Vendetta of a Samurai (1952) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
No Battle Plan Survives Contact With the Enemy
boblipton22 August 2018
This is a revisionist work. It starts off by showing a samurai flick version of a battle in which a noble samurai kills thirty-six of his enemies single-handedly, and then pauses. That's not what really happened, we're told. The real story is much more interesting.

And so we get to watch as Toshiro Mifune helps a young, untested samurai gain his vengeance, along with his loyal retainers. It's a slow movie, because first they have to find the guy, and that takes half the movie, and then we watch the actual battle, which doesn't go as planned.

It's a very odd movie from the pen of Akira Kurosawa, in part because he's the only credited writer -- he always liked to work with collaborators -- and the actual director is Kazuo Mori, who likes a lot more symbolism in his movies. Nonetheless, you can tell it's a Kurosawa picture. Not only is Mifune in it, but also Shimura, Daisuke Katô and Bokuzen Hidari, all of whom would appear in THE SEVEN SAMURAI and many other Kurosawa films. Mori himself would direct another movie from an unused Kurosawa script.

It's a theoretically interesting deconstruction of the movie samurai image. Only Mifune is professional; the others, when the moment comes, don't measure up to the image from hundreds of movies.... but neither do the bad guys. Nonetheless, the movie doesn't measure up as a movie. The characters aren't individuals, the situations along the way aren't interesting and cinematographer Kazuo Yamazaki shoots Toho's back lot in a way that lets you know that you're on Toho's back lot.

Perhaps that's part of the demolition job. Despite Mifune's histrionics, it just doesn't work. Maybe that's why Kurosawa handed the megaphone over to the guy who would become best known for directing the Zatoichi movies and started work on what would become the greatest samurai flick of all time.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Kurosawa de-glamorizes a legendary Japanese tale
pscamp0116 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The review contains a very mild spoiler.

The Igagoe Vendetta is a famous incident from Japanese 19th century history that has been retold many times in plays (and presumably movies.) Apparently, the tale has grown with each retelling. Araki Mataemon (aka Vendetta of a Samurai, as it is called in Hulu) is an attempt to tell a realistic version of the story. Although it was directed by Kazuo Mori (best known in America for directing many of the Zaitochi movies) an argument could be made for calling this a Kurosawa movie. He wrote the screenplay, it features 4 actors from The Seven Samurai and it is clearly influenced by Rashomon, which was made two years earlier.

The movie gets off to an unpromising start with a histrionic version of the fight. It is filmed in the manner of a much older movie.The film speed is sped up, Toshiro Mifune is egregiously over acting as he mows down warrior after warrior, despite the fact that his sword never comes close to touching anyone. However, this opening scene is a superb fake out. After it is over, the narrator announces that this is how everyone imagines the incident, but that the reality was very different.The movie then commences to tell a very realistic story of the events that led to the incident, as well as the motivations and personalities of the participants.

The result is a very stately, and maybe in a couple places static, movie about the conflicts between duty, revenge, friendship and fear. The movie seems a little slow at first, but the pacing ends up paying off as the suspense builds near the end of the movie. Mori's direction lacks Kurosawa's dynamism, but he makes up for it with nice set ups and interesting asides. I was also impressed with Mifune's acting. Often when he was working for directors other than Kurosawa he could turn into a horrible ham, but here his acting was remarkably restrained, while still dominating every scene he was in.

Overall, I'd say this was a must see for all fans of Kurosawa and Japanese films.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Vendetta of the flashbacks
Angel_Peter28 May 2017
The story starts with telling there are many exaggerated versions of this story told and therefore they will now tell it more true to the real event.

There are many great actors collected in this movie. Unfortunately the movie is too chopped up to get a real flow or a sense of the story. For every 5 minutes there was a short flashback from one of the characters telling some event in their life connected to this revenge attack. Unfortunately I did not feel they were so interesting or made any difference for the story most of them. Even in the battle there were flashbacks that I felt ripped me out of the flow when I finally felt it was becoming engaging.

I did like all the fighting participants were scared going into a fight. That did make a nice change. That was most likely often the case in reality.

I do love most of the movies Kurosawa directed but this he wrote I did just not connect with the story or characters. Maybe the story is realistic but in the end I failed to see the point why I spend 1½ hour here.

All in all I would say there are many better samurai movies out there. Maybe it does help if you think flashbacks are a great way of telling a story.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed