Anatomy of a Fall (2023) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
454 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Chilling
PedroPires906 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
If someone had told me that "Anatomie d'une chute" would make me add 50 Cent's "P. I. M. P." to my playlist, I probably wouldn't have known how to react. It was unexpected to see the presence of the theme in a French legal drama, and even more surprising was its prominence in addressing some of the film's central themes. But despite appearances, "Anatomie d'une chute" is anything but a typical dull legal drama.

I admit that your experience with this film may vary depending on your level of engagement with the work, as your experience will be greatly affected by how much this film can draw you into its world, its characters, and their nuances. At its core is a mysterious death.

There are various ways to approach this story. It could have been an investigative thriller in the style of David Fincher, but it's not. Justine Triet knows exactly what she wants to extract from it. She is more interested in showing it through the eyes of the people involved and does an astonishing job in this regard. Rather than the quest for the truth, the script is more concerned with how people react to the bits of information they come across. It also aims to demonstrate the complexity of human relationships and the path that leads to certain decisions in the lives of couples that can never be fully understood by an external audience filled with prejudices and snap judgments. The media attention surrounding the trial that occupies almost the entirety of the last two acts of this film demonstrates that the truth is not always the most important aspect. It also shows that the judgment of a specific moment or action is less significant for the audience than a character judgment that is always waiting to be passed.

The way this is all filmed surprised me greatly. Triet doesn't seek a classical and comfortable approach. The blocking is phenomenal, making us feel almost like intruders. The camera's movements are also unstable, approaching the emotionally unstable characters. It's a mastery that few possess, not because few know how to do it technically, but because few can do it so effectively, eliciting the emotional response desired from the audience. For instance, there's a scene in which a third party speaks about the deceased. The camera first focuses on Daniel (Milo Machado Graner), the son, who is visibly uncomfortable but tries to hide it. Then it shifts to Sandra (Sandra Hüller), and we can see the same discomfort in her as she tries to make eye contact with her son. It moved me and brought tears to my eyes. The foreground here wasn't the dialogue but how it was affecting these people.

What Milo Machado Graner, one of the most impressive performances by a young actor, and especially Sandra Hüller do in this film is sensational. Hüller brings an impressive array of expressive tools that always work according to the moment when they are put into action. When she tries to seduce, when she fights, when she opens up, when she closes off, when she feels invincible, when she feels vulnerable. Her micro-expressions and body language convey everything she has to say, and I must say that I consider this performance among the best I've ever seen. It's spine-chilling.

With this, I'm afraid I might be doing a disservice to the supporting actors, which would be unfair because they all deliver outstanding performances. In addition to the previously mentioned young actor, Swann Arlaud plays the eloquent defense lawyer and friend who becomes increasingly close to Sandra. Antoine Reinartz portrays a powerful prosecutor with a speech as intense as it is well-crafted. Samuel Theis shines in an incredible scene from the past. And speaking of that scene... what an immense kitchen argument, so well-crafted, packed with information, filled with conflicting emotions, repressed feelings, and expertly edited to the point where all you can do is open your mouth in admiration of such a work of art. After all, this film is about several falls, and no scene could better exemplify the most significant fall than that one.

Although this is not the easiest film to watch, demanding a lot from the viewer, especially until the end of the first act, the way everything unfolds, the development of its script, and the paths and destinations of its thematic approach are absolutely fascinating. It is one of the most realistically human films in its approach to unknown facts. It doesn't aim for flashy cinematic spectacle, but it provides plenty to engage your gray matter every time you think about it.

What happens inside each home is truly known only to those who live there. The truths. The half-truths. "Anatomie d'une chute" is a magnificent realistic exercise in the search for a truth that isn't always attainable, forcing everyone else to navigate in an uncertain but necessary zone of conscious decision-making. Sandra Hüller delivers one of the best performances in history. Period. Chilling.
369 out of 426 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Anatomy of a Fall
henry8-32 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
At his home at a a chalet near Grenoble in France, a young partially sited boy takes his dog for a walk. When he returns he finds his father lying dead on the ground, apparently from a fall from above. The police arrive and after some investigation they charge the boy's mother Sandra (Sandra Hüller) with his murder.

You often see on the web the question - what is the difference between a Hollywood and a Foreign film. This film provides a shining example of an extremely European film and one that would not be made in Hollywood. Whilst it is riddled with clues as whether she did it or not, twists and turns and a fabulous courtroom drama, it never once takes its eye off the prize. There are no odd little vignettes about the characters and their lives away from the core issue and no pointless sub plots, just the fall and the fallout. The performances, particularly by Huller are really first rate and you find yourself completely sold by her compelling courtroom testimony - bewildering you as to whether it was murder, suicide or an accident all practically in the same scene. A first rate, grown up, nuanced thriller - not to be missed.
89 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sandra Hüller and Milo Machado Graner give stunning performances
steiner-sam28 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
It's a legal drama set in the recent past in a chalet in the French Alps near Grenoble and a courtroom in Grenoble, France. It follows the investigation and trial of a female novelist charged with the death of her husband, also a novelist.

Sandra Voyter (Sandra Hüller) is a successful German novelist. While studying in Great Britain, she met her husband, Samuel Maleski (Samuel Theis), a French-background university lecturer and aspiring novelist. They have an 11-year-old son, Daniel (Milo Machado Graner), who suffered an injury at age four that seriously affected his eyesight. They have moved to Samuel's home community near Grenoble because he thought this would aid his writing. They speak English and French at home; Samuel doesn't speak German, and Sandra believes her French is not strong. Clearly, the marriage has been troubled since Daniel's accident, which took place in a traffic accident while Daniel was in Samuel's care.

The movie opens with Sandra being interviewed by a graduate student, Zoé Solidor (Camille Rutherford). Samuel is working in the chalet's attic, installing insulation and playing music louder and louder, forcing the interview to end. When Zoé leaves, Daniel takes his dog, Snoop, for a walk. When he returns, he discovers Samuel dead on the ground after a fall from the third-floor attic. Sandra claims she was asleep until she heard Daniel's scream.

The circumstances of Samuel's death launch an investigation. Did Samuel fall? Was he pushed? Did he jump? What caused his significant head wound? The authorities eventually charge Sandra with murder. Her lawyer, Vincent Renzi (Swann Arlaud), has an earlier history with Sandra and seems uncertain about his beliefs about her role. The trial does come to a believable conclusion.

Sandra Hüller and Milo Machado Graner give stunning performances. "Anatomy of a Fall" is one the best legal dramas I've seen for a long time. I can't speak to the accuracy of the French courtroom scenes; it's markedly different than North American and English courts in the wide-ranging manner of witness interrogation that involves the accused all along the way, and both the prosecutor and defense lawyers take great liberty to insert argument amid questioning. But the audience learns just a little more at each turn through the slow unfolding of Sandra's and Samuel's marriage through the testimony.

If you like legal dramas, "Anatomy of a Fall" is highly recommended.
126 out of 160 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
anatomy of a fall
mossgrymk1 January 2024
This film is a glorious exception to the rule that if a movie attempts to do too many things in its two hour time span then it will be disappointing. Not only is this film a gripping courtroom drama, the best I've seen since that previous "Anatomy", directed by Preminger, it is also a most acute examination of a miserable marriage as well as an uneasy mother/son relationship. That co writer and director Justine Triet manages to give moving, convincing renditions of each of these three subjects without putting undue strain upon my patience (I was never close to being bored) heralds, in my opinion, a most promising career. I definitely look forward to the next film by Ms. Triet and will, hopefully, be able to view her prior ones. And the lead actor, Sandra Huller, just may swoop in and make off with the Oscar.

It also has, thrown in free of charge, the best dog performance in a film since "Sounder". Give it an A.

PS...Remind me to never get arrested in France. Its legal system is, if this film can be trusted, more than a bit on the chaotic side. With an alarming tolerance for speculation. To mention nothing of witnesses viewing the trial!
87 out of 113 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Anatomy of a Fall
M0n0_bogdan21 October 2023
There are so many things I got from this after watching it. So many subtle little thing that throw shade over both characters, thus showing such complex humans with flaws and virtues.

Technically it does not stand out but it's servicable for the themes and story. Was this the perfect long-game psychological crime? That last scene speaks volumes. The last courtroom scene with the kid was devestating and conclusive, even if that lawyer tried to flip it. Even him knew the conclusion at that moment. It was cathartic.

It was a very devastating and powerful film. I would very much like to see it again so I can absorb that excellent dialogue all over again.
121 out of 163 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A deep yet entertaining take on the courtroom drama
dngoldman29 October 2023
Anatomy of a Fall is a French film that explores the ambiguity of how we create notions of the truth through complexity of a criminal case. The film refuses to answer the question of guilt or innocence, but rather examines how people construct their own narratives based on partial and biased information. The film shows how gender, media, and personal motives influence the interpretation of the facts. The son of the accused, who is the only witness, admits that he does not know what really happened, and that he has to make a choice about what to believe. The prosecutor, who seems to have a personal vendetta against the accused, also relies on assumptions and speculations rather than solid evidence. The film is a compelling and nuanced study of human psychology and social dynamics. The film is well-acted and directed, but it could have been shorter. Some scenes in the courtroom are repetitive and drag on for too long.
103 out of 138 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The legal drama I've been waiting for
parksiet5 November 2023
Anatomy of a Fall is an engrossing courtroom drama that packs a miniseries' worth of story in two and a half hours. I totally see why it garnered so much acclaim from the festival circuit! It is exactly the kind of legal drama I've wanted to see for years. THIS is the standard of crime genre that all other films now have to live up to. Thoughtful, intricate and emotional. The writing is phenomenal - it takes a lot of guts to do two hours of court proceedings but wow, it's enthralling; so meticulously plotted and presented, with such intricate explorations of the complexities of relationships. It's the kind of thought-provoking procedural where the truth is never certain and the power is granted to the audience to determine its true outcome. Sandra Hüller is extraordinary in a cant-look-away performance that will grip you from beginning to end, but if I'm being honest, everyone here is incredible. It has one of the best child performances I've ever seen in a film. Even the dog put in a performance of a lifetime! Taut, suspenseful and compelling until the final moment, the film progresses like a heady puzzle that tackles the messiness of existence and the often elusive nature of truth itself. Anatomy of a Fall is truly all-around exceptional filmmaking!
91 out of 122 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
More than one Truth
berndgeiling5 November 2023
A lonely chalet in the French Alps. A dead man laying in the snow in front of it. Apparently he fell out of the third floor window under the roof.

Was it an accident? Suicide? Or a murderess attack? Whoever expects a conventional crime thriller with a final simple solution will be badly disappointed by this complex psychological drama about a female author fighting for her independence, dignity and her own truth in the courtroom, where she stands under suspicion to have killed her husband. But beware: truth has different aspects and different sides, depending on whoever tries to catch it. It comes in disguises, often invisible, always subjective.

In the end it's up to the viewer to make up his own mind about the case. While the investigation is unfolded Triets movie proudly walks in the footsteps of Ingmar Bergman, a classic analyst of complicated couple relationships and she truly succeeds in doing so.
80 out of 103 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Blurring the lines between fiction and reality
akseltutcu28 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Palme d'or meant high expectations while I was in the theater to see "Anatomy of a Fall", and it didn't disappoint.

The first part of the movie has the tone of a typical crime-piece. We as an audience are shocked by the Samuel's sudden (although expected) death in the first few minutes. Now we have a mystery to solve: how did Samuel die? Was he killed? If yes by whom? And how?

So we start following the attorneys and the investigators in the construction of a murder case against Samuel's wife Sandra (Sandra Hüller), and like them we try to solve this puzzle as we get spoon-fed its pieces: drops of blood, vague fragments of memories, recordings, past tragedies.. Each new piece of information presented to us before and during the trial shifts our opinion about the nature of Samuel's death, each new evidence is inconsistent with the previous one and adds up to a pile of confusion. We have enough to suspect, that's all.

Then start the stories. Defense and general attorneys, experts, psychologists.. Everyone writes their own narrative about Samuel's death. And much like Kurosawa's "Rashômon" (1952), each storyteller bends the facts to fit their personal envies and objectives: Sandra wants to stay with his son, Vincent (Swann Arlaud) wants Sandra to love him back, the psychologist needs to keep his 100% record of patients that didn't kill themselves. Even the press has its goals in it: "a writer killing her husband if much more interesting than a professor killing himself". At that point, we understand that it doesn't even matter if Sandra killed Samuel or not, or as Vincent said "we don't care about reality". We all want the story that makes sense.

So does Daniel (Milo Machado Graner). He discovers that he isn't only blind physically, but also blind about his family's past and his parents' relationship. Like the audience, he is shocked by each revelation and asks himself questions, investigates, and gets lost. His law-enforcer/baby-sitter Marge finally gets the key to him: "if you don't know what is real, then decide it yourself". Daniel tells his story, that turns out to be the best one. No way to know if the story is true. Maybe he just preferred the "suicidal father, innocent mother" to "killed father, killer mom". But one thing is sure, with his testimony, Daniel has reached the goal that her writer mother wanted to achieve in her books: blurring the lines between fiction and reality.

Top notch acting by Milo Machado Graner, Sandra Hüller, Antoine Reinhartz, Swann Arlaud, and of course Snoop; I hope he isn't thirsty anymore.

9/10.
90 out of 124 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Will never be able to hear "P.I.M.P." the same way again
Mike_Devine24 March 2024
Courtroom-based dramas aren't all created equal. Chances are you can think of a few timeless ones that stand the test of time (perhaps 'To Kill a Mockingbird,' 'A Few Good Men,' 'The Pelican Brief'). In Justine Triet's 'Anatomy of a Fall,' we can get to see the French judicial system on display in a tale of the struggle to decide when it's difficult to see the truth through a forest of hearsay.

There are a few aspects of 'Fall' that hold the audience's attention more so than other films in this genre. The way the story unfolds from the initial events to the verdict and aftermath is riveting, which makes it easy to understand how it earned an Oscar for best original screenplay. The performance of Sandra Hüller is exceptional, as she convincingly plays a conflicted writer who loves her half-blind son, Daniel (Milo Machado-Graner), yet must defend herself against an accusation of murder.

There are a few scenes in 'Fall' that are masterclass, including the recreation of an argument between Hüller and her onscreen husband, Samuel Maleski (Samuel Theis). This scene is intense, agonizing and feels completely authentic, and both actors deliver A+ work. Machado-Graner also does a superb job across the board, including an emotional testimony as a witness in the trial. Oh, and anyone who watches this movie will never be able to think of 50 Cent's "P. I. M. P." the same way again.

For such a simple premise, 'Anatomy of a Fall' manages to showcase the complexity of human nature and the importance of seeing both sides of a situation.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Remarkable
richard-17876 September 2023
This movie runs 150 minutes, but I was never bored or distracted. The script is taught, the direction intriguing. Certain scenes, like when the boy is being questioned by two opposing lawyers at the same time, so that he is constantly turning his head back and forth to look at each in turn, are very clever.

Almost half this movie is in English, so even people who don't like subtitles should give it a try.

I haven't seen Anatomy of a Murder in years, so I can't say if there are any references to it. I do remember, however, that I didn't think it was a great movie.

This, however, has greatness written all over it.
120 out of 174 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
What's the big deal?
mesaxi25 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I was excited to see this movie because several people had recommended it, but I really didn't think it was all that good. Maybe I'm just too American to understand the French courts, but everything about the legal proceedings seemed ridiculous to me. Like suspicion even being cast on the wife without a shred of actual evidence, they simply say "these bruises aren't what we'd expect, his wife must have killed him". They badgered a child to get the results they want, taking his word as truth until he changed his mind and then their legal standing was "no takesies-backsies". The first witness is lead by the prosecutor like a dog to say the things he wanted, they read fiction literature in a court room as evidence to the authors character, people would just jump up and start cross-examining whenever they felt like it. If this is how it works in France, I'm mortified. When the movie hurt a dog to make a stupid point I started to check out, not only that but the court seemed to consider the "dog experiment" as actual evidence. The last 10 minute to me were the most confusing part. Like there was a perfect moment for an ending, I even said "aaaaaand credits" only to get 10 more minutes of.....? I don't really know what that ending was about, I kept waiting for some sort of reveal.

Again, maybe I just don't get the French courts, but this movie seemed extremely unlikely and felt very frustrating. If you're into European court dramas I guess check it out, but I think this was kind of meh.
355 out of 529 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Had a great sleep with this one
asdakitty22 February 2024
Before watching ensure you're comfortable and in prime position for a lush 12 hour snooze. The first portion of this film had me slightly captivated but cautious of what may unravel. And what unravelled? An 8 hour deep sleep. 3 hours and nothing is accomplished, the scenes are mundane, the storyline was a convoluted mess, the pacing could have you convinced that the next day has arrived when only 10 minutes has passed and by the end you're only left with a headache and a deep frustration of the time you've let pass. As I'm sure many other unfortunate watchers of this viewing similarly experienced, it was if I was at a personal war with myself throughout this film, fighting against the strong foe of sleep and trying my best to actually have interest for what crap i was perceiving. I'm not quite sure how this film is critically acclaimed, just be sure not to believe their viewpoint (they probably want to bring you down with them) and please don't make the same mistake as I by watching this movie.
35 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A (crime?) drama of the finest quality! [+83%]
arungeorge1315 October 2023
The beauty of the film truly lies in how delicately it's paced throughout. Even when it takes the shape of a courtroom drama with great attention to detail, it still rests firmly on the emotional bonding between the lead characters - in this case, a mother (Sandra), her son (Daniel), and their dog. That never takes a backseat, despite the film turning into a murder mystery (of sorts) at several points. I absolutely loved the performances here, be it Sandra Hüller, Swann Arlaud, Milo Machado Graner, and Samuel Theis. And for all it's worth, the standout here is Snoop (the dog), and his presence not only drives the story forward at a pivotal juncture, but this wonderful canine also takes the audience's perspective in the beginning and at the end of the film. He's travelling with these characters just like us, while also playing the role of an unconditional guardian angel to Daniel.

When the writing digs deep into the intricacies of a marriage, it is poignant, relatable, and hard-hitting. Both the husband and the wife are writers essentially, and that makes their struggles and little victories all the more accessible. The changing dynamics in their relationship is brought to light through superbly shot flashbacks (just as their audio recordings are being played in court), and we as audiences, understand what each half of the couple is going through. The journey is dramatic alright, but since the outcome determines whether the mother gets to reunite with her son after a long, drawn-out trial, it always remains riveting to watch. The "lesser" moments - like a scene that depicts Sandra and her lawyer friend drinking together, are also beautifully staged.
97 out of 147 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Perfectly executed courtroom thriller mystery
director-9711423 May 2023
I went into the Cannes premiere not knowing what to expect. The movie instantly hooked me and kept me captivated the entire time. The dialogues were some of the best I've ever gotten to watch in a film. There are spins and turns. Some very beautiful lines that resonate. The writing showed understanding of the intricacies of multicultural relationships. Some moments were intense and made me cry.

To summarize, I came into this movie with no expectations, and was mesmerized and left feeling like this is a perfect film, perfectly crafted. It deserves to win some awards and I will make sure to watch the director's other films.
101 out of 154 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I would like to highlight...
DayeValentijn25 October 2023
... the performance of the child actor: Milo Machado Graner. All the other actors were brilliant and amazing in their own ways, especially Sandra Hüller and Swann Arlaud. However, due to the demanding nature of the task at hand, Graner did superbly. He never phones it in. It's a calibre I've never witnessed before to this degree from a child actor. Surely I haven't seen all the classics and films in the world to make such a statement as there is still so much left for me to watch. Regardless, Graner's performance gives me so much confidence in proclaiming the following statement: this is the best performance I've witnessed from a child actor (ever?). There is mastery exhibited both in the quiet moments and dialogue-heavy scenes. Just from his body language, things can be inferred and implied. Graner is subtle as much as he is unsubtle. It's quite hard to put it into words, which is a sign of something great. You feel things that words cannot describe. That's art.

As for the film itself, I think it's pretty good. I was expecting something more due to the critical buzz and its success at Cannes, so I can't say I wasn't a little disappointed. I feel like the movie was a bit too long and/or slow, which I usually don't feel if the plot and narrative is as gripping that the film presents (I'm a fan of courtroom dramas). I think the film wants you to be second-guessing the characters' actions and motivations, which is a clear choice by the director and that is fine. However, personally I would've liked it to be more critical of the French legal system with a clearer voice. What Anatomy of a Fall boils down to is the law vs truth in the face of a tumultuous marriage between two writers.

Rating might go up on a rewatch but doubt I'll be watching it anytime again soon due to the pacing.

Also: loved the instrumental that plays on repeat in the beginning hahah.
51 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Anatomy of a relationship
cinish30 March 2024
Movie felt very cerebral and french.

Where nonchalant remarks that might have got overlooked somewhere else, would get dissected at multiple layers exposing striking nuances.

Excellent acting performance from the actress and the boy.

The movie dissects sharply into the relationship and exposes it's complexities.

The child actor has given a phenomenal performance.

Excellent writing. Excellent acting performances.

A very realistic treatment. You would never guess the direction the movie is going to take.

Methodical, scientific, analytic approach to get to the truth. That is the reason the movie felt very cerebral. Is the emotional core of the movie overlooked? Not at all. But what you see people doing are all the hard have-to-do things. Procedures. Practicality is given a lot of importance.

Anatomy of a fall refers to the anatomy not only of the physical fall but also of the fall of the relationship, which gets dissected to a fault in the courtroom.

When the film ends, you are not done. You have a stream of questions still to ponder. It is an excellent work, not an easy watch.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A clumsy, overlong and frustratingly insubstantial film with good performances
MogwaiMovieReviews16 December 2023
Watched this recent French film last night; the winner of this year's Palme d'Or, which says something about the level of competition in the world of film today.

It's an excellently acted and well-shot story of a wife on trial for the possible murder of her husband, who is found fallen from the highest window of their alpine home, but at 2½ hours, it's a good 40 or 50 minutes too long for such a small and relatively simple tale. There are endless courtroom scenes that don't progress the narrative or lead to any shocking twists, which could have easily been compressed or pared down in more competent hands.

It's an extremely - and frustratingly - female film, in its wallowing in subjectivity and its repeated assertion that what one feels is actual reality, rather than the facts of the matter, and as a result, there is no clear ending to the film, the message being that you can choose to believe whatever the hell you like. But of course this is silly nonsense: either one human being pushed another human being out of a window or they didn't, and in a murder trial, that should be all that matters.

So yes, it's a strange thing to rate: on a moment-by-moment basis, it's well-observed and often engrossing, but the substance of the story itself is flimsy and, in the final analysis, almost non-existent, so the most I can generously give it is 6/10.
284 out of 466 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Deep and subtle
thebeachlife20 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Amazing script, wonderful acting (Sandra Hüller is absolutely fantastic!), subtle music and skillful camera work: the film is interesting to watch, the twists are unpredictable and every next moment it digs deeper into the intricacies and imperfections in the relationship of a wealthy intellectual middle-aged couple. One of the partners appears emotionally stronger than the other, so they get over their family dramas and tragedies in different ways, to such an extent that it ends up with one of the partners dead and the other in court, charged with murder. This is how we are gradually exposed to the skeletons in their cupboards and feel free to recognize some of them as our own. Gives a lot of food for thought and discussion. Fantastic movie!
107 out of 171 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Flat, Boring, Talky and Overlong (Yawn)
brentsbulletinboard5 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
It's always disappointing when a film aspires to greatness that it never achieves. Such is the case with the latest offering from French writer-director Justine Triet, whose allegedly suspenseful thriller is about as appetizing as a plate of tepid leftovers. This crime investigation/courtroom drama about the mysterious death of a middle-aged unsuccessful writer (Samuel Theis) who falls from the second story of his mountain chalet looks into whether his demise is due to suicide or murder, with his wife (Sandra Hüller), herself a best-selling author, being the prime suspect. Despite an intriguing premise, however, the movie is overlong, needlessly talky and inherently flat, with a cold, clinical, unengaging narrative and characters who engender no connection, compassion or empathy. In essence, this is a "whodunnit" that plays like an extended "whocares." Fault the screenplay here, which seeks to tell a tale in the same gripping vein as such great courtroom dramas as "Anatomy of a Murder" (1959) but that never achieves the level of tension, mystery and audience engagement needed to pull that off. The meticulously orchestrated script feels calculated and derivative virtually from start to finish, especially in its trial sequences, which explore an array of possible motives and explanations, including everything from infidelity to plagiarism to previous suicide attempts, that rely on often-implausible speculation and inflated conjecture to carry forward a proceeding that probably never should have ended up in court in the first place. What's more, the double entendre that is the picture's title is so obvious that any hopes of nuance, subtlety or profundity evaporate quickly once the failing nature of the couple's troubled relationship surfaces. While the film admittedly features a fine performance by Hüller, it's far from enough to rescue a picture with big aspirations that never pan out. How this release has garnered so much exaggerated awards season buzz is beyond me, especially given its intrinsically insipid, underwhelming, overstated character. There are plenty of other films of this ilk out there that are far more worth watching than this one, so grab one of those better selections instead and give this one the well-earned pass it genuinely deserves.
175 out of 285 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
LIFF37 2023 #2
MattyLuke-8166320 November 2023
Anatomy of a Fall is a clever and compelling drama about a woman who must prove her innocence after the unexpected death of her husband.

It's not quite a mystery/why whodunnit, or a full-blown courtroom drama. And it's not a foreign movie either, as it slips in and out of English and French. It's a movie about the complications of a situation and the language barrier to get information across, both literal, as our main character has some trouble speaking French, as she is originally from Germany, and metaphorical with trying to communicate what we are feeling and saying to people who don't seem to listen.

We slowly learn what type of relationship it was between her and her husband during the trial, as she shares personal information to prove her innocence or a secretly recorded audio during a heated moment that gives you a better idea of their relationship.

Sandra Hüller's performance was fantastic, and her character is complex. One scene is when she delivers a fiery monologue, and it holds you in your place. I was unaware of her work beforehand, but after this film - she is on my radar. I cannot wait to see her in the Auschwitz film The Zone of Interest.

There is a stellar child performance from Milo Machado Graner and a challenging part, especially for his age, but he blew me away. The final speech he delivers towards the end is both beautiful and devastating.

All the acting from the cast was superb. Even the family dog was fantastic.

The directing and camera work was superb, and every shot was well thought out and presented effectively. The script was tremendous, as the dialogue and plot were terrific, but it also gave the actors a lot to work with.

My only issue with the film is the courtroom stuff, which slowed the pacing. While those scenes weren't awful, they just got repetitive after a while.

Overall rating: Anatomy of a Fall is a gripping drama that keeps you guessing. Both while you are watching the movie and long after it's over.
35 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Why such a high rating?
christiankg-851-20343324 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This movie isn't bad.

The bad part is that is 2 and a half hours long that could easily have been 90 minutes. I had high expectations because of the awards and the high ratings, but man, you gotta have a lot of patience to watch this. The first part got me, then it only gets boring (not that boring if you like court room and deep long dialogue movies).

The good points about "Anatomie d'une chute" is the plot that is interesting, some of the dialogue and I'm giving it a 5 because of Hüllers performance.

However, is just another court room movie without a clear closure. Not that I was expecting it to show if the guy killed himself or not but Palm D Or Winner? Why? Nothing new to see here.
64 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Anatomy of a fool
johnsonpaul160614 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I know, I know. It's my problem. A wonderfully acted, beautifully shot, two and a half hour french "whodunnit" and I feel cheated.

Most viewers, from the reviews I've read on here, got everything and more from this years winner at Cannes. But not me. To my shame, I waited and I waited, for that jaw dropping twist that I felt I deserved. I even stayed for the entire credits in the vain hope that there was a hidden denouement. But no. All I was left with was, did she or didn't she? (or did he?) I have enough stuff to worry about and adding to it like this isn't helping. It's bad enough having to spend the last twenty years never knowing what happened to Tony Soprano, now I have to ponder the fate of Samuel Maleski too.
69 out of 101 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Anatomy of a mystery. Conclusions the film struggles to provide.
tonypeacock-110 March 2024
I usually like my films to provide conclusive answers to things like murders and death. In fact to anything! Be warned in this death mystery you mainly aren't being fed much conclusive evidence.

We follow a mysterious death in the French Alps as a novelist couple Sandra and University lecturer Samuel reside at a chalet with their visually impaired son.

Samuel falls to his death from the upper floor with devastating consequences where after initial investigation wife Sandra is made the primary suspect and a courtroom drama ensues including a tape recording of the couple's fiery relationship. Add to the mix that the main witness is the visually impaired son.

The French/English movie plot has death, a courtroom drama, foreign language with subtitles and plenty of thought processes to contend with the lack of conclusive evidence.

The film is pretty long but keeps the viewer engrossed throughout. The courtroom scenes are pretty different to your usual legal angle being French. Don't be put off some scenes are cleverly shot in English.

I never thought I would be endeared to such a film but I couldn't leave the screen. The plot, the cast, the French legal angle, the film towards the end where the son takes the stand are all highlights. A film I recommend wholeheartedly.
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I'm lucky to have seen it in the cinema
olcare5 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, the movie was incredibly realistic. I haven't seen a film that felt this realistic in a long time, and it didn't oversimplify the complex situation. Additionally, the film was very well-directed, and the director's skill was evident.

I won't delve deeply into the performances, but everyone did quite well. There might have been a couple of instances of overacting that caught my eye, but overall, the performances were on point.

As I mentioned in the first paragraph, the direction really caught my attention. Apart from the screenplay, they portrayed events from a very accurate angle and profile, which was impressive. Another outstanding aspect was the courtroom scenes, with long, uncut takes that were mesmerizing in terms of both acting and cinematography, creating a sense of realism that truly captivated me. I couldn't believe how real it was. It was even more real than reality, to put it that way.

The screenplay was clear and straightforward, with no exaggeration. However, I can offer some criticism towards the end, as the runtime extended, and as the conclusion began to take shape, I started to feel fatigued as a viewer. This is where I deducted some points, as I had expected 1-2 unique scenes that were missing.

I'd like to mention my favorite scenes in the film with spoilers. The scene where the Snoop is poisoned was amazing; it made me feel so bad that my stomach still hurts, and that's a serious achievement. Daniel's final speech where he talks about the memory and his facial expressions were incredibly well done. I applaud the young actor. Sandra Hüller's performance in the scene where she argues with her husband was excellent, and her monologue was spot on. I also loved the part where the events were simulated; it was my favorite part, as it set this film apart from others.

Additionally, during the courtroom scenes in the film, there is a lot of back and forth, which is hard to describe. The film explores all possibilities but doesn't lead you to a definite conclusion by the end. I'm not sure whether Daniel's final memory he shares in court is real or if it indicates that he couldn't accept that his mother was the murderer. If the events in the film had been resolved to my satisfaction, I wouldn't have liked it as much. I don't know what the general consensus is, but I believe that each possibility remains equally plausible from the start, and this aspect of the film is one of its strong points.

In summary, despite the weariness towards the end, I'm glad I watched it in the cinema, and I'm glad I went to see this French production. It's the right kind of film in every aspect.
53 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed