The House by the Cemetery (1981) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
212 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
One of the better 80s offerings from Italian splattermaster Lucio Fulci.
capkronos12 May 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Professor Norman Boyle (Paolo Malco) moves his wife Lucy (Catriona MacColl) and "cute" (a-hem!) little blonde son (Giovanni Frezza) from New York City to a cursed three-story Boston house by a cemetery. The digs come complete with creaky floorboards, crying/moaning spirits, loud bangs, a rabid devil bat, bleeding walls, a sexy/weird live-in babysitter (Ania Pieroni), the friendly ghost of a little girl and the murderous rotting, eyeless corpse of the house's former owner Dr. Freudstein (Giovanni De Nari); who hides out in the basement and emerges only to hack people up for their blood.

Extremely gory Euro-splatter overdone as only Fulci overdoes it: Why slit someone's throat once when you can do it three times? There's also an impalement (make that three impalements), several decapitations, a knife through the head, a ripped out throat, maggots and other gruesome FX stuff to keep it humming along nicely for spaghetti splatter fans, and it all ends with a Henry James quote! Just be prepared to put up with some choppy editing and bad dubbing. Especially grating is the dub on the little boy... yikes!
44 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
THE HOUSE BY THE CEMETERY is a creepy horror film plenty of brutal images and gory events
ma-cortes20 January 2010
A family formed by Norman Boyle (Paolo Malco), wife (Katriona MacColl, Fulci's ordinary) and son (Frezza) move an old mansion in New England outside Boston close a graveyard . Norman advised by professor Muller (secondary role by Lucio Fulci) has to investigate a scientific named Patterson who committed suicide by hanging and killed his lover. There they hire a mysterious babysitter (Anna Pieroni). Early rare deeds begin to happen to them, as they start hearing noises, rare characters and tragic murders. The picture terminates telling some lines by Henry James : ¨ No one will ever know whether children are monsters or monsters are children ¨.

Chilling Italian terror flick full of screams, chills, thrills and lots of blood and gore. Good make-up and special effects make-up by the maestro Gianetto De Rossi. Produced on a tight budget by Fabrizio De Angelis , Fulci's usual producer and occasionally director. Eerie musical score composed and conducted by Walter Rizzati. The motion picture is realized by one of the most controversial filmmakers of terror movies ,Lucio Fulci in his usual style with flaws and gaps but is professionally made because he is a skilled craftsman . Reviewers are divided over booth the morals and talents of Fulci (1927-1996) who sometimes directed under the alias ¨Louis Fuller¨. For some critics many of his movies are cruel and shockingly violent, yet their gory surface often conceals religious, social commentaries or intelligent issues. Whether he should be viewed as a cheap sensationalist or just a genius Fulci has a loyal fan base and undeniably has an important and unique influence on the terror genre , creating great works on a low budget such as proved in ¨The Beyond¨, ¨Manhattan baby¨, ¨Gates of Hell¨, ¨Island of the living dead¨, ¨New York ripper¨ , among them. This gore-feast that tried to disguised itself under many other titles will appeal to Lucio Fulci aficionados.
22 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Weakest of Lucio's gates of hell trilogy, but the ending is interesting
Aaron13759 May 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This film, along with City of the Living Dead and The Beyond, belongs to the gates of hell trilogy by Lucio Fulci. The films are not part of the same story, but rather share similar elements and all three star the great screamer, Catriona MacColl. This one to me is the weakest of the three films. I consider The Beyond to be the strongest as it looks the best and looks like it had a rather sizable budget compared to the other two. City of the Living Dead had some good story elements and was the easiest to understand (except that stupid ending), but it lags here and there. This one tries to be too clever trying to divert your attention here and there and trying to throw a swerve because at times it almost seems like the killer is nothing more than a simple slasher killer that may even have been among the characters you meet during the course of the film. Except the child Bob, who is so annoyingly voiced that he is the one character you want dead more than anyone else featured within. Of the three though, it has the most interesting ending. Sure it is not quite as clear as The Beyond's, let's face it, the two lead characters end up in hell. It also is not a failed ending like in City of the Living Dead where the kid was supposed to have been a zombie, but it never really looked like it. No, the ending in this one is strange, weird and open for interpretation.

The story has a family moving into a house in Boston so the father can take up some research which will net him more money or something and really seems strange that someone can make a bundle simply rummaging through a library. The house they choose to live in though has a dark secret. Of course, the father may have a dark secret too as he seems to have been in town before. That babysitter seems to harbor some dark secret of her own as well. Meanwhile, Bob, the couple's son is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but at least he knows coming to this house is a mistake, only because the strange girl who seems to live in a painting has warned him while seeing the head of a mannequin fall off and ooze blood! Then there is the bat attack that prompts the couple to want to leave, but the realty agent gets killed before she can meet them and they seem to forget they want to leave and then the father learns everything about the house by listening to a tape that doesn't really explain everything and by visiting a cemetery. Seriously, the man knows that there is a dead guy living in their basement who sustains himself using blood by a tape that has a man screaming crazily and a trip to a cemetery that really reveals nothing other than Dr. Freudstein is not there! Then in the end you see the horrific Dr. Freudstein who is a shock to see when I saw this in the theater, but doubtful anyone from today would get the same shock as they always feature him on the back of the DVD box.

The ending is by far the most interesting aspect of the film as Dr. Freudstein is revealed. He is quite a sight and when the father stabs him, maggots flow out of his body and that gave me nightmares as a child! He then kills the father as the father becomes incapable of taking a few more stabs at the good doctor and then the mother falters too. The boy is seemingly rescued by the strange girl who seems to be a Freudstein herself. The film does not really fit the theme of the gates of hell trilogy as there are no gates of hell opening. However, perhaps the gate to hell in this one is more subtle as Bob is pulled through a crack to seemingly be rescued and then is led off by none other than the creepy girl and her mother who is Dr. Freudstein's wife.

So, this one is okay at times, but it does get downright silly too. That bat attack got absurd, too many things suggesting this person or that person was harboring a secret that never got revealed and the downright awful dubbing of the child. However, Dr. Freudstein looks really good and the ending is interesting. Makes me wish he was in the film more as he looks better than any of the zombies or creatures in The Beyond or City of the Living Dead. It is almost a shame that they kept him under wraps until the very end, but it really is a shock when you do not know what is going on. It is such a pity, more people will not know the surprise of seeing a man who is a living corpse, always accompanied by the cries and laughter of children and filled with maggots! Terrifying and quite frankly, it gave me nightmares as a child! This film just needed more work during the rest of the film and a better voice for the child!
50 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fulci Hits Another Home Run
eibon0929 March 2001
Quella Villa Accanto al Cimitero/House by the Cemetery(1981) is the first straight forward film for Fulci since Zombie Flesh Eaters(1979). Gets away from the dreamish themematics of his previous two films. Begins with the idea that this could be the third film in the 7 Gates Trilogy. Although not as violent as Zombie Flesh Eaters, The Gates of Hell, or The Beyond, The film does contain some gory set pieces. A bloody haunted house tale that employs the techniques of Lucio Fulci very well. The story builds toward the pessemistic climax.

Quella Villa Accanto al Cimitero's major weakness is the poor dubbing of Bob & Mae. Because they are voiced over by adults, the performances of the two children come out weak. Walter Rizzati performs a main theme that sounds alot like the theme music of Don't Torture a Duckling. One of my favorite film scores from a Fulci picture. Tremendously influenced by the zombie classic, Let Sleeping Corpse Lie(1974). This is one of the few Fulci films from the early 80s that Fabio Frizzi did not work on.

The film crew seems at home since having done many films together. I was impressed by the film when I first saw it. House by the Cemetery is helped out by the presence of Catriona MacColl who gives it professional respectability. One thing that annoyed some people is the scene where the babysitter is cleaning up blood with Mrs. Boyle not reacting to this. This was not done purposely but resulted due to budget restraints and time limitations. The House by the Cemetery(1981) was filmed after the editing of The Beyond(1981).

Dr. Freudstein is another in a line of monsterous villains that follows Father Thomas and Schweik the painter. He is the only zombie in an otherwise non zombie pic. Even though he is not seen for most of the picture, his presence is still sinisterly felt. His name seems to be a mixture of Dr. Frankenstein and Dr. Freud. Dr. Freudstein in my opinion also seems to be inspired by the longevity seeking Dr. Charriere of HP Lovecraft/August Derleth's short story, THE SURVIVOR. Dr. Freudstein is menacing and repulsive.

The set designs are eye popping and fantastic. The interiors of the Freudstein house from the past are stunning. Another example of Fulci using great gothic designs for the film. Part of the film was done in Concord, MA. The antique look of the Freudstein house from the past is something out of a Mario Bava movie. The House by the Cemetery(1981) is made special by the sight of gothic architecture in the small New England town.

Revolves around the relationship between Bob Boyle and the ghost, Mae Freudstein. They can communicate from far away while understanding each other's thoughts. They are the opposite of Mr. and Mrs. Boyle who are limited in looking beyond what is there. Bob Boyle and Mae are competently played by Giovanni Frezza & Silvia Collatina. Bob Boyle ends up in the same position as Liza and John from The Beyond(1981). Mae's role serves the same purpose as a warner that Emily served in The Beyond(1981).

Children play a vital role in Lucio Fulci's top films. In his films, children are the bearers of innocence who are surrounded by a nature of violence. Children are a crucial part in this film because they are the only ones who can sense danger. Dr. Freudstein in my opinion represents the dark half of Norman Boyle. The children in the film are inspired by characters in a Henry James Novella. Its interesting that the doctor lures his victims by crying like a child.

Quella Villa Accanto al Cimitero I feel had a profound influence on Clive Barker's Hellraiser(1987). One example is the monster who needs victims to keep himself alive and fresh. Another example is the architecture designs of Hellraiser(1987). Combines the ideas of HP Lovecraft with Henry James and Ambrose Bierce. Giannetto De Rossi produces some effective special effects for a low budget film. Sergio Salvati is one of the key ingredients to this picture because of his fabulous cinematography and camera placement.

House by the Cemetery(1981) is comparable to Mario Bava's Shock(1977). Both have families who live in a house with a dark past. Both have a child who talks to someone dead. The two films have female characters who are on the verge of total breakdown. House by the Cemetery & Shock contain a downbeat ending. These two rely on atmosphere and colorful set pieces.

There are show stopping highlights in Quella Villa Accanto al Cimitero(1981). One, the murder of the first victim played by Daniela Doria. Two, the murder of Mrs. Gittleson where realistic make up effects are employed. Three, the pix axe scene that is an encore of the "Buried Alive" sequence from City of the Living Dead(1980). The scene where Mae envisions the death of Anne, the babysitter is brilliant. The scene where the camera pans out from a house to a picture of that house is quite good and reminds me of a sequence towards the end of Brazil(1985).
30 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another Deliciously Gory Horror Tale From the Master of Gore
ryan-1007520 September 2019
By this point in his career Lucio Fulci was cranking out gorefest after gorefest. This film is no different. With a great opening involving two lovers in an abandoned house we are introduced to the great score by Walter Rizzati that plays through out the film. After the credit sequence we are introduced to the Boyle family. Mother Lucy (Catriona MacColl in I believe her third Fulci film after THE CITY OF THE LIVING DEAD and THE BEYOND), father Norman (Paulo Malco) and son Bob (Giovanni Frezza) are going to be moving to a new home with New England. Only problem is the previous owner murdered his mistress and then committed suicide.

The first half of the movie is good and quite restrained if you will for Fulci. It is introducing characters, infusing creepiness and at times visually impressive while not exactly going for the gore. But, to me it is the second half where it does amp up the gore, bring on the great, gruesome kills and really the tension at times is almost chaotic in the basement (especially when Bob goes down there) of their new house that brings this film up on the rating scale for me. I mean that is what I am expecting from a Fulci movie.

If gobs of gore isn't your thing you should probably stay away, but if you are a fan of Fulci or like a mix of gore and tension in your films I recommend this 1981 horror flick for you.

Two final notes: Mr. Fulci himself portrays Dr. Mueller and whomever did the voice over work for Bob does in fact have a slightly annoying whiny voice. So just be prepared for that.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Secret of the Basement
claudio_carvalho21 April 2013
In New York, Dr. Norman Boyle (Paolo Malco) assumes the research about Dr. Freudstein of his colleague Dr. Petersen, who committed suicide after killing his mistress. Norman heads to Boston with his wife Lucy Boyle (Katherine MacColl) and their son Bobby (Giovanni Frezza) to live in an isolated house in the woods that belonged to Dr. Petersen. Bob befriends the girl Mae (Silvia Collatina) that only he can see and she warns him to leave the house. Soon his parents hire the mysterious babysitter Ann (Ania Pieroni) and creepy things happen in the house, When Bobby goes to the basement, his parents discover the secret of the house.

"Quella villa accanto al cimitero", a.k.a. "The House by the Cemetery", is a sinister horror movie by Lucio Fulci. The screenplay is confused with poor development of the characters, but the supernatural atmosphere is creepy and the camera-work is great. The metaphoric conclusion, with the soul of Bob following Mae and her mother, is excellent. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "A Casa do Cemitério" ("The House by the Cemetery")

Note: On 23 March 2016, I saw this movie again on DVD with the original language (Italian) and subtitles in Portuguese.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More gore from Lucio Fulci
Red-Barracuda8 November 2021
Here is an effort from the infamous director Luci Fulci, who is probably best known for his ultra-violent zombie movies. This is one of them, although strictly speaking it is a haunted house/zombie combination. The story has a family move into a new home where it turns out a zombie called Dr Freudstein (yes, really) lives in the cellar. And from this premise much bloody mayhem does ensue. The highlight of the movie overall is the practical effects work from Giannetto De Rossi which kick into gear during the various scenes of over-the-top bloody violence. It's a fairly run-of-the-mill film aside from this really but it is also notable for having a very effective, intense ending. Last and by all means least is the child actor playing the character called Bob - he has been dubbed with the most ridiculous and inane voice that you would be forgiven for hoping he will wind up being torn apart by the resident zombie. But will he?
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Fulci's most overrated film
dopefishie5 January 2021
I know Fulci fans like this film. I wanted to like it too. But I just don't see it. It drones on so slowly. The bat scene was gratingly awful. The child (Bob) was gratingly awful. There were giant gaps in logic and plot such as disappearing blood and possessed doors that had nothing to do with the underlying genre (monster in the basement).

The only thing worth recommending is the monster who has a pretty disturbing look! However, he only appears in the last 10 minutes of the film, and he mainly just walks veeeeery sloooowly. And stands still. He also stands still a lot too.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
My favourite Fulci film
Ade-1615 July 1999
Out of the horror films by Fulci which I own (The Beyond, City of the Living Dead and this one), this is definitely my favourite. As well as containing the most gore (I'm lucky to have an uncut version) it is also the most scary. There are plenty of moments which will make you jump and the overall images projected from the camera panning of the house in question adds to this, creating a tense and terrifying atmosphere. The murders are spot-on with plenty of blood and great effects which again add to the overall tension in the film. The storyline, though fairly thin, keeps things moving along at a quick pace to the abrupt ending which is typical of Fulci's other work. Overall, I make a point of watching this film regularly (with lights off!) as I think it is just a great horror flick. If you're a horror fan, see this! My score: 8/10.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bob!!
KoolUhl123 April 2021
This is enjoyable. If you are looking for a serious horror movie that makes sense, give this one a skip.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The family should have moved straight into the basement
rhyatt119 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The first review I saw on this site about this movie was someone calling it a masterpiece. This movie is as much a masterpiece as Friday the 13th IV isn't a masturbation piece. And that doesn't even make sense. But neither does this movie.

Spoilers- I could sum up this movie by saying it's about a fruity looking Swedish kid who moves into a house with his parents and eventually watches them get murdered in the basement by some 1800's doctor with no eyes or mouth and one monster arm. However, I'll add a little more.....

First of all this movie is crazy boring. Secondly, it involves some 1800's doctor with no eyes or mouth and one monster arm. Now those two sentences shouldn't be referring to the same movie, but in this case they are.

From what I can piece together the family moves into this house out in the countryside so the dad can research the death of a colleague who also lived in the same house. The colleague basically hung himself as a result of living in a house haunted by an 1800's doctor with no eyes or mouth and one monster arm. Like in many haunting movies the colleague dude conveniently left a cassette tape explaining just enough about the bad stuff going on in the house to make the viewer decide not to turn off the movie yet. As you continue to let the movie play you'll quickly realize you made a mistake.

So the family moves to the house and the Swedish boy starts seeing some 1800's-ish looking girl, but it's hard to tell since this movie was made in the 70's. Her clothing may have been normal small town 70's gear rather than 1800's gear. Also some googly eyed babysitter chick shows up and generally acts strange, but never does anything and is eventually killed. Which doesn't make a lot of sense because there's a scene where an 1800's doctor with no eyes or mouth and one monster arm (yes THE 1800's doctor with no eyes or mouth and one monster arm) kills some broad in the house and the babysitter cleans up the blood the next day to hide it. So if she's helping this basement monster out why does he later trap her in his basement and kill her? Maybe she didn't do a good enough job of cleaning up the blood and she was already on thin ice with him to begin with.

General strange noises and what not happen in the house and at some point there is the discovery of a grave in the living room, which is obviously where this 1800's doctor is buried. Or is he buried? Well he might be. Whether or not he's the guy in the basement with no eyes or mouth and one monster arm is up to speculation, but it is mentioned in the movie that the doctor performed devious experiments when he was alive. So the doctor either created this basement monster or he IS him. Either way, the movie is so boring you won't care. All you'll care about is why this guy in the basement is 99% monster except for his one normal arm.

In summary you could say this movie is about a family being haunted and eventually killed by an 1800's doctor with no eyes or mouth and one monster arm or you could say it's about a family being haunted and killed by an 1800's doctor with no eyes or mouth and one human arm. But no matter how you look at it, they all die and you'll also die a little inside when you go to google this house so you can stay there for a night and make your own bootleg ghosthunters TV show and try to sell it to the travel channel only to find out that you can't even find this house because nobody cared enough to put it's real location anywhere on the internet.
35 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Terrifying Fulci Classic
Another terrifying Italian shocker from the legendary Lucio Fulci. A family move into a creepy old house and are unaware that living in the cellar is the flesh-eating zombie of a 19th Century surgeon. The little boy is soon a friend with the ghost of the late doctors daughter who warns them to stay away but to little effect. The creature gruesomely kills and dismembers a variety of Estate Agents, Copulating teenagers and Babysitters leading to a terrifying finale in the corpse-strewn cellar. The Lucio Fulci trademark of graphic gore is abundant as ever but it is the atmosphere that makes this movie stand out. Bumps in the night and the ominous crying of children coming from the cellar are just some of the factors that assault and disturb the viewer. This is a truly amazing movie that relies on shock and terror rather than revulsion. The gore just adds to what is already a truly chilling little tale of cannibalism and depravity that will linger in the mind long after you've forgotten about the illogical plot and poor dubbing. One of Fulci's best films. Deserves its cult reputation. My Rating – 9 out of 10.
28 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bewildering But Effective
ferbs5427 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Many horror-film characters would have been well advised "Don't look in the basement" (just ask Lila Crane!), but perhaps none more so than the members of the Boyle family, in Lucio Fulci's 1981 gore extravaganza "The House By the Cemetery." In the film, the Boyle parents, along with their cute little blond son, rent a deserted old pile, the Freudstein House, in the fictitious town of New Whitby, Mass. Norman, the father, hopes to continue his ex-colleague's historical research, Lucy grows increasingly unsettled by the creepy house's strange noises and indoor crypt, while young Bob amuses himself talking to a ghostly little girl who keeps warning him away. Too bad, though, that the Boyles' Realtor failed to tell them that a murderous entity happens to reside in that darn basement! Anyway, Fulci's film is a must-see for all the confirmed gorehounds out there, featuring such grossouts as a knife through the skull, possibly the nastiest bat attack sequence in screen history, death by fire poker, a beheading, the outgushing of maggots from a 150-year-old living corpse (!), a throat ripping and on and on. The film's plot barely hangs together and only makes as much sense as it wants to; I personally could have used a bit more explication regarding that thing in the cellar. Even with the cursory scientific and supernatural rationales given, many questions still remain by the film's end: Why does that store mannequin resemble the Boyles' babysitter, Anne? Why does Anne herself behave so very oddly? Why does the Freudstein House so closely resemble the house in a framed picture in the Boyles' NYC living room? Why do the town librarians behave so strangely and claim to have seen Norman before? You get the idea. Still, even WITH all these unresolved mysteries, the film works, and manages to frighten. And how nice to see Dagmar Lassander again, a bit past her prime here but still able to scream her head off so effectively; her death scene here might even be more nerve racking than the one she gave in Fulci's "Black Cat" that same year. Throw in an effective score by Walter Rizzati, Fulci's typically strong direction, and another imaginative script by horror veteran Dardano Sacchetti and you've got yourself quite a harrowing wringer indeed. And this great-looking DVD from the always dependable folks at Blue Underground only adds to the enjoyment. In short, a well-done if bewildering horror outing, but certainly not for the squeamish....
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A child boy-girl named Bob acts like an idiot!
thisistotalbs24 December 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I do not forgive this movie for wasting 90 minutes I could have better used turning my compost pile.

There is a child, supposedly a boy, named "Bob." "Bob," or, as I like to call him, "Diana," is an effeminate midget with fishy lips, and long, platinum blond hair that would be more appropriate on a Swedish girl. He-she is dubbed in a nasal, liquid voice that really aggravates his most noticeable quality: he's a stupid, fey dwarf who detracts from this movie in the sense that he's often the scariest thing on-screen in this ridiculous "film."

A good case in point is when the creepy babysitter, who has allowed caterpillars to roost on her face where other people have eyebrows, stupidly locks herself in the decrepit basement. She finds herself, of course, about to be murdered by the inexplicably animated corpse of the house's former owner, Dr Freudstein. So, she pounds on the door and screams at the top of her lungs for help. DianaBob's reaction to all this pounding and screaming is to stare at his stuffed monkey (a sign of something, surely) for a few minutes, before taking a pink squirt-gun in hand and finally deciding to rescue the by-now-dead babysitter. You must watch this ludicrous scene to appreciate it: the killer, wielding an absurdly large knife, takes not less than 45 seconds of movie time to climb the stairs leading to his victim; Bob doesn't even START TOWARDS THE DOOR until his babysitter is already dead. This farce of an action sequence descends all the way to the ninth level when DianaBob, having finally opened the basement door, finds himself in the same predicament as his babysitter. Thinking quickly, he runs up the stairs and then CLOSES HIS FOREARM IN THE DOOR. Now, when most people, even small children, close their arms in doors, their basic instinct is to open the door a bit to dislodge the arm. Not Bob. Bob remains stuck in the door up to his elbow because HE KEEPS TRYING TO CLOSE THE DOOR ON HIS ARM. He doesn't think to open the door and free himself, of course, until the walking corpse has closed to within six inches of grabbing his hand. I realize that this scene was supposed to add drama, or something, to the movie, but it ends up being only illogical and silly.

There are lots of reasons to hate this movie: the English dubbing is typically terrible, something for which I can't hold the Italians who made the film responsible. However, the Italian-to-English script translation should have been better. The English voice-actors are universally horrible, and the person doing "Bob's" voice is the worst. He sounds, at best, like a sniveling toddler, even in the most banal scenes.

The droning, ersatz soundtrack, laced with obnoxious synthesizer warbling, is unforgivable. I have heard more adept, emotionally relevant music on a Game Boy game's soundtrack. It crescendos from silence to onslaught almost instantaneously, and, without exception, clashes with what little atmosphere this movie creates.

Technical ineptitude isn't the worst thing about this film. The characters are utterly one-dimensional. They act without reason or perceivable logic, and they are oblivious to their environment. Worse than that, they're stupid. Bob's mother actually tells him that the babysitter may have gone home to see her parents after she is killed; in fact, Bob's parents make a career of ignoring pretty much everything Bob says or does. The babysitter herself is never explained. In fact, Bob's mother doesn't seem to think it strange at all that a pale, creepy young woman, who doesn't ever, ever speak, materializes from nowhere to look after her son. The father, whose job is merely a convenient excuse to get the family in the house in the first place, bobs randomly in and out of the movie, saying little and contributing nothing.

The story is an incomprehensible labyrinth; perhaps trying to understand just what the hell is going on is supposed to be the challenging part about this movie. There isn't any plot to speak of, and neither is there any story worth remembering. People say things, go places, and are then killed. The killing scenes are graphic and bloody; they're also extremely overdone, and more silly than scary. The makeup effects are done well, but not good enough to redeem this film in any way.

Toward the end of the film, which I won't give away, the voice-actor's director has Bob's character whine and snivel and cry and moan and weep into the microphone: the sounds DO NOT AT ALL correlate with what is happening onscreen. This part of the movie is so unbelievably irritating that it deserves it's own paragraph, but it's futile. You just can't understand how irritating it is to listen to Bob's English voice make these noises while the Bob onscreen looks only mildly upset. You must see it and hear it to understand.

There are many, many other illogical and ludicrous events, actions, and circumstances prancing around this film, mocking your intelligence and giving your reason the finger. Watch it with pen-and-notebook and see what you can find that I haven't mentioned. (You can trust that I noticed!)

This is an amateurish, poorly executed movie, made for no other reason than to shock with extreme gore. It's good for a few laughs and nothing else; it's not even worth the six bucks it costs to buy it. The only valuable thing about it is that it serves as a darkly hilarious reminder of what to never, ever do with camera and film.
26 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Middle-of-the-road Fulci
Wizard-814 December 2003
In some ways, you get a sense Fulci was trying hard to make this more "respectable" than some of his other movies. The camerawork is careful, creating atmosphere as well as a sense of polish. The makeup and gore effects (except for the ridiculous bat scene) are also well-crafted, and the Dr. Freudstein character is fairly creepy to see. Also, there are fewer splatter scenes, and they come more out of the story than any gratuitous attempts to add gore. However, the story (which has shades of THE SHINING) is pretty slow-moving, so after a while you wish Fulci *would* throw in some gratuitous splatter! And like many of Fulci's other movies, a lot of things are simply not explained. (I will admit I got a good laugh at the sudden burst of "explanation" by one character at the end, which comes out of nowhere!) Quite frankly, viewers who have heard about Fulci but not seen any of his other movies will be wondering at the end of the movie why he's received so much fuss. So only for Fulci fans, or people with more than a passing interest in Italian horror movies.
28 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Splattery Fun
glenmatisse9 October 2020
A professor, his wife, and young son move into an old house and discover that one of its former tenants might have never moved out and isn't too fond of intruders. In typical Fulci fashion, throats are slashed open, knives are plunged through screaming mouths, and heads are lopped off with a kind of maniacal glee. It's all so daffy that, if you go along for the journey, you'll have a good time. Take it too seriously and you'll wish you were dead.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not One Of Fulci's Better Offerings...
EVOL66625 January 2006
HOUSE BY THE CEMETERY is not one of my favorite Fulci films. It drags pretty much the whole way through until about the last 15 minutes or so, and although there are a few cool gore scenes, and the ending is surprisingly "downbeat"- it just doesn't make up for the poor pacing of the rest of the film...

The story is about a guy and his wife and kid who move from New York to New England. The house the family is staying in is kinda creepy and has a history of strange "goings-on" - and it's also located right next to a cemetery (hence the title...). In typical horror film fashion, the longer the family stays, the more weird things happen, culminating in the explanation of what or who is causing the strange disturbances...

Faintly reminiscent of THE AMITYVILLE HORROR or perhaps THE SHINING - HOUSE BY THE CEMETERY is decent enough in terms of atmosphere and the acting is what you'd expect from a film of this genre and era. The gore (when it FINALLY comes...) lives up to the Fulci standard. The main problem is that by the time anything interesting DID happen, I was already bored with the film. Not that all horror films have to be all blood, guts, tits, and ass (although I'd be happier if they were...), but if you don't show the "good stuff", then the plot, acting, and storyline in general better be pretty top-notch, or at least entertaining. HOUSE BY THE CEMETERY just wasn't to me. I'd recommend this one to hardcore Fulci fans or general Italian horror fans - but only after checking out some of Fulci's superior films such as THE BEYOND, ZOMBIE, THE GATES OF HELL, THE NEW YORK RIPPER and A CAT IN THE BRAIN, to name a few...a pretty generous 6/10 - and that's only because it ended on a high note...
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Where's the axe? Where's the damn axe!
Soucriant6 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Logic has never been a driving force behind any of Lucio Fulci's work, but I can say without uncertainty that House by the Cemetery is an incoherent mess even by his standards. The acting, dubbing and all round quality of this film is atrocious, but in a campy way. I honestly can't take House by the Cemetery seriously in any way whatsoever, and I don't think Mr Fulci did either.

The "plot" is basically irrelevant, as it makes little sense and doesn't go out of its way to make any sense. Norman (no idea what he does for a living) moves to the house by the cemetery with his dim wife Lucy and his son Bob the brat (or spawn of Satan) to discover what made his colleague flip his lid and hang himself. What follows is basically bad filler material, broken up by people occasionally getting graphically murdered and the showdown in the basement. What Fulci does very well is gore. What he's not such a deft hand with is dialogue, coherency, character and story development. Take the introduction of the foxy babysitter Ann, for instance. Ann simply walks into the house and exclaims that she is the babysitter. For all Lucy and Norman know, she's just walked in off the street and has never babysat in her life. But they decide she's good enough and let her do the job. Welcome to lack of logic and development!

Another example of this is that more than once it is strongly alluded to that Ann is aware of the killings and is possibly involved. Norman awakes one night to loud bangs coming from somewhere in the house. He finds Ann in a room pulling bricks out of the wall, and satisfied that it's not something more sinister, leaves her to it. Bear in mind that she was hired only yesterday and they have never met her before.After the estate agent is killed very bloodily, Lucy finds Ann cleaning the blood off the floor. By now we're certain that Ann knew there was a murder. Otherwise why would she be getting rid of the evidence before anyone else is awake? She's only the babysitter, after all. But even with this interesting subplot going on, Fulci takes it absolutely nowhere. Ann is killed in a brilliant scene that will have gore-hounds cheering.

I know it may seem like I'm just picking at the inconsistencies but the flaws are what made it bearable for me. House by the Cemetery is extremely amusing. Every scene the little girl appeared in, had me rolling with laughter. What was WITH her sudden switch from an American accent to really bad Italian? Then we have Doctor Freudstein, the fiend in the basement who looks like Jason Voorhees on a bad day. He also walks with the speed of an old guy with severe arthritis who just drank thirty beers. On the plus side for old Freudstein, I wouldn't want to bump into him in a dark alley.

Onto what I did think was very well done...the gore, of course. The murders are brutal and protracted in pure Fulci style. In conclusion, House by the Cemetery is everything that casual horror viewers will detest, but Italian horror and Fulci fans will devour it. Then there's slightly jaded fans like myself, who will see the humour in this and know that a really bad horror film is still anything but.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Muddled and Unconvincing
Rathko1 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
'Quella villa accanto al scimitar' is a pretty poor movie; more 'My Bloody Valentine' than 'Halloween'. The story, despite the attempts of some to describe it as complex, is simply muddled and ill conceived. The sound quality, and especially the foley work, is appalling. There is no real attempt to generate any level of suspense, merely dull and overdrawn sequences of little consequence stringing together a small handful of gory setpieces. When the gore does come, it is up to the usual Fulci standards, and there's one neck stabbing that is particularly well done, though the lack of arterial spray makes it wholly unconvincing. My primary complaint is with the creature in the basement. The mystery surrounding him, and Fulci's refusal to show us anything but a moldy arm, builds a sense of expectation that the climactic scene fails miserably to satisfy. The 'creature', when finally revealed, is very badly designed, with a completely amateurish make-up that destroys what little credibility the movie has managed to generate.

Many consider this superior Fulci. I'm not one of them. This is a poor film in any language.
24 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
My Personal Fulci favorite
bmk14918 September 2003
While most people think The Beyond is Fulci's best, i personally think this is his best film. The FX effects are alot better and realistic looking then his previous movies and the villain in the film Dr. Freudstein is among the ranks of Freddy, Jason, The Shape, Pinhead, Leatherface and others as a truely scary and nasty monster. Like all Fulci's films there are some problems including some bad acting, annoying dubbed voices, multiple plot holes and things that come up but are never hinted at or talked about again but overall the film conveys a frightening atmosphere (which Fulci is great at), excellent FX and gore effects (with one possible exception, lets just say it involves a bat), a great musical score and one of my favorite and most horrific villains ever put on screen. Fulci also ends it in a very dark and ambiguous manner. Vote: 9 out of 10
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Standard haunted house flick not up to the level of Fulci's zombie masterpieces
Leofwine_draca1 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Following on from his "zombie invasion" trilogy, Fulci returned to the realm of the undead in THE HOUSE BY THE CEMETERY, a slightly disappointing movie considering how much I love the first three. Although not without its moments, HOUSE is let down by a very slow pacing which is unlike Fulci in his prime, and the usual problems with cheap Italian movies: bad dubbing, acting, and editing. Standing alone, THE HOUSE BY THE CEMETERY is still an enjoyable film, nice and mysterious with a plentiful smattering of gore, but compared to his earlier works it appears as a confused, sometimes boring mess. As one other reviewer has said, the film is "trivial" in comparison to his zombie epics and seems more akin to one of the much-despised slasher movies filling the screens from the period.

Things start well with an atmospheric Gothic music score playing over the credits (sadly its only used later for the ending credits). The typical blonde bimbo and her dumb boyfriend are seen making love in abandoned house, only to be imaginatively killed (the girl gets a huge old knife shoved right through her skull!). We're introduced to the main bunch of characters, who this time aren't up to Fulci's standard. At least the obligatory Fulci cameo is in there, right at the beginning too. The male lead is played by Paolo Malco, who is no Christopher George, David Warbeck, or even Ian McCulloch.

Instead, he's a boringly studious type who spends all of his time hanging out in the library instead of with his wife and child. Thankfully that wife is played by Catriona MacColl, who was so good as the lead in THE BEYOND. Although her role and acting aren't as accomplished in this movie, her presence does certainly lift things a bit. The family is rounded out by Giovanni Frezza as "Bob", the blond-haired nuisance of a son. Frezza joins the troupe of weird-looking Italian child actors and his presence is a most irritating one in the film. Other familiar faces like those of Carlo de Mejo and John Olson pop up occasionally but the film is mainly centred around the three family members.

Things move very slowly at first, although Fulci does take pains to build up the atmosphere in the spooky house by having some creepy music and lots of shadows. There's a surreal scene where a shop mannikin's head is chopped off and Bob befriends a young girl who turns out to be the ghost child of the killer (as you do). Eventually - at around the halfway mark - things begin to happen. The father ventures into the cellar for the first time (what took him so long?) and is attacked by an evil toy shop bat which bites open his hand. In retaliation he stabs it repeatedly with a kitchen knife which makes a right old mess everywhere! Meanwhile Fulci keeps things moving by throwing in a grisly tracking shot of some splattery body parts, while the family's estate agent (played by giallo starlet Dagmar Lassander) arrives to find that nobody's home and gets stabbed by Dr Freudstein, a previous occupier who is now a zombie living in the cellar. Also killed is the weirdo housekeeper, a lady with demonic eyebrows who hangs around suspiciously and mops up a huge bloodstain without thinking to enquire where it came from in the first place! Bob ventures into the cellar to discover the housekeeper's decapitated head (and is alarmed by the film's best scare, the materialisation of two glowing yellow eyes in the dark). His mother hears his girlish screams and rescues him. Being a stupid movie character, Bob decides to go down into the cellar later on and finds himself trapped, and comes face to face with Freudstein who is now an effectively ghoulish rotting corpse (who bleeds maggots when stabbed), and who also moves extremely slowly.

Well, that's the movie in a nutshell, although bear in mind that I've written about all of the action and none of the slow atmosphere-building scenes in between where little happens. The movie benefits from some excessive gore from father-and-son team Giannetto and Gino de Rossi, which is as graphic as previous Fulci masterpieces but doesn't have the same level of imagination behind it. Otherwise everything else is merely perfunctory, with forgettable dumb music (apart from the theme) and direction from Fulci which is spoiled by his need for eye closeups. If you're looking for a standard haunted house flick then this one is worth a look, and there are a lot worse, but it's no masterpiece and not up to the same level of the director's earlier work.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
a disappointment
lambgary44426 September 2020
Honestly i saw this when i was a little kid and as a little kid i remember it being scary. I just watched it again and here is what was wrong with it acting, directing, producing, the writing, the sound effects. This movie should be taught in film class on what not to do the "loud" music before every scene was irritating not suspenseful. If i had to watch them zoom in on the actors eyes one more time i would have thrown my remote at the t.v. Honestly my advice if you saw a movie when you were between 10 and 15 do not go back and watch it again. I said before this movie should be shown in every film class on what not to do. I started it three times before i could finish the whole thing. Not because i was scared or busy i just could not watch it all at once it was hat bad. I had taped it to my DVR so i watch some of it and said oh this is bad and switch to another movie. Yesterday i was going to finish it but the same thing happen i watched it until i said that's enough i am going to watch something else. I just finish it this morning my advice if you are one of those people who like really bad movies because you find them being so bad their funny then this is for you. Now if you are looking for a real and good horror movie skip this movie.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A true classic
david-34530 September 1999
Warning: Spoilers
House By The Cemetery was the fourth and last of a series of Horror films that made Lucio Fulci a major cult figure in America. House is easily my favorite of the four films and quite possibly my favorite Italian horror film of all time. A cold, mysterious piece of gothic cinema, House is not to be missed by lovers of Italian Horror or Fulci's films. Maestro Fulci packs the picture with all sorts of weird little touches like the decapitated store window dummy that foreshadows the death of the baby sitter which in itself informs the death of Katherine MacColl at the film's conclusion. Like a number of classic Italian horror outings, House has a very ambiguous plot point concerning the nature of Dr. Freudstein's immortality. We are told that he must "kill to revive his cells" but are not 100% sure what this entails. Does he consume his victim's flesh, take skin grafts from their bodies (the appearance of his victim's remains make these two theories plausible) or is their some kind of alchemical process whereby the act of murder somehow keeps him alive? It's left for the veiwer to decide but one thing is certain, the process works but has done nothing for the evil Doctor's looks. With the exception of his left hand (which he ironically loses via the blade of an axe), Freudstein looks like a dessicated corpse. No wonder he hides in the dark basement of the house. Freudstein with his shocking appearance and his moldy suit of clothing ranks as one of if not the best of Fulci's monsters. Watch for the scene after he has captured Bob and lost his hand. He rocks back and forth in a corner nursing his wound while a child's sobs are heard over the soundtrack. Is this the voice of Bob's ghostly playmate crying over the possible fate of her friend or is it meant to be Freudstein himself, crying over the pain of his dismemberment?

All in all a great sequence. Fulci gives the film something that his previous three lacked, a happy ending. Well, of sorts. Bob has witnessed Freudstein murder both his parents and is about to suffer the same fate when he is saved by the ethereal little friend who we find out is indeed the ghost of Freudstein's murdered daughter. The girl and her mother (also a ghost) will now take care of Bob and protect him from Dr. Freudstein but Bob is now part of the ghostly limbo in the which they live, never to return to the real world. The final shot is a beauty as the Mother ghost leads the two children down the path away from the material world as the camera pans back around to show the house where Freudstein is quietly and patiently awaiting his next victims. It's a great way to end a movie that is claustrophobic, gory and scary as hell. House By The Cemetery marked the end of an era.

Not long afterwards uncut, unrated films would vanish from the nation's cinemas and become the domain of home video. I regret never seeing this film as it was meant to be seen, on the big screen.

Watch House By The Cemetery on a cold, crisp night. It's an experience you won't soon forget.
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable Italian Schlock Fest
MWNiese14 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
SEVEN OUT OF TEN STARS

Fulci turns in another one of his sub-standard horror schlock fests with "The House By The Cemetery"; and I really like it... But naturally, I'm a horror film monger with an immense interest in older horror movies that draw repulsion and disgust from many viewers. Enter Fulci's "House", which draws the ire on many in the film world. It actually seems as if he's still widely regarded as a slouch by the Hollywood movie making machine. Admittedly, Fulci wasn't a great screen writer in any of his films; which at the end the day, is his greatest fault. I mean, his stories are always full of plot holes and irrational character behavior.

And who are the characters in this story? Our main characters are a small family of three, who move from New York City to a small town so the father (Who apparently has some type of doctorate, we never find out) can pick up on a colleague's research project. In the end, it turns out some educational institution was paying the father's colleague to research a demented doctor, who coincidentally, is somehow living in the colleague's basement; unbeknown est to the father's colleague.? Getting the idea? No? Well, the idea is that, as I mentioned, the plot is full of holes and idiotic happenings that are mislead and underdeveloped.

It gets worse. The father's colleague never finished this research on the demented doctor because he killed himself. And to throw salt on the wound, the father, his wife, and child decide to blindly move into the colleague's old, dirty, and disgusting house. Yes! Well you can pretty much imagine the rest. In the course of the movie a girlfriend and boyfriend, a Realtor, a hot babysitter, and the mother and the father, all meet their fate in the basement of the house our good family from NYC moved into. Their son escapes this fiasco with the help of another character whose existence and origins in this plot are highly implausible.

But I've still found a way to enjoy this movie. The music is classically synthetic 70's foreign horror film fare. The gore and violence are wonderfully done, and an art in their own right. Their is plenty of creepy atmosphere, a couple of decent jump-scares, and enough action to keep the movie well paced and reasonably entertaining. I think as this film ages, more and more people realize it's importance as an artistic piece of film making. What I'm saying is that I did like the cinematography; it en captures a lost time and place and at times is like a moving painting. Sadly, Fulci's lack of writing ability and abysmal editing in places (Whose fault that was, I don't know, probably the business end) keep this dated gem from being what it could really be.

If your the type of horror fan person that enjoys old classic horror, "House" is highly recommended. If on the other hand you enjoy much of what Hollywood has produced since 1995, stay away, you aren't going to get the importance of this movie. For me I'll take a plate of homemade Italian cuisine, red wine, and "The House By The Cemetery" any day of the week. RIP Mr. Fulci.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Most annoying kid
a_lee-123 January 2021
The son of the researcher is a fair haired boy who is frightened repeatedly throughout the film and seems to spend his entire time banging on doors and calling for his mommy. The boy has the single most annoying child's voice ever heard on film and this alone makes him a character who needing killing off in the first minutes.

Not great but made worse by the kid.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed