The Blood of Heroes (1989) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
57 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Brutal Sci-Fi "B" Movie Classic
MadReviewer18 April 2001
On the surface, `The Blood of Heroes' comes across as a poor man's `Road Warrior' -- somewhere in the far-flung future, survivors of a nuclear apocalypse are doing their best to survive and thrive. In `Blood of Heroes', though, these survivors at least have some form of entertainment -- a sport calling `Jugging', which can best be described as a cross between football, lacrosse, and a gladiator death match, serves as popular entertainment. One of the teams of `Juggers' that travels from city to city is lead by Sallow (Rutger Hauer) a former world-class champion looking for one last shot at glory.

Essentially, `The Blood of Heroes' is a cross between a sports film and `The Road Warrior', but that's okay, since it manages to lift the best elements from its source and blends them into something fun, if not necessarily original. Rutger Hauer puts in a cool performance as Sallow, a man who acts like he doesn't care about anything -- even though he desperately wants to taste greatness again, even if it's only for a brief moment.

The `Jugger' matches are great, mainly because they're quick, bloody and brutal. Characters limp after matches, wounds get infected and take forever to heal . . . ironically enough, while the film is cartoonish in many ways, there's a certain gritty realism at its heart. Nothing comes for free, and anything that Sallow and his ragtag team of `Juggers' want, well, there's always a price.

`The Blood of Heroes' is full of action and full of fun, even if some of the dialogue is slightly cheesy and some of the scenes are bad, tired cliches. If you're a sci-fi/action fan, you'll definitely like it -- and if you're a Rutger Hauer aficionado, you'll probably love it.

Grade: B
29 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An unforgettable experience!
JohnHowardReid13 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
One of my most interesting experiences. Alas, the off-camera drama proved far more fascinating than the rather superficial, futuristic, action/adventure, grind-house offering that finally emerged on the screen. I worked on the film for only four days of a ten-week shooting schedule. But, aside from a brief shot of me in the Red City street as I pass by Gandhi on the right of the wide-wide screen, my part was left on the cutting-room floor. An earlier scene in the street in which I was accosted by a young boy, excitedly telling me that he'd just found a magic stone, was eliminated. Indeed, not only was this scene (and another in which I figured as worshiper in a weirdly colorful religious ceremony at a Red City temple), completely deleted, but the whole sub-plot involving this young lad was removed. He's no longer in "Salute of the Jugger" at all. That's a shame, because he was easily the best actor in the movie. A fine acrobat, a naturally gifted, charismatic performer, handsome as they come, with a captivating personality, he looked set for major stardom. I don't even remember his name.

I was on the set at the same time as Rutger Hauer, Delroy Lindo, Gandhi McIntyre, Joan Chen, Hugh Keays-Byrne (a wonderful actor in a made-to-order villainous role, which was cut to ribbons in the editing room), and numerous extras in an elaborate opening ceremony to the Red City games. This ceremony was also hacked out of the final cut. And almost as bad as the deletions already mentioned, was the pruning of Joan Chen's part in the climactic game. She bravely performed her own stunts (receiving many spontaneous rounds of applause from the assembled crowd artists), but all her efforts came to nought. They were scissored too. On the other hand, just about all Glenn Ruehland's footage was left in. He doubled for Hauer. It's interesting that the star wasn't even on the set for most of Ruehland's vigorous fighting. He came in right at the end for close- ups.

I didn't see much of David Peoples on the set. The first morning he had a set-to with Rutger Hauer. Peoples wanted to end the star's first sequence in a Red City street with Rutger turning his back on the camera, walking away down the bustling thoroughfare and being swallowed up by the unknowing crowd. But Rutger absolutely refused to turn his back on the camera. After nearly an hour of fruitless argument, the producer was sent for. We waited another hour, and when the money- man eventually arrived, he adjudicated in favor of Hauer. Peoples walked off the set. The scene was then directed the Hauer way by Keith Heygate. And in the afternoon, when Peoples had not returned, the jettisoned temple scene (in which Hauer didn't appear anyway) was directed by David Eggby.

Peoples, unshaven, bleary-eyed, returned a few days later. He explained that he'd been working on the script. In the meantime, the climactic games sequence had been directed and painstakingly choreographed by Guy Norris. His principal players were Ruehland (who assisted in "co-ordinating" these scenes) and Joan Chen. While the action specialists were busy rehearsing the juggers, photographer David Eggby in close collaboration with the continuity girl (indeed she took charge as the filming progressed) directed two scenes with the spectators.

Another interesting point was that a second camera was used for all scenes, except those actually involving the games. Eggby had no connection with the second camera, which had its own crew, and was generally set up behind and to the side of the first. Eggby did supervise the lighting of the set and actually operated his camera himself, with the aid of a focus puller. Cross was in charge of the second camera, which had its own operator and focus puller. These people were completely ignored by both Eggby and Peoples who both acted as if that crew didn't exist. Cross received his instructions from Keith Heygate (who yelled at Cross angrily when Cross asked for time-out to make some camera adjustments). In addition to these duties, the usually pleasant-mannered Heygate also personally directed the placing and blocking of the extras, as well as supervising the special effects men and the animal handler. The main scene that Peoples directed himself, while I was on the set, was the opening ceremony of the games, very elaborately staged, rehearsed and choreographed. I also overheard him telling a visitor that the young lad I mentioned earlier was a "great discovery" and that "Salute of the Jugger" would set the boy firmly on the path to international acclaim.

So there you have it. The credits, even the seemingly endless roll-calls attached to modern films, don't tell the whole story. Anything like the whole story. Many people still make important contributions without any credit at all. And some people who are credited actually do either very little to earn that name in lights, or contribute far more than the field in which their name appears!

Which brings me to my final point. Salute to the Jugger is a Poverty Row film in reverse. The aim of a Poverty producer is to use every trick in the book to expand his meager budget so that it looks shatteringly lavish on the screen. Jugger's editor evidently had the opposite aim. Make the film look cheap. Although filmed on a money- no-object scale, the on-screen Jugger has the appearance of an inferior American-International. You should have seen the Red City street down which I and about two hundred meticulously costumed extras wandered. The shops. Wow! All filmed with the weirdest, most bizarre, most inventively created produce and goods that highly imaginative designers and set dressers could imagine.

And what do we actually see on the screen. Zilch!
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A well-played sci-fi that deserves more recognition.
ldrunner19 June 2002
I certainly didn't have high expectations as I rented this movie. I hadn't heard of it before so I figured it would be some B-version of Mad Max. The reason it caught my eye was that it featured Rutger Hauer in the leading role. His acting skills is limited but his charisma gives his characters a weight that many better actors can't provide.

David Webb Peoples have done more writing than directing. He is behind movies such as "Blade Runner" , "Twelve Monkeys" and "Soldier", all of them similar to "Salute of the Jugger".

It's easy to tell that this movie have a low budget. Most of it takes place out in an apocalyptic desert kind of landscape. The rest in an underground colosseum. No panoramic shots. There are no special effects whatsoever, and that enforces the sense of gritty, futuristic realism that sets this movie apart from many others in the same genre.

You never get to know any of the characters well, but they all have a certain depth thanks to the good acting performances. Luckily this movie has no humoristic sidekick character. That's a relief. Most of these movies have one or several of those.

This movie is no masterpiece, but it's a well-played movie that kept me entertained for the time it lasted. I wouldn't mind seeing it again. With some character development and a bigger budget it could have been a true classic, and it deserves more recognition.

If you haven't seen this movie already I suggest you do it.
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
How Did People Miss This Great Film?
anborn30009 February 2002
What a hidden gem of a cinematic effort! I cannot believe that this film didn't receive the notoriety it deserved back in '88! The backdrop is the standard post-apocalyptic mess that humanity has left itself in after "who knows what." The juggers travel town-to-town in search of food and entertainment, in return for providing matches against the local teams.

The script is well executed and one is led to believe this sport would have a wide following in the aftermath, almost like a team sport of UFC of the future. The characters are superb and Hauer and Chen really give them life. Rutger needs to go back to this flick and see what he has lost! I really cared about this band of juggers and it seemed like everyone in the ensemble was on the same page. The Blood Of Heroes is a tremendous miss in the anals of great sci-fi films. Please go rent it.
48 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good
manitobaman8119 August 2014
Don't buy the hype. This Mad Max-esque film is one of the bleakest films I have seen in a long time. All characters are unhappy souls, surviving in a grim world, unable to improve their lot, prone to an almost genetically determined urge to mess things up. They have egos and the big guns aren't used to working with other people or playing by the rules. The cinematography is stark and bare, with only the soundtrack adding some effect. It's an amazing work and everything I had hoped for. From an artistic standpoint, there were some plot elements and character developments I didn't think were totally needed. They do however drive the story, which seemed to be their purpose, so I can accept them. Verdict: 7/10.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
In a world of survival art is meaningless
tenthousandtattoos12 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
What a brutal little film this is. We enter a desolate wasteland, the scorched remains of what once was the twentieth century, before "the cruel wars that followed", and track a band of "Juggers" - a sports team that roam the wastes, from filthy settlement to filthy settlement, challenging the population to raise a team of juggers and play 'the game!'

I love that the rules of 'jugging' are never explained, we simply observe, and learn. There seems to be few rules - it's a primitive, extremely violent version of American football, except the quarterback is also the running back and the offensive linesmen swing big sticks. The defensive linesman is a big dude swinging what sort of resembles a cat o'nine tails whip made from chains. Basically, the ball is a dog's skull and the object is to ram it onto a stick on the opposing side of the field. As there are no time pieces in this new world order, the game is timed by throwing stones at a metal gong. If the challenger can last 100 stones without the home side dog-skulling them, they win. Got all that? Good. Let's move on.

My favourite scene (although I do like that extreme violence) is when they enter the underground "Red City", and Hauer and Chen pass a man doing chalk art on the filthy pavement. I like how everyone just walks over his artwork, paying it no heed, and I also like that he doesn't object, he just keeps chalking. It's a great example of showing, rather than telling, the audience that in a world where survival is the priority, there is no room for art. No time to stop and admire beauty.

I really dig other parts of this movie, like the fact they make the oldest guy in their troupe lug a wardrobe full of their sh*t on his back across endless miles of desert. Nice. And the guys in the weird tank that stop them in the middle of the desert and basically take a ransom from them. We're not really told who these weird guys are, or why Rutger and his team bow down to them and fork over their hard earned winnings without a fight, or even a harsh word. Well, one guy spits on the ground in protest. I also like that when a member of their team is crippled with a broken leg, they just leave him there and walk off. Darwin at his most brutal. But this opens the way for Joan Chen to join the team. I also like that it's never explained why she wants to hook up with this band of violent men and trek off into the desert looking for a fight. She just felt like a change, I guess.

I also really like that there's neither a back story nor a bright future anywhere in sight. We know from a single title card at the start that these people don't remember how the world got f*cked up, and are so busy simply surviving they're not really thinking about a way to "fix" things. This is simply the world they exist in, and world where the game is everything and the epitome of social standing is to win "100 stones!" This brings me to one of my favourite bits of the movie, so typically Aussie, where Rutger helps the dude (big Australian guy) he's just pummelled to his feet, and the dude remarks, "Sh*t…I forgot you were better than me!" No hard feelings, mate. Love it.

That reminds me of another favourite bit, and indeed one of the best bad guy/good guy moments I've ever seen. It's where Rutger is walking off, after the final confrontation, to return to a life of endless jugging across the desert, living from meal to meal and sleep to sleep. The big Australian dude who got pummelled by Rutger asks the villainous ruler of the "Red City" why he's letting Rutger go. The bad guy simply muses that there's nothing more he could do to make Rutger's life any worse than it already is. What I love more is that Rutger knows it, and it doesn't bother him. He's not only resigned himself to this life, he's gonna enjoy it as well, dammit.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Salute Of The Jugger
damianphelps21 January 2022
Is a B grade movie in looks, feel and budget but an A grade film in terms of story and characters.

Its a really engaging tale that captures your interest with characters you can invest with.

The 'world' that the movie is set in feels reminiscent to Mad Max 2 or perhaps 3.

Looks aren't everything, this film offers a lot to the viewer :)
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
After the apocalypse, sports-ball STILL reigns supreme !
marshalskrieg16 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A post apocalyptic world where survivors live in wretched conditions in a cool desert zone. People are dressed in rags yet instead of busying themselves rebuilding civilization, they are engrossed in a bizarre brutal sport where small teams face off with each other gladiatorial style, the goal being to impale a skeletal dog head upon a post. This is the preoccupation of everyone in this future world. Anyway, one such team leader- a stoic sullen man with a past- takes the action down into a dank subterranean city. Here we find an odd aristocratic elite who run the show, while the peasants drool. This underground world has some industrial tech going on, something the surface world lacks. The direction did a decent job creating the look or mood of this world, you almost can feel the grittiness. However, the climatic battle left me cold- there existed the opportunity to take the film in a more nuanced direction, I feel the director missed an opportunity. Overall a thrilling yet simplistic flick.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A forgotten masterpiece
fi6153518 April 2002
"The juggers are coming!" is a shout that strikes both fear and excitement into the hearts of the villagers. These wretched people, living in the Mad Maxesque world of post-nuclear devastation will now have to defend the honor of their village by playing against a wandering band of Juggers.

This game is the centerpoint of the movie. It's a brutal match of American football and medieval warfare. Both teams will try to get a dog skull on a stake at the opposite ends of a small playing field. Only problem is that only a small, lightly padded player (the Qwik) can touch the skull, and all other players are armed with clubs, chains, mallets and bad attitudes.

Needless to say, the game can get brutal, broken bones and gouged eyes are common enough. But once the game is over, the real insights into the world this movie creates are made. There is no brutal rivalry outside the playing field, only a camaraderie that can stem from knowing what you both have been through. The winners are treated to a feast, no matter how poor the village, for the player's blood has brough some exitement into their otherwise dreary and hopeless lives.

I will not spoil the plot here, but needless to say, the young elements of the wandering band of Juggers, which is led by Sallow (Rutger Hauer), will not long be content to fight in backwater villages for little money and poor entertainment (a village of starving peasants can only provide so much).

On the technical side, this is not a brilliant movie, clearly made on a low budget, most of which was probably spent on actors. But movie itself is a great masterpiece, showing more and more of the "world" in which the Juggers live with every time you watch it. Small things will speak volumes and prove true the old saying: A picture speaks more than a thousand words.

Also the action scenes, while they do not contain the speedy cars and flashy wrecks of Mad Max, are still full of adrenalin and will leave thinking about why the game of Jugging is not played already.
49 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Underrated
FiendishDramaturgy15 August 2008
While I have found it impossible to clearly define, there is something special about this film. There is some hidden mystique the viewer feels, which has eluded me in my attempts to pinpoint it. Rutger Hauer gives as adequate a performance as anyone can expect from his work in the 1980's, and the story is a hodgepodge of a plethora of other films like Mad Max, Conan, and anything else made around the same time.

Honestly, the brutal football-like game seems to come straight from Australian Rules football, but who am I to judge? The banality of this film, would seemingly render it pointless, useless crud, but that doesn't seem to be the case, for some reason.

There is something about this film that holds the viewer, caresses the viewer's mind and brings it back to the film. I don't know if there are heinous subliminals embedded herein, or what, but there is something seriously luring about this work.

The main problem with it is that it was a film made about the future, painted darkly sinister, and released at a time when the future was bright as a new penny. It flopped.

All in all it rates a 6.4/10 from...

the Fiend :.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Watch the game played live instead
Azundris1 May 2012
Jugger is a great spectator sport; it's quick, with strategic elements, something's always going on, and a third is over before any ADD you might have could set in.

The movie, though? Well, to start with, it's the boredom of watching a fixed game that any sports movie offers. (And not much else, there isn't really much in the way of plot.) But you'll also be watching a game the rules of which aren't properly explained, and the cinematography isn't conducive to figuring it out, especially in the key games which happen in half-light. Any of Blade Runner, Split Second, even Wedlock are better vehicles for Hauer.

Reviewed: "Long" (99min/PAL) DVD. May work better on theatre size screen.
6 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent
wj-129 September 2005
It was a while ago when I first saw this movie and watched it again recently. People might complain that it doesn't have enough dialogue, plot is not intricate enough, there aren't any special effects for a Sci-fi movie, and it is too low budget to be considered a good movie. But I'll say people who say such things, they don't really know how to appreciate a good movie or understand what a good movie is, because they are too used to modern day rubbish jam packed with special effects, explosions, unnecessary twists and horrible scripts.

I think everything is done just right in the movie and I especially love the way they give no sentimentality to the backdrop to the movie. No discussion of the past as to why the world they do jugging is the way it is and everyone in this world just get on with their lives in this gritty desolate world without any lamenting thoughts to the past.

I won't go into much detail, but all I'll say is just watch the movie and you'll be glad that you did. By the way, it seems like there are two versions which I didn't realise until I read the comments here and seems like the shorter version cuts out the ending. Since I thought the ending was very fitting I do recommend you watch the longer version, it just won't have the same impact without the proper ending.
46 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Silly But Fun
TheExpatriate70022 August 2010
The Blood of Heroes is a reasonably good B-level action movie with a great cast and an interesting premise. Set after the apocalypse, it follows the exploits of a team of wandering Juggers-a post-apocalyptic team game with elements of rugby and football. At the behest of a new member, they set out for an underground city in order to try their luck with a team of professional juggers.

What makes the film so fun is its combination of sports film clichés and a Mad Max style setting. Although none of the individual plot elements is particularly original, they are brought together in a new and interesting way. Adding to the enjoyment factor is the skilled cast, who make this film a cut above what is typical for the genre.

At times, the film does slip into silliness. (The villain is named Lord Vile for crying out loud!) Nevertheless, it is definitely a good rent for Saturday nights when there is nothing on TV.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
It gets very dark at night
FlashCallahan6 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Made at a time when these post apocalyptic movies were heading right down the pan, Salute of the Jugger, is one of those films I wanted to watch for a while, and, 22 years after its release, I get to see it, and be sorely disappointed.

I for one, we're expecting some sort of Mad Max meets Rollerball, with some fun chucked in for good measure.

What I got was a miserable bunch of injured people walking across the desert, with a little bit of Land Of Doom and Solarbabies thrown in.

It's not the casts fault, Hauer and Co are perfectly fine, it's just edited poorly, lit poorly, and so uninvolved, you really care less what happens to the 'rag tag' team.

Some people call this a cult movie, and a film for the ages, it's not, it's a cheap, miserable little film, with an okay performance from the cast and little else.

If you like maundering people walking across the desert chucking a skull on a stick,then welcome to the pleasure dome.

Otherwise, stick with Mad Max and Blind Fury.
7 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Post-apocalyptic slam-bang sports movie is great!
seanarama15 January 2001
Warning: Spoilers
This is a great film, and one of Rutger Hauer's better films. He's made a lot of junk, but don't be scared off. And the rest of the cast -- "Last Emperor" sexpot Joan Chen (nude scene -- whoo-hoo!), Vincent D'Onofrio, and a great supporting cast. this is like an A-list cast slipped into a B-list video.

I spent the first five minutes trying to figure out the game that the "juggers" play in this post-nuclear future. I spent the rest of the movie wishing there was a league today!

***Spoiler Alert!***

Rutger plays a guy ekes out a living as a jugger in the sun-bleached nuclear wasteland aboveground, trying to put together a team that can challenge a team Down Below in the Nine Cities that are all that's left of civilisation.

Through the course of the film, we learn Rutger used to be a pro jugger in the cities, but was banished for loving the wrong woman. He's on a quest to put together a team that can successfully challenge the pros Down Under, and win his way back to civilization.

A lot of thought must have gone into designing the game itself, because it rocks. Through the course of the film, you start to see strategies and tactics. At the end of the last game, you'll be standing on your feet cheering, "Go, team, go!"

Or maybe not. Maybe you're a post-modernist snob who doesn't find anything cool unless it's politically correct, self-absorbed and hopelessly hip. In which case, this is not the film for you. This is a film for men and women who love great characters, a gripping plot, suspense, drama, a love story and dynamite sports action all in one.

In the interest of full disclosure, I'm a Rutger Hauer fan. But some of his films stink like week-old cheese. Not this one -- this one is slam-bam-thank you ma'am-gr-r-reat! Go, juggers, go!
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I like scars.
Hey_Sweden14 July 2019
An appealing and feisty Joan Chen plays Kidda, a young woman in your typical ominous future. In this environment, there is a popular sport, otherwise known as "The Game", in which combatants fight each other in order to allow a "qwik" to make it to the other teams' goal line and score by placing a dog skull atop a stake. Rutger Hauer plays Sallow, a longtime master of The Game who once played at the highest level, but lost his standing when he spent time with a Lords' wife. Kidda replaces the critically injured current "qwik" on Hauers' team, and they figure to improve their lot in life by issuing a "challenge" to teams still in this League.

Written and directed by David Webb Peoples, whose other screenwriting credits include "Blade Runner", "Unforgiven", "Twelve Monkeys", and "Soldier", this shows its audience a reasonably good time for just over an hour and a half. It doesn't really add up to much when it's all said and done, coming off as pretty familiar to anybody who's watched their fair share of low budget post-civilization cinema. But The Game itself is pretty amusing, and this viewer did like the certain bloody, grimy, and gritty aesthetic that Peoples gave this little picture. It has a definite atmosphere going for it - filmed topside in the desolate Australian area known as Coober Pedy (where "Pitch Black" filmed 10 years later) and underground in some understandably dimly lit sets, it's grim without ever getting TOO grim for some tastes.

The costumes, music, and production design are all entertaining. Hauers' team also consists of Anna Katarina, Delroy Lindo, Vincent Phillip D'Onofrio, Gandhi MacIntyre, and Justin Monjo, and they're fun to watch. Aussie icons Max Fairchild, Hugh Keays-Byrne, and Richard Norton have roles as well. Hauer is rather low key, dialling down but not forgoing his typical charisma. This may be one of his finest B movie appearances.

Long live the Juggers, with Hauers' bunch a team worth rooting for if ever there was one.

Seven out of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A satirical look at American society?
Audie-T25 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
  • - - WARNING SPOILERS - - -


.

.

The movie I have seen a long time ago was titled "Salute of the Jugger." The ending is markedly different than that from "Blood of the heroes." In the longer movie, "Salute of the Jugger," the fate of the character played by Hauer can be seen some time after their victory. His luck has changed little. Joan Chen's character was lucky to be adopted by the elite underground society. Hauer's character can only do what he does best: continue playing the Jugger game for as long as he is fit but without hope of being adopted himself.

That is the bitter sweet ending of "Salute of the Jugger." Perhaps this movie is a satirical view on American society; there is the dream of achieving success and being among the rich elite. In reality only a handful of entertainers (singers, sportsmen, actors) get to enter the wealthy elite society. The movie portrays the American Dream: even the lowliest people can become rich and elite themselves if they fight long and hard enough AND if they are lucky enough...

Joan Chen's character in this movie is one of the lucky few. Hauer's character, despite having won the final game twice, will never be allowed into high society though.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Blood of Heroes
phubbs8 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Bit of a forgotten Hauer cult classic this with your typical popular post apocalyptic world where only the strong survive. Haven't seen this in many many moons and it wasn't quite as cool as I remember it but still decent, the plot has now been copied over and over by many films since but as this was back in 89 it feels like its one of the first, almost.

An Aussie flick so you would be right in thinking there's a touch of 'Mad Max' in there but there's also a lot of classic barbarian type stuff and strong Roman Gladiator themes too, you wonder if Scott took inspiration perhaps. 'The Game' itself is kinda odd and simply revolves around sticking a dogs skull on a stick in the opponents half, like a touchdown really, whilst you batter your opponents half to death to protect yourself and your players. Dog skulls because they eat dogs in the future, why use them for this? who knows.

Of course there is more going on when you scratch the surface, literately. Deep underground (because the surface has been ravaged by war) there are affluent rich folk living in complete luxury that run a much bigger harder league of the game called 'The League'...imaginative huh. Down there the players are treated like real stars with wealth and fame but the risks are greater...well life threatening (duh!). The aim of many players is to get into this super league, of course good old Rutger has already played there and survived.

When you watch the game I did kinda get the feeling in reality it wouldn't last more than 5min or less but artistic license is in heavy use of course. The actual games aren't as violent as you'd think with minor blood and not much carnage, the film is quite tame really now but back in the day it was suppose to be pretty brutal.

Hauer is perfect for the role as the quiet brooding leader 'Sallow' and Delroy Lindo impresses in a surprise if slightly racially clichéd role. Overall the whole team are all pretty good in all their stereotypical post apocalyptic attire along with manly battle scars. The Aussie outback also adds to the inhospitable atmosphere and really gives this adventure a nice bleak barren feel as you would expect.

Nice ending which isn't totally predictable...if you watch the uncut version, the US version was cut for some reason. Personally I prefer the film title 'Salute of the Jugger' as it offers a bit more mystery, what the hell is a jugger? dunno but it sounds kinda neat doesn't it.

6/10
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best sport movie ever made
wilsonxxx6 February 2003
I am surprised and delighted by the sheer depth of this movie every time I re-watch it. Not only is the jugger sport convincing, well-designed and very enthusiastically played by the excellent cast of actors, but the post-civilised (as opposed to post-apocalyptic) world it takes place in is both subtly drawn and entirely believable. Nowhere in the pithy script is there the usual heavy-handed sci-fi references to the nuclear war (or whatever) that reduced human-kind back to feudal barbarism. We are presented with the world of the juggers as-is, without a single "as you know, our society collapsed after the great firestorm in the sky" speech or a hint that the heroes of the title can improve mankind's sad situation as anything other than gladiatorial entertainers. A masterpiece that should be on DVD, converted into a computer game and, if they can get the original cast and production team together, sequelled.
54 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Tired old gladiator sports mixed with blood and nothing more.
emm28 February 1999
THE BLOOD OF HEROES perfectly lives up to its title, and that's it. Anything else would be sub-par in comparison to other endless lists of movies that focus on death sports of the future as well as the present. You should take a hard look at the settings during the bloody battling. To make the barren post-WW3 scenery look "good", the filmmakers might have decided to be better off dry in the studio and forget a one-way airline trip to Australia, but that didn't work. What's so hot about heavy-coated gladiators hacking each other to the final death? This same plot has been used numerous times, and that includes recent martial arts movies taking place inside a cage (SHOOTFIGHTER). B-grade actioners are taking up too much space in the crowded marketplace, and I'm getting sick of them. See this if you want to taste the blood, but don't get excited.
5 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hail to the Juggers
Matador0729 June 2004
I recently rewatched this movie for the first time in ages, and I was pleasantly surprised to find that it held up remarkably well to my older eyes. So many gritty post-apocalyptic hero type flicks that I liked when I was younger turn out upon a more sober "adult" viewing to be amateurish and juvenile. But this movie has real depth, and drew me back in from the opening scene. It fully deserves any cult status it may have achieved, and I went ahead and ordered the DVD (which is finally out) for my collection.

The film is set against the backdrop of a fully realized post-apocalyptic society that actually makes sense (and the "game" the movie is built around is well conceived and executed too). Unlike in many futuristic movies, there is no need for grand exposition explaining why everybody in the film is acting so bizarrely -- in this movie, you understand the people, their desperation, and the certain grim courage of those who dare to dream of more. The movie also has the courage to take itself seriously, while still retaining a light enough touch to throw in spots of humor throughout.

The cast here is several cuts above normal for this sort of thing, with a number of recognizable faces (Chen, D'Onofrio, Hauer, Lindo) making believable and sympathetic characters out of what easily could have been cartoonish cutouts in a lesser film. Chen and Hauer play the two main characters. For Chen, I think it can be argued this is her finest performance, deftly combining vulnerability with courage, innocence with savagery. And for Hauer, an actor who has in more recent times has become a parody of himself, I think this may have represented his last truly effective performance. The stories of these two characters are not stories of grandiose save-the-world heroes, but more down to Earth stories of courage, redemption, and most importantly hope in a world with little of it. The characters aren't pure, they're not pompous, they're just normal people trying to make the best of a tough life. And I think that makes rooting for them all the easier. Its not so important they win -- its important that the find the strength to strive rather than give up. Simple tenacity and the courage to never give up is far more inspiring than the vast majority of the superheroes in the modern comic book adaptation fad. It really is remarkable to find such deft handling of themes like these in an offbeat movie from a genre filled with Grade B quickies.

P.S. I have never seen the longer version, and actually don't really have an interest to. The shorter "Blood of Heroes" is appealing precisely because it manages to scrounge out hope and weary courage from the grim backdrop in a believable fashion.
29 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
After Mad Max Aussie trilogy come out the Blood of the Heroes, it's foolish presentation!!
elo-equipamentos30 December 2022
The producers looking behind the smashing success of post-apocalyptic of Mad Max trilogy made in Aussie land, they envisage a profitable niche, attached a formulaic production resembling the previous ones, thus on late eighties show up The Blood of the Heroes also commonly knew as "The Salute of the Jugger" the movie was shot entirely in Australia as its forerunners.

To pleased the American audience they introduce in the plot something alike as US's football game, however instead a oval ball they replace for a Dog's skull, also mixing a medieval blood weapons, the result a brainless action picture, the story takes place in post-apocalyptic era, where this odd games is the main attraction at small villages, where those gladiators team earned some money to survive themselves, the leader of the team Sallow (Hutger Hauer) is a former fighter kicked out from the top league due he ventured to with a powerful chairman's woman.

Aftermath its goal is back to the league, where it's located in a deep underground spot where the whole elite lives in a flamboyant life, he must challenge a mighty team, nonetheless the challenge must to be accept by the board, Sallow returns is underway, the casting has some upcoming stars as Vincent D'Onofrio and Delroy Lindo and Joan Chen mixed with Aussie actors.

I've already known that will be bomb by mostly here due my lowest rating, although it doesn't matter, due I had my feelings over this wishful and senseless trash picture!

Thanks for reading.

Resume: First watch: 2022 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 5.5.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Gritty and involving
Ripe Peach17 March 2001
Sand, scars and blood just about sums up Salute of the Jugger (the title for the full 104 minute version, not the 90 minute US "Blood of Heroes" cut). Salute is an unapologetically brutal story, perfectly cast, well played and very competently filmed. All the cast acquit themselves well; Hauer is suitably grizzled, and Chen manages (believably) to be cute, scary, vulnerable and savage all at once.

There's very little plot or dialogue in Salute, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing. The showcase here is the heart pounding Jugger matches, which are genuinely gripping and gritty action sequences, shown to a sparse percussive soundtrack that only very occasionally veers slightly too close to smug Americana triumphalism.

Top marks go to the stunt, makeup and continuity people. There are no Jackie Channish balletic combats here - faces smash open under brutal blows, and the face remains smashed in the following scenes. The wounds heal slowly over time, but the grimly realistic scars of the Juggers remain consistent throughout. Continuity is often underemphasised, as you only miss it when it isn't there, but there are no slip ups in Jugger despite its low budget.

One interesting point is the change of emphasis in the 90 minute cut. The title changes to "Blood of Heroes", and the message of "Salute" that there *are* no heroes, only winners who sleep in silk sheets, is diluted by ending prematurely on a victory high. In the full Salute, there's a frank message that for some, beyond "happily after after" lies more sand and scars and blood. If you get the choice, the 104 minute "Salute" is a more complete and consistent film.
37 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
SEE THIS MOVIE!!!!
Soapbox21 June 1999
It's difficult to adequately describe this amazing movie A truly remarkable film. It tells a simple story in a beautiful and brutal way. The writing stays out of the way and allows the story to be told with out getting gunked up with a lot of preachy dialogue. The performances by Hauer, D'Onofrio, and Chen are intense when they have to be and minimalistic when they ought to be. But the true genius of this movie is the production design. The details are what leap out at me. The little things. Everything seems right and nothing is out of place. The constant brutality is underscored by the moments of beauty and heroics. SEE THIS MOVIE
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed