IMDb RATING
7.6/10
5.2K
YOUR RATING
Paris, 1792: After France becomes a republic, aristocrats are guillotined. The English Sir Percy tries to save as many as he can as The Scarlet Pimpernel in disguises.Paris, 1792: After France becomes a republic, aristocrats are guillotined. The English Sir Percy tries to save as many as he can as The Scarlet Pimpernel in disguises.Paris, 1792: After France becomes a republic, aristocrats are guillotined. The English Sir Percy tries to save as many as he can as The Scarlet Pimpernel in disguises.
- Won 1 Primetime Emmy
- 1 win & 2 nominations total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe dramatic scene performed on stage by Marguerite, and later by Louise, is from "Phaedra" by Jean Racine (1677).
- GoofsDuring the chase after he rescues the dauphin, Percy reacts as if he's shot, but his clothing shows no sign of damage from the bullet. Also, flintlock pistols had a very short effective range. If a soldier had really hit him, Percy couldn't have been so far ahead that the soldiers didn't see where he went after the wagon tipped over.
- Quotes
Marguerite: They seek him here, they seek him there / Those Frenchies seek him everywhere / Is he in heaven, or is he in hell?/ My own elusive Pimpernel.
Sir Percy: Sink me, the lady is a poet.
[they kiss]
- ConnectionsFeatured in The 35th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards (1983)
- SoundtracksYou Are My Home
Performed by Peabo Bryson and Linda Eder
Featured review
Good but not as good as the 1934 Film with Leslie Howard
The best dramas are the ones with the best bad guy and Raymond Massey with his screen presence and withering glare beats Ian McKellen. You just don't forget Raymond Massey who plays, as Pauline Kael once said about another villain in another drama, the Prince of Darkness himself.
The 1934 film picks up sometime after Percy has assumed the role of the Scarlet Pimpernel and his effeminate cover, so you see his beautiful and longing wife wishing for the "old" Percy who was a "man", not this effeminate "fop". The 1982 movie shows this effeminacy before, during, and after their courtship so you don't feel so much for the wife since she married the guy with his effeminate side to begin with. Not as an effective portrayal of their relationship. I felt the ardor between them more in the 1934 film than the 1982 film - more believable.
I liked Howard as Percy's Pimpernel more than Andrews . Although the 1934 didn't have the length and some of the detail the 1982 had, I still felt Howard's characterization was more compelling then Andrews. I thought Howard's comic timing was perfect. He used phrases like "sink me" sparingly but effectively and humorously. Andrews used that line too much and it lost its effectiveness. Howard moved well in and out of the effeminate cover pretty convincingly whereas I felt Andrews sometimes got stuck in the effeminate thing and the glass monocle thing while he was plotting with his friends and other times when he didn't need the cover.
I like the supporting cast better in the 1934 film, especially Nigel Bruce as the Prince of Wales and the portrayal of the restless Robespierre. I thought the end was better in the 1934 film. More dramatic, sharper.
Sometimes less is more, as I think that is true between the 1934 and 1982 films. Both are wonderful, but if you've seen the 1934 film first you may be a bit disappointed in the 1982 version.
The 1934 film picks up sometime after Percy has assumed the role of the Scarlet Pimpernel and his effeminate cover, so you see his beautiful and longing wife wishing for the "old" Percy who was a "man", not this effeminate "fop". The 1982 movie shows this effeminacy before, during, and after their courtship so you don't feel so much for the wife since she married the guy with his effeminate side to begin with. Not as an effective portrayal of their relationship. I felt the ardor between them more in the 1934 film than the 1982 film - more believable.
I liked Howard as Percy's Pimpernel more than Andrews . Although the 1934 didn't have the length and some of the detail the 1982 had, I still felt Howard's characterization was more compelling then Andrews. I thought Howard's comic timing was perfect. He used phrases like "sink me" sparingly but effectively and humorously. Andrews used that line too much and it lost its effectiveness. Howard moved well in and out of the effeminate cover pretty convincingly whereas I felt Andrews sometimes got stuck in the effeminate thing and the glass monocle thing while he was plotting with his friends and other times when he didn't need the cover.
I like the supporting cast better in the 1934 film, especially Nigel Bruce as the Prince of Wales and the portrayal of the restless Robespierre. I thought the end was better in the 1934 film. More dramatic, sharper.
Sometimes less is more, as I think that is true between the 1934 and 1982 films. Both are wonderful, but if you've seen the 1934 film first you may be a bit disappointed in the 1982 version.
helpful•50
- jimnew-66749
- Nov 16, 2021
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Das scharlachrote Siegel
- Filming locations
- Castell Coch, Castle Hill, Tongwynlais, Cardiff, Wales, UK(exterior shot of Temple prison)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Scarlet Pimpernel (1982) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer