Alexandra Pelosi returns with all her mom's connections and a camera with terrible sound. A close look into the democratic race for the white house, we join Pelosi in 2003 and conclude with John Kerry's speech at the Democratic National Convention. Although at times, the documentary is interesting and captures some wonderful moments with the candidates, it lacks the hype that Journey with George had. Not that Joe Lieberman isn't interesting (wink wink) but the Road to the White House with Bush was much more entertaining. Plus, this second time around doesn't do much for Pelosi's film making career. While the first was a giant shot in the dark and a success, it made A Diary of a Political Tourist possible and nothing more. A nice attempt, but a giant fall from anything great.
4 Reviews
A Political Party
rmax30482311 October 2004
At the end of this documentary, "Hail to the Chief" plays in the background as President George W. Bush mounts the stage at a military dedication. The camera focuses on Senator Kerry clapping ritually along with a hundred others in the audience. "So now Kerry has a chance to unseat George Bush," says Allie Pelosi in her grown-up teenager's voice. "If he wins, he'll be written into the history books. If he loses, he'll be home reading them like everybody else who failed."
The humor in the movie arises chiefly out of the candor of Alexandra Pelosi's voice-over. None of the candidates seems as willing to joke around as Bush did in "Journeys With George," except maybe Kerry, who shows a quiet appreciation of the irony in the absurd. Pelosi wants to see another side of Kerry so he begins to turn around. He asks her for her camera, turns it on her, and begins to ask her pointed questions, some of them the same as she has asked him. Interestingly, in this same exchange, Pelosi asks him why political candidates seem to be reduced by the media to stereotypes -- Gore is boring, Bush is dumb -- and what stereotype Kerry would like to project. And he repeats the opinion he gave in the second presidential debates when he was called the most "liberal" member of the Senate. He says he doesn't think the media create the stereotypes but the candidates themselves as filtered through the media. In any case, he says, he doesn't believe them. Gore was not boring and Bush is not dumb. It's easy to pin simple labels on people but the world is more complicated than that. (If Gore is boring and Bush is dumb, can Kerry be a philosopher?)
Oddly enough the movie has very little to do with political issues. We learn nothing about the Democratic candidates' positions on issues like abortion or Iraq. The movie is about the political process itself and how it's managed by the principles. By the end we're almost as fatigued as everyone else by the thousands of corn dogs, the bowls of chili, the hog lots, the weeping groupies, the well wishers, the nuisance who asks the same stupid questions of all the candidates, the flights, the buses, the need to keep showing those shining teeth in public, the identical stump speeches ("You ARE the power!"). Ugh. The wonder is that anyone would be willing to put himself through this meat grinder just to become president of the world's only superpower.
It's less focused on personalities than "Journeys With George," perforce. Pelosi had to cover half a dozen guys this time around, instead of just George W. Bush. So we don't get to know them as well as we got to know Bush. And there is far less of Allie Pelosi herself, of her affairs with other correspondents and of her decision to cut her hair. In the few shots of her we do see -- mainly taken by Kerry -- she still looks thoroughly deglamorized and goofy, yet vivacious and pretty nevertheless.
She has a sharp eye for the balmy among the supporters without overdoing it.
One Dean supporter in a beard died magenta explains why he's writing letters for Dean. Another, a woman from Portland, Oregon, is speaking to a group of Deanies. She DOES look a little strange, a middle-aged thin brunette with curiously off-kilter glasses, fiercely tied-back hair, lipstick the color of a three-day-old cadaver, and she speaks in a way that matches her grooming. Pelosi wordlessly lets the camera slide down the speaker's body, below the table, until we see her legs encased in thigh-high stockings that are made of multicolored rings, and finally her feet in things that look like some kind of modified geriatric devices. Not a peep out of Pelosi, although, let's face facts, it's a bit unkind. Pelosi doesn't spare Gebhart's supporters either, whom she describes as mainly old, and she gives us multiple shots of people in wheelchairs, a man with oxygen cannula in his nostrils, and an old woman with thick glasses and crooked teeth who responds to Pelosi's question with, "What?"
Another amusing moment. It's the airport at Wassau, Wisconsin. An employee tells Pelosi, "They're the biggest airplanes that ever came to this airport." We see a shot of a smallish executive jet and Pelosi says, "Howard Dean's plane." The camera pans slowly to a long sleek airliner the size of a small freight train. "John Kerry's plane," says Pelosi. Pan back to the little jet. "Howard Dean?" Then slowly back to the airliner. "John Kerry?" She does this several times.
There's pathos in this movie, too, which was also missing from her earlier film. Howard Dean buried in a horde of leaping fans, not alone for a moment. Then "the scream." And now Pelosi has Dean all to herself as he walks with a few friends through empty hotel lobbies and "The Party's Over" plays in the background. Gebhart weeping during his concession speech, a nice guy, as is Joe Lieberman, who proves to be bright and witty but is hampered by his receding chin and a voice that sounds as if it's coming through a mouthful of matzoh meal.
This film is all over the place, disjointed, funny and improvvisata, strangely sad, kind of like its maker. It's worth seeing as an historical document although no one should expect penetrating insights into policy or character.
The humor in the movie arises chiefly out of the candor of Alexandra Pelosi's voice-over. None of the candidates seems as willing to joke around as Bush did in "Journeys With George," except maybe Kerry, who shows a quiet appreciation of the irony in the absurd. Pelosi wants to see another side of Kerry so he begins to turn around. He asks her for her camera, turns it on her, and begins to ask her pointed questions, some of them the same as she has asked him. Interestingly, in this same exchange, Pelosi asks him why political candidates seem to be reduced by the media to stereotypes -- Gore is boring, Bush is dumb -- and what stereotype Kerry would like to project. And he repeats the opinion he gave in the second presidential debates when he was called the most "liberal" member of the Senate. He says he doesn't think the media create the stereotypes but the candidates themselves as filtered through the media. In any case, he says, he doesn't believe them. Gore was not boring and Bush is not dumb. It's easy to pin simple labels on people but the world is more complicated than that. (If Gore is boring and Bush is dumb, can Kerry be a philosopher?)
Oddly enough the movie has very little to do with political issues. We learn nothing about the Democratic candidates' positions on issues like abortion or Iraq. The movie is about the political process itself and how it's managed by the principles. By the end we're almost as fatigued as everyone else by the thousands of corn dogs, the bowls of chili, the hog lots, the weeping groupies, the well wishers, the nuisance who asks the same stupid questions of all the candidates, the flights, the buses, the need to keep showing those shining teeth in public, the identical stump speeches ("You ARE the power!"). Ugh. The wonder is that anyone would be willing to put himself through this meat grinder just to become president of the world's only superpower.
It's less focused on personalities than "Journeys With George," perforce. Pelosi had to cover half a dozen guys this time around, instead of just George W. Bush. So we don't get to know them as well as we got to know Bush. And there is far less of Allie Pelosi herself, of her affairs with other correspondents and of her decision to cut her hair. In the few shots of her we do see -- mainly taken by Kerry -- she still looks thoroughly deglamorized and goofy, yet vivacious and pretty nevertheless.
She has a sharp eye for the balmy among the supporters without overdoing it.
One Dean supporter in a beard died magenta explains why he's writing letters for Dean. Another, a woman from Portland, Oregon, is speaking to a group of Deanies. She DOES look a little strange, a middle-aged thin brunette with curiously off-kilter glasses, fiercely tied-back hair, lipstick the color of a three-day-old cadaver, and she speaks in a way that matches her grooming. Pelosi wordlessly lets the camera slide down the speaker's body, below the table, until we see her legs encased in thigh-high stockings that are made of multicolored rings, and finally her feet in things that look like some kind of modified geriatric devices. Not a peep out of Pelosi, although, let's face facts, it's a bit unkind. Pelosi doesn't spare Gebhart's supporters either, whom she describes as mainly old, and she gives us multiple shots of people in wheelchairs, a man with oxygen cannula in his nostrils, and an old woman with thick glasses and crooked teeth who responds to Pelosi's question with, "What?"
Another amusing moment. It's the airport at Wassau, Wisconsin. An employee tells Pelosi, "They're the biggest airplanes that ever came to this airport." We see a shot of a smallish executive jet and Pelosi says, "Howard Dean's plane." The camera pans slowly to a long sleek airliner the size of a small freight train. "John Kerry's plane," says Pelosi. Pan back to the little jet. "Howard Dean?" Then slowly back to the airliner. "John Kerry?" She does this several times.
There's pathos in this movie, too, which was also missing from her earlier film. Howard Dean buried in a horde of leaping fans, not alone for a moment. Then "the scream." And now Pelosi has Dean all to herself as he walks with a few friends through empty hotel lobbies and "The Party's Over" plays in the background. Gebhart weeping during his concession speech, a nice guy, as is Joe Lieberman, who proves to be bright and witty but is hampered by his receding chin and a voice that sounds as if it's coming through a mouthful of matzoh meal.
This film is all over the place, disjointed, funny and improvvisata, strangely sad, kind of like its maker. It's worth seeing as an historical document although no one should expect penetrating insights into policy or character.
Pretty boring
desperatethespian5 November 2004
I wouldn't quite describe myself as a political junkie, but as an independent film actor with a keen interest in politics --particularly this year -- you'd think this film would pique my interest.
So did I. But it didn't.
Pelosi definitely has a sense of humor, and either her pedigree, her success with the first film, or her charming personality has afforded her a sort of personal rapport with politicians I haven't seen exhibited with any other media types. But...that's it. You can tell the various wannabes are intrigued to be with her (most of them anyway), and in just a few short minutes of her footage you can tell certain things about certain men...Gephardt is the quintessential politician, always upbeat, always happy and confident about everything...Edwards is rather curt and rude...Bush something of an obsessed egoist (repeating to Pelosi a couple of times that he "made you famous!") Kerry has a big head etc., but Pelosi doesn't really do anything with the unique access that she is afforded. In a word, the film is...pretty boring. What seems like it might turn out to be a fascinating expose, an inside look at men we see on TV every night but don't know at all beyond their polished images, teases and then falls short.
It simply doesn't go anywhere. You slog through almost an hour and a half of...well, not much more than what we've seen on the nightly news for the last year and a half, plus a couple of cutaways. There are no moments that would be Candid Camera worthy, and even at half its current length it still would've felt too long. She needed more...moments, more insights, more truths that we're not privy to from the mainstream media to make this film worthwhile. And there aren't any. Towards the end of the film, she gives John Kerry a big speech outlining what her goals for the film were. They went through one ear and out the other; whatever they were, they just didn't succeed.
I didn't see Journeys with George. I assume that was a far better, more insightful film, one which gave Ms. Pelosi the clout to create another, similarly themed movie this year. Unfortunately for Pelosi, if HBO makes a determination every political season as to the worthiness of her latest endeavor, and on that basis determines whether to broadcast/fund her project in the next election cycle, there will be no "Chillin' with Hill and Bill" in 2008.
Despite all this, I'd love to meet her. She's purrty, obviously smart, politically savvy, and has a great sense of humor. Alexandra, if you're reading this, forgive my harsh words and email me! :)
So did I. But it didn't.
Pelosi definitely has a sense of humor, and either her pedigree, her success with the first film, or her charming personality has afforded her a sort of personal rapport with politicians I haven't seen exhibited with any other media types. But...that's it. You can tell the various wannabes are intrigued to be with her (most of them anyway), and in just a few short minutes of her footage you can tell certain things about certain men...Gephardt is the quintessential politician, always upbeat, always happy and confident about everything...Edwards is rather curt and rude...Bush something of an obsessed egoist (repeating to Pelosi a couple of times that he "made you famous!") Kerry has a big head etc., but Pelosi doesn't really do anything with the unique access that she is afforded. In a word, the film is...pretty boring. What seems like it might turn out to be a fascinating expose, an inside look at men we see on TV every night but don't know at all beyond their polished images, teases and then falls short.
It simply doesn't go anywhere. You slog through almost an hour and a half of...well, not much more than what we've seen on the nightly news for the last year and a half, plus a couple of cutaways. There are no moments that would be Candid Camera worthy, and even at half its current length it still would've felt too long. She needed more...moments, more insights, more truths that we're not privy to from the mainstream media to make this film worthwhile. And there aren't any. Towards the end of the film, she gives John Kerry a big speech outlining what her goals for the film were. They went through one ear and out the other; whatever they were, they just didn't succeed.
I didn't see Journeys with George. I assume that was a far better, more insightful film, one which gave Ms. Pelosi the clout to create another, similarly themed movie this year. Unfortunately for Pelosi, if HBO makes a determination every political season as to the worthiness of her latest endeavor, and on that basis determines whether to broadcast/fund her project in the next election cycle, there will be no "Chillin' with Hill and Bill" in 2008.
Despite all this, I'd love to meet her. She's purrty, obviously smart, politically savvy, and has a great sense of humor. Alexandra, if you're reading this, forgive my harsh words and email me! :)
A very good idea of who the candidates really were in 2004
pusherhombre13 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Saw her first documentary "Journeys With George." A high-quality documentary that really favored George Bush after all. She covered more people this time in "Diary of a Political Tourist" and finally centered on John Kerry. Some of the candidates were open to Pelosi and played to her camera, but came across as a little hokey like Gephardt and Graham(?). Others came across as stiff, like Wes Clark bagging groceries and saying, "We're here to serve, ma'am." The rest looked like caged animals and were totally uncomfortable in front of her camera such as John Edwards, Howard Dean, and John Kerry. Kerry actually kicked her off his plane, but pretended not to know about it until his aide nearly took her by the arm and escorted her off. And then subsequent coverage showed Kerry standing Pelosi up for scheduled interviews and dodging her altogether. What did he have to hide? The film's greatest contrast is when she showed up at a White House event. Her mother was almost hiding behind Bush and the entire senior leadership made her feel like she was one of them. The Dems were not nearly as interesting or fascinating as subjects for media attention as George Bush in her first documentary.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
