The Hidden Eye (1945) User Reviews

Reasonable plot and it moves along

[jknoppow · 7/10 · 5 April 2002]

Capt. Maclain, the blind detective, is called in on a murder case by a young lady of his acquaintance, Frances Rafferty. She is about to be married to Barry Gifford; they've tried twice before, but her father wants them to wait. They hope that three times will be lucky. Father seems to be agreeable over the telephone, and he sets up a seven pm appointment for the two to come and talk it over. But when Barry gets there just a few seconds early, he finds his prospective father in law dead at his desk. He's been murdered and the suspicion of the police has fallen on young Barry. For the sake of young love, we hope that Maclain can prove the police wrong before the picture ends, but it looks very bad for Barry.

This is not an exceptional film, but it's better than average for a forties B and the acting holds up very well. The plot is a good one, although the number of good suspects is quite small and the film doesn't cheat. But I think that even if you do figure out who the murderer is early on, the situations and the well acted characters will keep you entertained.

"Now we're safe in the circle of electricity."

[utgard14 · 6/10 · 28 October 2014]

Blind detective Duncan Maclain is asked for help by a young woman whose fiancé is the prime suspect in a murder. This is the second Duncan Maclain movie starring Edward Arnold. The first, Eyes In the Night, was released in 1942. I'm not sure about the reason for the gap between the movies. If MGM was trying to launch a series of B detective movies around this character, one would assume they would have produced them quickly. Maybe this was filmed years before it was released. I don't see that info here on IMDb but that makes more sense than them waiting three years to make a follow-up to a B programmer that wasn't a huge hit to begin with. There's something very odd about the opening minutes of this one. The audio appears to be dubbed. The actors' lips are in sync with the words but it still seems off. You'll see what I mean.

Edward Arnold is always worth a look. Reliable Ray Collins leads a so-so cast backing up Arnold. The weakest part is Frances Rafferty, whose overwrought performance borders on hysterics half the time. It's amusing at first but quickly annoying. She's very pretty, though. Audrey Totter has one small scene but it's a great one. Not a bad B detective movie. The pace is good and there's a nice amount of humor sprinkled throughout. The mystery itself isn't much of a mystery as the killer is revealed to be the most obvious suspect about halfway into the movie. I really wanted it to be the fiancé because his scenes with Rafferty were insufferably corny. If you're a fan of these kinds of movies I'm sure you'll enjoy this enough. Definitely not a waste of an hour so give it a shot.

Duncan Maclain returns in the second of two big screen outings. Its a super murder mystery that better than most programmers of the period

[dbborroughs · 7/10 · 28 May 2009]

Edward Arnold returns to the role of Captain Duncan Maclain, a former police detective forced to retire when he became blind, however he moved from being a public cop into being a private detective. Maclain previously appeared in the film Eyes in the Night, a wartime mystery where he battled Axis spies. Its a super thriller that should have launched a series, instead of a single sequel (this film) three years later. Here Maclain is hired by a young woman to find out who is killing off her family. The murders appear to be timed with the appearance of a beau in the woman's life. The murders also seem to be linked to what happened years before in Sumatra. The mystery is less then mysterious since the choice of real suspects number two, and odds are you'll choose the right one.(lets face it even the movie gives up with any notion of mystery half way in).A good little film that works purely on the basis of the performances, and in the case of this film its enough. Actually its more than enough with Arnold's Maclain being absolutely a joy to behold. He may be blind but its clear he's light years ahead of everyone around him. I still can't believe that MGM never went further with the series. You really should see this if you like mystery thrillers. Not quite as good as the earlier film, but its still a damn fine mystery.

Efficient Little Programmer

[dougdoepke · 4 February 2018]

Slick programmer from MGM. It's not exactly a whodunit, though the narrative starts out that way. Rather, the plot becomes a battle of wits between Capt. Maclain (Arnold) and the killer. Seems someone's knocking off members of the Hampton family, leaving daughter Jean (Rafferty) in danger. Now blind ex-cop Maclain, along with police dog Friday and comedic helper Marty, have to figure things out before more bloodletting.

Arnold's Maclain has to be the most genial cop in movie annals: he even manages a chuckle in the direst circumstance. I guess that shows acceptance of his impaired condition. Good to see one of my old-time heartthrobs Frances Rafferty looking gorgeous as usual. And that's Leigh Whipper briefly as the colored butler. Too bad he doesn't get to show the soul he shows in the classics Of Mice and Men (1939) and The Ox-Bow Incident (1943). Once you see him there, you don't forget. And, of course, there's Friday who should get a canine Oscar for his winning performance.

Anyway, the programmer's mainly a personality detective show, slickly done by MGM's accomplished production crew. I guess my only reservation is with some of the look-alike supporting players and keeping them straight. Still, it's an entertaining way to spend an hour that's also lost little over the years. Meanwhile, this old geezer could sure use a buddy like the genius-level Friday.

Whiff of Death

[sol-kay · 6/10 · 21 September 2007]

(There are Spoilers) No where as good as the previous "Blind Detective" feature "Eyes in the Night" the movie "The Hidden Eye" still holds your interest up until the final moments even though the mysterious killer is revealed almost half-way through the film.

After being discharged from the US Army Barry Grifford, Paul Langton, had met and fell in love with the pretty heiress to the Hampton tin fortune Jane Hampton, Frances Rafferty. The two lovebirds Barry & Jane eagerly wanting to get hitched have their wedding plans kept on hold by Jane's dad Mr. Arthur Hampton, Raymond Laugay, not wanting his daughter to get married so soon after two members of the family were founded murdered.

It later turns out that Uncle Rodney Hampton, Clyde Fillmore, who eventually was to give his consent to Jane & Barrys wedding plans, with his brother Mr. Hamptons blessings, in found murdered in his office as both Jane and Barry came to visit him.Finding a mysterious note laced with his strange Jasmin perfume as well as the Areng Tree mentioned on it all clues to Uncle Rodney's murder leads to Barry.

Barry was on the scene of Rodney Hampton's murder and later he was also at the scene of Mr. Hamptons murder which makes him a prime suspect. There's also the fact that the Areng Tree is native to the island of Sumatra the place where Mr. Hampton made his fortune some thirty years ago and his partner Barry father Mr. Grifford ended up losing his shirt! Are these murders the work of Barry Grifford in revenge of what he feels that old man Hampton did to his dad in swindling him of of his share of the prosperous Sumatra Hampton tin mine?

Getting family friend and blind sleuth Capt. Duncan "Mac" MacLaine, Edward Arnold, on the case Jane hopes he'll get to the bottom of these murders and exonerate Barry, who has yet to be charged, of committing them. "Mac" together with his partner Marty Corbatt, William "Bill" Phillips, and faithful seeing eye dog Friday sniff out the truth behind Mr. Hampton's and Uncle Rodney's murder in the fact that the mysterious perfume was purposely planted at the murder scene to implicate poor and innocent Barry Grifford.

The killer using his henchmen lead by Ferris, Morris Arkrum, realized that "Mac" has got the drop on him and the real reason for the Hampton murders. The killer happens to be in charges of the Hampton tin mine fortune and want's, with all the Hampton's out of the way, to get total control of it. The killer is also positioning Barry into a corner in that he'll murder his sweetheart Jane to exact revenge of what her dad, the late Mr. Hampton, did to his dad in bankrupting him.

As "Mac" gets closer to the truth the Killer has his seeing-eye dog Friday dog-napped and held hostage in an effort to get "Mac" off his back. This all backfires with Friday together with his master "Mac", who was also later kidnapped, turning the tables on the Killer and his hoods and then working against the clock in preventing Barry from being shot by the cops as he enters the Hampton Mansion. Barry was hoodwinked by Ferris & Co, impersonating cops, into thinking that he's coming to his sweetheart Janes rescue only to have him be gunned down by the awaiting police. The cops, the real ones, were tipped off by the killer that Barry is going to the mansion to murder Jane and and then plant evidence, fake of course, to implicate him in her murder.

The brave and courageous Friday who saved "Mac" earlier by attacking and tearing apart two of his and "Mac" captors at the killers hideout was rendered useless by being locked in a cab, that brought them to the Hampton Masion, by the suddenly metalized killer. "Mac" taking the killer on hand to hand made up for his loss of sight, he was blinded in WWI, by his expertise in both Oriental martial arts of Ju Jutsu and Sumo Wrestling. "Mac" ended up putting him to sleep without the help of Friday who if freed would have done a much better, or worse, job on him which the killer in not being torn to ribbons should be very very thankful for.

eddie arnold....no big deal.

[ksf-2 · 6/10 · 12 November 2020]

Eddie Arnold is the blind detective MacLain, helped by his dog and an assistant. now that a couple people from the same family have been knocked off, MacLain is brought in to track down the killers. a lot of discussion on perfumes. and Sumatra keeps coming up. a tired, running gag where MacLain's assistant keeps spilling perfume all over himself. co-stars Frances Rafferty and Ray Collins. the wheels turn slowly as MacLain comes up with clues. and he keeps laughing. it's a little odd. it kind of stumbles along. it has all the usual elements of a crime story, but it's just not very compelling. Directed by Richard Whorf. only directed about ten films, then it was a whole lot of television. no big deal. whatever.

adorable dog

[SnoopyStyle · 6/10 · 16 September 2020]

Jean Hampton and Barry Gifford are a young couple looking to get married. He asks her Uncle Rodney for a meeting. They find the uncle murdered, a suspicious note, and a smell of perfume. Barry becomes the main suspect and Jean seeks the help of blind detective Duncan Maclain with his guide dog Friday.

Oh My God! Friday tied up is adorably sadomasochistic. Relax! I'm sure the dog was trained and well treated. They could be muzzled him but they tied up everything including his mouth. It's so ridiculous. This is not really a great detective franchise. Duncan should wear dark glasses and do the blind man walk. He also has too many helpers. He would be much more compelling if he does his job by himself with ingenuity. I'll give this a passing mark just for the dog.

Nothing Hidden

[Waiting2BShocked · 4/10 · 24 December 2010]

Courtsey of MGM's prolific/proficient second feature output unit, comes this sequel to Fred Zinnemann's debut feature 'Eyes In The Night', about a visually-impaired sleuth. This time around, the technical team is unfortunately less resourceful than their protagonist who is busy, with the aid of his faithful guide dog, trying to clear an innocent man of murder.

The replacement of B-frisson chills with chuckles is a miscalculation on this outing, and stereotype B-movie characterisations abound from vulnerable love interest to seedy villains. The story's gritty, 'urban' settings, replete with dark alleyways and disused warehouses, are never exploited to the full effect of their classic noir trappings.

The proceedings are all lighthearted enough if a little too genial. However, although there is some inevitable sentiment, the film is surprisingly unpatronising in its treatment of our blind hero. All in all it's a disappointing sequel, but not an hour-and-a-bit wasted.

Not among my favorites

[bensonmum2 · 4/10 · 30 April 2020]

After several members of Jean Hampton's family are murdered, the police begin to suspect her fiancé. Jean decides to hire a private detective to help find the real killer. Captain Duncan Maclain comes onto the case. Being blind, Maclain is a rather unique detective who brings his own methods and skills to the case. And, as one of the few clues is a distinct perfume left behind at each crime scene, being blind may prove an advantage. But can he uncover the killer before anyone else is murdered?

Unlike a lot of the older films I've watched lately, I'm not really a fan of The Hidden Eye. My first issue with the film is the way Edward Albert played Maclain. It just never feels right. I didn't care for him as a character. His deep, hearty laughing response to most every situation really put me off. He solves a case - laughter. He uncovers a clue - laughter. He wrestles a baddie - laughter. His dog is kidnapped - laughter. It was so bizarre and I didn't care for it. My second issue was how easily the mystery was solved. One of the biggest clues is a phone number that Maclain overhears being dialed. How fortunate that of all the phone numbers the bad guy could have called, he dials one that Maclain already knows. So by happenstance, Maclain comes up with the murderer's identity. This also didn't work for me.

The real highlight and the thing I will remember most about watching The Hidden Eye was seeing Audrey Totter in an all too brief, uncredited performance as a perfume saleslady. Her 45 seconds of screen time was so amazing that I had to stop the movie to look her up on IMDb.

4/10

For a B-detective film, it's well above average

[planktonrules · 8/10 · 21 September 2007]

I love old B-detective films such as Charlie Chan, The Saint, Boston Blackie and The Falcon. In addition to these very popular series, MGM tried to make a string of films starring veteran character actor Edward Arnold as a blind ex-police captain who now investigates crimes on his own. Unfortunately, while I really liked the first two films of the series, there must not have been much interest as MGM killed the series and only ended up making the two.

What a shame, as I found them charming and innovative--something that is lacking in most films of the genre. I liked Arnold's easygoing manner (though my wife felt he laughed too much) and his guide dog, Friday, was a great sidekick--practically stealing the show. The plots were creative, the supporting acting very good and the production values many steps above lower budget Bs. About the only thing that was a deficit was the use of stunt doubles. All too often, it was VERY obvious that it was not the rotund and middle-aged Arnold but a younger and thinner man with significantly more hair! In this regard, it reminded me a lot of the work done on the original STAR TREK television series--where it was obviously NOT Kirk, Spock or McCoy in the action scenes.

By the way, if you get a chance, try seeing the first film (EYES IN THE NIGHT). It's really funny watching Arnold's character deliberately trying to be super-obnoxious and irritating!

Disappointing B Movie

[alonzoiii-1 · 3/10 · 31 January 2006]

I had hopes for this one, as it was written by a real mystery writer -- George Harmon Coxe, and featured Edward Arnold, who is incapable of a bad performance.

Problem is -- the story really isn't a mystery, as the killer is revealed about halfway through the film. And, while Arnold does the best he can with so-so material, the romantic leads and the comic "relief" is dreadful. One ultimately does not care whether the male lead did or did not execute the strange series of killings featured in the movie, as he is such a cold fish. As a matter of fact, when the police takes him down to the station "to clear up one or two things", one kind of hopes that they broke out the rubber hoses.

Arnold plays a blind detective, and the film is full of the uncanny sensitivity blind detectives always have in fiction. While most of this is hooey, Arnold does convey a sort of odd remoteness that absolutely appropriate for his character. More improbably, Arnold -- who creditably played Nero Wolfe ten years earlier -- is shown as an expert wrestler.

Seriously, this one is for Edward Arnold freaks only. And if one is hungry for Arnold performances, one can get them in many, many better movies.

Good Film

[Michael_Elliott · 28 February 2008]

Hidden Eye, The (1945)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Sequel to Eyes in the Night has the blind detective (Edward Arnold) trying to track down a killer who has murdered four people in a rich family. I haven't seen the original film but this one here is a pretty solid entertainment but we've seen this type of mystery countless times before. Having the lead detective blind was a new angle on the story and his ways of solving a crime without sight was rather interesting. The best performance in the film has to go to his dog, Friday, who is constantly entertaining. Arnold is also very good in his role and really sells himself as being blind. The film only runs 70-minutes and at times it drags along but there's certainly worst out there.

Modestly entertaining B-film about the blind detective...

[Doylenf · 5/10 · 17 September 2007]

As a genial blind detective, EDWARD ARNOLD chuckles his way through his familiar role as the man whose keen mind and senses detect things that a man with eyesight cannot possibly see. In this particular mystery, the murderer is revealed halfway through and the suspense lies in wondering how Arnold will get on his scent.

WILLIAM PHILLIPS has a good supporting role as his assistant who's assigned to test some perfumes. His scene at a perfume counter is the film's only solid comic moment and he shares it with the unbilled and unknown AUDREY TOTTER as an amused clerk. FRANCES RAFFERTY is the pretty leading lady, a woman about to inherit a huge fortune upon the death of her wealthy uncle. The crime is planted on her fiancé and it's up to Arnold to find a way to reveal the true murderer.

JACK LAMBERT makes a good thug, but Edward Arnold's bland portrayal of the amiable blind man is a bit tedious after awhile. Overall, it's pretty mild stuff.

Audrey Totter Makes the Most of Her Sixty Seconds!!!

[kidboots · 8/10 · 25 March 2013]

I could never understand why MGM didn't try to have a serious go of making a series about Capt. Duncan MacLain, an urbane private eye, who just happens to be blind. That does not hamper his skills as he has sharpened his remaining senses as well as being an expert wrestler. He also has an extremely smart seeing eye dog in Friday, who is almost MacLain's match in intelligence. Obviously MGM didn't feel that comfortable with private eyes on dark rainy streets, they didn't exactly fit in with the other series - heroic Dr. Kildare and the all American Hardy family. Of course they also had the Thin Man series but Nick Charles was different, he was a witty bon vivant married to a millionairess!!!

The first MacLain film "Eyes in the Night" got off to a terrific start, directed by young up and coming director Fred Zinneman and with a top cast of dependable stars including Edward Arnold who fitted the role like a pair of comfy slippers. But the next one, "The Hidden Eye" appeared almost 5 years later and somehow something was missing.

Jean (Frances Rafferty) is eager to marry Barry but is meeting stiff opposition from her uncle who is concerned that with a couple of recent deaths in the family it wouldn't look right. When Uncle Rodney, the man who is going to decide their fate is found murdered and Barry is already in the darkened room, suspicion naturally falls on him. Unfortunately for Barry, he seems to be being set up as that happens for the other murders too.

As another reviewer says the murderer is revealed half way through but, for me, that only makes it more interesting as now, with MacLain on the case, they know they are looking for a mad man but one who presents a normal respectable front. There is drama aplenty when Friday is kidnapped - the anguish in Arnold's voice as he promises to do exactly as the kidnapper's want proves there was real affection for the dog, a beautiful Alsation, there.

Frances Rafferty was just one of the numerous pretty ingenues who seemed to flood the screen in the 1940s, did a few colourless roles then disappeared. Far more interesting was the perfume counter girl - Audrey Totter gave her part as much oomph as her 60 second bit would allow. I believe she was also at the wrong studio and would have progressed quicker at Warner Bros. where her type of hard boiled dame was more appreciated.

Recommended for Audrey!!

The art of seeing beyond the range of sight

[clanciai · 8/10 · 3 May 2020]

Edward Arnold was an excellent actor, and all films with him are outstanding for his contribution. He made two films as the blind detective Maclaine with his good dog Friday, and although rather short, they are both excellent, the second even better than the first. There is nothing cheap or artificial in the construction of the intrigue, which eventually keeps constantly increasing in excitement and suspense, and you have to worry at times about the detective, especially when his dog gets into trouble. Ray Collins is abominable as the corrupt godfather-like guardian, and it is impossible not to fall into the trap of suspecting the wrong person of all these family murders. This is great entertainment for a chamber drama of murder at home.