Modern Marvels (TV Series 1993– ) Poster

(1993– )

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Oddly Addictive
SamuelChase26 June 2007
I gotta say I love this show. It really indulges your inner curiosities about a WIDE range of subject matter. What on the surface would sound like some documentary on a lackluster topic you'd watch in grade school, Modern Marvels makes fascinating.

Whether it's guns, engines, shipping, mining, plastics, or something as seemingly mundane as plumbing, Modern Marvels presents an entertaining and well-organized program taking you from the subject's origins to where it's likely headed in the future. This insightful program is highly recommended for those who have even the slightest curiosity, and who desire an understanding of the things that create our society.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Going downhill
wyflyr3 March 2021
For as long as it's been around, I've loved Modern Marvels. But in 2021, it has gone downhill, and a steep one at that. This program does not need a host. It slows down the continuity of the show, partly because he is too busy making an effort to be a celebrity, instead of being informative. With this guy as a host, the show is mindful of shows on the Food Channel, and we don't need another one of those! Bring back the old format. PLEASE!
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not as dood as before
dno-6071830 November 2021
I liked Adam Richman in Man v Food but on Modern Marvels he tends to praise whatever he's talking about too much. Hey Heather! Way too much. Add in the difficulty understanding him with the stupid mask on I'm close to not watching anymore.

Used to be my favorite show.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Greatest Show Ever!
melissa-langston-200730 January 2007
Anyone whoever has a chance to watch this show should! It is very entertaining. You need no scientific or engineering knowledge whatsoever...They cover every single topic: From movies and sex, to ships and storm, to terrorism and the military. Every topic is entertaining. You can watch the shows for FREE on the History Channel website. Any topic that has ever interested will be described in detail...the history and the future of the topics are covered. Some of the best episodes are the Engineering Disaster episodes. These episodes talk all about things that fail from the 1900's on. Watch this show...you will learn...and you will be entertained...
20 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Cornerstone Show On The History Channel
alexkolokotronis16 July 2008
When I think History Channel I think Modern Marvels. In a strange way it is very addictive. You learn so much you just want more and more. You could watch a marathon of this and not notice that hours have passed by. It covers everything from entertainment to architectural achievements to politics. It is so explanatory and at the same times it gives you a time line of whatever the show is displaying. What makes this show so great is that it could cover any topic including ones I'm not interested in and make me interested. This show at times has compelled me to research further to extensively learn about something for myself. A great show that does not base its episodes on speculation but on facts and examines and investigates them as well. I couldn't ever imagine this being taken off the air.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Panama Canal Supersized" (and others) Unwatchable
wingsrfs15 April 2015
Little good it will do posting here, but History Channel has obscured any feedback paths to their programming department.

I really would like to watch this show. I managed to get through to the first commercial. But it's the sound. Rather, the NOISE. Their sound editor seems compelled to pull out all the sound effects he can find and throw it into the program at an unreasonably high volume. I have to crank up the volume to hear the narrator, which causes others in the room not interested in the show to scream to turn it down. It's very annoying to me too, especially that sound of someone dragging sheet metal off a truck. Really.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The show is great, the host can go
rich-972-25539327 December 2022
I love the show and watch it more than any other show. I love to see how things are made and to see what stunning accomplishments man has made. I'm often surprised by the unique looks into corners of our development not seen elsewhere. My grandkids like watching too and get the same enrichment as I do. I hope it stays on forever with one exception.

Sadly, that obnoxious fat guy with the bad jokes turns me off and destroys my joy in watching the show. He adds no value nor knowledge other than stupid wisecracks. His voice scrapes against the smooth presentations and sometimes makes me switch the channel.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I can binge watch guilt-free
view_and_review3 November 2021
"Modern Marvels" is the one show I could binge watch without feeling the least bit guilty. It's educational, intriguing, and totally worthwhile. Between this, "How It's Made," and a handful of other programs, these are the only shows that you can watch and actually gain intelligence.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Upset if this is the new format
freddielburrow22 February 2021
I absolutely love Modern Marvels and just realized that it had a new episode airing about 2 hours before it aired. Since I've spent so much time watching Netflix and Amazon Prime lately, I hadn't seen any advertisements for the new Mod.Mar. Coincidentally, I saw the ad for the new episode today when I went to my DVR for this 1st time in a while and started watching 1 of the 50 Modern Marvels that had recorded over the last few months. Most of them I had seen several times but it had been a while so I always watch them again when they record... Did I mention I really love them? So imagine my disappointment when, what I saw looked like the format of every other Food Network show that follows some guy around the world eating any and everything in sight. Really?? One of the best most informative shows of all time jumping on the band wagon of the many How It's Made shows, and believe me, the Science Channel has started a little different version of their H.I.M. hit what seems like every month for the last 10 years. Don't get me wrong, I do Like How It's Made, I just don't have the desire to watch 10 different versions of it at least once a day. Now to be fair, everything I'm writing about the new episode of Modern Marvels is based solely on seeing the advertisement and first 3 minutes of the show. If I did not love the original so much guys, I wouldn't even give it a chance based on this so far. Why should you care about my opinion then?? Because if I feel this way so quickly being a self described fanatic of the show, how many people have you lost then that won't give it a chance, giving people's short attention span and the cut throat competition for viewers in today's world of on demand entertainment and desire for instant gratification. Lastly, I have hoped for a revival of this show for a long time especially an update for a lot of the older episodes from the 90's and 2000's. Even the exact same episode topics with todays HD programming and vastly updated and improved tech like the Military technology episodes, Electronics episodes (obviously), transportation and even some of the many farming and harvesting topics with the improved manufacturing techniques and farming equipment. Just please don't try to update the format and try to turn it in to a reality type show. It won't work and your format is already a proven success. So, I'm going to watch this new episode now and I really hope that all my preconceptions are proven wrong and this little rant makes me look like an idiot.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Panama Canal Supersized" is the best episode of all!
mrussell-98 April 2015
Be sure not to miss "Panama Canal Supersized" that premieres Saturday evening, April 11 at 9 pm. The special reveals for the first time the 5.5 billion expansion project of the Panama Canal.

Radiant Features filmmakers Dylan Robertson and Bill Ferehawk seamlessly integrate time lapse, drone and regular photography with full immersive sound in a fast-paced, one-hour narrative.

Memorable sequences include a tour through the underground channels while water rushes in, a concrete pour ten stories high, and the fabrication of the jumbo gates in Italy. The expansion project itself started in 2007 and is projected to be finished around early 2016.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A review of the Robots episode
robotbling4 December 2011
Modern Marvels' episode takes a look at the history of mobile robots in the United States. The show begins with the original Shaky and Stanford Cart, all the way up to the massive field robots developed by Red Whittaker at Carnegie Mellon to deal with nuclear accidents. It's particularly interesting because there really weren't any machines (robots or otherwise) capable of dealing with these sorts of disasters before Whittaker and his team began developing them.

While some have criticized Japan for failing to build practical robots capable of dealing with situations like the Fukushima plant, the United States was in the same position when the meltdown occurred at the Three Mile Island reactor. Whittaker jokes that the start-up he founded was the robotics equivalent of an ambulance chaser, making bank on the backs of disasters as they happened. It then goes into some of the early legged robots and autonomous vehicles.

Though it does touch very lightly on humanoids, it almost goes out of its way to tiptoe around Japan's dominance in that area (perhaps not to upset WW2 buffs, the History Channel's target demographic). Instead of Japanese humanoids (of which only familiar clips of Honda's P2 are shown despite the episode airing in 2004!), it focuses on the comparably simplistic animatronics for entertainment and Nolan Bushnell's failed household robotics venture Androbot. Even though our beloved humanoids are not the focus of the episode, it's still a history lesson worth taking, though its American bias is slightly annoying.

Modern Marvels also did a couple of episodes with robotic tangents ("Super Human" has a short segment on Raytheon SARCOS's exoskeleton).
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If you love history or pop culture watch it.
blanbrn15 December 2021
Being a history lover and liking the past and remembering dates over the years I from time to time have watched "Modern Marvels" a series on the "History Channel". The series focus is on the past of inventions that involve food, technology, toys, buildings, and anything that you can think of being from the past that was made and was famous or became part of pop culture. The clips shown are also well done being educational and informative. Really a good watch if you like past history.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
New 2021 Adam Richman show
Freiburger8 March 2021
For 2021 the format changed to have live host Adam Richman. The focus is now less onactual information and all about Adam. It's now total crap. Bring back the old format.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Need a new host
kdayl4 April 2021
Love the show! But you need to get so one other that Adam for a host. He has a habit of being off subject silly.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Manhatten Project episode
greenforest5610 July 2008
The first ¾ of this film is factual and useful. However, at the end it provides the usual moral distortion currently popular about America's use of the atomic bomb to end WWII. First, the main motive for dropping the bomb was not Russia but American casualties.

The American leadership was not indifferent to the spread of Soviet domination. However, at the time of decision the battle of Okinawa was still going on and Truman was looking at casualty reports of 5,000 a week and had been seeing those reports for weeks. In all, there were over 72,000 American casualties in this battle. So high was the casualty rate that congress called for an investigation. Over 200,000 Japanese died on Okinawa. It is not known how many were wounded.

Over 30 American ships were sunk and 164 were damaged. By comparison, only 9 ships were sunk and 14 damaged at Pearl Harbor. Several thousand American and Japanese aircraft were lost, far more than were lost in the Battle of Britain. In fact, more aircraft were lost at Okinawa than the entire June, 1940 combat strength of the RAF and Luftwaffe combined.

Thus, the small island of Okinawa was one of the largest battles of World War II.

It was estimated that there would be up to 1,000,000 American casualties if we had to invade and conquer Japan. Japanese casualties were estimated to be ten times higher. So many Purple Heart Medals were manufactured in anticipation of the casualties from the invasion that to this day wounded soldiers are awarded Purple Hearts from this WWII stock.

Ship losses were expected to be greater because a new form of Kamikaze, besides 10,000 remaining aircraft, in the shape of suicide attack boats, would also be met in the Home Islands. Aircraft losses were expected to be high because many more would be lost to ground fire. Thus, the invasion of Japan was going to be perhaps the largest and most horrendous battle in world history.

The second and little known reason was Japan had a secret biological weapons research program. They had also been bombarding America with balloon bombs that drifted across the Pacific to America on the jet stream. (In fact, it was a Japanese scientist, using balloons, that discovered the jet stream in the 1920's. It is used to this day by commercial airline flights from Tokyo to L.A. to save fuel.)

However, a strict news blackout kept the Japanese from knowing the success of this program, named "fūsen bakudan", and so they did not combine their biological weapons with these balloon bombs. Over 9,000 of these balloons were launched and about 1,000 reached the United States. They fell all over North America, as far north as Alaska, as far east as Detroit and as far south as Mexico.

As late as 1955 one with live ordnance was found in Alaska. Another was found in 1992, its ordnance too corroded to explode. Thus, only because of the news blackout were American and Canadian civil populations were spared widespread attack from biological weapons.

This was no small menace and the American leadership had to weigh it in the balance.

This film episode fails to mention either of these facts.

It is also a moral perversion to have the testimony of 'victims' of the atomic bomb without the moral balance of testimony of the victims of the true atrocities of the Japanese.

Such as: the victims of the Rape of Nanking where hundreds of thousands of Chinese were brutally raped, murdered and abused. Some were tied to posts and used for bayonet practice. Others were used for karate practice, 'practiced' on until they died.

The American and Philippine soldiers who were victims of the Bataan Death March who were brutalized, shot, stabbed, starved and given no water on their tragic march to their prison camps. Thousands died.

Or the Korean 'comfort'women who were enslaved and sent into prostitution by Japan to 'comfort' Japanese soldiers. Or the American captives who were sent to Manchuria where Japan conducted their secret biological weapons program. American G.I.'s were the guinea pigs. Or the U.S. Marines who were all beheaded after they were forced to surrender after defending Wake Island. Etc., etc.

It is a moral imbalance to present only the tearful testimony of a Japanese present at Hiroshima without providing a larger moral context of the war in general. Such an imbalance is a distortion to the point of moral perversion.

NOTE: This criticism is for the "Manhatten Project" episode only. The 'Modern Marvel" series in general is good to excellent and I recommend it.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Host Sucks
srs-1108522 August 2021
I Love the program or at least I did until Adam Richman came along. The subject matter has to interest me a lot in order for me to endure his drivel.

I have no interest in how great, fantastic, or wonderful he thinks something is, Give me the info without all the hype and I will decide.

Please change the Host.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Need a better format
pronuke2 August 2021
I used to love modern marvels when it was done more as a documentary. The new format does not work for me. Adam Richmond does his usual lukewarm job but in the case of this show he is very detrimental to the overall series. A very poor choice. His other series are tolerable at times (when nothing better is on) but he really ruins modern marvels. I hope they get rid of him and those responsible for the current format.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ruined
pfxmoran28 July 2021
Why do we need a guy that is famous for excessive eating hosting a show that was a great show with a narrator, not a host? Then EVERY episode has been about food. Why. Just launch a new food show H channel. Why ruin an existing good format.

Adam Richman is at the least off-putting. I find it disgusting watching him eat and eat, and go "mmm this is great"with food in his mouth. WTF How is this about "modern marvels"?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The new version is terrible.
13Funbags23 March 2021
I liked Adam on Man VS Food but he ruined this show. It even looks like every new episode is going to be about food. Another great show ruined.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
From GREAT to ATE.
stevenamalfitano3 February 2022
I am so thankful to finally find other people expressing their opinions about the new Modern Marvels and Adam Richman. He's terrible as a host. The show does not need a host. This was one of the most informative and intelligent shows I have ever watched, and then Adams reign came in. Every episode initially was about food. When did food become the only Marvel in existence? Finally he branched out to tools, toys and games, and while that was somewhat better, he is still terrible as a host. At least he didn't taste the GI Joe. Please return this outstanding show to its original format, and go back to whoever used to write in the intelligence of the show, and hopefully save it. It is a travesty what you have allowed this show to become.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Modern Marvels used to be good.
ahoffarth3 August 2021
I could watch Modern Marvels reruns over and over again and still enjoy them, until now. The new format with host Adam Richmond, instead of the former narrative format, is hardly watchable. Adam is not a good fit for this type of show. For the food topics, maybe. But even that was a bit (Covidly) awkward. Please let his contract run out and go back to the old format.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It's Modern Marvels not Fat Food Guy!
wreckermattmf1 October 2023
This used to be 1 of my favorite shows on television from the beginning of its existence. I really wish you would dedicate an episode to real Wreckers and tow trucks. The show started tailing off because there are only so many subjects and the subjects need to be somewhat interesting although I found the show made things interesting to me that previously were not interesting to me. That being said I far more preferred the original format of having a narrator and just interviewing professionals from whatever area the show was about. Since the relaunch with Adam Richman, the show has become unwatchable even with the great topics. Why would you put an annoying, fat food guy that knows nothing about trucks and construction equipment as the host of a show about trucks and equipment? I'm a truck and equipment guy so I wouldn't expect you to throw me on a show about gourmet foods. This is about as pathetic as when History decided to shove Megan Fox down our throats as an Ancient Aliens pro when she was nothing more than a sex piece viewer grab. Adam Richman isn't funny, he isn't knowledgeable about anything other than feeding his face with fattening, gluttonous foods that make him look like Jaba the Hut. Please stop trying to grab for ratings cuz this is HISTORY, not MTV but that seems to be the viewers History channel is trying to reach for some reason. Please don't keep selling out like most of America has already done. Again I would love to see some kind of programming dedicated to the history and future of the Towing and Recovery industry. You can start in Chattanooga TN with Holmes and go from there. I would love to be part if you need someone with knowledge of towing and recovery because I can tell you Adam Richman never worked a real job such as towing and recovery for a day in his life. That's why ppl don't care for him, he's unrelatable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"We are holding our own"
evening120 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I stumbled upon this series' episode about the Edmund Fitzgerald, the ore freighter that sank to the bottom of Lake Superior on Nov. 10, 1975, causing the deaths of 29 brave crew and inspiring Gordon Lightfoot's atmospheric sea shanty.

According to this well-narrated and -illustrated program, it's still not known what brought down the 729-foot vessel. It's possible that after the ship took on water amidst 35-foot swells, a particularly powerful wave smashed windows of the control room, sinking the ship before its highly experienced captain could send out an SOS.

This segment was of additional interest to me because it also examines the September 1994 crash of USAir 427 outside of Pittsburgh, my hometown. I well remember this tragedy due to its proximity, and I knew a young woman among the 132 dead.

The plane was a Boeing 737, which we're told is the workhorse of the commercial airline industry. Another 737 had crashed in an eerily similar way in 1991, and an investigation of both prompted the longest-ever investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board (4.5 years). We're told that 737's are safe today, having been retrofitted and their pilots trained.

Amazingly, this episode addresses an additional incident of personal interest to me -- the 3.5-million-gallon Ashland Oil spill of 1988, some 25 miles south of Pittsburgh. By that time, I was long gone from the vicinity, and I'd never even heard of the assault to the Monongahela River. Only one year later, oil devastation made big news, when the Exxon Valdez leaked 11 million gallons into Prince William Sound in Alaska.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed