Double Negative (1980) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Major Disappointment
cfc_can28 November 2000
With a cast like this, I expected great things but Double Negative is a disappointment at best and a lousy thriller at worst. The film simply does not make sense even after seeing it twice. It's about a writer (Michael Sarrazin) trying to figure out the facts behind the death of his wife. Susan Clark plays his lover and Anthiony Perkins plays a mysterious man who connects the two of them. Actually, Perkins is probably the most interesting part of the film, which is not a difficult task. Some SCTV faces pop up for about a split second and the finale fails to clear up several questions. Double Negative has some great shots of Toronto in winter.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Could have been a TV movie.
gridoon16 January 2004
Michael Sarrazin is the journalist who can't remember anything about the night he found his wife raped and murdered on their bed; Susan Clark is his devoted girlfriend, who tries to help him piece the events together. Sounds good, but actually it's a muddled, visually unattractive thriller, with a predictable resolution. Anthony Perkins is fairly amusing as a kinky blackmailer. (*1/2)
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Negative is right.
mark.waltz1 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A truly boring thriller about a man with a wife and girlfriend who finds out that the wife is dead. Murdered. He has no memory of where he's been. Michael Sarrazin is a handsome actor but he seems bored by the part. Susan Clark is the girlfriend, in a hairstyle similar to Glenn Close's in "Fatal Attraction". Anthony Perkins, Howard Duff and some of the SCTV cast members costar, all dealing with a convoluted script that is curvier than a mountain road. This is the perfect solution for insomnia. Quite a disappointment for a thriller that is a few years ahead of its time. The execution of the plot is what destroys it as is the obvious belief that the writers were being intelligent.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Yawn...
sgt619-12 December 2002
This murder/mystery makes little sense. Its a pity that an actor of Perkin's caliber got stuck in roles like this. Note John Candy's short appearence early on. I say go see it, if you don't fall asleep before it ends, then at least you can say you saw it!
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Snoozy Canadian Thriller
Lebowskidoo23 June 2019
On paper it sounds great, with Anthony Perkins as a baddie involved in an unsolved murder, but drifts aimlessly most of the time.

Perkins is great though, easily the best thing about this movie. There are a few attempts to recreate Hitchcockian camera angles involving Perkins that I liked.

Apparently the SCTV studios doubled as the casting offices for this movie, the following all have tiny roles: John Candy, Eugene Levy, Catherine O'Hara, Dave Thomas and Joe Flaherty.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed