Spy Kids 3: Game Over (2003) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
223 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Awesome for kids, not for nostalgia-hungry 18 year old-now 19.
cinephile-2769028 June 2018
I LOVED this as a kid, and whenever it came on Disney Channel, I had to watch it. I found it at a garage sale for only 50 cents and bought it. I was BORED half the time! I kept naming movies in my head that I would RATHER be watching! I just don't care for it anymore.

If you are a kid, definitely see this, and have fun, For everyone else, don't bother. Stallone as the villain is the main thing that kept me going until the end.

I have read complaints on the 3D. I have never watched that version and I also don't need to since I have a lazy eye and can't see 3D.

In short-kids, see it. Preteens and up-skip it.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
irredeemably stupid
cherold28 August 2004
What a mess. There are clever ideas here and there, a few laughs, the occasional decent special effect (I saw this on TV so didn't see it in 3D, which perhaps would have made the generally disappointing effects more impressive), but the lame, tossed-together script and the lack of any cohesion to the final product make this only barely watchable. This movie seems to just be going through the motions; you can't even call it formulaic because it barely attempts to even stick with any formula, it's more like random stuff thrown in here and there. As for the ending, well, it's main purpose was to create an excuse (and not a very good one) to have cameos by everyone who was in the first two movies (allowing them to list Bandaras first in the credits even though he's on screen for only a couple of minutes), and the final showdown is so utterly moronic that words fail me.

At the same time, I didn't actually hate it. I wasn't in pain watching it. It was a mindless Saturday afternoon movie and I watched it as mindlessly as I could and occasionally enjoyed it. But after the very fun second movie (which I thought superior to the first), this was a great disappointment. I'd advise skipping it.
32 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not awful, but could have been much better.
TheLittleSongbird31 July 2009
I did like the first two movies, which had a sense of fun, but despite a wonderful idea, Spy Kids 3D fails to live up to the standard of the first two movies.

I will say though that the 3D effects are more than decent, and there are spirited performances from Alexa Vega and Daryl Sabara. And I did really like the idea of the story, it was a very original idea, sadly the execution was patchy.

The storyline was sadly very predictable, and despite the impressive images on screen, it failed to have a sense of wonder. Another problem was that the script was very devoid of humour, and while the first two movies were well written and had some funny moments, this instalment had one or two laughs scattered here and there, but overall was a bit limp, and the finale was rather disappointing.

The acting certainly wasn't awful, it was just a little uninspired. The two leads are fine and Ricardo Montalban is surprisingly very good as the grandfather, and while Antonio Banderas, Steve Buscemi, Tony Shalhoub and George Clonney did their best, the uneven script disallowed them to have any sense of fun. The actor I was most disappointed with, sorry guys, was Sylvester Stallone. Now I like Stallone, and I consider Oscar(1991) one of the most unfairly underrated movies ever, and I like a fair majority of his work. But here I felt he was out of character playing the villain. Hamming it up, a phrase I usually despise describes his acting here perfectly, and he overdoes it shamelessly at times.

Overall, Spy Kids 3D isn't terrible, it is just mediocre, and could have been much better. 4/10 for the 3D effects, and the efforts of the cast. Bethany Cox
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
fun for the little ones, but the series is getting stale
argv30 July 2003
Get your little ones ready for the game of their lives, cuz `Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over' will tickle their little bitty funny bones. This third installment of the popular `Spy Kids' series is like its predecessors in that it's high-tech, high-energy, high-fun, and high on the pro-family moral messages. What's more, it's in 3D, which requires disposable glasses, handed out at the theater. On the downside, the Spy Kids theme seems worn out, the actors have out-grown their roles, and the strong family-values messages are disingenuous and schmaltzy. In short, the cow's been milked for all its got.

But, anyway, back to the fun.

In this new adventure, Juni and Carmen Cortez find themselves on a mission to stop the release of a virtual-reality video game, aptly titled, `Game Over'. It is purported to be the best video game ever, and lines outside toy stores are growing around the country. But, the ISS has learned that the infamous `level five' captures the mind of the player, entrapping him eternally within the game. The threat, of course, is that `The Toymaker', played by Sylvester Stallone, is really out to control the minds of our youth, and thus, our future.

It turns out that The Toymaker himself is already entrapped in the game, so the only way to stop him is to actually play it. The movie begins when Juni, eager to be an `independent PI' at the age of 10, is called back to duty to the ISS to enter the game and find his sister Carmen, who had already tried to invade it, but was suspended in level 4. Juni catches up to her with the dubious help of a few experienced beta test players, who are determined to reach the 5th level on their own.

The true essence of the film is to simply show the video game, and with the 3D glasses, the 80% of the screen time that game consumes is definitely fun and worth the ride. The funny thing is, `Spy Kids 3D' makes no attempts to hide the fact that the only reason for the film is to show game. To wit, the plot points are meaningless, even to the point where the script itself acknowledges it: Juni asks why the Toymaker is caught in the game, and the answer is a humorous hand-wave, `Oh, it just happens.' The plot and characters are hurriedly scooted along to the start of the game, which then goes on and on and on, till the end, when scores of famous cameo appearances pepper the screen, all having fun and making statements about the importance of family, and yada yada yada.

Oh, it's not that there is anything wrong with such pro-family messages. But conspicuously downplayed are the genuine circumstances and feelings that were the impetus in the first, and best, of the Spy Kids trilogy.

The 3D aspect of the film involves wearing glasses that give depth to the objects on the screen. There are two ways to do this, and unfortunately, Spy Kids 3D uses the old-fashioned way, from the 1950s, where one lens is red and the other blue. The film is shot with the two colors shifted in opposite directions, and depth is perceived by the distance of the shift. Unfortunately, this mutes colors so much, that the beautiful and surreal colors expressed in the digital photography are lost. I can only assume that this was intentional, so as to give the video game its own sense of other-worldliness, which again, was nice.

With all its wild-riding and fun, Spy Kids 3D is just a movie for kids, unlike the first of the series, which was much smarter and hence, enjoyable by adults, too. So, best to drop off the little tykes at the theater with a baby sitter, and go shopping for a while. But, don't buy anything that's red and blue plaid, or your kids just may throw up on you.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No
jackstringer12 February 2006
One day, I was in an mood to watch an action movie. I decided to go see this movie, I thought "how bad could it be?"...Bad. I hated everything about this movie. Those kids were horrible actors, they were annoying, and they had bad lines. The story was lame, I mean they're called "Spy kids", they don't spy! The only thing that made them spies is that they had a bunch of gadgets. The whole "guy" thing was taken right out of The Matrix. I've seen some other Rodriguiz movies and I liked them. But dude, stick with adult movies, cause the kid movie thing ain't working'. I play video games, and that doesn't make the movie any more interesting. The FX were horrible, and my Dad does visual FX, so I know a thing or two about that stuff. All in all, if you haven't seen this movie, don't see it.
19 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrid
j4s0nX4 February 2004
They should of stopped this after the first movie.. That movie was just horrid. The plot just was just not original anymore, only upside to the movie is the 3d look idea which was not to bad but just did not measure up with the weak storyline.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Game Over indeed
bizzaroarchetype13 August 2003
I was bored the other night and thought to myself, "I have never seen a 3D movie before and all the hype they are giving to Spy Kids 3D, I should go check it out." I bought my ticket not expecting a good plot but at least expecting decent special effect and a 3 Dimensional experience.

The special effects were crappy- The movie would have been better if they either had just shown the green screen instead of the virtual world or if the grandfather had died. I think the producer's objective was to dig into the Hollywood Actor Welfare Hat and pull out the names of several really poor actors.

Defining moment: when the theater had to call an ambulance for me after I slobbered onto the floor from a seizure induced by probably some of the crappiest, blurriest special effects I have ever seen.

One last thing- these people that make movies for kids can't use their audience as an excuse for stupid crap like this. Anyone who has seen Spirited Away or Princess Mononoke knows that there is talent and creativity our there that can be used to make movies for children.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The Spy Kids Franchise Ends On A Bad Note
christian1237 July 2005
Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over is a weak conclusion to the very entertaining Spy Kids franchise. Agents Juni and Carmen Cortez set out on their most mind-blowing mission yet: journeying inside the virtual reality world of a 3-D video game designed to outsmart them, as the awe-inspiring graphics and creatures of gaming come to real life. Relying on gadgetry, bravery, family bonds and lightning-quick reflexes, the Spy Kids must battle through tougher and tougher levels of the game in order to save the world from a power hungry villain. The plot sounds like it has some potential but the execution wasn't very good. I really don't have a problem with 3D but just because it is in 3D doesn't mean everything else has to be bad. The first two had good stories and were entertaining to watch. This one had a poor story and at times was too painful to watch. The acting took a drop from the previous film as most of the performances were bad. Sylvester Stallone did the worst out of everybody and I was wondering why he was even cast as his career is pretty much over. Alexa Vega and Daryl Sabara play the two kids Juni and Carmen. In the first two, they give decent performances but, in this one they were awful. Antonio Banderas and Carla Gugino don't really appear in the film which is probably better for them. There are also a series of cameos including Salma Hayek and George Clooney. Robert Rodriguez does a rather bad job of directing as the film looks like a mess. The script is terrible and predictable. The ending is really bad as it just seemed like some cheap way to include everyone in the film. The entire film felt rushed and they should had spent more time on it. The 3D isn't even that impressive and they focused on that then more than anything else. The film is also not very enjoyable to watch. When the film isn't in 3D, it gets really boring and most of the dialog isn't very funny either. The special effects were cheesy and looked really bad. The running time was a brief 90 minutes yet that felt a lot longer with the dull story. There is just very little to like here and I think they blew it as they could had made a very successful franchise {in terms of quality not money making}. In the end, this is a poor film and its better if kids and adults alike just skip it. Rating 3/10
18 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Would have been average at best without the 3-D...
Fyodor_Karamazov2 August 2003
Far inferior to it's predecessors, Spy Kids & Spy Kids 2, this third installment would have been a moderately entertaining - albeit enormously insipid - afternoon matinee, had it not been for the awful 3-D. There are newer, more advanced forms of 3-D entertainment, but director Rodriguez decided to go with the old fashioned 1950s variety - resulting in a virtually colorless mess of hazy images rushing past the audience's confused, aching eyes for an hour and a half. If they release a non-3-D version on DVD, wait for that and enjoy what little screen time was given to Ricardo Montelban, who steals what little entertainment value this stinker manages. Otherwise, save you money for a fall or winter release, when movies of any value whatsoever are typically released.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent movie for youngsters
neil-47626 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
For his third (and final, until he did a 4th) foray into the Spy Kids universe, Robert Rodriguez sends them into a computer game masterminded by wicked Sylvester Stallone.

As ever, Darryl Sabara and Alexa Vega play the spy siblings, a batch of other kids play assorted allies and enemies, and a bunch of high profile buddies of Rodrigues cameo as assorted bizarre adults.most of the settings are, to a greater or lesser extent (usually greater), CGI, and the 3D is real in-yourface coming atcha! stuff.

This is going to annoy a certain mentality, but for those who are prepared to enjoy a good-natured, eye-catching romp with a whiff of cheese about it, aimed formly at the younger viewer, this has a lot to recommend it
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If you have any sense do not watch this movie
ianmorrisongarrett18 May 2015
This movie starts out with sub par visuals and acting and simply gets worse the longer this mess drags on. It amazes me how a movie with a budget of $38,000,000 could be this horrible. Some of the actors have at least mediocre talent and yet the end has visuals that look straight out of Microsoft word "Word Art". This movie would have been better if M. Night Shyamalan directed it! The plot is predictable, the acting is deplorable and the visuals are downright awful. If your children seriously want to watch a good movie show them something of actual quality.Personally I think that the rating of 4.1 is extremely generous to say the least.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best movie of all time
franblancoo16 December 2018
I am a single father of three children. I raised them and I showed them affection. They do their best to please their father, but they will be never be as loved as this movie.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun, but not overwhelming.
general-melchett9 February 2007
There's little denying that the Spy Kids series wasn't brilliant. Far better kids' films have been made. Though I must admit, I have enjoyed them. They have proved to be extremely flexible with mediocre budgets and are extremely fun to watch. And Spy Kids 3-D brings you into the experience - anything in 3-D is brilliant, but I found this an overwhelming cinematic experience with the 3-D glasses. This may explain why Spy Kids 3-D did well at the box office. Although, saying that, the only really good thing is the cinematic experience. This film does have substance enough to keep you watching through the whole thing, but there's no denying that it lacks on the intelligence and is once again, a predictable affair. And there's no character development either - didn't either of the Spy Kids learn anything from their encounters in the game? There really isn't much to warrant a DVD purchase - though you can still view it in 3D on the TV, a lot of the experience is lost in the translation. Though to be honest, this isn't exactly a gem for your collection, but it isn't exactly a large mound of doggy do either. 6/10
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I Can't Believe I Watched The Whole Thing. It's Really Bad!
Rodrigo_Amaro1 June 2010
A exactly 2 months ago (April 1st and this is not a lie, you can check my reviews) I opened my movie sessions with "TRON" and it was a completely disappointing movie about a technician who must enter into a video game to destroy a powerful villain. First of all I have never watched anyone of those "Spy Kids" movie series. Lack of trust? Lack of interest? Lack of time? Who knows? All I know is that I attempt to watch "Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over" because I was awake, with nothing better to do and I knew that there's a big and great cast in it. Result: A boring movie and visual video game played by director Robert Rodriguez with a pathetic ending.

I usually tend to simplify the story of the movie, explaining details of the plot but I won't do that. Perhaps just a little bit. It's like "TRON" except that this time the former spy boy Juni (Daryl Sabara, a tiny version of Jensen Ackles with almost the same angered expression) must enter into a dangerous video game created by a sarcastically villain (played by Sylvester Stallone, totally hammy) that kidnapped Juni's sister (Alexa Vega). The whole film is Juni trying to figure out a way to reach the next level and save his sister, with the help of some friends and his grandfather (Ricardo Montalban, the only good performance here).

Why this movie sucked? First: I have a total dislike for movies who basically is 80% special effects with scenarios moving all the time, all those blinding colors. Annoying. I hated this one, hated "Speed Racer" and the only one I really liked of this new wave of movies was "Captain Sky and The World of Tomorrow" (needs a urgent sequence) because that was great, had a interesting plot, the visual concept was incredible and it resurrected Laurence Olivier (it's archive footage of one of his films but that's OK).

Second: I don't even know if kids are that dumb to want to watch something like this. This movie wants to be too many things; want to be a comedy without funny things, want to be a spy movie but can't even kill a character and not even make a evil villain. By the way the villain played by Stallone multiplies himself into three other sad characters. If kids have enjoyed this or even adults enjoyed this film then perhaps my heart grows colder and I don't know what I'm saying. All I know is that this movie was pretty bad.

Third: Here comes the list of actors who unfortunately appeared in this movie in commitment to friendship or loyalty to the director, executives and producers, and or are in it for the money: Antonio Banderas, Carla Gugino, Steve Buscemi, Tony Shalhoub (I must have missed his scene or he's very different so I couldn't find him), Bill Paxton, Matt O'Leary, Salma Hayek, Danny Trejo, Ryan Pinkston, and of course Stallone and the child actors, and at last but not least George Clooney. In the very last scene of the movie, during the outtakes and funny movie mistakes Clooney appears saying a brief statement: This could be the end of my career (and then he burst in laughs more than that we didn't saw at 2010's Oscar). Yes, he's right about that. It could've been the end but after this film he made things far more interesting, won a Oscar, directed, wrote and acted in "Good Night and Good Luck" and more.

In short: a movie that didn't needed to be made. Game and review over. 1/10
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The 3-D thing didn't work for me but there is still enough style and silliness to amuse both kids and adults
bob the moo2 May 2004
Juni Cortez is no longer with the OSS and is now a private detective, taking work where he can get it. However, the President himself requests Juni return to service as his sister is in danger. She has entered, and become trapped in, a deadly video game called Game Over which has been designed by the Toymaker. In it he ensnares children's minds forever. Juni is sent in to rescue her and team up to stop the Toymaker's evil plot. Enlisting his grandfather's help, Juni sets out to win the unwinable level 5.

I usually don't enter a film series in the middle simply because it is often difficult to appreciate the third instalment of anything without having seen what has gone before. However, when it comes to a kids' film, I was pretty sure that I could managed to battle through the labyrinth-like plotting of the Sky Kids series! I started watching this film in 3-D (I had a 2 dvd set) but the glasses were a little uncomfortable and the colours looked funny all the way through. After seeing a few items sort of float vaguely around my television I was quite unimpressed and decided just to go with the 2-D disk. The plot is pretty thin (it's never really clear what the attraction of the game is or what the Toymaker even wants) but it sets up a colourful and enjoyable little ride through a computer game - which is delivered pretty well despite all it's silliness!

The main weapon in the Spy Kids' cannon is it's stars - both actors and director. Rodriguez is a very good director when it comes to style and action and his influence makes this film a lot more fun than others likely would. He is slick but also fully aware that he needs to make it `fun' and not just colourful and noisy. It's all a bit silly of course but the 3-D gimmick is a little bit heavy at times (like the old films in the 50's that had actors punching at the screen) but it isn't that bad. The reason the silliness doesn't really damage the film is because the actors seem to play to it - and a very fine series of performances these are. Pretty much all the cast are good fun and their performances are about as hammy and fun as you can imagine. Sabara is great fun - a cool kid without any of the horrid cutesy stuff that can happen. I found Vega less fun as she was a little too smart for my liking, but she was still fun and the rest of the kids were suitably fun with not a bad performance between them. The adult cast will provide much of the fun for the adults watching - there is a large number of Rodriguez regulars in the cast who all overplay to suit the sense of fun the film has.

Montalban is great fun. Forever Khan in my mind, he has a great voice and screen presence and he heavy makes the message of forgiveness work reasonably well and not just being mawkish like it should be! Stallone hams it up and has good fun even if his multiple personalities don't totally work. Clooney has fun in his small role but the rest of the cast are all cameos some of them are used pretty well and got a giggle but others just show their faces. However, they don't detract from the film and it at least will amuse parents to see people like Martin, Trejo, Cumming, Shalhoub, Buscemi, Paxton, Wood and Hayek. The out takes at the end made me realise how good the performances were - it just never dawned on me that, although I knew it wasn't real, that 95% of this was shot on greenscreen - making acting to anything that little bit harder.

Overall, this is a silly film but it is one that kids will love. The sheer sense of fun that Rodriguez brings to it is infectious and makes for a great 90 minutes with the kids. The star cast made it more enjoyable for me and helped the sense that everyone was just enjoying themselves. It is hardly a great film but it does just what you expect it to do and who can ask anymore than that? On the basis of this I will definitely be watching the first two films when I cross their paths. Sad - but true!
30 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How exactly are they spies?
ThunderKing65 February 2017
This is a review for all 3 movies. I watched all 3 this weekend. Seen the 1st one years ago as a kid back in 2001 and I loved it. Now 2017 lets see what I think.

The first one is tolerable and you can see that they are spies and for a first take movie. During that time period it was cool to see the effects and style.

Second movie. It's all forgettable. As I type this I can't remember what happened. Anyways, Spy Kids 2 was garbage. It made no sense, green screen sucked, effects sucked and why are they called spies? Was there even a villain in this movie because the Giggle guy was also in the 3rd one without any punishment it seems. 2nd Spy Kids movie is a waste of time. The 1 thing that baffles me is that Juni gets the blame when he didn't really do anything but do the right thing.

3rd spy kids movie would work if they didn't call them spy kids. Iunno why they call them spy kids when they don't do anything spyish. His sister was barely in the movie. The villains always go from evil guy to good guy without some form of punishment for what they have done. This movie was garbage, the green screen even in those days looked bad.

In-conclusion only movie of the 3 worth watching is the 1st one, even tho all movies are a waste of time. Only good of the movies were the mom and dad but even after the 1st one they are portrayed as clumsy wash ups.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
about as exciting as watching the grass grow
cmg525 July 2003
oh goody. 4 lines to explain one movie that can be explained in 2 words which are: REALLY AWFUL. this is a movie that was put together simply because the first 2 were sucessful at the box office. and this explains why this movie has absolutely no plot whatsoever. as for special effects? even the original mario game from nintendo had more of a story then this.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Four Tylenol and a couple of Dramamine later
clydestuff14 March 2004
It seems like every twenty years or so, people in Hollywood find it's necessary to dig out the 3-D process to entice a new generation of film goers. In the early eighties a 3D Film called Comin' At Ya made a surprising amount of money with the process. Shortly thereafter we were subjected to such monstrosities as Jaws 3D, Amityville 3D, and Friday the 13th 3D. Just as quickly as the process had been revived however, it once again disappeared. Hopefully, the latest reincarnations will soon suffer the same fate.

Having made a nice tidy sum with the first two Spy Kids, Robert Rodriquez must have decided he needed a gimmick to get those fannies back into the theater seats one last time and decided to give us the Spy Kids in 3d. I'll give him credit for getting the little tykes back into the theater one last time, but as a film, Spy Kids 3D is as painful an experience as any adult might ever have to experience. Story wise, script wise, and especially cinematography wise the film is one huge convoluted mess.

In this third outing, Juni has resigned from the O.S.S. to strike out on his own and make it rich, or at least rich enough to be able to play a new video game called Game Over. When word is sent to Juni(Daryl Sabara) by President George Clooney that his sister, Carmen(Alexa Vega), has been trapped inside the video game, Juni rejoins the O.S.S. to save his sister. It seems that once the game goes on line, the evil Toymaker(Sylvester Stallone) has it rigged so that once kids complete the mysterious level five they will be trapped in the game forever and he'll be able to control them. So shortly after he arrives at the O.S.S., Juni or at least his subconscious is whisked away into a virtual reality game world. Time to put your scarlet and cyan glasses on folks.

Now I'm not normally one to quibble with small details in a movie obviously meant for the youngest of kids, but if I'm going to suffer a headache and queasy stomach for the sake of a film, I would like for the writer and director to at least connect the dots. It is never explained with any satisfaction as to how getting inside the game with your subconscious really works. It can't be a big O.S.S. secret because the game is filled with a whole boatload of other kids wondering around trying to achieve the same goal. Add to this Juni's wheelchair bound grandfather(Ricardo Montalban), whom he summons into the game to help him out. Conveniently, Grandfather quickly spouts legs so he can play right along, and watching Ricardo Montalban inside a video game is an unnerving experience. Watch him closely though, as he'll mysteriously disappear when not needed and reappear just in time to help Juni and Carmen out of some sticky situations. To make matters worse, as Juni bounces around the game world, any kind of logic as to what he must do and why he must do it is thrown out the window. Every scene is nothing but a set up for Rodriquez to throw in what he hopes his audience will see as some cool 3d magic. It doesn't take long for it to become tiresome, to your eyes, your head, and your stomach.

If all this wasn't bad enough, the villainous Toymaker and his other personalities(all played by Stallone), controls the actions of the players inside the video game, then makes decisions that actually help them win it instead of having them figuring it out on their own. So much for any kind of suspense. Some of this is explained toward the end of the film, but by then we are so glad to see the film come to an end, we no longer care about his rationale or lack thereof. Despite his razzie award winning performance, I did actually like Stallone's campy over the top performance. It's too bad the script doesn't give him anything to do that makes any sense.

The funny thing about Spy Kids 3D, is that Rodriquez actually had a clever idea. It's too bad he was so intent on making use of 3D that he forgot to make a good film in the process. It is also hard to explain why he went back to using 3D that required the glasses with different color lenses. The effect was awful twenty years ago, twenty years before that, and in 2003 is even worse. There seems to be some great computer generated backgrounds and sets in the film, but because of the silly glasses, you never get to appreciate them because they are muted and colorless.

I'm sure the kiddies will be enthralled with this film and have fun wearing the funky glasses. If you're an adult and you must watch it with them, a quick trip to the drug store for some aspirin and Dramamine would be advised.

My grade D
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Graphics steal the show
Spanner-25 August 2003
The summer of sequels continues with this third entry in Robert Rodriguez "Spy Kids" series.. Though this one bares only a superficial resemblence to the other films in the series.. and is mostly a gimick effort for Rodriguez to try out his computer graphics ideas... Basicaly only one Spy Kid, Daryl Sabara's Juni is the focus this time around (Alexa Vega being kept on the sidelines for most of the film) as he enters the world of computer games (ala "Tron") to try to save the world or some such thing from Sylvester Stallone's evil Toymaker. Now Stallone seems to be having a grand old time hamming it up in the bad guy role, and is such a hoot in this film that we forget that he really doesn't have a plan or a motive for being a bad guy,... Really the story is hogwash.. and you just take a backseat to the CGI and the 3D gimmick... which do keep you entertained for large chunks of the film. Kids will love it and adults will be amused, but don't expect to remember much afterwards. GRADE: C-
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Thank goodness it's GAME OVER!
BrettC28 July 2003
20 minutes into SPKY KIDS 3-D GAME OVER I wanted to demand the box office give me my money back in quarters so I could have more fun outside playing video games rather than watching some other kids play for an hour and a half! I loved the original SPY KIDS - thought it was smart, hip and fun. I was never bored, and the actors and action was great.

Here we have the same great actors, but no script whatsoever. So they have nothing to do! And the 3-D? It's the old anaglyph technology which uses red and blue lenses! In the 80s they developed polarization 3-D technology which IMAX has perfected. The red and blue lenses were used in the 50s, and now exclusively for TELEVISION viewing of 3-D movies. I suppose this will make it cheaper to go to video and dvd down the road! But it makes the colors HORRIBLE! So not even the 3-D is going to save this one.

Blech! Give me the original!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
While Rodriguez is clearly a gifted filmmaker, he lets the 3-D hamper his creative imagination....
crowrobot6 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Robert Rodriguez, director of the blood-soaked action movies "Desperado" and "From Dusk Till Dawn", struck gold with his wildly inventive and creative "Spy Kids" in 2001. In 2002, "Spy Kids 2" was released, a worthy sequel, and now we arrive at "Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over".

I've never been much a fan of 3-D, but when it is done well (like at the Disney theme parks) I am quick to applaud. Not here; Rodriguez has gone back to the Stone Age of cinema and utilizes the red-and-blue 3-D glasses from the 1950's. As you can imagine, this doesn't work too well.

Still, there is much fun to be had in the third and final installment of this super-cool franchise. The kid actors perform well, although for many of them this is their first movie. Ricardo Montalban returns in a greatly-expanded role as the grandfather, and through the use of CGI, Montalban (who is restricted to a wheelchair in both the movie and in life) gets to "walk" again (I will not spoil how). I also liked Sylvester Stallone as the Toymaker, the bad guy who, after spending a long time in cyberspace, has literally developed multiple personalities. Stallone is clearly having the time of his life as he hams it up as the wacky and colorful villain. Elijah Wood has a quick cameo, as do most of the adult cast members from the last two movies in the film's finale.

The special effects are impressive, but they are once again hampered by the 3-D (thankfully, there is a 2-D version on the DVD).

In short, while the 3-D didn't work for me, I still had a good time at this otherwise excellent family movie. 7/10
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Title Says It All
TheMysteriousReviewer11 November 2021
Spy Kids 3: Game Over is a poorly made conclusion to Carmen and Juni's trilogy that contain its quality pretty low. The story mostly feels basic as a your typical rescue mission. The action went from being at least some that can be enjoyable in the previous two to being mostly dull. And the characters get uninteresting. But the biggest problem, most of the visuals. I do get that, it was the time 3-D was being developed as a new style. In fact, there are some that actually do work in others. This movie is not the case at all. Like Sharkboy and Lavagirl, the visuals look almost unfinished. Full of unnecessary closeups and the effects are a joke. This feels it's more suitable for a video game than a legitimate film. You got five worlds, a series of battles, random minions attacking other players, and the final level with the big boss. But as a movie in general, it's just a low quality mess. The only ones I can see the need of watching are those that really like the Spy Kids franchise. Other than that, I recommend to just skip this one. There's a film that came out years later after this, Ready Player One. That film has something this movie wanted to do for a direction, but is actually much more enjoyable. The title says it all, it's a game over for this film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Surpassed All Expectations
Alliance3D26 July 2003
I was a little skeptical of Spy Kids 3-D because I wasn't sure what the filmmakers were going for. Instead of the usual 3-D films of today, which are mostly boring large screen pseudo-documentaries, or specialized environment theme park rides,: Spy Kids 3-D is a compelling franchise that the whole family can enjoy with added dimension that makes it even more exciting. Even though the film was theatrically presented in eye straining anaglyph format (red and blue), which, to date, is the most cost effective for a mass theater release and shot on a 24p 3-D High Def system (VIDEO) introduced by James Cameron, I found myself immersed enough in the story and just having fun with the genre to not really care. After all, I wasn't expecting James Bond. It's `Spy Kids' for crying out loud and they got away with it!!! Richard Rodriguez combined all elements of HD-making in a smart and acceptable way. Leave it to a cannonball gorilla HD-maker to get it done - thank god Miramax is here to let filmmakers actually create and control their own films with promise for distribution!! As a 3-D aficionado, I am hoping to see the movie in all its true-to-color and full 3-D glory one day as a polarized release or a well-mastered DVD release for virtual reality shutter glasses. To sum it all up.Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over is more than an experience; it's a milestone in history that will start a new revolution in 3-D Filmmaking. Kudos to Richard Rodriguez and James Cameron to a great start.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun and different, but the franchise went out falling
Agent102 September 2003
I will say this, the Spy Kids franchise was certainly a different piece of movie fare on the grand landscape of kids movies. Sadly, while Spy Kids 3D was interesting and different, it also proves to be rather shoddily acted and written. It seemed to lack the charm of the original movies, and while the 3D effects and the story seemed attractive and what-not, it just didn't fall through. This will definitely be the weakest of the saga, but fun nonetheless.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
i want my hour and a half back.
joshua-halstead21 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
i should keep my mouth shut, i said thank god it wasn't 3-d on the second one and guess what it came back in 3-d. this is the second stupidest movie ever. this time Carmon goes inside a video game and gets stuck on level seven. if she is not saved she will die. juny goes inside the game and has to rescue Carmon. after rescuing Carmon they have to complete the game with out dying so they can leave it.(if they die in the game they die in real life.)the movie is just full of pointless action. another thing i should keep my mouth shut about is saying at least there not making another one. i said it and they made 3 more only this time not only were they stupid they were dirty. thats right. Robert Rodregez (the director and writer of the spy kids) made 3 movies about the character machete. number one Machete, this movie is about machete's agency turning on him and machete tracking down and killing everyone in the agency. the movie is full of language. Number 2 planet terror, this movie has no plot and is full of nudity(front and back)and language. number three grind house this movie has no plot but has lots of language. this movie got 1 star.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed