Vroeger kon je lachen (1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Great actors-movie: warm and subtle.
Stan Limburg4 September 2001
Simon Carmiggelt was/is best know as a writer of daily columns. He wrote beautiful "paintings" of everyday people. These columns were selected, put together and made into a beautiful and warm movie, in which we can see some of the best dutch actors at work. The sets are just the locations of the beautiful city of Amsterdam. No expensive special effects or computer animations; just great actors and they do a great, great job! Compared to an average 'Billion Dollar Hollywood Production' this movie can compare with it! It's also the best example for the saying: "The Lesser, The Better..."
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This is not a funny movie
tvamsterdam31 January 2010
This movie is about a (real life) daily writer of small articles about folk sorrows, Simon Carmiggelt, in Amsterdam. His quality was to notate these stories after listening to those people in bars and in parks, and make it to an every newspaper article every single day, and he sold a lot of books filled with these stories, he was very popular. When Carmiggelt became 70 years of age, someone decided to make this movie as a tribute. It did not worked out that well. Bert Haanstra and his fellow crew made the movie (with a huge cast of AAA actors from Holland at that time)and it did not succeed to be a movie at all. Haanstra, very famous Oscar winner (!) documentary style was in 1983, when the film was shot, also in the range of old people wanting to tell stories for the aftermath, but he had no experience at all making drama (Like: Doctor Pulder Zaait Papavers). The movie is so called Comedy, but there is only ONE laugh in it. Haanstra, and his crew (cameraman Anton van Munster) did a great job to light and motion all frames in the film for that time, the sensitivity of the stories were KILLED by the lack of DRAMA in the photography. So you have an actor, we will frame it, and that's it! They, in that time, were to afraid to create reality in front of their lens! So they filmed real people in the park, asking permissions and signing quit claims and film them again (for more better frames). All stories are played by actors doing monologues, Carmiggelt, playing himself as the listener, only listen and don't interact at all. The film is shot as a masterpiece of decent cadrage and lightning, but it lacks anything from warmth, glamour, sex, decadency. It is all not there. However the stories they selected for this movie (around 12) none of them is dramatic enough to catch your brain afterwards. It ends with a scene that the writer is photographed with all his grand children (not for the first time by the way, for the books it has happened before) as it is really a BIRTHDAY TRIBUTE for a 70 year old famous writer. So this is a very boring product I would not call a movie. It is more like a TV special for a celebrity. What you could learn from it nowadays (30 years later) is that you never should documentary filmers get loose on somebody's written content that fits well in the papers for years. Better let some folks rewrite it and make some good drama. And get the original writer's name on the credits in a proper size as the creator and collector of all those great ideas and stories. It is a pity that this movie does not match the quality of the great writer Simon Carmiggelt at all, while it is filmed by one of the greatest documentary filmers Bert Haanstra, who I admire because of his (oscar winning!) editing skills.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The human condition
lor_2 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A classic movie from the brilliant Dutch documentarist Bert Haanstra, "One Could Laugh in Former Days" actually represents the work of journalist Simon Carmiggelt, whose human-interest stories about ordinary people have been brought to the screen by Bert with top local actors to enact the unique monologues, plus Simon himself on screen. Sadly, this movie has never been shown in America, but is available on a Dutch boxed set of DVDs devoted to Bert's work. Included with this film is an hour-long documentary of 1980s interviews with Bert plus film clips of his work made in 1997 after he died, titled "Het uur van de wolf".

The dozen or so segments of this unique feature film deserve individual description and analysis, hardly possible in a review here, but I will summarize the key points. Both Simon and Bert are true humanists, commenting on our condition in their respective media with great originality and subtlety. Simon in particular presents here a study of loneliness, often involving older people (whom I can now easily identify with at my age of 75), reminiscing about the past or just living day-to-day defined and constrained by the past.

Included are strongly comical segments, such as a Dutch Rodney Dangerfield sort of stand-up comic who gives rise to the movie's title, as he delivers a routine at a concert hall to an appreciative audience, about how folks used to be able to laugh at their foibles, but now are too uptight about everything. Similarly, Simon turns the tables on himself at a book signing, where a nutcase/pervert insists he sign a book by a gynecologist turned novelist (of smutty literature), claiming that Simon is one and the same writer using pen names, and regales him with dirty thoughts, culminating in a clever verbal montage of the nut finding dirty meanings or double entendres in a dozen or more of the titles of compilation books of Simon's stories that he's published. Another scene in the recording studio shows vocalist Robert Long singing a song based on one of Simon's stories written as a poem, both humorous and poignant.

A key scene that Simon claims "wrote itself" has an old man having a beer at his favorite pub, lamenting how he can't sleep, consumed with guilt over the way he responded 50 years ago (including his lack of response or tears) to his father receiving a death sentence from the doctor. This touching scene is revealed to be an actor portraying Simon himself, the son who was uncaring so long ago.

With Bert using both his documentary eye toward locations and people-watching, the stories unfold with a useful format of a person pouring out their 'most personal thoughts to a listener who sometimes reacts or merely is a sounding board. One lady who prattles on about her life in ultimately boring fashion has her female "friend" actually walking out on her, tired of listening.

A strange pair of scenes has Simon paying respects as a journalist to a WW II hero he didn't know, by attending his cremation, and we hear peculiar but enlightening point-of-view expressed by a guard who is an expert on the "business" of death, what times of year the crematorium is busiest and how the ceremonies are altered when zero mourners show up. He's followed by an old man who is devoted to attending such ceremonies, as it keeps alive for him the young men he knew who were killed in 1942 by authorities for having participated in the Resistance.

Also included is a short, unsubtle film from one of Simon's stories tiled "A couple" (concerning a boorish man who thoroughly dominates his wife, making its point about loneliness even with a monster companion there all the time), directed by Otto Jongerius, whose movie "Twee vorstinnen en een vorst" is a unique, relatively unknown classic combining (somehow) social protest with pornographic content.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed