by the talented but misused Sam McDaniel as Dunn's wise-cracking black chauffeur, an over-the-top Mabel Todd as a typical dumb Dora, and Robert Dudley as the ridiculous former hangman who still walks around with a noose, anxious to try it out on McDaniel in a really extreme bad taste joke. There aren't even any amusing farm clichés to be found, although McDaniel does get a few witty lines, mostly concerning his unseen wife, such as "She could give an aspirin a headache." Poor camera work and slow film editing make this dull, at even just under an hour.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Pleasant but certainly not riveting
Paularoc27 July 2012
James Dunn, Florence Rice, Sam McDaniel - a solid cast of pros; Morey Amsterdam as one of the writers and the ever popular old dark house setting - all of this is a pretty good formula for success, but in this case, it somewhat misses the mark. James Dunn is always so likable on the screen and this film is no exception and Florence Rice is one of those "coulda been a star" if she had gotten a couple of breaks (and, of course, a couple of less bland roles). Sam McDaniel is once again a servant but at least in this movie he gets all the best lines. While there are some funny or witty lines, there are just not enough. And the whole bit with the retired hangman is just not funny. While as memorable as most t.v. episodes airing today, it's not that good an example of the old dark house comedy/mystery genre.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Poor
Michael_Elliott27 February 2008
Ghost and the Guest, The (1943)

* 1/2 (out of 4)

William Nigh directed "old dark house" flick about a newlywed couple who buys a farm house only to discover someone was recently murdered there and now the body has disappeared. I wasn't expecting too much out of this thing but got a lot less than I was hoping for. At 55-minutes you'd think this thing would at least fly by but it's pretty dry and slow. The horror elements are incredibly weak as is the mystery behind the body. The humor is even worse with some racial jokes about a local hangman who keeps threatening the black servant with hanging jokes. James Dunn takes the lead and is more annoying than anything else.
9 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The corpse vanishes
bkoganbing16 May 2013
It's possible that a better studio could have done something more with The Ghost And The Guest, but I think had this been done by someone with the comedic touch of Hal Roach the results might have been better.

James Dunn and Florence Rice are a pair of newlyweds heading for their honeymoon dream house to spend the night. What they got was the hideout of an old gangster recently deceased courtesy of the state. Not only that, the late owner's corpse arrives by delivery for burial on the grounds of the estate.

And then after that all kinds of friends and relatives and henchmen of the deceased arrive and the law and the body then disappears. You don't even have to wait an hour for it to be explained to you.

This was a PRC release and that usually meant they vied with Monogram for cheapness of production. This one was a PRC product through and through.

This film was the farewell performance of Florence Rice who found life and love outside the cinema on her third try and left the screen. She started with MGM, but now was reduced to PRC films. I guess she figured she wasn't leaving much. As for Dunn he was two years away from a comeback of sorts with A Tree Grows In Brooklyn.

This also featured a really sickening performance from Sam McDaniel as Dunn's old family retainer.

Still someone like Hal Roach could have made this work.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A hodgepodge of old Morey Amsterdam jokes.
Bernie444413 April 2024
This Alpha Video presentation is almost up to their standards.

Writers Morey Amsterdam and Milt Gross.

Webster and Jackie Fry (James Dunn and Florence Rice) are just married; we have no idea why.

They are given a farm and inherit a body. The standard body disappears and the house seems haunted. We see ridiculously dumb police, wise-cracking newlyweds, a hangman with more "Morey Amsterdam one-liners". For some reason, there is a comic relief chauffeur. And a peeping Tom. The film goes from bad to worse.

"A lot of dummies can walk." and "I've got brains I never even used yet." Mabel Todd as the ditzy Little Sister Mabel.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Predictable thriller
russjones-8088720 July 2020
Newly-weds travel to a remote old house for their honeymoon. They start to believe that the house is haunted but it is being used as a hideout by gangsters.

A mildly entertaining second-feature comedy thriller starring James Dunn and Florence Rice as the couple with support from Sam McDaniel as their chauffeur. At just over an hour it is long enough.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Poverty Row Mash-Up That Lacks Elements
Reviews_of_the_Dead28 September 2023
This was a movie that I discovered when searching for horror movies from 1943. I don't believe it is listed that way on Letterboxd, only on the Internet Movie Database. Having now seen this, I understand why. I'll get into that later. I did see this streaming on Tubi. I watched this blind, just knowing what I did and expecting this to be a haunted house film of sorts.

Synopsis: a newlywed couple winds up spending their honeymoon night in an old, dark, spooky mansion.

We start this off with Webster Frye (James Dunn) trying to get his fiancé on the phone. He's unable to and he is annoyed. The operator even knows his voice and tells him the line is still busy. With him is his chauffeur, Harmony Jones (Sam McDaniel), during this scene. Webster does get the idea to send her an urgent telegram, telling her he is trying to call.

His fiancé is Jacqueline 'Jackie' Delong (Florence Rice). She has friends in her room with her as this is her wedding day. When the telegram arrives, she realizes how long she's been on the phone and hangs up. It rings immediately. Their call sets up the plot. Jackie's father bought them a house in the country. She wants to spend their honeymoon there. Webster is annoyed that she canceled their plane tickets as they're supposed to go to California. He puts his foot down and they still end up at the country house.

They arrive and the place is rundown. It is a 'fixer-upper'. Upon arriving, they see a man tying a noose. We learn that he is a former hangman who just did his last job. His name is Ben Bowron (Robert Dudley). This guy is here for a bit of comedy effect and he plays off Harmony going forward. Apparently, this house belonged to a gangster who was just executed, nicknamed Honey Boy.

Things take a dark turn when a casket is brought to the house, containing the body of the owner. Webster signs for it, believing it is their stuff. This causes issues and they call the police to fix it. Police Chief Bagwell (Jim Toney) fancies himself a crime writer and dictates to Herbie (Eddy Chandler), who is also a cop. They head out to the house to see the body and figure out what to do.

The cops aren't alone. A group of gangsters also show up, looking for something hidden in the house by their associate. They're led by Smoothie Lewis (Robert Bice) and he comes with Ted (Anthony Caruso), Harold (Eddie Foster), Little Sister Mabel (Mabel Todd) and Big Sister Josie (Renee Carson). The body that is in the coffin might not be who they think it is, as we see someone sneak out. Is Honey Boy dead like Ben said? Or did someone hitch a ride in it?

That is where I'll leave my recap and introduction to the characters. Where I want to start is that this is another poverty row film. It has a short runtime, which I can appreciate. It also has elements we've seen in other things. My biggest issue is that this is a comedy first. It feels like they're trying to do an Abbott and Costello or a Laurel and Hardy style comedy with wordplay, but our cast isn't strong enough for it. I've seen Dunn before in The Living Ghost. He did make me chuckle, but this isn't constructed well enough for this to work.

Let me get to positives here though. I like the set up. Not necessarily one that would work today, but this is from the 1940s so I can roll with it. I like that Webster and Jackie are getting married. We see that they love each other, but also get under each other's skin. That felt real. They go to this house and it isn't what they expected. Honey Boy set it up with passages and other hidden things so elements of the 'Old Dark House' film are here. I'm a sucker there. I even like the different players that show up. We have gangsters that know something is here. The police are here so that complicates things. The same for Webster, Jackie, Harmony and Ben. This last one feels out of place, but it doesn't ruin it. I like the basic premise for sure.

While I'm discussing the story, let me then discuss if this is horror or not. I don't think it should necessarily be considered. We do have someone sneak out of the coffin. That is only creepy until we learn who that person is. There are these gangsters that end up holding our characters hostage. That is more of a crime film. 'Old Dark House' films aren't necessarily horror either. I think what I've gone through here put it in the genre only because of the era it was made in.

Since this runs barely an hour, I think that is enough for the story and moving over to the acting. Despite what I said about the cast not being strong enough to carry the comedy, I don't think anyone is bad. Dunn is probably the funniest here. I like his banter with Jackie as that felt real. I should also then that Rice is right there, performance-wise. They work the best as our leads and driving the 'investigation'. Dudley and McDaniel also play well off each other as well. My only issue is that they have the latter playing a racist caricature. It is the time and if they didn't have them this way, he wouldn't be working so I'm not going trash the film beyond that. Todd, Carson, Bice, Anthony Warde, Caruso and Foster are all solid as the gangsters or the dames with them. They can be bumbling at times as well. The same for the two cops, Toney and Chandler. As I said, no one is bad while still not making this work as well as it probably could.

Then all that is left would be filmmaking. This is made well enough. I thought the cinematography was fine. Capturing the atmosphere of the setting as well as the 'old dark house' stuff is the best part. I do have a negative that this ends abruptly. I'm not sure if that was a budget thing or just no one cared to think out the story more. Regardless, it needed just a bit more to fully work. With a runtime of an hour, it wouldn't take much there. I do believe this is a poverty row picture so that explains it. Other than that, the soundtrack was fine without necessarily standing out.

In conclusion, this is a decent film here. I like the 'wrong place, wrong time' narrative where our married couple and their chauffeur show up to a house that belonged to a gangster. Having the police and gangsters converge there build the crux of the story. This being a comedy doesn't necessarily work. I wouldn't even necessarily consider it horror. The cinematography to build the setting's atmosphere was good. I'd say that the acting would be the next best part. The script isn't strong enough though and the rest of the elements are fine. Not one I'd necessarily recommend unless you like this era or these poverty row films. Horror seekers I'd say could skip this for sure.

My Rating: 5 out of 10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed