The Floating Castle (2012) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Fighting History
kosmasp12 April 2020
There have been a lot of wars and battles. And many have found themselves pitched against the odds. Being at disadvantages for one or many reasons, some still fought on and why not? Shouldn't you do so for your and other peoples freedom? The answer will depend on your value system of course.

Of course this is a movie so it probably takes liberties (I have not read up on all the things that actually happened, but we do get notes from the movie, not just in front of the movie). It also takes violence to a level that might be too much for some. It truly is gritty and brutal. If you can handle that and like movies with great battle scenes ... you are right here.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Far from the best, but can be enjoyable for the more open-minded
floppydisk9095 June 2013
The Floating Castle isn't the worst I've seen, but its pretty far from the best. First thing to note, however, is that this is most definitely NOT a realistic historic drama, despite what the trailer and description seem say. The best example of this is a particular scene where one character lifts an enemy bodily from the ground on the tip of his spear. With one hand. On horse back. So yes, don't expect too much realism here.

It's strongest point is probably its colorful cast of characters. The team defending the castle consists of a good hearted buffoon, a reasonable older leader, a blood-thirsty warrior,a young strategist, and finally, a warrior princess that doubles as the love interest. It's a good mix, and pitted against the ambitious young general, the story sure sets itself up for a fun, adventurous tale. Unfortunately, it doesn't go much further than that. The right ingredients are there, but the final mix is particularly lacking.

I would say that the biggest problem lies in the movie's tone. It doesn't seem to have decided on whether or not it wants to be a light-hearted comedy or a serious action film, and trapezes back and forth between both extremes. Don't get me wrong, comedy action is a perfectly acceptable genre. But there has to be transitions. There are several jarring scenes where the entire cast is serious and somber, and literally, in the span of a single second, everyone on screen is suddenly doubled over in laughter.

One of the biggest complaints I've heard of from viewers is the CG. However, keep in mind that judging whether or not CG is good or bad really depends on what you compare it to. By Hollywood standards, yes, the CG is quite atrocious. By lower- budget Asian Cinema standards, the CG is acceptable, maybe even slightly above average. There are some scenes that stand out in particular and really throw you off, but I have seen far, far worse in non-Hollywood films.

The other big complaint I've heard of is the "lead" character, Narita Nagachika, or Lord Bone. The character is supposed to be a buffoon, and the actor seems to play him in a very over-exaggerated, slap-stick sort of manner. Another review describes him as Chaplin-esque, which I think is accurate. Although it might work in a different sort of movie, it stands out quite a bit here and seems overdone. Context might be helpful though, since a quick Google search reveals that the actor, Nomura Mansai, is a well-known Kyogen actor in Japan (Kyogen being a type of traditional Japanese comedy related to Noh theater). If Nomura's exaggerated, comedic acting is a direct result of his background, I'd say he was a bit...miscast. But whether or not it's the actor's or director's fault, Lord Bone's character definitely sticks out like sore thumb in the movie. I can see what they were trying to go for though, so I'd give them some points for trying.

Final recommendation? Only watch if you're of the more tolerant type and genuinely interested in the story. Many might say its a bad movie, but if you don't mind the CG or some of the more unique decisions made by the director, it can be enjoyable and fun. Just don't go in expecting too much.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Interesting, fun, unfortunate
yawgmoth_7424 November 2012
Honestly, I really enjoyed this film. I liked the characters, it was VERY funny at times, it told a fascinating story. Nobou is about as fun and well-developed a character as one would tend to find in this kind of movie. At the same time, the battle scenes were bloody and fairly realistic, and exhilarating to watch.

But while all of that is good, it's not what stuck with me after the movie.

I live in Iwate, one of the three prefectures that were badly hit by the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami on 11 March, 2011.

Given that I imagine most theatres in Japan that are showing this film probably have the same warning stamped on the posters as the one I went to had, I don't think it qualifies as a spoiler to point out that the reason this film's release was delayed over a year is that there is one particular scene in which a village gets flooded in a rather graphic manner that for me (and probably for most Japanese audiences) was reminiscent of the tragedy that struck these shores last March. (Also, a similar attack happens in the first 5 minutes of the film, with Mitsunari saying, effectively, "I'm gonna do that too someday!". It's not a spoiler.)

The film is basically a comedy throughout, and when I watched it the theatre was packed and many other audience members were audibly laughing. Then when that scene hit, the theatre went silent. I can't help but imagine the film probably originally had more jokes punctuating that sequence, but they were cut in the aftermath of the tsunami because of obvious inappropriateness.

Still, even in light of how depressed the film made me with that one scene, I highly recommend that anyone who has the opportunity see this film. It is still highly entertaining. :-)
21 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Heartfelt comedy of war.......
s327616913 March 2017
On first inspection The Floating Castle appears to be an odd mix of comedy and warfare.

Indeed, there are some excellent, very Japanese, comic moments but if you dig deeper, this film is really about the pointless tragedy of war and the enduring joy of life.

The main character is a off beat, seemingly un-samurai, samurai who hides a sharp strategic mind behind a goofy, childlike exterior. More than that, however, he's a humanist, who understands the value of the simple joys of life and places them above martial ambition.

This is a wonderful film that's funny, sad, joyful and poignant in equal measure. Its easy to overlook these aspects of the film as a good portion of it, is taken up with remarkable battle scenes that could be seen to "shout down" its anti war message.

Surprising in so many ways, its a shame The Floating Castle, has had so few reviews as there is so much to like. Nine out of ten from me.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wow!!
net_orders27 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Where to begin when attempting to review a film classic and overwhelming cinematic epic? A production so immense that it required two directors (Shinji Higuchi and Isshin Inudo)! The movie recounts the siege of Oshi Castle (located about 40 miles northwest of Edo/Tokyo) when defenders (out numbered four to one) successfully held off attacking forces towards the end of Japan's feudal era. This "floating" castle was mostly surrounded by swamps which formed part to it's fortification. (It has been partially rebuilt in modern times.) Defenders threw in the towel (but seem to have never really surrendered) after being drowned out by a flash flood induced by the attackers who built and then emptied a large reservoir filled by damming nearby rivers. All of this is convincingly (and grippingly) recreated in this film which is also loaded with believable high drama. Crammed with supporting-actor talent, actor Mansai Nomura (playing the leader of the defenders) is a stand out while actress Machiko Ono not so much. Nomura's character is an aristocrat who: is also a man of the people; has an amusing off-the-wall personality; although not a warrior, can be a shrewd military strategist when pressed; and is a very good song-and-dance man (yes, you read this right!). The latter talent is used to confuse and soften the resolve of attacking forces after the flash flood. The castle looks more like a fortification than a castle as depicted in the movie. Special effects are spectacular (and rarely look like simulations). Costumes are imaginative yet seem to be historically accurate (except for some head gear). Same for weapons. Interior sets are richly detailed. Music adds much to what is occurring on screen. Nomura's singing is hauntingly reprised during the closing credits. Subtitles seem to capture the gruff, hard-to-understand dialogue , but the translation ignores clarifications and guide posts (names, titles, etc.) inserted through out the film to help the viewer keep on track. That said, movie watching very seldom gets better than this! Viewed at Japanese Film Festival Online. WILLIAM FLANIGAN.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed