"11.22.63" The Rabbit Hole (TV Episode 2016) Poster

(TV Mini Series)

(2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A good, if slightly uneven, start to the series
i-am-so-original16 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I love Stephen King's work, and I particularly enjoyed 11/22/63, but I'll be the first to admit that his novels don't always translate well to screen. In fact, I'd say that a large majority of them get lost in translation. 11.22.63's premiere isn't an entire failure, but it doesn't exactly spring to mind when I think of the great King adaptations, either.

The story follows Jake Epping (James Franco) as he travels back in time through a portal in his friend Al's (Chris Cooper) diner's closet (it's Stephen King, just roll with it) and is tasked with preventing the assassination of JFK, thereby, hopefully, making a better present world. It's a fun story concept, but it worked much better in the novel.

For one thing, I couldn't help feeling that this episode was far too rushed for its own good. Bridget Carpenter's script isn't electrifying, and it speeds through wholly necessary developments and ideas. Jake is whisked away, before we even really get to know him (we know he's divorced and that he teaches), and the time travel plot line is established in a matter of maybe ten minutes. I realize that Stephen King loves to keep things moving, but it doesn't translate well to the screen. This show needed to find more time to breathe. We needed to live in the present for a little longer, we needed to learn more about Jake, and we needed to learn more about the time travel.

The acting in the present day scenes was also a little stiff. Franco was serviceable in the role, but not great by any means. Chris Cooper (who seems to be in everything) wasn't particularly engaging, as he just sort of grunted his way through his awkward King-like lines. This wooden acting and mediocre script didn't make for a great pairing, but once Jake stepped through that door, everything changed.

And it's when Jake is back in 1960 that the show really shines. The sets and costumes are a miraculous achievement, and it's evident that a lot of care and attention (not to mention money) went into these scenes of the past. There's no denying that this is where the show's heart truly lies, and it's also where it finds its greatest strength. It's at it's best when Jake is simply walking around town and observing the culture, the buildings, the people. It's in the past that the show finally finds time to indulge in itself a little bit, and works for the best.

Jake needs to find money in the past, so he bets on a boxing match, which infuriates the bookies. This stuff a little tired. But what isn't tired is the past's insistence on remaining unchanged. Jake encounters many obstacles when trying to alter or interact with the past, including a car running down the payphone he was using to call his dad, nearly being crushed by a falling chandelier, and having his Bed and Breakfast room burn down, which effectively ruins all of his detailed notes. It's exciting stuff, and the visual effects used in these scenes are especially good.

The episode ends with Jake forgoing his objective, as he realizes that he's in way over his head. Before he goes back to Maine, he makes one last stop in Kentucky to stop the murder of one of his classmates' family. We'll have to see where this storyline goes (if Jake can go through with it) and how it alters the present. Maybe when he returns, he'll find that Sad Story Man is nowhere to be found, as he's found solace elsewhere.

Overall, it was a very functional episode. I just wish that, in the future, the show will stop to smell the roses, so to speak. Oh, and a little more enthusiasm from Franco wouldn't hurt, either.

B-

For more reviews, head over to nathansharp28.wordpress.com.
13 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Adaptation of Stephen King Novel
krst_martinez26 February 2024
Some Stephen King book adaptations don't always do well on-screen, but I was immediately pulled into this mini-series, and as someone who had also read the novel prior to watching, thought it was done very well. Stephen King has a knack for telling a really good story--the kind you can't put down--so when it is successfully put onto tv or movie screens, you wind up with something really special.

This first episode was engaging from the start. Great acting--it is a shame about James Franco; he is a great actor, handsome, charismatic. It's too bad his personal issues kind of ruined things for him. Chris Cooper is great as Al. And Josh Duhamel is excellent as the psychotic Frank Dunning.

There are 8 episodes in the series, with various writers and directors attached to each one, so I look forward to seeing if future episodes shine as brightly as this first one does.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Awesome
okakacesar15 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
11.22.63 - Episode 1 Starting another series, this is the seventh that while I'm watching I'm also doing an amateur critique at the same time and it appears to be very interesting. I think it's incredible how James Franco evolved in his acting after the Spider-Man trilogy and he was on autopilot. Here he is very expressive, which is very good, he has a comical and dramatic side. I found the mix between present and past very interesting. The old timers finding Franco's clothes strange at the beginning was funny. I want to know who or what that old beggar is, who is the only one who realizes that Franco is not from that time, could he be the personification of the past? The personification of the timeline? Episode one watched on March 15, 2024.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
James Franco ruins this episode (and the series?)
Solnichka29 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Loved the book, but James Franco is severely miscast here in the lead role. Maybe it's because he does comedy best, but he's impossible to take seriously in this role. When he smiles, you just expect some dumb Pineapple Express joke to come out of his mouth. Someone more serious needed to be cast here. That aside, the production quality of the episode/series is OUTSTANDING. As a period piece, it's great to see the details done up so well, even if most of it is CGI. That's not a complaint, either: It's a beautiful 1960 painting we're seeing on the screen in clear HD, and it's amazingly awesome. That's why this episode got five stars instead of something less. In terms of how the screenplay is changing the novel? Don't expect anything faithful here. Almost everything's been changed, and you have to wonder, why bother making an eight-part series if you're going to change everything? Why not just make it a 10-episode arc and leave the storyline intact? Even just changing the time entry point from the 1950s to 1960 is annoying, for reasons that become clear once the episode gets rolling. A lot of rich detail of the book is scrapped for Franco's ham-and-egging smile (and lack of charm—no way could that guy seduce our Sadie!), and I'm already disappointed by what's to come.
6 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed