The War Lover (1962) Poster

(1962)

User Reviews

Review this title
39 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
More Gripping as a Human Drama than as a War Story
JamesHitchcock19 September 2006
Unlike a number of those who have reviewed this film, I have never read John Hersey's novel. (Indeed, I only knew Hersey as the author of "Hiroshima" and did not realise that he was also a novelist). I caught it by chance because it was on television when I took a day off work last week, and decided to watch because it was a Steve McQueen film I had not seen before or even heard of. (McQueen is one of my favourite actors).

The use of black-and-white film in the cinema survived for rather longer in Britain than it did in America, largely because colour television did not arrive in Britain until the end of the sixties, several years after it came to America. I have heard it suggested that "The War Lover" was made in black-and-white to allow the filmmakers to insert actual newsreel footage rather than recreating aerial dogfights as was done in a number of later films. The use of monochrome, however, is also a clue to the filmmakers' intentions. Even in Britain it would have been unusual for an action-adventure film to be made in black-and-white in the early sixties, and "The War Lover", although it is set against the background of the World War Two Allied bombing campaign against Germany, is not really an action picture along the lines of, say, "The Guns of Navarone" or "Where Eagles Dare". The aerial combat scenes, even if they are genuine, are less thrilling than those in later films such as "The Battle of Britain" or "Memphis Belle", or even an earlier one such as "The Dambusters". "The War Lover" is really a character study, a human drama of the sort for which the British cinema was still routinely using black-and-white at this period.

Although the film was made in Britain by a British director, it is about the US Army Air Force rather than the RAF and the two leading roles are played by American actors. McQueen plays bomber pilot Captain Buzz Rickson, the "War Lover" of the title. Rickson is a brilliant pilot but is regarded with suspicion by his superiors because of his arrogant, insubordinate attitude. On one raid against the German submarine base at Kiel he blatantly disregards orders to abandon the mission because of bad weather, leads the aircraft under his command through a gap in the clouds, and succeeds in hitting the target. The men under his command, especially his co-pilot Lieutenant Ed Bolland, have mixed feelings about him.

Bolland, played by Robert Wagner, is the other main character in the drama. Unlike Rickson, he is the conformist, by-the-book, type of officer. He has an idealistic belief in the rightness of the Allied cause, which means that he hates war but loves what he is fighting for. He suspects, however, that Rickson is indifferent to the cause he is fighting for but comes dangerously close to loving war for its own sake. Nevertheless, he chooses to carry on flying with Rickson, whose flying skills he admires, even giving up the chance of promotion when he is offered command of his own plane. (To complicate matters still further, both men are in love with the same girl, Daphne). The difference between the two men's characters is best summed up by the exchange between them when Rickson accuses Bolland of being afraid to die. Bolland admits that he is, but counters that Rickson is afraid to live.

What gives this film its force is not so much the changing fortunes of war but rather the changing dynamics of the triangular relationship between Rickson, Bolland and Daphne. Daphne is played by the lovely Shirley Anne Field, who was one of the rising stars of the British cinema in the late fifties and early sixties but seemed to fade away later. Perhaps this was because the British cinema itself seemed to be fading away in the seventies, and because she never really adapted to Hollywood. Incidentally, her cut-glass accent, which one reviewer took exception to, would have been historically correct for an upper-class young woman in the forties. (I was also interested to see a young Michael Crawford as an American flyer). McQueen is particularly good as Rickson, one of his few unsympathetic roles but also one of his best. (In later films McQueen generally managed to keep the audience's sympathy, even when his character was on the wrong side of the law, as in "The Thomas Crown Affair"). McQueen receives good support from Wagner and Field, and while "The War Lover" may not be a particularly gripping war adventure (except perhaps for its tragic climax), it is certainly gripping when seen as a human drama. 7/10
22 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Portrait of a screwball...
planktonrules5 September 2016
Steve McQueen plays a really screwed up bomber pilot, Buzz. Unlike most of these guys, Buzz LIKES that there's a war and finds the whole thing exciting and even fun! This doesn't bother his men during much of the film...he's very, very good at what he does and seems to lead a charmed existence. However, as the film progresses, it becomes obvious to several of the men that he really is a sociopath....a loner who likes to destroy things and has contempt for women. Nothing seems to get to him at all...until his last mission.

In contrast, there's his co-pilot, Bo (Robert Wagner). As the film progresses, the two have a falling out and in many ways, they are different. However, he's no angel either when it comes to women. Handsome and likable, like Buzz, he's a bit of a user. But he does not love war and can't wait to go home.

This film did a great job of fooling the viewer. According to IMDb, there were only three B-17s used in the film...and they made it seem like a lot more. Additionally, MOST of the aerial sequences are pretty good and the stock footage they used was better than normal in most cases (though the stuff later in the film wasn't nearly as good). There were only two serious problems I noticed (and I am a stickler for these details) were scenes where a plane exploded, as they were obviously just cheap models and could have been done better. There also was a BRIEF clip of a supposedly German fighter plane attacking at 94 minutes into the film...and it's actually an American P-38.

In many ways, the film is an interesting portrait of the folks who flew the missions. I am pretty sure a reasonable number must have been like Bo and Buzz...and such attitudes must have proved helpful in war...and certainly NOT during peace time! Not a great film like "12 O'Clock High" (probably the best film about WWII bombers) but very good nevertheless.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good character study, weak movie.
eaglejet9820 May 2002
Although this is one of my McQueen favorites, the movie itself is flawed.

The film does not stand on its own merit. Rather it assumes the viewer has read the original novel, by John Hersey, upon which it was based. Since many of the important aspects of the book are assumed, the film contains gaps and jerks in its sequencing and total focus.

However, if you like period pieces, the uniforms and flight gear are terrific. And except for one really bad special effects sequence (anyone who saw this movie knows I'm talking about the burning parachute which looks like what it is- a burning handkerchief) the aerial sequences, both war footage and interior close up action shots, are detailed and believable.

McQueen clearly captures the character of Buzz Rickson ( Buzz Marrow in the book), an A#1, narcissistic SOB. A great line is: "I risk the crew's life every time I take them off the ground, don't I...sir?" The pause between "don't I" and "sir" tells the whole story. This guy deftly walks the line between being totally professional and totally insubordinate.

All in all, a great flick.
23 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An excellent novel that translated into a so-so motion picture.
H.J.29 July 1999
War is a wrenching experience. Whether experienced in far off foreign lands on the battlefield or at home in the living room gathered around the radio to hear the latest news, those who experience it are often moved to put their physical and emotional experiences down on paper. Later, others are moved to attempt to turn those writings into motion pictures. The process just doesn't always work perfectly. More often than not the emotions that can be expressed beautifully in words by an excellent writer like John Hersey just cannot be caught on screen.

It is really hard to define exactly what kept "The War Lover" from becoming a first rate film. The production effort was definitely first rate, and the casting was excellent. The framework of this move is all there. It is well filmed, well acted, well directed and well produced. Even the use of the black and white format works. It not only allowed the use of actual combat air footage, but also provided a gritty quality that fits the material nicely. The adaptation of the dialog is good. It may just be that the emotions which Mr. Hersey put into his novel just can't be translated onto the screen, no matter who tries to do it.

I like this movie despite its shortcomings. I occasionally watch it when a nostalgia for the "bad old, good old days" of WW II gets hold of me, usually on a dreary winter evening when it gets dark around 4:30 in the afternoon, and I enjoy it. Watch this one for the realism of its depiction of the air war over Europe from 1942 to 1945.
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Living on the edge
bkoganbing23 September 2013
In the great Oscar winning best picture Patton, Karl Malden as Omar Bradley explains the difference between himself and George C. Scott. Malden is a professional soldier trained to do a job, whereas Scott just lives for the action because he loves it. That's what Steve McQueen is as a hotshot bomber pilot who has a crew of Karl Maldens who just want to do a job and get home alive.

Oddly enough a year after The War Lover came out Steve McQueen would play another hotshot pilot in The Great Escape. A pilot who's been grounded and temporarily enjoying enemy hospitality. I wonder how the two McQueens from The War Lover and The Great Escape might have viewed each other.

McQueen's co-pilot Robert Wagner dislikes McQueen's living on the edge style though he knows this guy has the skill to back up his brag and has done so. But things could be going further south in their relationship as McQueen makes a play for proper British woman Shirley Anne Field whom Wagner likes as well.

It's an interesting role that McQueen has and he pulls it off. He's not a nice person, but you can't help rooting for him. Especially in that last close run thing he attempts at the close of the film.

The War Lover is a good war picture and will satisfy the fans of Steve McQueen who are still legion in this world.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
War Lover back story
elijahbailey15 March 2005
Aviation author Martin Caiden (his books were the basis for the film "Marooned" and the t.v show "The Six Million Dollar Man") published a book entitled "Everything But The Flak" that detailed the efforts to revive three Navy PB-1 Flying Forts and the ensuing flight adventure of moving them across the Atlantic to England for the making of "The War Lover" which is a "must read" for those interested in the making of this film. He accompanied the flight crews and although his larger-than-life account of their hijinks (rumbling with Soviets in the airport in Greenland, being locked up by Interpol in Portugal on suspicion of smuggling illicit warplanes - after all these three B-17s had active gun turrets) must be taken with a grain of salt, the guy sure could spin a great yarn! The book is probably WAY out of print but is well worth seeking out as it gives some idea of the difficulty of reactivating three WW II bombers years before the warbird revival got underway. Unfortunately, due to import/export duties in England in the early 1960s, Columbia Pictures scrapped two of the three Fortresses after filming was completed and only one has survived, used for promotion of the film before being passed onto other hands.

The movie itself has lots of B-17 action of the planes taxiing around the airfield prior to mission take-off that is frequently edited out for television broadcast to save time for commercials or to fit into a specific airtime envelope. If it airs uncut, notice the patchy paint on the Fortress noses as three airframes portray a much larger squadron, with nose art changed several times.

Mark Sublette, Falls Church, Virginia
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Mixed Bag but Good Overall
wmarkley24 January 2007
"The War Lover" isn't the greatest movie ever made, but it has some very good elements. The scenes of airmen inside B-17 bombers are excellent, with very good views of flight uniforms, equipment, flying instruments and the cramped conditions. The fearful aspects of aerial combat are also shown quite effectively. Some of the sound effects are muffled, but the general experience of flying on bombing missions over enemy territory is well portrayed.

Steve McQueen gives an excellent performance. While his character "Buzz" Rickson is often arrogant and amoral, McQueen is mesmerizing. He also nicely shows how Rickson has moments of compassion towards others. Its good to see a character like Rickson depicted in a way that's not completely black-and-white. Robert Wagner does a very good job as McQueen's co-pilot, a man with more decency and quiet character than Rickson, but who is also flawed like all of us. Unfortunately, while Shirley Anne Field is beautiful and shows some charm, she does a poor job of acting.

"The War Lover" is especially good at showing the toll of war, and how men of various characters and backgrounds are thrown together in the military. And it is very frank about the sexual promiscuity that is often a part of war. While the movie effectively shows these things, it does so in ways that are not as explicit as many movies of today might do.

The editing of "The War Lover" is quite poor at times, with a choppy quality, and minor characters sometimes pop up here and there in a confusing way. Overall, though, the film is very worthwhile for viewers who are interested in character studies and war movies.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Flying On For Dear Death.
rmax30482310 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
There are fine black-and-white scenes of B-17s flying through flak, taking off and landing, belly landing, buzzing the field, and generally roaring around. Not that many films pay attention to the racket and vibrations of a mass of metal being hurled through the air, but "The War Lover" does. Some of it is model work. Much of the footage isn't.

It's England in mid war, and the Flying Fortresses are being sent on dangerous missions. "Dangerous" in the most literal sense. Crews have an alarming tendency not to return to their bases.

Steve McQueen is a captain in the USAF and the pilot of one of these big babies, and Robert Wagner is his copilot. McQueen just loves it. He's the hottest pilot in the squadron and his men feel completely safe with him. He takes a lot of chances but his airplane always returns in immaculate condition.

The problem with McQueen is that he boasts about it so much. He oozes self confidence. To him, war isn't just war. It's a chance to kill people. He seems to get OFF when his bombs explode on the target. He has nothing else going for him.

The romantic business concerning a rivalry between the sensible Wagner and the relentless McQueen over a wraith-like Sally Anne Field is sandwiched between the two combat scenes. In war movies like this, most of the love stories are commonly fatuous, put there perhaps to stretch out the running time, give the audience a rest from its arousal jag, and introduce a bit of sex to keep them interested. When the romances are done well, they can add depth to the characters. This one succeeds. Field embraces Wagner and is openly receptive to him. Not that Wagner is especially tuned to her desires. She wants to marry him and build a home, while he just wants to enjoy the excess of his phenylethylamines. She finds McQueen attractive too, "in a dangerous sort of way" and dresses him down when his advances become too forceful. It takes the wind out of McQueen's sails and he loses his confidence in himself and his life.

John Hersey's novel wasn't as good as this movie, I don't think. The movie's explosive climax has a half-crazy McQueen flying his airplane straight into one of the White Cliffs of Dover. It's an extremely tense scene, with the roar of the airplane, the wind sweeping through the riddled fuselage, and the cliffs growing larger and larger. It's unnerving. I've been through a similar experience with a dead airplane just off Montauk Point, Long Island, only I went into the water, as McQueen does in the novel. His airplane sinks and he goes down with it, holding on to a propeller shaft "for dear death", as Hersey puts it.

Sally Anne Field is compellingly beautiful in an odd way. Her eyebrows seem to have been destined for someone else's face. She can't act. Wagner, my co-star in the superb -- what was it, again? -- "The Wrath of Angels?", "Windmills of the Gods"? Something like that. Anyway, Wagner can act, as least in the manner that Hollywood demands. McQueen has only two expressions here -- a smirk and none at all. It took him a few years to develop his chops. In 1968, he was unimpeachable in "Bullett." It's worth watching. Hersey's discourse on the way war turns people into beasts.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
McQueen Is Top-Notch in this Minor but Memorable World War II Combat Yarn
zardoz-1327 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Steve McQueen gives an outstanding performance as U.S. Army Air Force Captain 'Buzz' Rickson in "Reach for Glory" director Philip Leacock's World War II gripping aerial epic "The War Lover," one of those rare movies where McQueen qualifies as more of a villain than a hero. Robert Wagner co-stars as his straight-laced co-pilot and beautiful Shirley Ann Field with her sultry voice provides the love interest in this black & white film based on author John Hersey's 1959 Pulitzer Prize winning novel. "Casablanca" scenarist Howard Koch penned the screenplay. Leacock and Koch have created an Allied World War II movie where the conflict is confined within the ranks of the 8th Air Force. Furthermore, aside from some stunning aerial footage of an actual Luftwaffe Messerschmitt Bf 109G armed with 20 mm cannons blazing away at the B-17s, filmmakers never present the Nazi side of the war. In other words, we neither see the Germans nor the swastika.

This snappy Columbia Pictures release was lensed on location in England at RAF Bovingdon in Hertfordshire, RAF Manston in Kent, around Cambridgeshire, and at Shepperton Studios in Surrey. Aside from Henry King's "Twelve O'Clock High" (1949) and Boris Sagal's "The 1000 Plane Raid" (1969), "The War Lover" is one of the very few World War II movies about the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress in combat over Europe. Former R.A.F. pilot Captain John Crewdson and his company Film Aviation Services flew three vintage B-17s in "The War Lover." Clearly, it was testament to both Leacock and Crewdson that these three bomber look like an entire squadron. In fact, the belly landing was taken from "Twelve O'Clock High."

Captain 'Buzz' Rickson (Steve McQueen of "The Magnificent Seven is an arrogant pilot who enjoys flying bombers and dropping bombs on the enemy. He lives to fly and flies to fight. In the opening scene, Rickson is flying to blow up some German submarine pens when the squadron commander reports that the cloud cover is so thick that they cannot attack their target. He gives the squadron orders to turn around, drop their bomb load in the sea and return home. 'Buzz' refuses to obey orders. Instead, Rickson and his squadron continue to the target and Rickson orders his pilot to descend through the clouds to about 85-hundred feet and drop their bombs. Although the submarine pens are destroyed, Buzz loses one Flying Fortress on the return journey and gets chewed out by his commandeering officer. Actually, this first scene is reminiscent of director Raoul Walsh's wartime aerial film "Desperate Journey," where Errol Flynn's impetuous bomber pilot descends below the clouds to clobber a target but in the process gets shot down.

Later, on another mission, Rickson gets upset because instead of dropping bombs on the Jerrys, he has to drop propaganda leaflets. He shows his rage when he returns to base by flying low over the base. Indeed, he lives up to his nickname 'Buzz' because he buzzes the base. Buzz is such a tremendous pilot that his commanding officer lets him get away with it. Lieutenant Boland (Robert Wagner of "Prince Valiant") refuses to part company with Buzz when his superiors offer him an aircraft of his own. According to Boland, Buzz is one of the best pilots and flying their ship 'The Body' more by instinct than my instruments. Although Buzz is a hotshot in the air, he isn't popular on the ground and he comes to resent Boland's ability to land girls, particularly British beauty Daphne Caldwell. Daphne and Boland hit it off right away and become lovers much to Buzz's chagrin.

"The War Lover" reaches its climax when Buzz has to fly deep into the heart of Germany on a special bombing raid. Back in the base briefing room, a soldier discovers a rabbit's foot. We are led to believe that the rabbit's foot belonged to Buzz, but the connection is never concretely established. Before this top-secret, hush-hush raid, Buzz gets to intrude on Daphne after Boland has left his sweetheart. Leacock and Koch never show us watch happens as Buzz enters Daphne's house at her request. Indeed, he slaps her around, but he doesn't take advantage of him. Later, once they are aloft, Buzz confides in Boland that Daphne broke him. After they reach the target and blow it to hell and gone, our heroes turn back for home. A crew person informs Buzz that a bomb has been caught up in the bomb bay and was never dropped. Messerschmitt fighters attack Buzz's plane on the return trip, and he loses not only his ball turret gunner, Sergeant Junior (Michael Crawford of "The Knack . . . And How To Get It"), but three of his four propellers.

Buzz orders his surviving crew members to bail out and pushes Boland out. Afterward, he climbs back into the cockpit and struggles to bring the ailing airship back to base. Instead, he smashed the bomber into the White Cliffs of Dover. Boland and Daphne are seen walking away at Cambridge.

"The War Lover" is one of those odd World War II movies where the Allies are not depicted in a wholesome light. Buzz is insubordinate and selfish. He thinks of nobody but himself and he lives up to his villainy when he invades Daphne's house and roughs her up. Later, when Buzz wants to save the B-17 instead of bail out, Boland tells him t hat he is a coward because he is afraid to kill. Generally, if you analyze the career of Steve McQueen, he played characters for the most part who were whitewashed. Buzz Rickson, however, is an exception to the rule. Buzz embodies both heroism and villainy. "The War Lover" isn't a great W.W. II movie, but McQueen's sterling performance, the vintage B-17s, and the fact that only a handful of such Allied aerial films have been made about the European Theater of war makes it an exemplary combat picture.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good film - though a tad clichéd
info-591820 November 2006
Nice action piece, with some nice period detail of what it was probably like being a US bomber pilot in the US in the war. While not the movie mainly focuses on the the relationship between the three main characters, it also focuses on Buzz's character, a vaguely psychotic bomber pilot.

Motivations and the lives on the bomber crew are shown, I quite liked the setting and the portrayal of these guys. The relationship between Buss, Boland and Daphne is a tad clichéd...and really seems to be one of those war movies that are spoiled because it was felt there was a need to fit a romance into it.

Lots of great footage of bombers, including some amazing footage of a bomber landing on its belly with no undercarriage, and some low level stunt stuff that has to be played with a good sound system. However some of the effects are a tad dodgy, and all the Luftwaffe fighter footage is obvious grainy stock footage..shame that they went to the trouble to use real US bombers, but couldn't get hold of a few Messercshmidts!
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Little-known Steve McQueen movie
Leofwine_draca11 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
THE WAR LOVER is a UK-USA WW2 movie about a squad of bomber pilots operating from Cambridgeshire in the UK and carrying out daring raids on mainland Europe. It's a rather slight picture, shot in black and white for reasons unknown (although I suspect that they're budgetary in nature) and of note for featuring Steve McQueen in the leading role.

McQueen dominates the scenery with his portrayal of a brash and cocky pilot with something of a death wish, repeatedly putting his crew into danger for the sake of glory. The rest of the film is a mish-mash of romantic interludes, rivalry and friendship, and some brief bombing raids that are handled reasonably well. Supporting cast members include Shirley Anne Field and Michael Crawford, long before he was famous. War film fans will enjoy this, but the familiarity of the set-up works against it.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent movie for McQueen and B-17 buffs
RoundTripTicket27 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Steve McQueen's performance as a psychopath was chilling and very convincing.

The movie had 3 Air Force advisers who'd served on B-17s in combat and the movie staff listened to them. The result is a refreshingly accurate depiction of missions and the details of the procedures and what it was like. (My father was one of those advisers.) The director was initially told the "buzz job" in the movie could not be safely done, and so planned to do it with models. But my father convinced them that it could be done safely. A course was laid out, cleared of any wires or other obstacles, and the B-17 made repeated passes over it, each time a bit lower, with crew on the ground constantly advising them of their exact height. The result is a spectacular sequence unlike any other I've seen in aviation movies - a B-17 "cutting the grass" with its props and gear up. No CGI, no models, no trick photography, it's the real thing. The Air Force was unhappy the stunt was done, until after the movie was released and a lot of people said the buzz job was the highlight of the film.

The cockpit shots were done using a cockpit section of a real B-17, it was not a set. Atypically, the shots of the crew were done with oxygen masks on in their desire for accuracy. Normally, the masks are left off so the audience can see their faces.

The crews are woken up in the barracks with "grab your socks." This was a cleaned up version of the actual lingo, which was "drop your c**ks and grab your socks." The Air Force consultants provided a lot of the lingo used, and also helped the pilots with things like how to hold the control column and what the chatter was like. The mission maps in the preflight briefing were accurately depicted.

The film was done on an actual WW2 B-17 base near London.

In the movie, a live bomb was hung up in the bomb bay. During the war, there was a hatchet provided to make it possible to chop away any such problems.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Scenes from a small,sad episode in the Grand Scheme.
ianlouisiana11 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Arguably "The War Lover",along with Len Deighton's "Bomber" is a top contender for the best novel written about the air war against Germany. I understand Mr Deighton has insisted on full control over any adaptation of his masterpiece - a proviso that has so far kept it out of the hands of the studios .Even a casual view of the movie version of "The War Lover" would seem to vindicate his position from a writer's point of view. Arthur Hornblow has made a good film about the USAAF's bombing campaign in Europe in much the same way as John Huston made a good film about catching whales out of "Moby Dick". The perennial problem of translating a work from one medium to another remains unresolved,quite possibly unresolvable unless a director resorts to a scene-for-scene adaptation.An ideal solution perhaps to salve the delicate ego of a novelist,but not to retain the attention of a moviegoer. Mr Hornblow settled for a no nonsense approach this story about a menage a trois in wartime England.Miss Shirley Anne Field is the object of affection for both Mr Bob Wagner and Mr Steve McQueen. Mr Wagner is the nice sensitive guy,Mr McQueen is the arrogant womaniser.As they both fly the same B17 this tends to put a strain on their relationship.Miss Field rather niftily steals the film from under the noses of her illustrious co - stars.The daughter of legendary British Music Hall comic Sid Field,she had beauty,brains and talent in abundance.The Film Industry's failure to make the most of this fine actress's abilities is scandalous. Mr Wagner does well as her original lover,introspective,with a quiet strength of character.Mr McQueen cleverly combines cockiness and vulnerability as the eponymous "War Lover",a character who - in the novel - lacked empathy to the extent of being almost sociopathic. But the iconic Big - Assed - Bird is the real star of the movie. Bloodied,battered but unbowed,the Flying Fortress brought back its crews time and again from the hostile skies over Europe,often with incapacitated pilots at the controls,almost as if it was willing itself to bring back safely its cargo of brave young men whose collective will and courage helped destroy Nazism. In the Grand Scheme of things,men like Buzz and Bo ,their personal affairs and their fate was of little consequence,but from time to time it is appropriate to remind ourselves that the Grand Scheme is made up of a lot of Little Schemes that involve individual human beings and their individual lives.That is what "The War Lover" does - and it does it rather well.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
War Lovers and a Girl
EdgarST6 August 2017
When the old-fashioned melodrama «The War Lover» premiered in 1962 it did not impress anyone. The protagonist Buzz Rickson (a convincing unpleasant performance by Steve McQueen), a psychopathic American pilot, haughty and pedantic, hardly aroused sympathy among mass audiences, other than military and civilian population who might have shared with him his obsession with war, macho supremacy or boastful bragging. This aspect of Rickson only finds objection and disgust in Daphne Caldwell (Shirley Anne Field), a pacifist British girl who defends opposite values , which she expresses in her dialogues with Ed Bolland (Robert Wagner), Rickson's co-pilot. The script unfortunately reduces Daphne to a "war girl" that falls in love with Bolland, who just wants to have a good time, unlike Rickson, who is obsessed with her, but keeps a distance. I am amazed when I see these war films that exalt death, without taking a moment to think that, almost as a rule, every war usually responds to economic interests, concealed by political motives. I feel they are almost horror movies, preparing us for the death of the characters in a sinister conflagration. Similarly, they bother me even more when I know that they are propaganda vehicles that sell the image of an army - in this case, foreign and distant from the events that motivate the war - and overlooks the real drama of local human beings who have to endure so much tragedy. Richard Addinsell provides such a pompous score to «The War Lover» that it makes you think you are watching a major historical event. But no. It is a romantic-war melodrama, with a mad soldier leading the events and making propaganda for his army, in those days when that institution was intervening in the genocidal war of Vietnam and when England was producing the progressive "free cinema", to which this film is completely alien. Avoid.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Character Study of Arrogance and Conceit
trpdean29 November 2001
I haven't read the John Hersey novel others praise. (I've always liked Hersey's reporting and writing - just missed this one). So I can judge only the movie.

Steve McQueen gives a truly wonderful performance as the sort of guy you want to punch - arrogant, self-absorbed, cruel, conceited. (Of course in life, we read the same of him!). Robert Wagner also gives a wonderful performance - how not to appear a loser when the cruel arrogant one always wins. Shirley Anne Field is absolutely lovely in a very upper class/dreamgirl sort of way.

The movie is quite romantic - you really believe in Wagner-Field as a couple. There is warmth and lust and trust and realism between the two. The movie gives the flavor of love in wartime almost as well as Yanks.

I quite liked the movie- but it seems too short - let us have more of these characters' interactions. They ARE interesting characters at an interesting and dangerous time. I suppose if they'd have taken more from Hersey's novel, it would have felt a more substantial meal.
25 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Top Bomber
st-shot6 June 2017
Once they arm his B-17 "The Body" with bombs they become Buzz Rickson's (Steve McQueen) and he will allow no abuse to come to them until he reaches target even if it involves disobeying orders. Rickson is a war lover, emotionally dead on the ground, unless competing for his co-pilot's (Robert Wagner) girlfriend, but it is in the air over enemy targets is where he finds his real ecstasy. Arrogant, fearless, cynical, courageous, his crew knows he's short a full deck but it is the fearlessness that they bank on to get them back home.

As in any film it appears (12 OClock High, Catch 22) the B-17 is the star, making its way through the flak in imposing formation, the crew in the chaotic interior trying to jell as they fight off German Messerschmitts. Using actual footage War Lover in the air is an intense watch especially with Rickson at the controls. On the ground things tend to get dull with Wagner and a dull Sally Ann Field playing out a mawkish romance to perhaps distract from the well cast McQueen's psycho hero. But it is McQueen's Rickson and his battered B-17 that give The War Lover the thrust that it has.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Perhaps a bombing mission during a war isn't the greatest place for self-discovery.
mark.waltz2 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The performances of Robert Wagner and Steve McQueen aide in making this World War II psychological drama something a bit different than any other war movie that had come before. They are both excellent pilots, but when McQueen gets into the air, the desire to be a crackpot daredevil takes over him, not only risking the lives of all the men aboard or in plains nearby, but the mission as well. He has a reputation for being an excellent pilot, but psychologically, he's already damaged both in his private life and as an Airman. He's also very jealous of the love that McQueen finds with a beautiful British girl, Shirley Ann Field, making nasty cracks every chance he gets and stepping in to get his own piece of the pie when Wagner and Field call it quits.

The romantic aspect of the film does not at all get in the way of the film's main story, and in fact, it adds to it because they are both tied in with each other. Wagner and McQueen start off as very good friends, but there's a narcissism to McQueen's character that guides him in everything that he does, and while he could definitely be unlikable, there is a charm to him that prevents that. The air sequences are very good, and it seems very realistic as far as the war story line goes. But this appears to be long before they gave people in such positions psychological tests of detailed nature to see how leading pilots in missions like this are affected by things going on in their lives as well as how their personality plays in on their part on a mission. Certainly, McQueen makes enemies among his own allies, but through his performance, the viewer discovers that his biggest enemy is himself and not the other aiirmen or the enemy he supposed to be out to destroy. An above-average post-war movie that will keep the audience thinking long afterwards about its themes.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bad Boy Buzz
richardchatten10 May 2020
A valuable record of rising star Steve McQueen in his youthful prime surrounded by a solid production and under the sensitive stewardship of recently returned British director Philip Leacock.

Unnervingly well-cast as an "insubordinate and irresponsible" and utterly self-centred American pilot stationed in Britain; McQueen draws upon the same seemingly limitless reserves of glamour and self-confidence that in reality got him to the top only to then stall.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting
grantss25 February 2018
Interesting war movie, based around a B-17 pilot (Steve McQueen) and co-pilot (Robert Wagner) and their bombing missions over Germany in WW2. Reasonably predictable, but the action sequences are great, utilising WW2 footage plus footage filmed especially for the movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
McQueen is excellent in this entertaining movie.
kfo949411 August 2018
For whatever reason, this film had slipped pass me and I was viewing this movie for the first time. And I have to say that I was very entertained by most of the scenes, especially the ones involving Steve McQueen and his not-so-normal view about war. It was a pleasant surprised as I got caught up in the story and followed the players right to the end of the film. In fact, the relationships with the flying crew were so well done, that I was somewhat disappointed when they threw in a female love interest taking the story into an even more irrational mind-set of our main player, Buzz Rickson.

A written summary of this movie will not do the film justice. A person really has to view the production in order to see the development of characters and the quirky plot that is laid out with its slight references to the line between sane and insanity. Steve McQueen gives an excellent performance as the viewer is caught up in the action of the B-17 crew leader that has a fondness for this horrible situation called war. One cannot wait until the next air- raid to see how character is going to react to the crisis and also to each other.

At times, the movie did get a bit slow but overall an entertaining watch. A movie that most people will not be disappoint in viewing.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Did not this movie morph into Memphis Belle 1990 ?
coryrex-647843 May 2022
Fairly entertaining and gripping movie about those lives in that era. In the history of movies about war or the west, drama and relationships are often included. I prefer that action be the focus. If you like the relationship drama, they're plenty here. Certainly 1990's Memphis Belle came from this movie; too many coincidences between the two stories.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This tale of air-borne bombers never takes off.
MOscarbradley16 April 2014
Philip Leacock's "The War Lover" puts as much emphasis on the 'lover' as it does on the 'war'. Robert Wagner and Steve McQueen are American bombers stationed in England during World War Two. Wagner falls for local girl Shirley Anne Field while McQueen is more in love with killing. This was an early lead performance from McQueen and he certainly displays charisma. Wagner, on the other hand, is his usual eager-to-please self and, although he's the good guy, comes across as a bit too serious and far too smug. Again Shirley Anne Field is wasted in a bland, under-written role while the film's main strength lies in Bob Huke's first-rate black and white photography. Look out for a young Michael Crawford in a small part.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"When you've built a bomb big enough to kill Rickson, come back and blow up the world"
thinker169124 November 2008
World War II has always been a treasure trove of some of the finest moments of heroism known to Hollywood. For this offering, tinsel town selected a novel by John Hersey and made a movie called, "The War Lover." The late Steve McQueen, was very proud of his role as Capt. Rickson, during the filming. Added to that was the cast and crew from his co-star Robert Wagner as Lt. Ed Bolland, to the supporting actors, Gary Cockrell as Lt. Marty Lynch, Michael Crawford as Sgt. Junior Sailen and multi-talented Robert Easton as Sgt. Handown enhance this fine war time saga. The well written story about the war, it's effects on the characters and their ability to cope with it is what makes this movie a classic. Occasionally some pearls of wisdom are uttered which makes one think, such as the phase spoken by the Flight Surgeon Randall (Bernard Braden) who said, "I consider war to be a complete cession of rational thought." That is true, not to mention memorable. Like the tale itself which zeros in on the men, their loves and their own mortality. All in all, a worthy Classic from the Greatest generation. ****
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
pretty bad
KyleFurr21 September 2005
This is easily one of Steve McQueen's worst pictures and it's a pretty lousy World War II picture. McQueen almost turned down The Great Ecape because of this and his picture picture Hell Is For Heroes were both World War II films and both flops. Hell Is For Heroes was a much better film directed by Don Siegel and McQueen's character are basically the same in those two. It's easy to see why this film did so bad and but not so with Hell Is For Heroes. There isn't much plot here except that McQueen is a rebel and always has to disobey orders and Robert Wagner plays his co-pilot and friend who wants to play by the rules. There is a girl played by Shirley Anne Field who Wagner likes but it's a pretty bad movie and you shouldn't watch it.
0 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Oh. My. God.
Aneonscorn29 November 2007
It is difficult to express just how terrible this movie is. I have seen plenty of older movies and I understand film conventions pretty well. Acting and directing styles, writing, cinematography - these have all changed over the years, and one should not expect a movie from 1962 to play just like a movie from 2007. That said, the writing was goofy, the cuts frequent and disorienting. The acting was silly, the realism (aside from the fact that flying B-17s and stock WWII footage are used) just wasn't there. I have seen WWII movies, I have read books, I know plenty about the ins and outs of a B-17 mission. If you want to see something decent, watch "12 O'clock High" which, though made more than a decade before "The War Lover" is superior in most every respect.

I just took the 20 minute tour of the DVD. I was excited to watch this movie, having just finished Hersey's novel (which was well-researched, well-written, and gritty). My excitement has turned to pure scorn. Maybe today a decent adaptation could be made (it would have to be PG-13 at the least for gore and sexual content), but this movie just doesn't cut it. Doesn't even come close. My guess is that the only reason it's on DVD is because it has McQueen (who, yes, is perfectly cast for the character).

I have a liberal approach to movies...I embrace all kinds with good will. There are some pretty bad movies that I simply adore. I'm not much of a film snob. But seriously, don't waste your time on "The War Lover."
0 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed