"The Alfred Hitchcock Hour" The Monkey's Paw--A Retelling (TV Episode 1965) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
This is Madness!
sol12183 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** Overlong and updated version of the 1902 J.J Jacobs short story "The Monkey's Paw" that goes on an on with a number of meaningless subplots, in it's less then 60 minutes of running time, that makes you almost forget what it's all about when it finally and mercifully comes to an end. The best thing about this Alfred Hitchcock episode is that at least were the audience spared the bloody parts in it that if seen would turn one's stomach.

It's businessman Paul White, Leif Erickson, who come upon this monkey's paw charm from a Gyspy fortune teller, Zolya Talma, at the party that he and his both wife Anne, Jane Wyatt, and son Howard, Lee Majors, attended. Deep in debt and on the brink of bankruptcy Paul in a last desperate attempt asks the "Paw", which he was told has magical powers, to give him the $150,000.00 that he needs from keeping him and Anne from ending up losing their home and being thrown out on the street. Not realizing what he's up against, the "Paw", Paul does end up getting his $150,000.00 in a life insurance payment but at the cost of his son Howard's, a race car driver, life on the race track in a car smash up. The policy on Howard's life was taken out by his girlfriend Selina, Collin Willcox Paxton,who by knowing the story about the "Paw",knew what was coming.

By now Paul is content with the loss of his son but his hysterical wife Jane isn't and in knowing that it ,the "Paw", has two more wishes left in it she wan't to wish her dead and beloved son Howard back to life with it! Paul who was at the morgue and knows what condition Howard's body was in, burned to a crisp, tries to keep Anne from wishing him back to life.

***SPOILERS*** It's when the dead and burned beyond recognition Howard comes back from the dead and is knocking at the White's door that Paul finds the "Paw" and just before a happy Anne, who doesn't know what condition Howard is in, is about to open it that he wishes his son dead, who turns into a pile of dust, with the last wish left to him. This not only speared Anne the horror of seeing her son looking like a victim of a nuclear blast but Howard himself from him being taken from his eternal resting place and ending up in some circus freak show as its star attraction!
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
30 minutes too long
ronnybee211231 December 2020
''Alfred Hitchcock presents'' was 30 minutes long,which was a perfect length. This later show,the "Alfred Hitchcock Hour",is often too long for the actual story. Usually,the hour-long shows have time-wasting, repetitive chit-chat and so forth to burn-up film. This episode is unfortunately a sad example of exactly this. Here is a great story that is greatly diminished by all sorts of time-wasting tomfoolery. It is truly a shame,because the actual original story itself is solid. Hour-long shows should not be made from short stories, I say. As another reviewer pointed out,it is a shame that Hitchcock is even associated with this convoluted nonsense.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good indeed--but not great-- late series entry
gregkent-6762931 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Story is of a race car driver who dies and whose mother tries to use a monkey's paw good luck charm to bring him back to life.

First what is good about it.

Colin Wilcox playing the race car driver's girlfriend. Wilcox is highly strapping and outstanding in the role.

Some eerie moments.

What is not good.

The actress playing the mother is rather bratty faced.

Mixing the episode's conservative characters with mod characters does not go great. Both groups look like they would have made a better show without the other's company.

The plot is confusing. Is it really a supernatural story much or mostly only a coincidence story with nearly all straight forward trappings? It is really hard to tell. Watch once fully and then men just enjoy getting shots of strapping Colin Wilcox.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
60's "update" of old Jacobs' book version
twofortulip10 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
In 1902, British author W.W. Jacobs first published the story of a monkey's paw talisman cursed by an Indian holy man before being transported from India by a soldier returning home to England. The Jacobs' story was made into a play and, later, many film versions. Hitchcock takes the story out of the 19th century and into the 20th. Paul and Anne White acquire the paw from a gypsy while in the Bahamas to see their "beautiful" only son, Howard, race in the Grand Prix. The paw comes with three wishes. In the book the couple is given the paw and told it is more of a curse than a blessing. The Whites soon find this out when financially-strapped Paul White uses the paw to wish for money. Not long after, the couple is visited by an insurance man with a check; insurance payment on the life of their son who was crushed to death in a terrible racetrack crash. Paul identifies the body and knows how horribly their "beautiful" son was disfigured. After a séance arranged by Howard's creepy girlfriend fails to bring Howard back to grieving mom Anne, Anne urges Paul to use the paw again to make Howard "alive again." Paul gives in and makes the wish. Immediately a knock comes at the door but it is only the girlfriend, who they learn, never really loved Howard. She gets the house and they must get out by morning. After she leaves, the couple go upstairs. Knowing the cursed nature of the wishes granted by the paw Paul begins to fear what it means to make Howard alive again. After all, he saw their son's remains. "He had no face," Paul recalls. Just then they hear the sound of a car drive up. Anne, undaunted, runs down to unbolt the front door. Paul looks out only to gaze upon the nightmarish face of his son (unseen by viewers). He yells a warning to Anne who is struggling to unbolt the door. Paul fumbles through their luggage to find the paw. Just as Anne slides back the last bolt, Paul makes the third and final wish that Howard not be alive. The door opens and all that Anne finds heaped on the stoop is the scarf, now torn, that she had given her son for luck before his fatal last race. Chilling. One of Hitchcock's best in the series.
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"How do I get what I want?"
classicsoncall23 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
What really unnerved me about this episode was how frantic Anne White (Jane Wyatt) was in an effort to wish her son Howard (Lee Majors) alive again. I mean, how detached from reality would one have to be to think it was even possible? But this was a story involving séances and black magic, so I guess rationality could be thrown out the window. Paul White's (Leif Erickson) first wish came true on the back of a tragedy when their race car driving son was killed and mangled in a car crash while competing. A hundred fifty-thousand-dollar insurance check was delivered within hours, but I won't even get into the timing of that. And if Howard's fiancée (Collin Wilcox Paxton) had a premonition that he was going to die, why not take out a policy for a million dollars, and name herself as one of the beneficiaries? Those are some of the things I would have considered if I was writing the story, but they weren't writing these episodes for Mensa candidates in the Sixties. I also question that confusing fog enshrouded scene when all of Howard's friends and associates showed up at Selina's home. It had the appearance of a dream sequence, with the oddball dialog virtually confirming it, but then it took on the aspect of reality. Very strange. So, with the monkey's paw theme as the basis of this story and the first wish for the money granted, the next two wound up canceling each other out. There's a partial feel-good ending with the return of Anne White's good luck scarf, with just the right suggestion of comfort to ease her troubled mind.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Monkeys Yawn
lazlopanaflex27 September 2011
The Monkeys Paw one the most well known horror stories ever so how could anyone go wrong making it in to a scary experience for TV viewing, er easily I'm afraid. Season 3 has it's fair share of clunkers but this equals Thou Ravished Bride for worst of the season. The original tale is short, creepy and nasty and would have worked perfectly as a AHP in a 25 minute slot. This drawn out version takes all the things that made the original so good and makes for tedious viewing-some of the acting is so awful I was wishing I had a monkeys paw to make it all go away. This episode and many others of Season 3 make you realise why there was no season 4 for Hitch, a Shame as all 7 seasons of AHP and the first two of AHH are essential viewing.
17 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Writing Doesn't Do the Ideas Justice
thefreelancingsamurai21 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I think the biggest issue with this episode is that it doesn't have any cohesive themes to unite all the different character conflicts.

The extended dialogue moments would make more sense if they actively progressed the story instead of just being creepy and foreboding for the sake of it. Unfortunately they just sit and diffuse any tension the script could have built otherwise.

Theoretically "monkey's paw" theming should center around the cautionary cost that comes from wishing, yet that somehow isn't addressed in a direct manner until halfway through. For example, a good chunk of time is utilized in an attempt to reverse a tragedy, as opposed to contemplating why it happened to begin with, and before the second wish is ever even mentioned as an option. The seance and daughter-in-law conflict were definitely time filler.

Overall, the beginning is relatively strong, with Zolya Talma's performance being quite captivating, but it lost momentum soon afterwards. The last five minutes were appropriately creepy, culminating in a selfless use of the final wish, which barely gets its due before the episode promptly ends (which is ironic due to the time-padding). Everything would've been better served by a stronger, more concise middle.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Is it me, or do so many characters in this episode seem confusing and poorly written?!
planktonrules30 June 2021
"The Monkey's Paw...A Retelling" is a bad episode of "The Alfred Hitchcock Hour". Most of the problem is the writing, though Stuart Margolin's acting wasn't very good either....though he fortunately wasn't a major character.

The story begins at a weird party where there is a Spanish speaking medium who is trying to tell fortunes, though some of the guests are behaving obnoxiously. In fact, they are so weird and obnoxious that the whole scene seems fake...very fake. At the end of this scene, the medium is angry and gives the folks a monkey's paw charm....one that brings wishes but with a curse. Well, Paul White (Leif Erickson) is having severe financial worries...so he takes the monkey's paw and plans on using it. Of course, bad things are gonna happen.

The initial scene at the party was poorly done as I already mentioned. But again and again, people in the show behave strangely...almost randomly. They just don't make a lot of sense and the episode is pretty much a dud as a result. Even the twist ending isn't great because it's so obvious. The pacing was poor, as the show was heavily padded and I did not understand why so much of the show was in Spanish but there was no interpretation of most of it. I fortunately could understand most of this....but what if you don't understand Spanish? Overall, one of the poorer episodes of the series...and season three, unfortunately, had a few too many of these.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Grueling
ziklag199028 March 2021
I'd really like to say the other reviews here are wrong and the episode is actually spellbindingly brilliant, but no such luck. It really is mind-achingly slow and a chore to watch; at times I could feel myself trying to mentally speed up the pacing. A small scene when the male lead goes into the bathroom to fetch a glass of water and decides to make a wish on the monkey's paw is dragged out forever, the only reason for which I could see is that someone suddenly realized they didn't have enough commercials to get them to the necessary running time.

A maybe partial explanation for the ghastly lugubriousness is that they're trying for a strangely baroque tone; the characters strike odd, formalistic attitudes and speak remote, unreal lines of dialogue. A scene where a crowd gathers outside a house in silence at first seems like it's supposed to be real, then it's implied it was imaginary, and then it's back to real again. The source material for the episode is very brisk and straightforward leading to the climax, and that approach is far preferable to the arch, pretentious tone taken here.

It's hard to judge the acting when the performers are forced to utter those peculiarly off-base lines they're given, but Jane Wyatt is very beautiful and has a strong presence, and it's interesting to see Lee Majors in his youthful bloom, long before The Six Million Dollar Man with his hardened, scowling visage. I'm not sorry I watched the episode, but if I ever decide to do it again I'll be sure to have a strong drink on hand.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Boring and drawn out to fill time
deedrala26 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
So disappointing that this has Hitchcock's name attached to it. Several times throughout this episode I almost fell asleep or fast-forwarded (recorded on DVR) to just get to the end already.

Ridiculously long bouts of boring and/or absurd filler dialogue: "You will win.." (kiss kiss) "I will win tomorrow" (kiss kiss drink) "Yes you will win tomorrow".. And: "the car's coming" - "I hear his car running" - "Howard is here"...

The long drawn out climax: will the dead disfigured Howard be brought back to life and will his mother see him when she FINALLY gets all the locks undone and gets the door open?? It sure didn't take her any time at all to throw open that same front door when she saw all the people standing in the front yard from her bedroom window!

The unintelligible chanting gibberish and dancing and whatnot at the very beginning lasted way too long, until finally the monkey's paw came into view. I WILL give the whole production this much: the paw was extremely creepy, especially when Lief Ericson rubbed it while holding it in his hand toward the end....ugh!

3 out of 10 / Grade D
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Ugh!
Hitchcoc1 June 2023
This shows how writers and producers can take one of the greatest short stories ever written and turn it into a rambling mess. Yes, the basic plot is there as it relates to the paw itself. The father is in financial trouble (we never know why), so he wishes for the amount he owes to keep going. Of course the paw is cursed and we know how things play out. What ruins it is a cast of characters who are utterly unlikeable and have no connection to anything other than their presences. We are given a sort of voodoo woman who is at the center. There are distractions, like a stupid seance. There is the love interest, an insipid girl that supposedly loves the son. Then there is the appearance of a bunch of people on the lawn in the fog. Huh! I was really disappointed. Imagine what they could have done by playing it straight.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed