The Simpsons (TV Series) Murder, She Boat (2023) User Reviews

Well...

[ElizaWasHere832 · 7/10 · 25 December 2023]

I suppose I would call this your standard modern day Simpsons episode. It's exploring something new, keeping up with modern day trends, and diving into characters more. There's nothing really special about this episode, I suppose it was average for modern Simpsons. However, I still believe that the episode was good. It was a memorable episode and I liked the mystery segment and how Bart showed that he was innocent. I didn't expect a new friend to be the culprit, and I was quite surprised when that was revealed. This episode certainly reminds me of the "Who shot mister burns" episodes that aired years ago, and I feel like this episode would be better as a two parter. Anyways, it's just an average modern Simpsons episode, but as most modern Simpsons episodes are, I find myself enjoying them.

A Decent Mystery, But Should Have Been A Two Parter

[e_daneva · 7/10 · 18 December 2023]

Murder, She Boat was a good episode. I have watched 8 other Season 35 episodes, 1 bad, 1 okay, 1 good, and 6 pretty good. This falls in the good category. The last episode was better, but this is still a pretty good episode. Murder, She Boat is a mystery, and it's a good one. I figured out the culprit at I think around the 15 minute mark. But the mystery was still interesting. I think the episode should have focused more on Bart, but I still liked how it focused on Comic Book Guy. I think this "murder" mystery should have been a two parter. I really do. The last mystery was a two parter. In all, I give this a 7.2 out of 10.

Not naughty and not nice

[azcdk · 3/10 · 18 December 2023]

Without spoilers, it's a mystery episode. With a rather cheesy guest star.

*One thing, not really a spoiler...Marge found 2 old stimulus checks stuck to the inside of the mailbox and that was the money the family used for the episodes setting...unfortunately, wealthy Hollywood is so out of touch with the common folk that they didn't realize that those treasury checks are only good for 180 days or 6 months...meaning she couldn't deposit them or cash them. Since timing-wise it's been well over a year since the last payments expired.

That doesn't ruin the ep. Just something I noticed. The episode itself was a bit better than some of the others from this season.

ON

[i-96425-05609 · 1/10 · 19 December 2023]

This episode is so rubbish. What's wrong with the Simpsons? They wrote so many boring and rubbish plots. Can you find some good screenwriters for the Simpsons official? Are you out of money for those junk screenwriters? If you run out of money, let the Simpsons finish it. Lisa's statement is too rubbish. Lisa said that Bart's scratch was caused by Homer scratching Bart while eating, but the plot does not show Homer eating and there are no utensils in Homer's position. How could Bart be scratched? And Bart is far away from Homer, so it is impossible Scratches. When the lights go out, it's a moment of darkness. Why is Bart picking up food at that time? Is Bart the Flash? He runs over to pick up food in an instant, and then runs back to eat it or not. This episode is too rubbish. Garbage. Garbage. Garbage.

Bart should be guilty not the guest Taika Waititi

[brettw-66546 · 1/10 · 19 December 2023]

This episode is too short, and it only runs for 18 minutes, I don't believe Bart was telling the truth since I saw him destroy all of Lisa's dolls and Lisa is being ridiculous like her father for example: Crying, yelling, and making critics to her point of view. Even worse Now she uses the D bomb when she swears, she is exactly like her father negatively. Overall Taika Waititi didn't steal the Radioactive doll's head It was Bart because he is complaining to Comic Book Guy about Shredding his own comic, Bart deserves his punishment for revenge. When Lisa explains the Incident, she is not telling the truth she is making up stories how the head of Radioactive Man disappears, Overall, the plotting is written poorly and messed up.