Water's Edge (2003) Poster

(2003)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Mixed bag of Nuts
sol121826 December 2005
**SPOILERS** Moving into his dad's old hunting cottage outside of Reedsville Robert and his wife Molly are trying to put their lives back together since the tragic death of their daughter.

Robert feels that the peace and quite of the country would give him the inspiration to write the great American Novel and get both him and Molly out of debt from the expenses of keeping their daughter alive on life-support. Molly's depression starts to become suicidal and one afternoon she loads a shotgun and tries to blow her brains out. Robert, coming home after being out on the lake writing, sees that the gun was loaded and, knowing Molly's unstable state of mind, flips out and runs into the woods with the shotgun to get his thoughts together.

Sitting alone in a clearing Robert sees a police car pull up and the sheriff pulls out this young woman and is about to smash her head in with rock when he interrupts the obvious attempted murder by blowing, after warning him to stop, the cop sheriff Dodd away.

Taking the young woman home to get her patched up, she was badly beaten up by Dodd, both Robert & Molly find out that the woman, Rae Baines, worked in the office of the mayor of Reedsville Mayor Block. It's later when Robert goes to dispose of Dodd's body and patrol car that he finds a bag with $200,000.00 and a bunch of photos of Rea and the mayor in a number of compromising positions; was she blackmailing him and Sheffif Dodd working for Mayor Block was to kill her on orders from up high to shut Rea up for good?

The movie "Waters Edge" goes on with Rea manipulating the somewhat foolish Robert in trying to split him up from his wife Molly and the blackmail money. Molly later finds out, at the Reedsville Public Libery, that Rea was actually working with her husband Bobbie, the town's official photographer, who was later found dead in the trunk of Sheriff Dodd's patrol car. The two were the ones involved in blackmailing Mayor Block not this local power and control freak T. Wallace, who runs the towns feed store, as Rea told Robert.

Later Robert gets taken back to town by Officer Campball for questioning in Dodd's death. It's then when he quickly realizes that he's being set up, by the town's mayor and is henchmen like Campball & Wallace, to not only take the rap for Dodd's murder, who Robert shot in self-defense. But thats not real reason for his troubles with the corrupt Mayor Block & Co. It's the $200,000.00 in blackmail money and photos that Robert has hidden in his cottage that is.

Meanwhile back at the cottage Rea, showing her true colors, has the helpful and kind-hearted Molly knocked out and tied up, after an eye-popping and ferocious cat-fight with her, and dropped into the lake with a heavy weight tied to her body and left to drown. Robert who made a run from it from both Campball and T.Wallace is captured and made to go back to his cottage and get the money and incriminating photos that the mayor wants so badly. It's then that Robert finds out that Rea, who was there looking for the same things, is not the innocent soul that she said she was. It's then that he has it out with both her and the Mayor and his corrupt crew of law enforcers in the movie's fiery conclusion.

There's a lot of holes in the plot of "Waters Edge" that make the story a bit hard to swallow as well as the very unconvincing and ham acting of both Emmanuelle Vaugler & Daniel Baldwin as Rea and the Mayor. But actor Nathan Fillion as Robert keeps your mind off them by his taking the role he has, as an innocent man on the run, deadly serious and not trying to sleep walk his way through the film in order to just collect a check.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Nathan Fillion saves this moving from being too lame
kiraboo27 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of those movies that if someone I really liked hadn't been in it, I would have stopped watching it. It was creepy in a not-enjoyable way (I'm not a fan of movies about women being assaulted), and there were too many times when I thought, "That's dumb. Why are they doing that?" For example, when someone decides to put a body in a car & push it in the water, instead of reporting the incident to the police (I'm being intentionally vague here in order to avoid major spoilers). It's full of movie clichés- someone you think is dead isn't, someone you think is good isn't, someone you think is guilty isn't, small-town folks band together, etc. Nathan Fillion, as always, shines. This movie could have been much better with just a little effort (better writing, mostly, probably better directing too). Disappointing.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Eh... At least ONE of them could act!
culbeda11 September 2004
The movie had some potential, but it was saddled with HORRIBLE acting, directing and producing. Seriously, the woman who played Rae gave one of the worst performances I've seen in quite some time. I found myself squirming in my seat, I was so embarrassed for her.

Unfortunately for her, the direction wasn't helping her. People should see this if only to see how bad her first real talking scene is. Film students should also watch this to see how NOT to film a flashback.

The writing and direction were also lacking in depth and detail. Some of the dialog was uninspired, to put it politely.

The only actor who delivered was Nathan Fillion as Robert (the lead). People should definitely see him in his proper role on the TV show Firefly, available on DVD.
24 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Waters too placid
movieman_kev30 May 2013
Castle's Nathan Fillion and Chandra West of the horrendous Puppet Maaster 4 & 5 films, star as Mr. And Mrs. Graves, a double who recently transplant to the country after their daughter dies. After a fight, he stumbles onto a scene in the woods that leads the couple into a sordid tale of greed, lust and murder.

This is a strictly by-the-books affair, low-key thriller that won't have you guessing at what's going to happen as its all way too easily foreshadowed.the acting is merely mediocre and the whole film just has the feel of an absolutely average, mundane TV movie, akin to one one might find on say Lifetime or Hallmark.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
weak even for "Lifetime"
caa82116 April 2008
Let's see if I can remember the initial details at the beginning of this "opus." A young couple are going to a cabin owned by his late father. In an opening scene, she is dreaming of being underwater with some sort of plastic barrier preventing her from emerging. This is something like, say, a 10th-grade student might write as a scene in a sophomoric attempt to copy Fellini's "8-1/2." But it's a perfectly appropriate beginning for this flick, which looks like something Ed Wood would have done if he'd had a bit larger and better-looking cast, and enough more in budget to film in British Columbia with better equipment. Other than that, this movie doesn't exceed what he could have achieved, but without the underlying humor and "so-bad-it's-good" quality of Ed's works.

The lead couple are broke. They have fled Gotham to recuperate from a family tragedy. She's contemplating suicide, and to regain their financial status, he's here to complete the great American novel, and thereby they obviously hope to restore themselves both financially and emotionally.

Things get off to a bad start when the lead male/author goes out in a boat to begin writing, but the pages of his text (which are lying in an open box on the boat's seat) blow away into the lake. He returns to the cabin, and finding a loaded shotgun (wife had loaded and aimed at her chin in contemplation of whacking herself), declares they've both had a bad day.

She indicates a need to have something to go with their rice and beans, and he departs with the shotgun, in search of a duck for main course. He almost immediately stumbles upon a policeman who drags a young woman, who is bound and gagged, from the trunk of his vehicle. About to shoot her point-blank, the backwoods gendarme thinks he hears something, so decides to bash her head with a rock instead. The lead then confronts the corrupt lawman, and ignoring the latter's admonition not to interfere with "police business," offs him with his shotgun. Along the way he subsequently discovers another body, 200K in cash, and some racy pictures of the young woman and the mayor (played by the most prominent name in this film, Heaven-Help-Us, Daniel Baldwin).

Soon, we have scenes where the hero is attending a charity auction at the town's library, while his wife chats with the mysterious young woman he had rescued, as the latter cleans-up in the tub. They chat as if they were two sorority sisters getting ready to go to a theme party. At the library, he's introduced as a prominent author and honored guest at the auction. Presumably, the dead lawman is simply still just drawing flies in the woods.

And so it continues, and the remaining plot occurrences and storyline represent time capsule examples of the meaning of the words "banal," "vacuous," and (again) "sophomoric."

All of this is about as gripping as a "Three Stooges" offering. And we all know the "Stooges" writers weren't interested in creating great plots; the main purpose was to create situations where Moe could slap Larry and Curly, hit them on their heads with a mallet, and poke their eyes. The end purpose here is anyone's guess.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tidy thriller
ctomvelu121 March 2010
This Canadian quickie, starring mostly Canadian actors, deserves a look-see, even with Daniel Baldwin on board. Nathan Fillion plays a writer who has lost a child and moves with his wife to a small town that turns out to have more secrets than Carter has liver pills. The incredibly sexy Chandra West plays the wife and the even sexier Emmanuele Vaughier plays a femme fatale who intrudes in their lives. Baldwin is the corrupt town mayor. Vaughier and Fillion share a lakeside seduction scene that is hotter than hell, and a reminder why you don't usually see this film running in the daytime. It's A TOWN WITHOUT PITY for the new millennium, and holds up fairly well on a rewatch. I know it was not intentional, but there is a a very funny foot chase scene a little more than halfway through involving Fillion and the local sheriff. This ain't THE HOT SPOT and Fillion isn't Don Johnson, but it will do for what looks like a made-for-cable movie. Vaughier (or West, for that matter) is welcome to drug and seduce me any day.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Formulae thriller, just a cut above average
gzerna1 February 2004
"Water's Edge" screenwriter Craig Brewer wrote and directed the very low-budget, very compelling and brilliant "The Poor and Hungry", so that was all I really needed to know to put this picture at the top of my rental que. I'm a little disappointed. This is only a formulae thriller, perhaps just a cut above average, with decent casting and direction. I can see the Craig Brewer touch in the screenplay: relatively interesting characters, mostly believable plot considering the contrivances necessary for a formulae thriller, and good dialogue. I will still keep an eye on this remarkable talent for another unforgettable picture like his first. Some day. In the meantime I know you gotta pay the rent.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Tense, edgy drama ... soaked in mystery
editfilmr22 July 2003
Nicely paced drama with tense to intense moments. Excellent casting and location make for superb ingredients of an unfolding rural mystery. The human conditions of broken dreams, empathy, greed, and love play major roles in fleshing out the characters brought together in this small place, in this small moment ... in time.

The major characters of Robert, Molly, and Rae flow downstream in increasing torrents of emotional whitewater, as jutting rocks of sex, murder, and deceitful suspense reveal themselves. Nice "Hitchcock-tonian" touch applied with a goateed Daniel Baldwin playing the shrewd small-town Mayor. [ What better way to accentuate a drama/mystery than applying a 'lil Daniel .... with those piercing blue eyes !?! ]

In my opinion, the climax was a bit "watered down" , but as in Life ... all is not as we might have hoped for , but as we have wrought , going up... only .... to the edge .

Good move by the producers to change the title to the present one from the former ... "Wicked Season" . Vive la Canadiens ! Bringing us all .... to the Waters Edge ....
10 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
IIlogical Ending
Montayj31 May 2018
I was feeling most of this movie but Molly coming back at the end from the water just in time was too much.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed