Stiff (TV Movie 2004) Poster

(2004 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Enjoyable at least
aaronfloky20 June 2004
I just saw the network premiere of this film, and I must say that I wasn't completely sure what to make of it. I was often left wondering where the direction of the movie was going, and the climax wasn't overly climactic. I did find it, however, to be easy to enjoy and relaxing to sit through.

David Wenham plays a lovable, struggling father, if not a bit of a nimrod, but all of those qualities are endearing to his character. It's an ironic look at an Aussie battler getting in over his head with a kind of low-key Turkish mafia mob. The irony is, his life is as stiff as the body he's sent to investigate, and everything kind of snowballs into chaos from there. In the process of turning his life upside down, things somehow result in being the right way up, or at least acceptable.

A lot of the humour in this movie is very dry, and that's maybe why it appealed to me. I really enjoyed Wenham's character, and especially the way he deals with his problems. Or doesn't. I think more attention should have been paid to the villains and fleshing out that plot line for more impact at the conclusion of the film. Still, I really liked it, but I don't expect every will.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining & humorous
JohnZoidberg4 August 2005
No, that isn't the name of a Pub near my house, it is a description of this TV movie set in good IL' Melbourne, Australia.

Most people would recognise David Wenham from Van Helsing as Hugh Jackman's little off-sider, but he is the main star of this (hopefully) series of movies where he plays Murray Whelan who seems to end up in many awkward predicaments throughout the show.

It is probably aimed more at Australian audiences to be honest, but it is well written, well acted and very amusing in parts. Murray Whelan is a likable character which may explain why there are a couple of his adventures out there.

As far as a mystery goes, it wasn't terribly hard to work things out in the end, but as it is sort of set up as a potential series of films, it is very good at telling us about the character and giving us an understanding of what he's about.

Good to see a cameo of our state Premier in there too! Looking forward to more in the series.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
**** spoilers **** Ending not fleshed out **** spoilers****
mighty_pickman28 June 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Solid but not brilliant Melbourne made telemovie. Stiff is the first movie made from the books of the Murray Whelan series & had that "first movie of the series" feel, a lot of time was spent establishing the characters & their relationships.

The ending was a bit unsatisfying, the discovery that Gardiner was the bad guy & his final moments appeared to be rushed & that part of the story not fully fleshed out.

Good to see brief cameo performances from Australian Labor Party legend Barry Jones & current ALP Premier of Victoria Steve Bracks. Would we see Liberal (conservative) Party officials appear in a film that takes pot-shots at their party setup? I don't think so!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not as 'stiff' as you would think
inca_HOOTS_films20 June 2004
Australian telemovies have a reputation to uphold. They are supposed to be poorly written vehicles for our much trotted out band of thesps to portray clichéd characterization coupled with inane dialogue. I must say, I AM disappointed. What I witnessed tonight was an interesting storyline with believable characters and a very talented David Wenham giving my cynical mind a reprieve from the standard fare. Shame on you! I liked the program.

Wenhams' laconic Murray Whelan is certainly a treat to witness. He's like a scruffy Blue Heeler getting kicked from pillar to post but still keeps coming. You have to admire that sort of tenacity. I delighted in the gentle humour of the story and Murrays' optimism despite his train-wreck lifestyle.

Anyway, I was happy to see a production that did not contain the usual suspects and would welcome many more Whelan adventures. Top shelf.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
David Wenham and John Clarke at their best
PeterM2719 December 2021
The real star of this entertaining and fast-moving comedy thriller is writer-director's John Clarke's droll and economic screenplay. The film displays all of John Clarke's dry wit and pithy wordplay, well delivered by David Wenham, as the self-effacing and increasingly embattled Whelan, as well as Julian O'Donnell as his son, and Deborah Kennedy as his long-suffering co-worker, as well as by a host of hilarious minor characters.

The film looks at the lives of all the little people that inhabit this ethnically-mixed area of Melbourne, as well as all the political, business and criminal deals that operate just under the surface of society.

Though the plot is a bit too hastily explained at times, the film contains the right mix of comedy and tension. This film sees both John Clarke and David Wenham doing what they do best.

After this Wenham began to be cast in villain roles, but his best work has been as the likeable working class bloke.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An enjoyable adaption, a humorous TV-movie
youngspirit21 June 2004
An amusing and entertaining TV-movie, "Stiff" showcases David Wenham as Murray Whelan, political fixer and amateur investigator.

It made me laugh with its combination of in-jokes, political cameos, and physical humour: in this respect, the translation from the page to the screen allowed the telemovie to become the superior story - however, the detail of the book was obviously missing in the adaption.

Finally, Wenham came across as a cross between his characters Jim Doyle ("The Bank") and Johnny Spitieri ("Gettin' Square"): Knowledgeable but also slightly sloppy and tired. The supporting cast did a great job, as did John Clarke on the story adaption.

All up, Three and a Half out of Five.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Another great study of the laconic from John Clarke
alex-stephenson22 June 2004
Throughout Australian Film there are many examples where the nobler characters tend not to say too much. They tend to be quite laconic, resorting to the occasional outburst which might take the form of a diatribe aimed at life's foibles. Murray Whelan, played cleverly by David Wenham, is depicted as one of those characters. His self deprecatory humour is typical of the genre and a breath of fresh air. For me this film exuded Melbourne. Although maybe just a little harsh on the State parliamentarian. Delightfully idiosyncratic. Some of the scenes around the factory were hilarious. Less convincing may have been the villain , Herb Gardner, played by Alan Hopgood, and Lionel Merricks, played by Sam Neill.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stiff a Little Flimsy
isabelle195519 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I caught up with this Australian TV piece some 4 years late, and of course much has changed on the Australian political scene in 4 years (not that I'm claiming an excess of knowledge in the first place.) And Stiff is a very Australian piece; it doesn't travel well. I haven't read the book, and I appreciate that it's very local to its roots, NSW and in particular the Melbourne Labor Party, so perhaps a critique from the other side of the Pacific Ocean is a little unfair. Still, it's out there, being offered for viewing well beyond its national origins and north of the equator, so I feel justified in commenting.

This is a rather strange film; it can't quite decide what it is and neither can I. A political satire? Probably too laconic. A slapstick comedy? Well not quite, although it has its moments. A black comedy? No, not dark enough. I watched it twice, ransacking my mind to try and pinpoint what it reminded me of, and then it came to me. Minder, a classic British TV show of the late 70's through into the 80's. This is Australia's belated Minder.

In Minder, Dennis Waterman played Terry McCann, a personable and almost-but-not-quite bright enough help mate for Arthur Daley, a London wheeler dealer who skirted the law in a number of entertaining dodgy deals which never quite made him the fortune he thought they would. Terry (Tel) provided the muscle to Arfur's finesse, and he ended up in a variety of perilous situations, not unlike Murray Whelan's beating in the cold store or the sinking of his car (with him still inside) while undertaking the business of his paranoid, scheming boss, politico Angelo Agnelli (Mick Molloy). Substitute state politics for dodgy deals (or are they one and the same?) and David Wenham for Dennis Waterman (they even both have reddish hair) and the similarities become obvious; all it lacked was the Cockney accents. Mind you, I don't think I ever saw our Tel drinking a latté.

A dead man turns up in the cold store of a local meat packing plant. He was Turkish, the plant has a bunch of immigrant labor which may or may not be legally employed – or even exist - and the political opposition could just possibly make a meal of it, with an election approaching. Poor, beleaguered Murray Whelan (Wenham) runs the office of Agnelli and is dispatched to investigate. He gets drawn into a low key drama involving an immigrant support group, the Turkish Mafia, the Kurds and lax HSE laws while trying to deal with his own disintegrating personal life. We learn early on that poor Murray isn't getting any, and here we're not talking lattés. On the babe score, I think Terry was ahead. If I recall correctly - from 30 years distance - Terry shacked up with a succession of comely air hostesses. Murray clearly needs some lessons.

While there is a good story struggling to get out of Stiff, it never really survives the over-stated comedy. The 'putting his head through the roof' routine, the exaggeratedly long pee complete with sound effects, the manly avoidance of anything approaching a vitamin when he takes his son out for pizza, putting a broom through his kitchen ceiling, and then, the coup de grace, the roof all falling off in one go. I'm sure the crew had a blast setting that stunt up, and I'll bet it was fun to film, but in Stiff I felt we'd just left the realm of reality behind completely, and it added to my confusion as to what this movie is actually trying to say. At one point Whelan appears to walk away from the camera doing a passable imitation of Charlie Chaplin's tramp. So is this a tragi-comedy or what?

Although I did feel that at the centre David Wenham held the piece together – he makes Whelan attractive in a laddishly helpless sort of way, with his slightly ill-fitting suits but cute son – and DW obviously relishes playing this guy - the lesser characters are mostly stereotypes, especially the girlies. There's the motherly office manager Trish (Deborah Kennedy), who shakes her kindly head at Murray in fond exasperation when she should probably give him a swift kick and tell him to get his act together, the poor but virtuous Turkish girl whom he obviously fancies (played by a non-Turk though – like another commentator on IMDb I thought this a bit of a cop-out), and then there's the pit bull (but lipstickless) wife, who is more successful than our Murray so therefore obviously a ball breaking bitch, and quite possibly a lesbian too (and he didn't spot that before they married?) Sigh… This stuff is just so passé. It was, even in 2004. Can't we move on? And whilst I'm not normally keen on overly strong doses of political correctness, tossing the planted drugs into the grocery bag of the nearest available black guy? What on earth was that about? It's a truly crass piece of racial stereotyping, unless I missed something vital? No, it's not ironic.

Also of minor irritation are the muttered thinking out loud passages, where Murray explicates the plot for us. I'm sure these are meant to be helpful and funny, but if the writing isn't good enough to allow the audience to follow the action without the hero muttering asides like "Aha! It's the Turkish Mafia!" then it needs better writing. No, I can't get too enthusiastic about Stiff. I can't pretend that David Wenham isn't pleasant to look at for extended periods of time (come to think of it, so was Dennis Waterman) and it was modestly entertaining on a night when I had little else to do, but I've seen Australian TV do better.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
bor-ring
vladimir-13721 June 2004
Wenham is excruciating: the man can't act, he can only inflect his voice affectedly. Steve Bracks gave a better performance; at least he didn't say anything, which was an improvement on Wenham.

The script is excruciating: talk, talk, talk, and all the 'jokes' unfunny.

The mystery is about up to the standard of a sub-par episode of Scooby Doo; why didn't someone call the cops?, who would have solved the crime in less time than this telemovie takes.

Typical of Australian television that we have to have a fake show of multiculturalism from an entirely Anglo project, in which even the Turkish love-interest girl is played by an Anglo actress. (Couldn't have had Wenham falling for a *real* Turkish girl, of course!)

This crock belonged on the ABC (government television). Nuff said.
1 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I think I blinked and missed it.
gardnergillian20 June 2004
This film, while written by a talented funny man, with a good acting line up, did nothing for me. It lacked a beginning, an ending and a plot. Finding a dead man then researching through everything, only to find Mr Whelan dogged by bad guys, and no link was ever established as to why. I expected better work from Aussie film makers. This only serves to send Australian films back 30 years when the merest hint of one sent shudders down my back. It wasn't funny, not even amusing, it totally sucked. An awful lot was said about fictional and notable Turkish names of employees at the meatpacking plant, yet no connection was established with them and that exclusive club, and having politicians playing cameos was just plain silly. Are Australian writers wanting to lose out to big budget companies in America when it comes to quality TV movies? The Australian public deserve better than the trash it currently gets. I'll give it a 1/10 and that's being nice.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed