Castaway (1986) Poster

(1986)

User Reviews

Review this title
30 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Back to Nature with Oli
TheNorthernMonkee2 September 2003
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS

So this is the film which was fronted as the late, great Oli Reed's comeback. With Amanda Donohoe, Oli stars in a wonderful film about an Odd Couple who for certain reasons decide to live together on a desert island.

Oli is superb as the 45 year old man who just wants to be alone on his dream island with the gorgeous Amanda Donohoe, and she's also superb as the girl who's forced to live with the volatile Oli Reed.

The difference in viewpoint between the two central characters is stunning, and drives the film along well as whilst Oli is blatantly interested in both her, enjoying himself and fulfilling a few desires, she's keen on being much more active and building things. The comparison of the two continues as the film progresses until eventually a boat containing two men appear. Truth be told, it is the appearance of these two men (Jason & Rod) which leads to the film going slightly downhill for the customary dip which most films experience. The psychology of Donahoe as she blatantly gets upset at a missed opportunity to sleep with one of the men is slightly infuriating for the audience as well as the characters, and it's clever to see how the two characters behave differently amongst visitors and this is actually quite an interesting portrayal of how we change amongst guests compared with in close company.

Eventually, the two almost die of malnutrition, and yet once again some random strangers turn up, this time in the face of nuns. It becomes blatantly obvious this time however that Donahoe does actually quite like Oli at times, when he's not being aggressive and violent, or excessively lazy. It is the upgrade in living enviroments and food provided by the nuns and their friends, that allows the two to regain their health and the film perks up now as the end of their year approaches.

Eventually the film runs through to it's climax, via a few memorable moments, and the film is completed, as, looking back, it seemed destined to throughout.

It's hard to sum up this film really. After a slightly weak review as the one I've just written, most people will probably have stopped reading by now. I guess, it's probably just worth saying that whilst films on desert beaches are by no means in short supply, this one is more enjoyable than most other efforts and is head and shoulders above both Tom Hank's most recent effort and the Beach with Leo Di Caprio. Enjoy one of Oli Reed's finest roles and find yourself inspired to escape society to a beach of your own.
19 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
My island getaway.
lost-in-limbo14 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Gerald Kingsland a middle-aged writer advertises an ad in a magazine, looking for a wife to take to a secluded island for a year. The young Lucy answers and the two marry and head off to an island off the coast of Australia. However their idyllic dreams are pushed to the test and soon the two are caught up in a love and hate relationship.

Far from Nicolas Roeg's best, but "Castaway" is an interesting curio that pulls you along for a very offbeat, psychological drama than what might seem like a relaxing pastoral getaway. Alan Scott's adapted story opens up as a thoughtful jaded power-play between two characters, impeccably performed by Oliver Reed and Amanda Donahoe. While the sporadic script comes across literately trivial in the growing situation, than actually delving deeper into the character's past and motivations. Something about this down-played metaphorical search for acceptance, communication, fulfilment, obsession and inner discovery is unpredictably planned out.

It's quite a warped spin on the island dream, as you observe and get involved with the feelings being shrouded about and their journey now to survive. Nothing comes easy, and both realise they have to work hard for their dreams. What was their choice to escape the madness and restrictions of society eventually becomes their downfall because there's nothing there to shape their daily lives. There you could escape your problems, but on an island you got to live with them and overcome them to move on. Gerald seems to be the go-getter from the very beginning, but it's Lucy who adapts to the island life. This is a surprise as the tables are turned with the muscularity card. Lucy is the resourceful one, not afraid to shy away compared with a loafing Gerald's relying on her. This gives her power (a sexual one) over the lazily whiny Gerald, and her inner strength and confidence makes her the object of affection, or better put lust to Richard. She uses this sexual edge to her advantage, and spends most of the time flaunting about in little or no clothing. The hardship makes her stronger, but he gets weaker. The real pettiness that Lucy shows Gerald, is deservedly so. As he hides his pain, and uncomfortable side with erratically insane behaviour. That's until he finds a purpose, then she sees the true person he is, than the one she had been stuck with for most of the year. Now the attention she drew from him is clouded and the true notion of them roughing it out on the island is lost with the intrusion of mechanical devices, locals from another island and food supplies making it much easier to cope. It's no longer about survival, and depending on each other. Where left trying to figure him out. Both are self-seeking persons with their own goals for this journey. She's there to be apart of the island, but he has his eyes on her. Humour can be found in some sharp witty passages, and there few amusing darkly twisted exchanges. Reed's hearty performance is one of complexity, intrigue and tremendous versatility. His let loose. A ravishing Donahoe terrifically grows with her independently headstrong performance.

A true calling card of Roeg is the visually enigmatic experience he emits from his productions. Reality and fantasy convincingly milked together, and not with the usual fractured editing style that he incorporates. It hasn't got that vagueness; open-ended feeling that usually ends with his films. Incidentally there's a strange surreal punch done in a more clear-cut fashion finding its way in, but it's the whimsically mediative illustrations of nature doing what it does best that engraves many striking, and at times dreamy images. Blending the beautiful with the jarring. Harvey Harrison's scenic photography work is masterfully projected, and admirably frames the lush pristine locations (stunning water shots) to the desirably leering lensing of Donahoe. Stanley Myers silky melancholy music score wraps itself with many uncanny, moody shades. Roeg's symbolic direction is sufficiently custom-fit with his usual brassy stylish imprints, and casual sense of pacing.

There are two novels out there, but the material is taken off Lucy Irvine's version, "Castaway", which was soon followed by Gerald Kingsland's book "The Islander".

While it might not have a lasting powerful stamp of his other achievements. "Castaway" is still a creditably solid and lyrically transfixing opus.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nicolas Roeg's twisted island love story
didi-521 January 2005
This film by Nicolas Roeg builds on the unusual titles of his past career (Don't Look Now; Walkabout; Performance) and adapts Lucy Irvine's book of her real-life experiences as a Girl Friday on a desert island.

Amanda Donohoe reaches career-grabbing perfection as Irvine, the girl who answers an ad from lonely middle-aged businessman Gerald (a multi-faceted role for Oliver Reed) and goes to live with him in the tropical sun for a year. Roeg's film requires Donohoe to appear nude or semi-nude much of the time but it doesn't seem gratuitous. Not surprisingly it helped her gain other roles in the remainder of the decade as a ballsy, sexy siren.

As a two-hander for most of its running time, 'Castaway' depends on the performances of its two leads - they have to be convincing, they have to be compelling, and they have to have chemistry. It isn't a match made in heaven - but as Gerald and Lucy learn to live with each other despite the obvious problems, the viewer is drawn in with them.

Oliver Reed is excellent as Gerald, a complex character who goes from bluster and rage to sweetness and sensitivity. It was something of a comeback role as the first part of the 1980s hadn't given him roles of any great depth to work with (neither did many films after this one), and he does well within the confines of Lucy Irvine's reminiscences.

I particularly like the ending. Fact or fantasy? But it rounds off this atmospheric film beautifully.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Castaway is based on the novel by Lucy Irvine
boogieknights1929 February 2000
Castaway is based on the novel by Lucy Irvine about a young woman answering an ad in the paper placed by a man seeking a wife, to live with him on an island. Oliver Reed is perfectly cast as the gruff, thickly bearded 50yrs+ man who places the ad. And for once in a brilliant casting decision, an actress was chosen who shares much chemistry with him onscreen! Amanda Donohue is the much younger blonde and an aura of sensuality about her chosen to play his reluctant love interest in the film, Lucy. His young bride is only interested in learning island life, and the frustrated Gerald broods and seethes as young Lucy parades either naked, or wearing the tiniest of loin cloths. She is ever the tease and as she becomes more accustomed to island life, Gerald silently broods in his own lust. She has no interest in this man old enough to be her father, other than basic companionship. Gerald has other ideas. The movie is full of powerful scenes of the struggle of the sexes, and beautifully shot on a gorgeous island. Gerald and Lucy heat up the screen, and it is the contrast in their ages, and physical make-up that only add to the film. The story deals with their trials and tribulations, and contains many interesting twists. It builds up to a fantastic climax that shows the viewer the fate of both characters. Very powerful film, and beautifully cast, Castaway is highly recommended. More films of this nature should be made.
35 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A deeply psychological thriller, if you know what to look for.
priva-212 December 2007
Nick Roeg did something which I am sure is way above most viewers' heads. A man decides to spend a year away from the madding crowd (who doesn't want to?) and takes a woman with him. So far, so good. But the man is so far removed from reality that he does not prepare properly, ignores warnings (they do not come at him as his normal world would deliver them: you should not, danger, etc. - friendly advice he sloughs off as inferior) and nearly starves to death. BUT, here's the interesting part, in his own mind he sees it all as idyllic and wants to continue. He creates his own fantasy i his head and lives there, while in truth he and the woman are starving to death. Anorexia anyone? If you know someone who believes in their own reality, make them watch this movie as psychotherapy. Will they survive? Watch and find out.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Huis Clos
Laakbaar27 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Castaway movies are always a treat, but this is one is a little different. It's essentially about two ordinary Londoners who are able to make this ultimate fantasy a reality, but then face the problem of things not going as they thought it would.

A few words of advice (gleaned from this movie) to anyone wishing to live out this fantasy. Pick your island mate with great care. Find someone your own age. Only go with someone you're sexually attracted to, and make sure he or she feels the same way. If you go with someone you're not attracted to, be prepared to put out. For god's sake, go on a few holidays together first. And not just for a week. Try to find someone who is self-reliant and handy, a natural explorer and a hard worker. Avoid picking a user or a loser. Go into therapy for a few months beforehand to make sure you understand your relationship and psychological issues, because they will all arise to bite you in the ass once your diversions are gone. Try to find out what you are really looking for. Take survival and first aid courses first. Study the ecosystem. Bring lots of medicine. Don't do anything that will get you injured.

If you're very lucky, you'll find someone who looks like Amanda Donohue when she was 24. The nudity in the film wasn't gratuitous though because it was essential for understanding Gerald's frustration. However, I can see why some might think it overdone.

And if you're very lucky, you'll end up with an island like Tuin (filmed in the Seychelles). The director does his best to show us how this island was perfect for Lucy.

The problem for Gerald is that the island is not what Gerald really wanted. In a nutshell, Lucy is into the island, Gerald is into Lucy. It's essentially a "Huis Clos" drama. Like a paradise island, a sexy young lover is what many older men want as the door is gently closing. It's a powerful fantasy that even in fruition proves fruitless.

This movie is under-rated here on IMDb.com. I can think of several reasons for that. I didn't like the complicated Oliver Reed character at all. Oliver Reed was the right casting choice, because I can imagine Oliver Reed being a little like Gerald Kingsley.

This movie worked for me. It felt realistic, including the strange dream sequences. I agree with the other reviewers about the jarring body double scenes. That didn't work for me either, although I assume it was the director's way of showing us their bodies through their own eyes and objectively.

The movie is interesting and has a few profound things to say. It's worth about 7.5. Also, be sure to read the review here by David_Frames. It hits the nail on the head.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Fatally flawed one-sided character study
zevt22 May 2009
Roeg is always interesting and challenging so I make a point of watching his films even though I don't always like them. This film reminded me of Bad Timing, in the sense that it is a movie about an incompatible couple drawn together for the wrong reasons, their relationship put under duress and under the microscope of a reality they can't escape from, until everything snaps.

He has an obsessive, idealistic fantasy about living on a desert island with a woman, her reasons are never made clear, but they both seem to want the adventure so they ignore their problems during their first few months of their relationship, and embark on the survivalist project. The problems start already on the first day, with his ideals and fantasies getting in the way of real work that needs to be done, and she takes all the wind out of his sails by suddenly denying him any more sex, and nagging him to do more house-wo... I mean island-work.

At least that's the way I see it. Watching this movie, I found myself constantly wondering what's going on in his mind. His mind seems to be a mess, his behaviour is extremely erratic, and everything he does is criticized by her, blatantly chauvinistic to the point of being a caricature, or just wrong. He doesn't feel like a real person. Whereas she can do no wrong, and her emotional needs are explained to death.

And then it dawned on me: This is a one-sided story told only from the woman's side, consisting of rants against a man she doesn't like nor understand, who finds herself in a survivalist adventure that didn't match her romantic ideals.

Imagine my lack of surprise when I looked up the credits and found that this is based on a real-life adventure book written from her point of view.

Another flaw is the lack of realism and changes in their always-displayed nude bodies, Roeg having to insert awkward shots of another emaciated body to convey the idea that they are in bad health. Compare this with Tom Hanks' physical work in his desert island movie.

In summary: I like the idea, I like the acting, I like Roeg's constantly challenging cinematic work and inventive methods of telling a story, but the material this is based on feels fundamentally flawed and biased, with Reed's character making no sense as a result. This is fatal in a character study.
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mysteries Have Mysteries.
rmax3048232 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The last seven minutes were missing from the print I saw so I don't know what happens after the number of relationships gets bumped up from one to six. If someone dies, I don't know about it.

I've always admired the best of Nicholas Roeg's work because, as with Peter Weir, there's always something odd going on, simmering just beneath the surface. Libidinal impulses just dying to be discharged.

It's not usually clear what they are, but here it's not clear that they exist. It's possible to be compulsively hypervigilant, to look harder for pattern than the thing looked at will ever provide. Oliver Reed and Amanda Donahoe, two strangers, agree to marry in order to spend nine months on a tiny, uninhabited tropical island. They argue openly. Is that all there is? Reed gets to mutter about "secrets within secrets" but there's nothing much unusual or hidden about a man wanting sexual intercourse from an uncooperative wife, and the wife in turn constantly nagging the husband. "Secret", my insect-bitten foot! I still like Nicholas Roeg despite thinking that this is one of his lesser efforts. After all, he hired my little boy as an extra in the compelling and immediately forgettable "Track 29." "Castaway" is not a total failure. It's not marred by multiple flashbacks and flash forwards. There is a confusing dream sequence or two involving the moon and fellatio, I think. But the performers do a crack job with this nebulous material.

Amanda Donahoe looks great -- in or out of clothes. She has thin lips but her features are clean and sleek. Her figure is peerless.

The scruffy Oliver Reed is a delight. We first meet him at a swimming club in London, plump, flabby, and repulsive. But on the island, he's lost weight, acquires a sienna tan, and is full of mischief. He's supposed to be a writer but his reading is limited to self-help books (I think that's a joke) and his recitations are bawdy limericks with none of the naughty bits left out. At one point, desperately randy, he describes a series of dishes from London restaurants while Donahoe writhes with desire. Their toes wriggle spastically, and Reed says, "That was better than sex, wasn't it?" However, if there is a hidden message or even a shallow mystery, I didn't even catch a hint of it. The only message I was able to discern was, "You can take the boy and girl out of the city, but you can't take the city out of the boy and girl."
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The depraved and the even more depraved
David_Frames16 September 2005
A middle-aged misogynist letch harbours fantasies of groping a woman half his age who will double as a door mat and assume the role of a sexually submissive automaton on a desert Island and advertises for the same omitting everything except the woman part in this true-ish story based on Lucy Irving's account of year with this obnoxious, overweight behemoth. This is a gap year with a difference, in this case the gap between reality and the ignorant daydreams of a couple of selfish, moronic Londoners. If this introduction implies you should feel some sympathy for Irving then forget it. If Gerald Kingsland, as portrayed by Oliver Reed was as crass and obvious as one of those sex cards you find in phone boxes then Irving, as played by Amanda Donahoe is a priggish middle class suburbanite who tires of the grind of city living and facts of life like crime and Royal weddings and so imagines that she alone, despite having no idea how it might be done, will travel thousands of miles to be self-sufficient and uses Kingsland to make this a reality. Initially she's not going to let anything, even the facts, get in the way of this protracted venture to la-la land. She ignores the warning signs - Kingsland's obvious fear of female intelligence, the fact that he's had to advertise for a "wife" in the first place, his obvious interest in sex with a woman 20 years his junior and even, in a wonderful example of the will to ignorance, the way he contrives to spend all their money before they've left, forceing Irving to marry him in accordance with Australian immigration law. Some women might bale out at this stage and cut their losses but those sandy beaches are quite the lure and the two sad-sacks go anyway prompting 12 months of predictable implosion in which Kingsland angrily resents Irving's lack of sexual interest while she alone is astounded by his laziness, toe curling advances, crudity and total lack of survival instinct. In fact 9 months in and the two have virtually died from malnutrition. If Irving had hoped to spend a year bathing naked while Kingsland built the house and grew the food, she's as deluded as the old man who hoped to spend 12 months engaged in vigorous intercourse, pampered by his new wife in idyllic surroundings. This is a fascinating story but its impossible to feel anything but irritation at these two characters and Roeg does nothing to pull us toward either of them. He seems content to be a bit of letch himself, focusing on Donahoe's nakedness while mercifully sparing us shots of Reed's reed. Ultimately Irving's story confirms something we already knew, namely that Robinson Crusoe is a great story but it makes a lousy lifestyle choice for a mismatched couple from west London who would normally get no closer to the life of self-sufficiency than a visit to M and S. It wouldn't have taken us a year to figure it out either. Pity they had to come back.
21 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underrated Roeg film
JohnSeal2 August 2000
After Walkabout this is Nic Roeg's most beautiful film. Stunning photography by Harvey Harrison complements the story of two loners who set out to live on a deserted Pacific island for a whole year. Oliver Reed and Amanda Donohoe are both excellent as the two frustrated Britons who don't exactly enjoy their year together.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Inflated with ornamental pomposity...typical Nicolas Roeg, in other words
moonspinner558 May 2008
Island travelogue and would-be 'uninhibited' male-female relations get sprinkled with psychosexual melodrama here, as only filmmaker Nicolas Roeg could present it. An older Londoner (Oliver Reed) advertises for a female companion to spend a year with him on a deserted island; Amanda Donohoe answers--she's the kind of gal who whips off all her clothes the minute the boat docks. Based on Lucy Irvine's book, one gets the sense this plot could be more a fantasy for women than for men--after all, the headstrong lady seems to call most of the shots, while Reed does the deep contemplating (with most of his clothes on!). The initial set up of the story is fun, but once the couple gets to the island, the script becomes non-existent. Director Nicolas Roeg isn't interested in lush, romantic tiptoeing through the flora and fauna (and he probably didn't see "The Blue Lagoon" anyway), yet one cannot help but imagining these two as older Blue Lagooners for a more cynical age, caught up in a messy combination between that scenario and the more political "Swept Away". Alas, this "Castaway" seems made up of leftover parts. *1/2 from ****
9 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Don't me misled...
malexander5429 December 2007
Don't be misled by other comments posted here. The original uncensored version of this film shows Amanda Donohoe full frontal completely nude (yes, pubic hair and all). In fact she is fully nude in many, many scenes and with long lingering shots (almost voyeuristic).

She is a very beautiful woman and her nudity made the film far more realistic for 2 reasons. One is that people do often go about nude when there is nobody around, her nudity helped to convincingly portray a sense of isolation. Secondly, as a man I can get a sense of the frustration that Reed has when he sees her walking about and he can't touch.

I feel bad for the people who have seen this movie censored because there is very frequent high level nudity in this film, which means that the censored version would have been cut to ribbons. This may also explain the experience some people had with "short scenes" or "scenes that ended abruptly".

A very good film worth while watching (uncensored).
44 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An adult Blue Lagoon
DrPhibes19646 November 2020
In the latter years of his film career Nicolas Roeg seemed to become a shadow of his former self and seemed to be working under increasingly limited budgets, but even a minor Roeg film is still worth watching.

The film's theme connects with several with his previous films, namely the breakdown in communication between women and men. Whether it is a communication barrier as in Walkabout or here where the two characters are isolated on an island and fail in their efforts to make it a liveable environment. Whether this is a reflection of the director's own views on relationships I cannot say, but, as noted above, it figures into many of his films.

Even if it is not prime Roeg it still has moments of flare that marked his cinematic style. It does play like an adult version of the 1980 film The Blue Lagoon but with more realistic consequences as they squander their food supplies and struggle to adjust to this primitive life. The cinematography is stunning and the early scenes have a lush and vivid quality that slowly begins to fade as their circumstances change and grow more dire. Both Amanda Donahoe and Oliver Reed give exceptionally good performances. This is not among my favourite of his films but I do enjoy watching it every so often.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A very Boring Peepshow
elcutach12 May 2006
This is based on a true story of a couple who were left on one of the Great Barrier Reef Islands east of Australia. I don't think this was filmed on location for the whole story, such as itis, revolves around the couple's efforts to survive in an unfriendly environment. There is good reason that natives do not live there. If you want to see half-naked people in tropical environments then watch the Survivor TV series. There is good reason for there not being a Survivor-Greenland or Antarctica. As to the north woods, the flies and mosquitoes would eat up the contestants, clothed or not along with having to endure long cold winters. The only reason to watch this is to study Amanda Donohoe's epidermis. But even that gets old after a while. Edit out Reed and the scenes set elsewhere and you might have a half hour stroke film. Otherwise forget it. The premise is because the couple cannot forage enough sustenance, she and Reed are gradually are gradually starving to death. In fact, neither appear to have lost any weight so the director keeps flashing a shot of the upper torso of some emaciated woman to make the point. But it is always the same shot. Though AD is nude most of the time , there is never any full frontal so this is rated B for boring and R for ridiculous.
5 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting imagery, fairly believable
Moondrop_C3 August 2001
Two people who barely know each other, spend a year on an island together. They suffer malnutrition, stormy weather, and just plain I'm-sick-of-you-itis. I managed to catch this movie a while back on cable. I love watching movies from England, Australia or New Zealand because they're so different from what I'm used to. This movie didn't disappoint there. There was only one thing missing from this movie to make it totally realistic. Amanda Donohoe played a young, presumably fertile woman on an island for 12 months and never so much as had PMS, if you catch my drift. Forgive me, but as a woman, this is something I think of *whenever* I think about being stranded *anywhere* for months at a time. All in all, though, a very entertaining movie.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
hoo lalalalalalla!
mmunier21 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
If you imagine yourself on your own, switching on your TV to accompany a frugal lunch and there on that screen you'd see a gorgeous young woman wearing her birthday suit in the most natural pose, for you to see all; would you call this a spoiler? And this in some way was only the "hors d'oeuvre"! I nearly bit my finger as I did not want to miss one frame! Well being on a commercial station it was not as bad a this so I did not go hungry either and for once appreciated those otherwise very annoying ads. I was only aware of one "castaway", recently with Tom Hank. I can tell you I did enjoy this one much more, I might have to give a go to the early one too, although if I understood rightly it's again a very different story. Beyond that thrill I also enjoyed the development of the characters through the story. I have seen the late Oliver Reed in a couple of other movie. And I expected from him a strong performance, well that how I know Oliver Reed, Bill Sykes! I sent my dice rolling on the table and it produced a 7 for my rating how about that. MM
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Beware who you get yourself shipwrecked with.
Irhorwood16 August 2022
Did I enjoy this film? Actually yes. Everyone dreams of sunny tropical islands, away from civilisation from time to time. Without the hotels and the bars though, things are very different, aren't they? Only the idea and the surroundings seem perfect at first glance. This portrayal of self-inflicted island isolation presents the Robinson Crusoe life as somewhat closer to what reality is, especially if, as they seem to have done, you did you did nothing sensible to prepare. The moral of the story being, be careful who you choose to be shipwrecked with..

Oliver Reed's skills as an actor (and one of my favourites) are still there, but somewhat buried under 1980's Oliver Reed. Oliver is also completely buried under the most annoying red beard ever, making it almost impossible to see the subtelty of his facial expressions 90% of the time. Amanda Donohue is excellent as Lucy, portraying a woman with her own agenda perfectly throughout.

Being a man on a desert island with a woman you desire, who is there by choice, but who once installed, suddenly refuses to be intimate with you..? Hell. Being a woman on a desert island with anyone other than someone with Bear Grills' survival skills and the emotional intelligence of a master, not recommended.

Other reviewers are right, Kingsland and Irvine show us the full gamut of human emotions, from extreme rage to much needed tenderness, but their relationship is fatally flawed and annoying as a result. I found myself looking for that one moment of pure tranquility which never came, or if it did I missed it.

Castaway is a roller coaster ride alright. When Tom Hanks made his epic Cast Away he was at the top of his game and it shows. I can almost imagine a sozzled Ollie telling his mates in the bar, 'Listen chaps, I'll see you all after the winter, I'm off to make a shipwreck movie in the pacific...'
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Castaway
jboothmillard9 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The is one thing I remember this film for more than the story or even the two lead stars (which I knew too), and that is the nudity! Basically Gerald Kingsland (Oliver Reed) advertises in a London newspaper for a female companion to spend a year with him on a desert island, and he gets Lucy Irvine (Amanda Donohoe). A couple of meetings later, they are on their way, and most of the time, as I said, roaming around naked as they indulge in what the island has to offer, which is not much. It soon becomes clear it is not as idyllic as they would have thought, with both the island and their arguments creating tension, but they have to bare with it the full year. Also starring Georgina Hale as Sister Saint Margaret, Frances Barber as Sister Saint Winifred, Tony Rickards as Jason, Len Peihopa as Ronald, Todd Rippon as Rod, Virginia Hey as Janice, John Sessions as Man in Pub, Stephen Jenn as Shop Manager, Sorrell Johnson as Lara, Paul Reynolds as Mike Kingsland and Sean Hamilton as Geoffrey Kingsland. This is a very odd film for director Nicholas Roeg (Walkabout, Don't Look Now, The Witched) to choose, and both Reed and Donohoe aren't very suitable, there isn't much to say about this film to persuade you to watch it, well, maybe seeing Donohoe naked, but that's it. Oliver Reed was number 78 on The 100 Greatest Movie Stars, and he was number 26 on The 50 Greatest British Actors. Adequate!
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the most mainstream, yet obscure Nicholas Roeg films
olgagreer6 July 2018
This is not the Tom Hanks Castaway but the Nicholas Roeg one full of complete nudity and great acting. Both Oliver Reed and Amanda Donahue are amazing as the couple who chose to live on an island for a year, and even more astonishingly this is based on real life events. Nicholas Roeg is an acquired taste and this film is strictly for cinephiles but you will be rewarded if you give it a chance.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Castaway
BandSAboutMovies20 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Lucy Irvine wrote the book Castaway all about the year that she spent living with writer Gerald Kingsland on the isolated island of Tuin, between New Guinea and Australia. Director Nicolas Roeg made this adaption, working from a script by Allan Scott.

Irvine is played by Amanda Donahue, while Kingsland is Oliver Reed. Donahue said of this film, "Well, naked on a desert island with Oliver Reed - it was a tabloid fantasy, wasn't it? He was an alcoholic and his behavior was erratic, but he was always a courteous and good actor."

Yeah, Reed lost weight to be in this movie by using the vodka diet.

Kate Bush was the initial choice to play Irvine but didn't want to be nude for the entire film. Instead, she sent her song "Be Kind to My Mistakes."
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
That Ollie Reed was a lucky fella!
Stevieboy66614 April 2024
"Our lives may depend on these vegetables." Middle-aged Gerald (Oliver Reed) puts an advert in a London newspaper seeking a young female companion to spend a year with him on a deserted tropical island. Lucy (Amanda Donohoe), an office clerk, responds, after a quick marriage of convenience they head off to a Pacific island near Australia. Based on a true story I can remember all the fuss when this was released, I have always been curious about wanting to watch it and after nearly 40 years I have finally done so. I hate to say it but I wasn't terribly impressed. The story starts off in London, Gerald is teaching young kids how to swim, then he's in his (Reed's) natural environment, the pub. This was great. I also really enjoyed seeing London, the fashions and the vehicles from the mid 1980's. One thing I did pick up on though were a couple of TV news segments, one about the serial killer known as The Yorkshire Ripper, the other the engagement of Prince Charles to Diana, these events took place around 1981 yet some of the motor cars seen are clearly from several years later. Once on the island Lucy strips off and is naked for much of the running time. I had a bit of a teenage crush on Amanda Dononhoe, beautiful as well as being a great actress. Oliver Reed is one of my favourite actors, however his best roles were definitely behind him at this stage in his career. Gerald is crude, chauvinistic and randy, he gets a bit tiresome after a while and I sadly wonder if Reed had to try very hard to play him. The two just aren't very compatible, they are both rather stubborn and selfish, and over the course of nearly two hours the movie loses its initial charm. It was shot in London and The Seychelles, the visual aspect - including that of Lucy's natural charms - are for me the best thing about the movie.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
for the free-spirited & those who like islands of deserted beauty
spj-429 December 2007
I thoroughly enjoyed seeing this movie again!

It has a beautiful sea-side setting, that has been explored from "Robinson Crusoe" to "The Black Stallion" to "Summerfield". That's apart from reading "Coral Island" & "Lord of the Flies" as a school-boy & such as TV-series as diverse as "The Count of Monte Christo" to "Gillian's Island". Since I enjoyed all of these, I fell into the familiar surrounds with abandon!

Supposedly, it's based on a true story, but I would think some of what's presented is unlikely, like the willingness of the beautiful young woman to embark on such a reckless voyage of discovery, & having been caused to enter into a contract involving marriage in the process. These are merely introductions into the nature of the potential partners evolving, but they attempt to serve each other & at times, seem quite close.

But they are in an Adam 'n' Eve-type scenario of ambivalence. So the hostilities between them do not take long to surface! And they dare to reflect remarkable similarities to the difficulties & modern complexities we are all part of, in our respective worlds, as islands, within islands, of government religion & media domains, almost always beyond our control, operate.

So we have a movie here, a little over 20 years old as I write this, which invites the viewer to see a microcosm of the world that surrounds us everyday as we live & watch TV & visit the cinema! A bit ahead of its time, I would suggest!

So, in the process of preparing this, I have upgraded my rating of it from 8 to 9 out of 10. Relationships are complex & its ending is rather sudden, but I felt I'd been on a good journey overall in watching this & didn't regret having re-visited this idyllic wilderness of natural beauty! Easy on the eye & yet not failing to note the turbulence all around!
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The real desert island experience...
Leofwine_draca8 January 2024
CASTAWAY is Nic Roeg's chance to make a desert island film and the result is typically obtuse, although not as profoundly moving as his classics like WALKABOUT and DON'T LOOK NOW. The story is adapted from the book by Lucy Irvine and follows what happens when the young and beautiful Amanda Donohoe answers a classified ad to spend a year on a Pacific island with grizzled Oliver Reed. Now, this is one of the best films I've seen dealing with the desert island topic; no Hollywood fluff piece like SIX DAYS, SEVEN NIGHTS here, just grim realism as our characters soon find themselves at each other's throats. Both actors are up to the role and the location photography boosts the experience, but I do find it more than a little depressing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Relationship movie
Gatorman920 March 2011
This is yet another one of those movies that tries to study complex or unusual male-female relationships and thus what any particular viewer will get out of it depends upon that viewer's own life experience. Another reviewer here characterized the relationship in this film as being between "two selfish morons" and that is about the way I took it as well. If you have ever been in a long-term relationship with a selfish partner you will see a lot that looks familiar here, and as a tool to help sort out your own feelings and make sense of your own experiences you might find watching this useful. Otherwise, I'm not sure what purpose the film or the underlying literary treatment it was based on would serve. Basically this movie is about two not-especially likable people who don't really like each other all that much, either, trying to have a relationship together, and the entertainment value you get from that exists right at that level.

Yes, there is a good deal of nudity here involving the heroine, but it is usually not especially erotic; it is presented so matter-of-factly and almost entirely in non-sexual situations (in fact, most often while she is entirely alone) to the point that I got the impression that she was more of a sensualist than anything else, and certainly she was no party girl or anyone else with anything more than an ordinary female interest in sex, if that. Moreover, I never got the impression that she was conspicuously teasing the male lead as some other reviewers seem to have indicated, beyond the mere fact that she was there with him on this same island with nothing or nobody else around, and granting that such circumstances alone might make for some of the subtlest and most provoking kind of erotic torment possible. Certainly there are women in real life capable of the same.

The male main figure is no less selfish in his own way, and the mere fact that at his age he can't think of any way to bed this woman other to demand sex like a love-sick college freshman shows it as well as anything else. For a man of his maturity to behave the way he does certainly justifies the description of "lecher" given him by some other reviewers. Whatever complaints might be assessed against his would-be mate, he certainly didn't make much effort to treat her very well. If the dummy had done just a few simple things to make her feel good about herself for having made the decision to shack up with him on this island for a year, they both would likely have had a much better time. But he was too selfish or at least too self-absorbed to see that, something that is shown in the film to be just as true of his life before the island (and which, indeed, would explain his reason for wanting to be there in the first place).

What some of the movie reviewers more talented than I have said on here about the cinematography and so forth is true; those aspects of the film as as good as any, and make me wonder if this film wouldn't be better watched over a glass of wine or two and the right music on your stereo while the sound on the TV is turned OFF.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Plot is a great idea, erotic, entertaining.
john-18319 October 1998
I saw the movie in 1987 and me thinks the plot is not such a bad idea! Fantastic scenery, erotic, entertaining. Would love to get a copy of it on video but no luck. See it if you can.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed