Accidental Meeting (TV Movie 1994) Poster

(1994 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Linda Gray like JR Ewing would never have wanted to see her
sutcal26 November 1999
Not a bad movie all up.

Without giving the plot away, don't ever tell a friend you wish someone was dead. Your wish may just come true. But then the favour may be expected in return as well.

Linda Gray is convincing in her role as the crazed killer. If only she was like that in Dallas, the show would have been so much better.

I gave it a 6/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
exciting meeting of two made-for-TV movie stars
petershelleyau28 January 2003
The plot is in the tradition of Alfred Hitchcock's 1951 feature Strangers on a Train, where murder swapping is suggested, with two women revealing there are men in their lives who they wish could be eliminated. Jennifer (Linda Gray) has an unfaithful husband, and Maryanne (Linda Purl) an exploitative boss. The narrative establishes Jennifer as bad since she takes the initiative, as a form of blackmail for Maryanne to also act, to keep her part of "the deal". The characters being female, as opposed to Hitchcock's males, also adds a different moral flavor, since women are traditionally the opposite of murderers. However, the reluctance of Maryanne forces Jennifer to keep on killing and threatening those closest to Maryanne, as a sign that Jennifer is serious in her expectation, and also psychotic.

As with Robert Walker in Hitchcock's film, the bad character is the more charming, and the calmness of Jennifer in the face of the growing hysteria of Maryanne is used for comic effect. The casting therefore makes allowances for either actress, by not demanding too much of Gray, and giving Purl the most emotional scenes.

Purl excels in her steely attempt to control her fear, however director Michael Zinberg errs in giving her an extended reaction to the discovery of a dead body. Credit is given to the film's top production values, and how attractively both women are lit and dressed, with Gray's blonde bangs in her brown hair a hint of radicalism, and Purl's thick blonde hair more conservative. Purl makes one line funny with her dry delivery. When she is told by the police that she was thought of as a suspect `What do you think of that?' she replies `Not a lot'.

The teleplay by Pete Best and Christopher Horner, based on a story by Best, repeats Jennifer's call for Maryanne to `be bold'. Although this can be interpreted as impulsive action, Jennifer's seeming sensitivity to Maryanne as the events unfold can also be read as the feminine response to a dilemma. Although Jennifer is given the humiliating scene of asking her husband if he `still finds her sexy', the pain she expresses after she kills reveals she feels remorse, underlined later when she asks Maryanne if she thinks the killing was easy to do. This makes the conclusion, where Zinberg reduces Jennifer to a monster, all the more disappointing. A plot point which means Maryanne is to be promoted and hence the man she wishes were dead is removed, is introduced after Jennifer has planned to kill him, which adds a nice fateful touch, though Maryanne's forgetful nature, which allows Jennifer to plant her earrings at the scene of the crime, is more an obvious device.

Zinberg provides opening cross-cutting between the two households, a beautiful view of a beach at sunset, uses a funpark location to recall the Hitchcock film, and Sorry, Wrong Number on television. However the attempt at comedy of the bumbling policemen falls flat, and his staging of the pivotal car accident and the final confrontation are weak, with the latter particularly bad.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Standard made for TV rubbish
christophaskell17 September 2003
`Accidental Meeting' is, unfortunately, exactly what we as American viewers will let pass as acceptable entertainment. No original scenarios, characters, or dialogue, and a god-awful ending … but it's good enough for something on TV. For whatever reason, we'll let it slide because it is ‘good enough', or it's deemed a good popcorn flick. It makes me sad that people will watch this when it's on cable; anything on TV is more stimulating than this film, even the Teletubbies. To give credit where it's due, all of the principal actors played their roles adequately, Linda Gray was especially deceitful and evil in a role that stretched her `Melrose Place' skills slightly further, and Linda Purl was exceptionally sweet and innocent. Stay away from this heaping pile of mediocrity and you will be smarter and more successful in life. Rating: 5/40
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Distaff remake of Hitchcock's classic STRANGERS ON A TRAIN
ritzbros13 December 2002
Patricia Highsmith's celebrated crime novel STRANGERS ON A TRAIN has been remade several times since Alfred Hitchcock's 1951 masterpiece (e.g., Once You Kiss a Stranger and Throw Momma From the Train). How is it possible therefore that the originator of this "criss cross" premise goes uncredited in this tepid TV version starring Linda Gray and Linda Purl? It's more than merely a conspicuous oversight. Instead it's the most blatant instance of plagiarism I've ever encountered.

Mark H. Wolff - author of Hitchcock Poster Art
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
not a great film but its not the worst way to ward off boredom... More entertaining and less painful than shaving your tongue!! 2/10
Slidexi-KylimE9 June 2002
if it comes on t.v. and nothing else is on and you really have nothing better to do...its alright.

acting is a step above daytime soaps (not much in some cases) plot is recycled rip off of Hitchcock's classic "Strangers on a Train" dialogue/screenplay is a triffle weak.

All in all better than most of the swill on daytime television. More entertaining and less painful than shaving your tongue! 2/10
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not bad at all, but typical of the pap spewing out of TV
harry-771 November 2000
Is television so desperate for something to fill up two hours that producers are turning out stuff like this? Melodramatic to the extreme, unbelievable story and predictable denouement. The cast, who all do well, have my sympathy for wading through this.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed