If this film title were true, then I am sure the Air Force Office of Scientific Research would know about it. Ultimately since world war II the use of long distance airplanes, the submarine, and the hydrogen bomb have made man the ultimate threat against himself.
I have referenced AFRL-SR-BL-TR-01-0349 because it is an internal code that was made un-classified. Just as this movie tries to un-veil about the X-files of military intelligence so did this program try to maintain a level of transparency in government. Also, the object was to identify management methods in US government and industry laboratories. I however think this was a cruel joke on society and sociology practice with infamous business analytics like Thomas Saaty, Joyce Alexander, Kevin Kearns, and Luis Vargas who made decision making in management a historic analytic process via publication and education.
However, the national security of American and allied citizens is always a role of any public servant. It is our civic duty as a citizen to report all threats to society. Even the methods of society.
I think that if national security was as much of threat today and in the era of this film as when the Roman Empire existed, or the Hittite Empire then the use of boats to disperse culture would have been more prevalent. I am assuming that the psychic powers mentioned in this film were genetic just as known genetic traits are passed down along generations with the knowledge of human heritage.
Thus questions of the objective of our National Security as technology has become more advanced. Methods to monitor, calculate, and even control people. This question is most likely the same as most civil leaders from Hiram Abbif builder of Solmons Temple from the city of Tyre, the Papal heads of state at the Vatician in Rome with famous inventors and scientists, and the Freemasons who have long since established lodges to promote brotherhood of society such as the Grand Lodge of England, Grand Orient de France, and Masonic Temple in Cincinnati Ohio USA. The main question I think should be what is our society made of and how should we defend it. If we are defending a greater cause than beyond man then it is not our cause to defend.
I have referenced AFRL-SR-BL-TR-01-0349 because it is an internal code that was made un-classified. Just as this movie tries to un-veil about the X-files of military intelligence so did this program try to maintain a level of transparency in government. Also, the object was to identify management methods in US government and industry laboratories. I however think this was a cruel joke on society and sociology practice with infamous business analytics like Thomas Saaty, Joyce Alexander, Kevin Kearns, and Luis Vargas who made decision making in management a historic analytic process via publication and education.
However, the national security of American and allied citizens is always a role of any public servant. It is our civic duty as a citizen to report all threats to society. Even the methods of society.
I think that if national security was as much of threat today and in the era of this film as when the Roman Empire existed, or the Hittite Empire then the use of boats to disperse culture would have been more prevalent. I am assuming that the psychic powers mentioned in this film were genetic just as known genetic traits are passed down along generations with the knowledge of human heritage.
Thus questions of the objective of our National Security as technology has become more advanced. Methods to monitor, calculate, and even control people. This question is most likely the same as most civil leaders from Hiram Abbif builder of Solmons Temple from the city of Tyre, the Papal heads of state at the Vatician in Rome with famous inventors and scientists, and the Freemasons who have long since established lodges to promote brotherhood of society such as the Grand Lodge of England, Grand Orient de France, and Masonic Temple in Cincinnati Ohio USA. The main question I think should be what is our society made of and how should we defend it. If we are defending a greater cause than beyond man then it is not our cause to defend.
