"Bonanza" Square Deal Sam (TV Episode 1964) Poster

(TV Series)

(1964)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A Grifting Robin Hood?
redryan6411 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
WHEN ONE THINKS of great actors of the 20th century stage and screen, we often find that although we know the face, the name never seems to attach itself to our consciousness. So it is with one Ernest Truex (1889-1973). He was a supporting player-extraordinaire, who always played meek, brainy bosses, intellectuals and annoying twits.

HE HAD EMPLOYED his considerable talent and 5'3" frame to many of such roles in film from the early 1930's up until the 70's. There are two such portrayals for which we do remember him well. One was a TWILIGHT ZONE Episode, What You Need (1959) and ,perhaps his most visible and prominent role as milquetoast reporter, Bensinger, in HIS GIRL Friday (Columbia, 1940).

AS FAR AS today's subject, BONANZA: Square Deal Sam (1964), it presents the now venerable actor's comic abilities on display for the TV generation. Being a standard sort of comic relief episode; it is essentially a reworking of the old "Con Man With A Heart of Gold" plot that had been kicking around for years. It was the stuff that W.C. Fields had gotten so much mileage out of in the '30's and '40's.

IN THE PROVERBIAL "nutshell", Samuel & Martha Washburn (Truex & Martha Westman) arrive via stagecoach in Virginia City, Nevada and are befriended by Hoss Cartwright, after poor-mouthing him with stories of lost fortunes and unrealized expectations at this their new "home." What follows is a series of increasingly lucrative cons, which are artfully dodged by grafter Washburn. Even when discovered, his apology and explanation always leads to greater scams.

FINALLY THIS STORY ends up with the conman once again looking like a a blue collar champion of the people. He escapes prosecution successfully by claiming his shady financial dealings were meant to be a means of raising the needed funds that the City needed to found and construct a Needy Children's Home; a charitable pursuit alluded to early in the episode.

THIS WIND-UP IS both a violation of the age old axiom about "The End Never Justifies The Means." But, this was, of course, the "Dawning of the Age of Aquarius" and the 1960's marked what was just the beginnings of such warped ways of viewing things.

AS MUCH AS one may well find this BONANZA Installment to be somewhat trite, unoriginal and unremarkable, we did enjoy it very much; especially when contrasted with some of the other episodes that were being turned out during that period.

AND TO BE sure, a lot of our appreciation of this hour story is due to the appearance of that "Mr. Milquetoast" (himself), Mr. Ernest Truex.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A disarming manner
bkoganbing21 June 2017
Ernest Truex and Nydia Westman guest star on this Bonanza episode where the two play a nice elderly pair of grifters. Well at least Truex is or tries to be, Westman just goes along with the man she loves.

The thing is that Truex has a truly disarming manner and he takes the Cartwrights in good. But he keeps getting caught and keeps going on with one lie after another to cover it up. Even with the disarming manner it was hard to believe people could be so gullible with the exception of Dan Blocker because Hoss has such a good heart he's always gullible.

A gang of ragamuffin kids prove to be Truex's salvation and he their's. You'll have to watch the episode to see how that works out. Truex and Westman do fine in roles admirably suited to their types.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I hate episodes like this
glitterrose7 April 2022
I look at the Cartwrights + Hop Sing and I wouldn't really say any of them were idiots. There's different types of intelligence. There's common sense and there's book smarts. You might have one character that has both qualities, one character might have one level of intelligence over another, etc.

So you have an episode like this where the writing dumbs the characters down to the point where all of them are idiots. And I just don't like that. You need to respect who and what you're writing for. It'd be the same level as writing a script where you have a nice character being a bully. It doesn't make sense. Characters like Ben and Adam aren't gonna fall for some crap story and that make them invest in something or buy something before they can research into what they're buying into.

And to add insult to injury is the guy in this episode is a compulsive liar who's always trying to pull a scam. All of the Cartwrights and Hop Sing are ALL intelligent enough to be wary of somebody that gets caught with their pants down when it concerns pulling a scam/lying.

But this continues through the whole episode. I'm not dissing the actors. I've seen Ernest Truex on Alfred Hitchcock shows before and he put in a fine appearance on those shows. It just boils down to what I said before. A person can only do so much with a lousy script. Ernest was supposed to play a crooked scammer/liar and he did it. He nailed what was in the script. It's just a shame the storyline wasn't better.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Might as well be year 2017
Thomas0013 July 2017
So, a swindler moves to town, and just when he is about to get caught for cheating the town's middle class, rich liberal elite from out of town devises a way out of jail for him. The elite create new victim class and get the town's middle class to set up and pay for a new social program. And this was in 1964? The acting was good though, I particularly liked the last little kid at the store, first he bit off a piece of licorice, then he run off with the whole jar. Nice touch.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolute trash
briansgate28 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER ALERT: Review contains spoilers. This is one of the worst episodes of any TV show I've ever seen. The main stars and recurring characters all act like gullible, naive fools. The story is completely illogical and utterly unbelievable. Apparently attempted to be humorous, the script is absolute garbage. Hoss invites two strangers he's known for two minutes to come and stay at the Ponderosa as if it were a hotel. Sam Washburn swindles the Cartwrights, their cook, a local gambler and half of the townspeople by selling his worthless land to them that he claims has a rich copper mine on it. Even though he swindled the four Cartwrights and Hop Sing, they prop him up and let him keep the money he swindled from them to buy and run the general store, where he can swindle the whole town. A local gambler wins Hop Sing's 10% of the land, and without checking as to whether or not it has value, tries to buy the whole property. The fact that Sam is running a general store while supposedly owning the valuable copper mine isn't questioned by the gambler. Without any logical reason, he just accepts that the land is valuable. They why would Sam sell all of it? After the truth comes out, Sam tells another lie regarding his intention to use the money to build an orphanage. So naturally the gambler and rest of the people Sam swindled all vote to let Sam keep the money and run the orphanage. He swindled the Cartwrights twice and the rest of the town once and was on the verge of running with the money when the deputy caught him, but they trust him with the over $2,000 collected to build the orphanage. And Sam's wife talks about how Sam always bungles, yet he successfully swindles everyone. He doesn't bungle, he's just too immobile to make good his escape. Jessica Benson wrote "Enter Thomas Bowers," a fine episode of Bonanza. This makes me assume that co-writer Murray Golden turned this into the trash that it was. His co-writer credit for this episode is his only writing credit, and it's no wonder.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another dismal Bonanza comedy
branenberg7422 August 2022
Generally Bonanza episodes are enjoyable to watch. But, when they delve into comedy the results are usually unfunny. This snoozer of an episode is no exception. Slow paced, humorless dialogue, with an uneven storyline that doesn't hold up. Hop Sing gets plenty of screen time in this travesty of an episode, and that's not a good thing. His stereotypical portrayal of a Chinese cook is hard to watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed