Warning to Wantons (1949) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Romance in the Frame
wilvram20 January 2021
Notable as being the first major feature utilizing Independent Frame, sold to Rank as a revolutionary technique to reduce both budget and filming time. One aspect included pre-shooting of location scenes using stand-ins, with the stars performing against these filmed backdrops. The system's main originator, veteran art director David Rawnsley, was on set in an advisory capacity while another pioneer, Donald Wilson, became one of Rank's several one-time-only directors of the period. Even J. Arthur himself made a rare visit to one of his sets to see the promising new set-up for himself.

However, for all the excitement, the actual result was a rather long-winded romantic comedy, with French actress Anne Vernon as man-mad ex-convert girl, Renee. Despite her abundance of charm, a character so pleased with herself is not altogether endearing and my favourite part was when she was taught a drastic lesson by Sonia Holm's Maria. Holm, an attractive and intelligent-looking actress had a surprisingly brief career, and like star Harold Warrender did not live long past fifty. It all finally fails to fulfil the early promise where Ellen Pollock, reputedly G. B.Shaw's favourite actress, is enjoyable as confidante of Renee's mother.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable
calvertfan24 February 2002
I think I'd need to watch Warning To Wantons about 3 more times before it all made sense, but I liked what I saw the first time around and I hope that if anyone has a chance to watch it, they do. The part that most sticks out in mind is when I was so sure one girl was going to drown the nice one, in a scene which didn't feel like a 40s movie at all, and I was quite surprised. That set the scene for the rest of the film, as the nice girl was forced into hiding, which proved for a very surprise ending! Good film, such a sweet romance.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Painfully unfunny
malcolmgsw26 August 2018
The main problems with this film are firstly the basic concept that it is funny for a 17 year old girl to fling herself at a married man,and that a mature 25 year old is playing a girl of 17 or maybe less.For some reason she wants to fling herself at every available man regardless of age.Watching this through its 94 minutes is sheer torture and should be avoided at all costs
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A sophisticated satire
leporellom4 May 2022
The major problem (for the audience) with this movie is that the "sophisticated satire" is hidden behind what might appear on the surface as a series of puzzling, random events: this might be one of the most underrated and one of the least understood movies.

Most (of the very few) reviews of the movie describe it as comedy. Hardy a comedy. Rather a sad, almost tragic, story of social injustice, human cruelty and envy and the hopeless struggle of those less wealth and less lucky in this society that values money and pedigree.

In many ways this movie reminds me the 1951 Luis Buñuel masterpiece "Susana" - a tragic film described - again - as comedy and depicting the hopeless efforts of a young women to be admitted into the "charmed lives" of the affluent society using the only assets she possesses; her youth and her beauty. In both films she is only betrayed by those who claim to love her and to do anything for her.

Just as in Buñuel's film, the "happy ending" is in fact a masterly veiled indictment of our society.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed