(1957)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Procreation not recreation
ticklemetorgo18 June 2005
Another fun short skewered by MST, thank you!! A very bratty only child gal announces to her Romulan (or Vulcan) roommate she is marrying the captain of the swing choir (claims to be a football player are unfounded) Mom and dad who are older than her grandparents disapprove (along with the Romulan who has a superior relationship with her fish lipped boyfriend) so what other choice than to elope and have a miserable marriage (implied) Happiness cannot be achieved here unless EVERYBODY approves. It does not matter what the couple thinks but society here must decide and judge for themselves whether this marriage should happen.

These shorts are fun for their entertainment value, I really don't see where people in the 50's would have actually believed what they were watching. Oh well.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Love is a burning thing, marriage not so much
johnny_burnaway23 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
You know what the old-timers say: Marry in haste, repent at leisure. This short film is the celluloid embodiment of the sampler that hung in your grandmother's living room.

Half the focus of this short is on Peg, the impetuous, thin-skinned young lady with an overwhelming desire to marry Joe, the football player she's known a whole semester. Peg suffers from a raging case of "only child syndrome", demanding the world see things her way or she's going to get ugly. I suspect she would have done better if she'd had siblings, but considering her parents' advanced age, she was probably a late arrival to the family and the doctor advised against having more. She's spoiled but conflicted over it; while she wants what she wants when she wants it, she also lashes out at her father for thinking he can buy his way out of any situation. It's possible that Peg and the girl whose father bought her a house in the movie "Psycho" grew up in the same neighborhood.

Red flags abound in the Peg-Joe relationship: Peg tells Joe the story of how she defied her parents when they wouldn't let her go to a dance. If he was even half-listening, he'd know this is a girl who doesn't like to hear "no" from anyone, and that's going to include him too. Likewise, Joe shows no interest in meeting Peg's parents, despite the fact that they're in town because of him and they're going to be his in-laws. Running off to marry a girl after blowing off her folks is going to make for some icy silences around the dinner table next Thanksgiving.

On the other side of the coin, we have Liz and Andy, the couple who are taking it slow, getting to know each other (and presumably their future in-laws as well). They talk, they argue, they play tennis, they keep a respectable distance between them when they dance, Liz hectors Andy about his homework, all the hallmarks of a good relationship. The movie comes down pretty solidly on their side.

While there is something to be said for starting warm and growing hot as opposed to starting hot and growing cold, this movie really sets up a straw man target in Peg and Joe. It seems the desire to jump the gun on marriage comes from basic selfishness and hormones rather than love, whereas the measured approach of maturity will keep you from making the wrong decision. I say maturity because, as other reviewers have pointed out, the actress playing Liz is way too old to be portraying a college student. Unless, of course, she has gone back to school after getting a divorce and Andy is going to be her second marriage. Maybe she learned the lesson of this short the hard way. Maybe she's living in the dorms as the house mother. Maybe I'm over-thinking this.

Anyway, everyone jumps on the matrimony pony in their own way. Whether you move fast or slow, do it with your eyes wide open and don't worry too much about what Liz, Andy, Peg, and Joe have to tell you. Unless you're watching the MST3k version. You can learn a lot from that one.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Or is it just plain stupidity?
icehole48 March 2002
This short film definitely does not stand up to the test of time. In 1957, when this was released, returning war vets and their lovers were anxious to get married, have the 2.5 kids, and live the American dream. This short film tries to warn them about how choosing the wrong lover can be tragic. Bad acting, stupid plotline and no resolution shoot this one down. Avoid it if at all possible.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Eh, I've seen worse.
Bevan - #43 March 2008
Alright, the actress playing Peggy's "college roommate" was 37 when the short was filmed, and her (grand?)mother looked older than my 90-year-old grandmother does, but truth be told, this is less raw than I would have expected or the comments would have you believe. In her wild rush to marry her football star ASAP, Peggy's no more irresponsible than many a young lover of today, and her ostensibly "furious" parents are portrayed, in fact, as being concerned and wishful of her slowing down rather than overtly trying to bust them up or angrily scream about conventional morality.

Beyond that, the performances involve earnest moralizing, but there wasn't a lot committed to film in the 1950s that didn't. Peggy's boyfriend wasn't any more styrofoam or wooden than any other pretty boy film BMOC of the Fifties (and it isn't as if he had more than twenty words of dialog). If there's anything creepy about the short, it's the Stepfordesque so-called "romance" between Liz and Andy, a couple with all the screen chemistry of Rex Harrison and the Pushmee-Pullyu.

I agree that Joel and the bots riffed well and truly upon it, but c'mon ... Mr. B Natural this isn't. Another victim of MST3K pack mentality.

4/10.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Is Peggy Afraid of Losing "Boing?"
kkmwills7 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I understand the premise of the short ( compare/contrast Peggy & Liz), but Sue, the high schooler from "Are You Ready For Marriage?", has more maturity.

I just don't see that Peggy understands what life as a pro-footballer's wife will entail, even if he makes a team. Especially in that era.

Yes, there are plenty of elopements that work out. I think my feelings come down to why is the question framed in a binary? You're either mindlessly horny or willing to wait for variables to meet your societal needs, according to the short.

I enjoyed AYRFM much more!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Where's Waldo?
lee_eisenberg25 July 2007
"Is This Love?" is the typical sort of so-called educational film that Dr. Forrester makes the guys in the Satellite of Love watch (in this case, it preceded "Teenage Strangler"). Needless to say, they have a lot of fun heckling it, going so far as to call one of the characters "Patrick Swayze".

But the point is that this can't be love. In fact, we can't even insinuate that love is blind. Such an assertion presupposes that this short has some value, and it clearly has none. Maybe it's just that the past half century has changed our mores so much that this sort of movie no longer looks realistic. But mark my words, it provides some great fodder for "MST3K".
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I thought it was love, but it was just a rash.
zmaturin25 February 2002
Another movie about teen troubles that could all be avoided if we popularized fun, safe sex with multiple partners! See, the trouble here is, one sad-faced college gal wants to marry a hunky, carved-out-of-styrofoam football player, against the wishes of her doddering, doily-wearing parents AND her Romulan senior citizen roommate. So the two love birds run off to be wed in secret, ruining their lives forever. Now, in a perfect world they could just, uh, do the deed, repeat as necissary, and get it out of their systems. Then they could concentrate on their studies, graduate, and find true love in the private sector once they are mature and sickened of a frolicking, mind-blowing sex life.

What was I talking about? Oh, yeah, this short. It's not that good. The scenes of the elderly college gal and her Maynard G. Krebs-like boyfriend gloating about how great their relationship was really sickened me, as did the decrepit corpses who played the enraged parents. My only consolation is that they're both long dead by now.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed