IMDb > Youthanasia (2005) > IMDb user comments

IMDb user comments for
Youthanasia (2005) More at IMDbPro »

Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 5 comments in total 

11 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :-
Engaging, especially the acting, 8 kesäkuu 2005
9/10
Author: Sunah from Berkeley, California

Saw YouthAnAsia at its world premiere at the good old Parkway. The movie was about some young friends and how their lives changed in one pivotal moment. The acting, particularly that of star Justin Zachary, was phenomenal. The writing was good but I don't know why the story was told in so determinedly asynchronous a fashion. I wish I had thought to ask the writer that when he was standing right next to me. I can't speak to the cinematography, because it was transferred from Super-8 to DVD and projected from that for the showing, so it looked more or less like mud.

On the way out I ran into Justin Zachary and said, "You were so great." He high-fived me! "Is this your first film?" he said it was. I said, "Kid, you're going places." He played someone who was seventeen to nineteen in the movie, so he seemed like a kid to me.

He said, "Thankee, Baby," which made him a lot older and me a lot younger. That was fun. I hope he makes it. He's very talented, as well as smooth.

Sorry I don't have much to say about the movie because I don't know how to avoid spoilers very well. Just catch Justin Zachary on his way up, that's my advice.

Was the above comment useful to you?

6 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :-
Beautiful Cinematography, 30 lokakuu 2005
9/10
Author: vinolvr from United States

I attended a Master Class that the Cinematographer (Barry Stone) of this movie was giving at The Wine Country Film Fest. The title was In Camera Tricks For Low Budger Flicks. It was an entertaining seminar that showed ways to create effects when you have little or no money. One thing that I learned from the seminar is that Barry has a vast body of work. The seminar included a pass to "Youthanasia" which I was excited to see as there was some in camera tricks that were not included in the seminar. I really enjoyed the film, I was surprised to learn that this film was a first for the majority of the cast.

Most of the crew and the star of the movie where in attendance for the Q&A that followed, which is what I was really interested in, as I was at the Festival to learn as much as I can about the Technical aspects of Film-making. This showing was the first time the filmmakers were able to present the film Color Corrected and properly transfered to HD from S16, which would probably explain the previous comment on it looking like mud. A young kid in the audience asked how the filmmakers were able to write in a manner that did not betray how young people think and feel, an element that I didn't even think about until that was mentioned, that is one of the great things about viewing a film at a Festival, it gives you the opportunity to get the perspective of people who you might not ever meet.

It was refreshing to learn of the sacrifices that all involved had to make to bring this film to the big screen. They seemed like a fun bunch of people, I only wish I had the nerve to ask if I could party with them that night!

Was the above comment useful to you?

3 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :-
Cool Indie Film, 2 helmikuu 2006
10/10
Author: DJrooster from United States

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

caught youthanasia on Comcast. Didn't know too much about the film, but I l liked the title. Was a little caught off guard by the jumping back and forth in time, but once i settled in and got familiar with the way the filmmakers chose to tell their story i was actually appreciated the way the filmmakers chose to tell their story. I'm not saying this is a message film or anything, but at the end of the film, I mean the last shot which I found to be beautiful. I suddenly became aware that I was watching a film where the filmmakers chose to let us the audience make some decision as to the how and what's . The restraint that was shown in telling this story, even if they did run out of film is appreciated my this indie film lover. On to the music in the film, which to me is a huge part of watching a movie. There are two songs in particular that stand out. i actually rewound the movie, Comcast lets you do that, so I could watch a scene where the kids are slamming beers in slow mo. what really make the scene is the song My Outfit by Intel Agents. There was another song that was a combo, punk metal. I won't say where in the movie, cuz I don't know if it'll be a spoiler, but it plays like it was composed for the scene. if so great job, if not great choice.

Was the above comment useful to you?

3 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-
Wanted to like this movie but..., 8 lokakuu 2005
7/10
Author: theseanman from United States

I wanted to like this movie, I like independent movies in general, and to find one filmed in my adopted hometown of Modesto, CA and directed by locals as well...what's not to like?? Well, right off the bat, the opening credits seemed like a gee-whiz exercise, names on a rolling basketball, stop action style. It was approximately 30 seconds into the movie that I realized that whatever they did with the transfer and format change had really mucked up the picture and sound quality, detracting from what might otherwise have been a more positive experience. The story is good, the acting is decent, but as a previous reviewer mentioned, the story is told in a non-linear fashion that really isn't necessary and in fact it is a distraction.

But kudos to everyone involved, hopefully they will keep at it and improve with experience. By the way at the opening of the film's run at the State Theatre in Modesto, the entire cast and crew were in attendance and seemed to be very cool, likable people. It was kinda surreal to walk into the lobby and see the familiar faces from the movie..

*****UPDATE 11-21-07*****

So, I got a copy of the DVD for this film, hoping it would have some behind the scenes stuff of the making of the movie. It didn't. But, watching it on DVD pretty much allowed me to concentrate on the film without the distractions I noted earlier due to a poor screening. I really enjoyed the movie this time, enough to bump it up to a seven star rating. It makes such a difference when you're able to see the movie the way the director intended.

Was the above comment useful to you?

1 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-
Not enough film in the camera?, 21 tammikuu 2006
3/10
Author: RitchCS from Ft. Lauderdale, Fl.

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

Unlike the previous three reviewers, I didn't meet any of the cast or crew. So I wasn't as carried away as they were. I saw it on Palm On Demand TV. As two others have already said, I couldn't understand why the story wasn't carried straight through without trying to follow two or three back flashes of the story simultaneously. The convention to keep track of the time was to notice the different hairstyles and beards. The acting was above par, especially Justin. The movie only ran 70 minutes, just above the time of a featurette instead of a full-blown feature. Running out of film and budget apparently, the writer and director chose not to end the picture but leave it up to the viewer's decision. I felt as if I had been gypped. While only wasting an hour and ten minutes of my life, I would like for the story to have some conclusion or resolution. Even if it meant one more day of shooting on a VidCam, no one was being paid in the first place. Why not film ten to twenty more minutes? It was like a great premise but it stopped before it got to the main story. This is not a spoiler for in the first scene, we already know that our hero just got out of serving three years in prison. Now we want to know what will happen after he gets out. Instead, the story flashes back to tell us why he went to prison and then stops. I'm only glad I didn't plop down eight bucks to see the beginning of a good movie. It was like in the old days when the film broke in the theatre or someone forgot to send the last reel. A good try, but next time, if they're going to make a movie. Give us ninety minutes at least. With a good editor, the final film could have been cut down to thirty minutes. If anyone wants to see it, don't rent it or see it at a movie house, see it on TV.

Was the above comment useful to you?

Add another comment

Related Links

Ratings Main details Your user comments
Your vote history