The Man from the Alamo (1953) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
26 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Excellent western from the master of tight action
funkyfry3 December 2002
Glenn Ford plays the only survivor of the Alamo -- not a very popular man in Texas. Of course, the story gives him a good excuse -- he drew lots with some other Alamo soldiers to see who would go west to defend their homes from Texan bandits hired by the Mexicans, but the families were already dead when he gets there -- but nobody wants to believe him, except one lovely woman on the wagon train he sets out to defend. Only problem is his strategy of siding with the bandits to get into their confidence puts him in a nearly impossible situation.

A well-made film, with convincing action and gritty characters. Unlike other Boetticher westerns, here the scale of the film is "epic" as the future of the West hangs in the balance. Ford makes a surprisingly good substitute for Randolph Scott or John Wayne.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hey, it's a Budd Boetticher film....so it's well worth seeing.
planktonrules26 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
When I received a DVD from Netflix with this film and "The Cimarron Kid" on it, I wondered why I'd placed this disk on my queue. After all, I am not a huge fan of westerns and the films appeared pretty unremarkable. However, when I noticed both films were directed by Budd Boetticher, I remembered that THIS was why I'd put these films on my list many months earlier. Boetticher was a wonderful director who managed to make his westerns better than the norm--with stories that lack many of the usual clichés.

This film is set during the war for Texas independence from Mexico in the mid-1830s. Soon after the film begins, you see a brief recreation of the Battle of the Alamo. Just before the compound is overrun, the commander has the married men draw lots--the one selected will sneak away from the fort and look after the families left behind. Glen Ford is the one chosen, but when he arrives home he learns that his family had been murdered. And, people begin to talk and think he was a coward since he left--though he was following orders. And, now that the battle is over, he's going to use all his energy tracking down the gang (dressed as Mexicans) responsible for his family's deaths. So, he infiltrates a gang...hoping to find out who is ultimately responsible.

The film is helped by having some good support for Ford. Neville Brand (one of the scariest looking heavies in film history), Victor Jory, Hugh O'Brian and Chill Wills all are available to provide nice color and good old dependable acting. And, Boetticher at the helm sure didn't hurt, either. Together, they are able to take an okay story and make it a lot better than it should have been. While it's not as good as the Boetticher/Randolph Scott collaborations, it's quite good.

By the way, they did NOT have revolvers and repeating rifles back then. The very first guns of these types were not yet available until AFTER this war and really were very rare until well into the Civil War. All too often, I have seen Hollywood mess up this detail--perhaps because it would be less exciting to see everyone stop to reload after each shot...and because reloading would take at least 30 seconds (and quite possibly more). But, unfortunately, that IS how they would have fought in the old days. And, by the way, the inexperienced women in the film managed to reload in about five seconds---something even the best soldiers never could have accomplished at the time!
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent and attractive Western with Glenn Ford as a soldier who is branded as a deserter
ma-cortes1 September 2018
Texas , when General Santa Anna seized the Presidency of Mexico. They were them faced with the prospect of military government of war. General Sam Huston was entrusted with the task of mapping a course of action that would determine the future of Texas. 1836 a soldier called John Stroud, Glenn Ford, is sent from The Alamo during its last hours to get help, but then he is branded as a coward and a deserter. As he struggles to clear his name. Stroud infiltrates Wade's band led by Victor Jory. As The Alamo mission became a fortress and the fortress that became a shrine.

Well acted and colorful film, this one will satisfy those with a taste for action. Furthermore, here shows up some historic roles from The Alamo such as Col. Travis , Davy Crocket and Jim Bowie. Stars Glenn Ford and Julie Adams give acceptable interpretation. While support cast is pretty good, such as Chill Wills who played in El Alamo by John Wayne, Neville Brand as a rebel, Hugh O'Brian and special mention for Victor Jory as leader of a gang of renegades turncoats supporting Mexicans. And Guy Williams , before his successful series playing El Zorro.

It displays a glimmer and brilliant cinematography by Russell Metty, Universal Pictures regular . And a moving as well as charming musical score by the classic composer Frank Skinner. The motion picture was well directed by Budd Boetticher who was a Western expert. His first Western was in 1949 called The Wolf Hunters, following Cimarron Kid , Bronco buster, Horizons West, Seminole, and Wings of the hawk . In 1956 with 7 Men From Now starts his collaboration with Randolph Scott, along with producer Harry Joe Brown and writer Burt Kennedy , including prestigious titles as Tall T, Decision at sundown, Buchanan rides alone , Ride lonesome, Comanche station , among others. Rating 6. 5/10 . His last Western was in 1969 titled A time for dying with Audie Murphy. The movie witll appeal toWestern aficionados and Glenn Ford fans
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
He's just an unlucky guy.
hitchcockthelegend29 January 2009
As the war for Texas independence heightens, the Alamo has become a critical point of time buying interest. Fearing their families will perish under the might of the marauding Mexican army, the men of the Alamo draw lots to see which one of them will flee the Alamo battle to steer the respective families out of harms way. John Stroud is the man faced with the task, but upon reaching his destinations he finds he's too late to save anyone. However, this is just the start of his worries as he finds he has been branded a coward for leaving the Alamo, where all have now perished; while his attempts to avenge the murder of his family are beset with problems at every turn.

In truth, no great shakes in the Western genre here, and certainly not even close to being amongst the better work of director Budd Boetticher (The Tall T & Comanche Station) or Glenn Ford (The Big Heat & Blackboard Jungle). It's also not high on production value and doesn't have location vitality to give it an earthy sheen, it still, however, manages to be an entertaining piece putting an interesting offshoot to the Alamo legend. Glenn Ford is a watchable star at the best of times and he manages to keep this picture afloat by putting a bit of cool bravado urgency into the role of John Stroud, with dashes of emotional fortitude, his relationship with the young, recently orphaned Carlos, gives the film its emotional weight, and when that sits alongside the usual array of shoot them up sequences it makes for good honest Western fare.

Of the supporting cast, Chill Wills and Neville Brand put in some fine work, while there has been far far worse female leads in this genre than the radiant Julie Adams. Of Boetticher's direction? It's just about adequate, where working within the confines of the lot and it's lowly budget origins, he manages to pull it thru; but in truth probably himself cringed at some of the final night time sequences in the cut. He of course, a couple of years down the line, would go on to direct some of the best genre pieces on the market, so he owes the genre fan very little all told. So good and bad here folks, with the good far outweighing the technically bad deficiencies on offer. But I mean come on now, if you can't enjoy Ford having a good old punch up on the brink of a waterfall? Well you're probably better off not watching a 50s B movie Western in the first place then. 6.5/10
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
hero or coward?
paulo BH19 February 2000
During the war of independence of Texas, a group of five men of the city of Oxbow chooses, for a raffle, who would leave the fort Alamo to save the families of all them of the Mexican troops. Stroud is the chosen, but is considered a coward by the other men of the fort, that don't know about the real reason of his escape.

However, when arriving to his home, his family and the one of all his companions had been killed by American renegades, that struggled beside of the Mexicans. Now, is the hour of the his revenge! But how to face the hostility of all the Texans that considered him a coward for fleeing of the Alamo?

Happily, his heroic behavior due to the adversities, as when leading a caravan of Texans before an attack of the renegades, will show to his compatriots him real value!

Good film, with good interpretations. An excellent western for a Saturday afternoon.
18 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Clearing His Name
bkoganbing29 November 2007
Glenn Ford plays the title role in The Man From The Alamo which probably should be better titled The Man Who Left The Alamo. Don't worry, Glenn had good and sufficient cause for doing so.

Ford is one of the men who was there at the mission fort at San Antonio De Bexar when word is received of some renegade Texans raiding some of ranches up where Ford and his family have settled. He and three others draw lots to see who goes out of The Alamo to check on their families. Ford gets the short straw and when William B. Travis played by Arthur Space draws his famous line in the sand, Ford is the only one who opts out of the fight.

Of course when Ford arrives he finds his and the other families dead at the hands of renegade Victory Jory and his band who are in league with Santa Anna. After that it's a struggle to clear his good name and alert others to the dangers of Jory's band.

The Man From The Alamo is a short, but action packed western. Budd Boetticher got good performances out of his cast which besides those mentioned include Julie Adams. Hugh O'Brian, Neville Brand, and Chill Wills who as we all know was in John Wayne's blockbuster film on the same subject.

The film is very similar to a lot of the westerns that Boetticher did with Randolph Scott and I wouldn't be surprised if the film wasn't created with Randy in mind originally for the lead. If it was, Glenn Ford was more than adequate in the part.

Western fans and other fans will not be disappointed.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fast Moving Action Packed Western!
bsmith555225 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
"The Man From the Alamo" is a slick fast paced littler actioner from Director Budd Boetticher and another of those little 80 minute gems that Universal produced during the 1950s.

It starts out during the siege of The Alamo in 1836. The battle scenes are quite well done in light of the small budget.

A group of ranchers draws straws to see which of them will leave the battle and go home to check on their families. John Stroud (Glenn Ford) "wins" the draw. A messenger from Sam Houston, Lt. Tom Larmar (Hugh O'Brian) arrives to inform the fighters that Houston is unable to send reinforcements. Stroud is the only fighter to choose to leave and Larmar is ordered back to Houston by Col. Travis.

When Stroud reaches the ranches, he discovers them burned and the families murdered. He find out that it was not the Mexicans who were responsible but a gang of pro Mexican Americans led by Jess Wade (Victor Jory) who were responsible. He then goes to the town of Franklin where he learns that The Alamo has fallen and all have been killed. He also learns that the town has branded him a coward for "deserting" the fighting and want to string him up when Lt. Larmar, who is assigned to escort the wagons, accuses him of cowardice.

Town elder John Gage (Chill Wills) plans to lead a wagon train of women and children away from Franklin when Houston warns them of an impending attack by Wade and his renegades. Stroud is jailed for his own protection and by chance is put in the same cell of one of Wade's henchmen (Neville Brand). The men manage to escape during Wade's raid on the town and Stroud joins Wade's gang to obtain his revenge.

Before Wade and his men can attack the wagon train, Stroud manages to warn them and escape Wade to the wagons. Lt. Larmar, still thinking Stroud a coward, places him under arrest. Beth Anders (Julie Adams) begins to sympathize with Stroud, believing him to be innocent. Eventually Larmar comes to believe in his innocence as well.

Before the wagon train can cross a river to safety, Larmer and his men are recalled by Sam Houston and leave the wagons unprotected. Stroud volunteers to lead the wagons. But as they are about to cross the river, Wade and his men attack and..............................

Glenn Ford as always, is better than his material. As the beleaguered Stroud, he steals the picture. Adams is a stock western heroine who comes to love the hero. Wills has little to do as the one-armed Gage and Jory, who is wasted here, looks ridiculous in his outlandish costume. Others in the cast include Trevor Bardette as Davy Crockett, Dennis Weaver as one of his men and Stuart Randall as Jim Bowie.

An excellent "B" Plus western.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aftermath
dbdumonteil15 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This western is the opposite of WAYNE's epic :it demonstrates that the personal is personal -as well as the political;Alamo is a background,since most of the action takes place after the defeat.

Glenn Ford portrays a character that strongly recalls that of Richard Widmark in Delmer Daves ' "the last wagon" ;a "deserter" in the former ,an outlaw in the later,they are both rejected by the whole community of a town,then a convoy ;their fiercest enemy is a marshal (caravane) and a lieutenant(Alamo).

Both "so called " cowards,pariahs save many lives and thus regain their lost honor;the most moving moment is when Hugh O'Brian asks Ford if he can shake hands with him.

A pleasant western ,with a credible figure of a man who has lost all that was his Raison d'être.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
WHY IS HE SEEN AS A COWARD???
larryanderson1 August 2022
Glenn Ford leaves the certain death of the Alamo "Myth" and chooses to go home and save his family. That is not the actions of a COWARD but just a man who wants to see his family. Stupid "die for an ideal" philosophy. As HISTORY has since proven, the Massacre at the Alamo wasn't even necessary. Sam Houston spent the rest of his life trying to explain WHY he never sent re-enforcements. Just a total waste of life.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Alamo and its fictional outcomes, minor western the master Budd Boetticher!!
elo-equipamentos11 June 2023
Every single picture signed by Budd Boetticher worthwhile to see, one the greatest western director of all time, The Man From The Alamo is a minor work, about the famous Alamo when Texas became an independent Republic and Col. Santa Anna tries incorporate it on Mexico territory, the story starts at Alamo under siege and strong attack, some farmers decides that one of them will be choose to look out how are their families around, the chosen one is John Stroud (Glenn Ford), he left the Alamo before the massacre took place.

Aftermaths find out his whole family killed by American allied at Santa Anna's cause, solely remainder a one survivor only, the little Mexican boy Carlos who is a kid of his old employee also killed in the raid, Carlos told to Stroud that weren't Mexican soldiers that killed them, but American men disguised as Mexican outfits lead by the renegade Jess Wade (Victor Jory) reaching at near city Stroud is treat as coward and he needs clean your name, however first he wants a revenge against Jess Wade that killed his family meanwhile Gen. Huston is gathering men to strickes back.

It displayed a lit bit about Texas story, re-telling how the lonely territory was still apart of the United States at its time, the Alamo and all unfold the real happenings afterwards over the Alamo massacre and under leadership of the Gen San Huston at final battle of San Jacinto, instead the picture focuses on the story of a supposed man John Stroud, the casting have so many interesting people as Julie Adams, Chill Wills, Hugh O'Brien, Neville Brand an upcoming stars as Guy Williams, Stuart Whitman and Dennis Weaver, also the old acquaintance of us uncredited Kenneth MacDonald who was a usual guest as bad guy on The Three Stooges.

Thanks for reading.

Resume:

First watch: 2023 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 7.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Never underestimate a man and his courage.
mark.waltz26 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Glenn Ford has been put in jail for desertion over the fight at the Alamo, and nobody believes that he actually left his post for honorable reasons. When the town that has turned its back on him shows up to lynch him, he is briefly lucky when an American bandit (pretending to be Mexican) shows up and abducts him, falsely believing that Ford is on their side. In reality, the villain (Victor Jory) was responsible for Ford's family's deaths, and Ford is determined to expose the truth that Jory is out to rob the wagon train that these settlers are now in to get to California.

The beautiful Julia Adams ("The Creature From the Black Lagoon", the TV soap "Capitol") is a feisty heroine who may look fragile but isn't above loading and using a rifle to keep the bandits away from her group which includes an obvious Caucasian kid (Mark Cavell) playing a Mexican whose family worked for Ford's. Daytime soap diva Jeanne Cooper may be hard to spot for those expecting to find "The Young and the Restless's" Katherine Chancellor, but once you do, you'll be delightfully surprised. Chill Wills, as a one-armed member of the wagon train, seems to have taken over here the roles that Walter Brennan was playing just a decade before.

Overall, this is a fast-moving, colorful western, no classic or historically accurate, but fun and filled with action. Ford proves again he was one of the more versatile actors in Hollywood with his ability to go from comedy to romantic lead to film noir hero to action star.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Superior Glen Ford/Bud Boetticher western, with complex web of ironies
weezeralfalfa2 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Glen Ford, as Texan settler John Stroud, finds himself threatened with death by 3 opposing groups during the fight for Texas independence from Mexico, his only apparent friend an orphan Mexican boy: the only survivor of a raid by American renegades dressed as Mexicans, who killed Stroud's family and burned his house. Stroud was one of the American defenders holed up inside the crumbling Alamo mission, being used as a fort, until he drew the black bean, used to decide who would try to ride through the Mexican lines to lead the families around his farm in a retreat. But he discovered that the renegades had already destroyed everything before he got there. The Mexican boy decides to 'adopt' Stroud as his new father, but when they go to town, the people figure out that he is the man who quit the Alamo, thus he is labeled a notorious coward. His association with the boy further suggests to them a pro-Mexican stance.

The screenplay is very tightly constructed, and includes a complex web of ironies, which is one of the main selling point of the film. For example, the renegades unwittingly saved Stroud's life twice 1) the report of their proximity to some settlements caused Stroud to leave the Alamo, thus saving his life 2) Later, the renegades save Stroud from an imminent lynching by the enraged town people. This was an incidental result of their attack on the town, with the goal of robbing the bank and freeing one of their members from jail. Stroud professes his desire to join them, but they don't really trust him. Thus, he engages in several fist fights with them, the last leaving him presumably dead after tumbling down a long rocky slope. But , he is found by searching members of the fleeing townies plus cavalry protectors, and after recovering, he organizes the defense of the seemingly defenseless townies, minus their men, after the cavalry unit receives orders to immediately join Houston at San Jacinto. The women, kids, old men, and Stroud manage to annihilate the renegades, using borrowed cavalry firearms. Thus, Stroud achieves his revenge and resurrects his reputation as a brave and smart man.

Chill Wills and the other townies, along with Hugh O'Brian, as commander of the cavalry unit, want to lynch Stroud when he refuses to vacate the region. Ironically, Wills is later pressured by Beth(Julie Adams) into doctoring the unconscious Stroud, after his long tumble, against an overriding sentiment to let Stroud die. Again, ironically, O'Brian's troops soon thereafter are called to abandon the wagon train and join Houston. Initially, O'Brian refuses to obey, but Stroud convinces him that he can lead an effective defense of the wagon train. Thus, the man they wanted to kill a short time before becomes their savior.

Stroud effectively rescued the Mexican boy from starvation. but the association of the boy with Stroud increases the perception of Stroud as pro-Mexican, thus increasing the call to lynch him. The boy tries to tell the others why Stroud really left the Alamo, which Stroud inexplicably refuses to do. But, initially, he is disbelieved. Later, the boy saves Stroud's life by leading a search for him after he tumbled down that hill, and insisting that Wills try to revive Stroud. Also, he corroborates Stroud's statement why he left the Alamo, thus diffusing a renewed demand by the fleeing townies to kill Stroud. At the end, the implication is that Stroud, the boy, and Beth will form a new family.

The biggest weakness of the screenplay is the extreme reaction of some of the Alamo defenders and of the townspeople to Stroud's leaving the Alamo, and his curious refusal to adequately explain why he did so, until late in the film. Also, Stroud recovered awfully quickly from his long tumble down that hill, and his being found by the boy is unlikely.

Ford's character is very loosely based on the disputed historical fact or legend that one man(Moses Rose) chose to leave the Alamo, when given a choice. He said he saw no reason to stay and die in a hopeless defense. Thus, he was labeled a coward. Unlike the portrayal of Houston's attitude toward defending the Alamo, the historic Houston sent Bowie with instructions to remove the cannon and destroy the make-shift fort, as being indefensible! While at the Alamo, Stroud risks his life to reraise the Texas flag on the wall, while under cannon bombardment. The scenes of Mexican cannon bombardment are pretty cheesy.

Only some of the firearms are the historically-relevant flint locks. The use of repeating firearms speeds up the gunplay for the audience. Yes, the women reloaded their muskets impossibly fast! Also, an obvious photocopy of President Hayes(1876-80) should have been removed from the jail wall!

Several of the renegade actors took impressive body-slamming falls when shot off their horse or their horse was shot. Also, Victor Jory, as the head renegade: Jess Wade, takes quite a plunge down a waterfall. I don't see how this could have been faked. The assumption is that Wade drowned. However, it looks survivable to me, assuming a deep plunge pool.

Presently, part of the Classic Western round-up, Vol. 2, DVD set, along with "The Texans", "California" and "The Cimarron Kid"
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
good visuals and acting bolster a conventional story
j_eyon24 December 2021
Highly conventional storytelling - with nice visuals - and capable acting - - strangely enuf - the story of the real man who didn't cross Travis's line to stay to fight - Moses Rose - isn't touched upon - this bears no resemblance to his story.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Groan
aimless-463 September 2007
Deserving of its obscurity, "The Man From the Alamo" (1953) is probably Director Budd Boetticher's weakest Western and Glenn Ford's weakest film. While not actually horrible, it is not something to seek out for exciting entertainment or for a showcase of the talent of those two Hollywood immortals.

It's another of those lame historical fiction stories that would be at least tolerable if the names and places had been changed to protect the innocent. In fairness, the film would have been easier to take back in 1953, a couple of years before Fess Parker and later John Wayne told slightly less fictional Alamo stories and established lasting mental pictures of the event and the participants.

"The Man From the Alamo" is probably most noteworthy for its overuse (and misuse) of "day for night" filming. There are endless "day for night" scenes with many among the worst examples I have ever seen. One camp scene is so underexposed (to simulate nighttime darkness) that it's just five minutes of disembodied voices. The scenes at the Alamo itself are lame sound- stage stuff.

Also amusing are the sequences of the wagon train traversing the same California valley in scene and scene (the high hills in the background and the dry valley just don't square with the alleged East Texas location).

While Boetticher was normally excellent at pacing, in "The Man From the Alamo" he dissipates the tension way too early and the film drags along to an unexciting (snore) ending. The wily renegades turn out to be totally inept cream-puffs and the viewer is left waiting for a tactical surprise that never happens.

The story opens with John Stroud (Glenn Ford) as part of the Alamo's garrison. We never meet General Santa Anna but there are brief scenes with Travis, Crockett, and Bowie. Stroud and his group draw lots to see which one will leave the Alamo to protect their ranches and families from a band of renegades. But he arrives too late and finds all the ranches have been burned and most of the families killed.

Since no one at the Alamo survives, Stroud is labeled a deserter and is about to be lynched in the first town he enters. But the renegades attack the town and Stroud infiltrates their merry little band led by Jess Wade (Richard Jory) so that he can get revenge.

There is not much challenging acting required although Neville Brand is quite effective as one of the Renegades. Hugh O'Brien gets a lot of mock fest moments as a kind of combo of George Custer and Kit Carson; complete with a tight buckskin costume.

Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.
9 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting, nothing more
searchanddestroy-14 December 2022
Budd Boetticher made several films for Universal Pictures before going to Columbia studios. His movies were westerns and adventures movies. Universal standard, where the bull fighter director could only show his professional skills but maybe nothing more. Anyway, I guess that served him for his later Columbia westerns starring Randolph Scott. This one surprised me because the presence of Glenn Ford, a Columbia star borrowed by Universal. I am sure it was the only one, knowing that later Ford will "emigrate" towards MGM. So this movie shows something rather unusual, related to Alamo battle, something surprising. A man falsely accused of cowardice instead of a murder, yes, very interesting. But the rest is predictable; good, effective but predictable.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent fiction set during the Texas revolution
rejackson-3707726 January 2020
Just wish they showed what fighting in those days was like with six guns
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Depends on what you want in a period movie
runtexas10 May 2023
If you are looking for a Glenn Ford western from the early 50s, taking place in the post Civil War west, this is a good movie. Even has notable actors like Glenn Ford, Julie Adams, Chill Wills, Victor Jory, and a young Hugh O'Brian.

But if you are looking to see a western taking place in Texas during the Texas revolution in 1836, you will be very disappointed. Yes, it starts off in the Alamo and features Sam Houston, Travis, Bowie, and Crockett. But beyond that, everything is wrong. Uniforms, clothing, tactics, weapons, all are from the post Civil War era. Even the scenery is all wrong for that part of Texas.

There is a legend of the Alamo that when Travis drew the line in the sand, one person didn't cross the line and left, but he did not resemble the Glenn Ford character at all.

If you want to see a period picture from 1836 Texas, don't waste your time.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Branded
FightingWesterner4 August 2010
Drawing straws (or in this case beans) Texas patriot Glenn Ford is picked to leave the Alamo in order to evacuate his and his neighbor's families, only to find them all dead at the hands of marauders and himself branded a coward.

Starting with a fairly colorful, low-budget Alamo siege (shot on a sound-stage!), this is pretty compelling all the way, with an excellent, hard-boiled performance from Ford and nice direction from the great Budd Boetticher, one of the best unsung western filmmakers ever.

This is almost as good as Boetticher's later collaborations with Randolph Scott. My only problem is that this wasn't shot in widescreen.

As far as the supporting cast goes, Chill Wills is always fun to watch, while the incredibly beautiful Julie Adams is always fun to look at, and Neville Brand delivers some great, macho, swaggering villainy that easily overshadows the more subdued Victor Jory.

On the other hand, I can't quite understand the Golden Globe win by Hugh O'Brian. He's okay, but slightly bland as Ford's main accuser.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Glen Ford: Sniveling Coward?
rmax3048232 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Travis, Crockett, Bowie and the rest are back behind the barricades at the Alamo in 1836. Budd Boetticher directed this tale of Glen Ford, the only escapee and survivor. Of course, Glen Ford would not have left except that he and a dozen other heroic defenders had families and ranches up there around Oxbow and they drew lots (actually beans) to select the single one of them to leave the Alamo and see that those families thrive.

So when Travis draws his famous line in the sand and says, "All of you who are with me, step across this line," only Glen Ford hangs silently back. Travis arranges Ford's escape and the others, who don't know beans about the lottery, sneer at him and call him a coward.

Well, it didn't do the families of Ford or any of the others any good. It seems there are a gang of traitorous Texans who have been promised land grants by Santa Ana after the war. The gang is led by the ever-villainous Victor Jory as "Jess Wade" -- a name to conjure with -- and the ineffably viperous Neville Brand. They have murdered all the families and burned all the ranchitos. This fills Ford with rage.

Ford rides into town to warn the residents of the approach of Santa Ana's troops but Hugh O'Brien's soldiers are already there, and O'Brien knows about Ford's leaving the Alamo.

Complications follow, involving multiple shoot outs, a Mexican kid devoted to Ford, the pursuit of the town's wagon train by the gang, the slow melting of O'Brien's hatred towards Ford, the gathering warmth of Julia Adams' schoolmarm, the destruction of Jory's gang, and the redemption of Ford.

This is a thought-provoking movie. So, okay. Everyone considers Ford a coward and deserter because he fled under fire. The only men who knew the reason for it are dead. When townsmen, soldiers, women, and children spit on him and get ready to lynch him -- why doesn't he EXPLAIN why he left? That's the principal thought the film provokes.

But of course Glen is not the kind of man who talks excessively or "feels sorry for himself" or tries to excuse any of his actions. Here's another example of what I mean. He's in the midst of a shoot out with Victor Jory atop a mountain. The footpath gives way under his boot and he seems to roll down the slope for several thousand yards before sprawling, apparently dead, in the scree. Jory smiles down at the body way below and doesn't even bother to shoot him.

The unconscious Ford is about to die but is rescued by the little Mexican kid and Julia Adams. They manage to pull him through after a day or so. Ford regains consciousness and begins to climb to his feet. No, no, say his two saviors, wait until you regain your strength. "A man's gotta get up sometime. Why not now?" You don't seriously expect this guy to EXPLAIN himself, do you?

Now, I am not an historian or a gun freak, but my impression is that this movie does to historical accuracy what a bulldozer does to asphalt. The Old West (roughly 1865 to 1895) depicted in movies can be divided into three tiers. (1) Absolute disregard for accuracy, as when John Wayne gallops his horse along a road lined with telegraph poles. (2) The Movie West, in which wardrobe and plot conventions are as taken for granted as our most primitive beliefs. (3) The "Realistic" West, in which somebody has done some research and spent some money on period props. This one purports to belong to the third tier but yearns with all its soul to leap down to the second tier and finally, unlike the defenders of the Alamo, surrenders willingly.

The Battle of the Alamo took place in 1836, not during the conventional period. And there are some nods to period accuracy -- soldiers wear the hats of sea captains, one carries a saber, there are a sprinkling of buckskin shirts, the ersatz Mexicans wear embroidered jackets, and the hat brims are sometimes wider than usual though not always.

But that's it. The rifles and muskets are muzzle loading, as they should be, but they're shorter than usual so they don't get in the way of the action. And for only one brief moment do we see one being loaded the gals in the bonnets. Too much exposure to the inexpert use of balls, ramrods, powder horns and the like would slow the tempo from agitato to moderato. The pistols aren't flintlocks but the Colt and Remington six shooters common to all Westerns. At one point, Glen Ford fans his pistol and gets off a quick series of blasts. They're carried in conventional gun belts and holsters, not clipped to belts or stuck through them. The men wear ordinary shirts with string ties and vests. The tight bodices and wide skirts of the women are generic and ex post filmo. They all seem checkered and loud. They might have been seen at a Nebraska picnic in 1920. I don't mean to suggest that this detracts in any way from Julia Adam's recherché appeal, any more than does the concave profile of her nose, which seems to begin in the middle of her forehead.

If there's a lot of stereotypy in the plot, is it at least well executed, helped by the dialog? No. Boetticher needed the poetic Burt Kennedy as a writer, and the marmoreal Randolph Scott as the lead.

It's okay if there's nothing better to do or if you want to be wafted away into a world as remote from the real as Oz.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
No buttons and belt loops please!!
gkhege7 September 2018
Good little movie with plenty of famous character actors. Glenn Ford, as always, does a great job as the coward who left the Alamo. As the case in many of these westerns, the director did not spend much time researching the details pertaining to historically correct clothing and weapons. Button down shirts and belt loops were not available in 1838. In spite of many accuracy flaws. This is a good little family western.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"I didn't know we were at War with Children"
LeonLouisRicci31 March 2013
There is always something interesting and just a bit different in this Director's Movies. This one is no exception. It is replete with thought provoking ideas like cowardice, bigotry, loyalty, and other values only found in the better Westerns.

This is an action filled Film with guns blazing, galloping Horses, Wagon Trains, bushwhackers, Mexican impersonators, fist-fights and all that is expected in this type of thing. But the difference here is the intelligence. The injection in a popular genre some things that rose above the material.

Budd Boetticher, Anthony Mann, and sometimes John Ford and Howard Hawks always gave more than the raw material. This is a modest effort from one of the Greats with an OK cast and a Production that looks so much bigger than it was. That was Boetticher, he was always so much bigger and better than what he was allowed.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
decent western
ddirby10 April 2020
I am a long time fan of the western genre, and I found this film to be about average fair. What is short on plot is made up with action and suspense.
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a ferocious western with an ethical bite
bengleson4 June 2005
By chance, June clouds threatening, I sat down and watched this entertaining western on a Saturday afternoon. An earlier commentator ended his praise for this film by noting that it is "an excellent western for a Saturday afternoon." And it was. The ethical dilemma of leaving a field of battle (in this case the Alamo)to try and save the lives of loved ones is a powerful theme. The repercussions to John Stroud, Ford's weary but stalwart character, are scorn, accusations of cowardice and worse. The best part of the film are the sweeping shots of the Texas plains. The movie is well-composed, capturing the majestic plains and hills with a strength of purpose that demands an emotional response. One of the early films of Jeanne Cooper, who is a favorite of mine.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It Takes a Tough Man to be Superman's Dad!
JenExxifer22 July 2021
I grew up watching Glenn Ford as Pa Kent in the 1978 Superman movie, and after watching The Man from the Alamo I can see why he was great as Superman's earth dad -- he knows how to play a tough man!

Glenn Ford's character John Stroud is branded an unpopular coward but that doesn't stop him from doing what he has to do; no matter what people think of his actions, he does what he believes is right, and that takes a tough man.

As is pointed out in the movie, it takes more nerve to go against the grain than to stay with the herd. This movie demonstrates that doing what looks wrong to others takes more guts than doing what others do, and it takes a tough man to do it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fiction that works
dunsuls-129 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
OK,movie executives brainstorming,what if 1 guy left the Alamo??Everyone thinks he's a coward,but he lost a lottery with fellows from the same area and had to leave to warn THEIR families of renegades in their area. Now that seems how the idea came about to make this movie ??? But dang if-in it just done works !!!!!!! I love the cast,all great from that era,headed by Glenn Ford,as the"coward"and Julie Adams as the woman who believes him.I'm sure there was a very subtle political message hidden because at the time this 1953 movie was made,the cold war was at its hight and "commies"were everywhere and courage,well,that came in short supply.What better way to dramatize that then going back to something as religious non debatable patriotic as the Alamo and yet have someone, such a coward for leaving that temple,actually be bearing news about renegades truth??? Er,or just the movie exec brainstorming,ether way its a thrilling ride with old west values and fine right vs wrong character portrayals we don't see enough of in today"gray"hero's.Well worth the view.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed