34
Metascore
34 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 75New York PostLou LumenickNew York PostLou LumenickIsn't great, but it's an enjoyable if overly discreet and romanticized look at a long-vanished show-business world.
- 70Los Angeles TimesKevin ThomasLos Angeles TimesKevin ThomasAh, what glorious casting!
- 70SalonStephanie ZacharekSalonStephanie ZacharekA cupcake of a movie, a sweet and lightweight little thing that's all but served up in a ruffled paper cup.
- 40Rolling StonePeter TraversRolling StonePeter TraversJust isn't enough.
- 38San Francisco ChroniclePeter StackSan Francisco ChroniclePeter StackLeaves an unintentional unpleasant aftertaste.
- 38Chicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonChicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonA flabbergasting waste of time and talent.
- 30The New York TimesA.O. ScottThe New York TimesA.O. ScottIf you're looking for laughs, give "Valley of the Dolls" another read instead.
- 25Miami HeraldRene RodriguezMiami HeraldRene RodriguezJust plain bad. Really, really bad.
- 20Chicago ReaderJonathan RosenbaumChicago ReaderJonathan RosenbaumA major washout.
- 0Philadelphia InquirerSteven ReaPhiladelphia InquirerSteven ReaHas to be among the worst movies ever made.