"Taboo" Episode #1.1 (TV Episode 2017) Poster

(TV Series)

(2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
That's a Show I will wait Every Tuesday night
ahmad_nadal10 January 2017
For the fist time in my life I feel like I loving Tuesday, I am actually waiting for Tuesday to come and this will show you how much I enjoyed every single minute of the show and of Tom Hardy.

Tom Hardy had show us how to be a calm clever psychopath. He nailed how to give us a character to love from the first episode. He was just tremendous even in his laugh.

Kristoffer Nyholm introduced the darkness of the 19th century in a respectful way and pictured "James Keziah Delaney" psychopathy in a way that make you really feel it.

Can't wait to the next episode.
18 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"One remembers those one looks up to more readily than those you look down upon."
LegendaryFang5623 November 2022
(658-word review) It was about time that I (re)watched this show/first season. Back in 2019 was my first viewing of it; I binge-watched it in four days: two episodes on the first day, one on the second, two on the third, and three on the fourth. Since then, I've "matured" a lot, for lack of a better word; 2019 was a long time ago: my reviews for episodes, seasons, shows, and films are properly reviews now, or close to it, not so-called, and as an off-shoot of that, my outlook and takeaways have massively improved.

Packed to the brim with enough information to get your thoughts and theories going, yet hardly any information at all in a general sense, which adds much mystique, intrigue, and anticipation, this premiere was nothing short of engaging. It also had some supernatural elements/undertones, connected to James Delaney specifically, genuine or with some rationale - I feel ambiguity would be best, as it would create dialogue, discussion, and theories, keeping the investment strong - sprinkled here and there: for example, one that likely went under the radar for most people was the woman from his visions, presumably his mother, showing up on the top left of the screen in the scene with him and the East India Company; a significant part is how others perceive him. That possessed (pun intended) some of the overall mystique and intrigue.

One might say it was too much so, or maybe not enough, whether due to the appearingly-slow pacing or a subjective lack of content that meets the individualistic criteria of engagement and investment: thereby scratching that yearning itch, in which case, that's understandable. But I feel either of those things or both are a positive impact.

Naturally, as this was the premiere, it was a bit slow or not as exciting yet, with its focus more on introducing the characters but, more importantly, setting the groundwork for various avenues of interest that will evolve and progress each episode. Telling you, "there will be plenty of unraveling throughout the season regarding so much." I thought that was its most potent feat; enough was happening in different ways to where it was almost too much to handle, on the surface, as, in actuality, it was somewhat the opposite. That added even more to the intriguing nature, increasing your anticipation for what's to come and making you desire to dive in immediately, leaving no time to waste.

Moreover, the performances were exceptional: yet another incredible feat, as this is only the first episode. My main observation was how alive the characters already feel; the characterizations are a factor, too; however, the playing and portrayal of a character are just as important. Tom Hardy, of course, was the highlight: his character, James Delaney, seems rich in complexity and nuances. But even other performers, whose characters weren't as much of a focus as his, were as successful at administering a near-conscious, if not conscious, identity to their characters, like David Hayman, Jonathan Pryce, and Oona Chaplin: even Jefferson Hall, Richard Dixon, Leo Bill, Nicholas Woodeso, and Franka Potente, which, I know, is every significant character, and that goes to show why I spoke of it as an incredible feat.

Other commendable aspects were the cinematography and the score. Particular shots stood out, and they were good shots. And the score cue playing when James was walking very intently and on a mission had that feeling of intensity; the score cue playing at the end, which is used other times in the episode, was just as good, and it reminded me of the theme song of The CW's Arrow. Mark Patten and Max Richter did their jobs well.

To conclude this review, this was a compelling premiere to a thrilling and captivating show/first season, from what I remember, which is 99.9%. Nearly everything (if not everything) was at a level worthy of enthusiastic appreciation, which also coincided with each other, elevating it further.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mystery drama that we begged for from long time..
akshatdave10 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Over the last few years, the number of TV shows that leave viewers with more questions than answers has grown exponentially. What started with Lost has led to Game of Thrones and the brilliant Westworld, shows that have increased in popularity thanks to rabid fan discussion on the internet.The first episode of Taboo – created by Tom Hardy, his father Chips, and frequent collaborator Steven Knight – pines after the same audience by giving away very little while hinting at lots to come.

Set in 1814 London – which shares a similar dirty aesthetic with Peaky Blinders – Taboo centres on blunt-talking James Delany, played by Hardy, who returns to England from Africa following his father's mysterious death. Delany, however, was believed to be dead, his appearance at the funeral disrupting plans made by his half-sister Zilpha (Oona Chaplin) and husband Thorne Geary (Jefferson Hall) to sell an inherited plot of land to the East India Trading Company.

Having caused quite a stir, Delany decides to pay numerous characters from his past a visit, including his father's butler, lawyer, and the aforementioned villainous trading company, headed by Jonathan Pryce, who channels the same arrogance seen in his Game of Thrones character, the High Sparrow. Things, obviously, aren't as they appear: Delany has a bizarre and unexplained connection with the undead along with a vicious temper, making numerous threats without doing anything particularly threatening.

From these various exchanges – each filled to the brim with exposition – we're left with dozens of unanswered questions, some of which can be inferred (Delany's abandoned son is presumably his and Zilpha's love child), others merely guessed at (did Delany make a pact with the devil in Africa?). Unfortunately, by giving very little away it also leaves viewers with very little reason to care for any of these characters, including Delany, who appears to have righteous intentions but spends the majority of the hour brooding. Of course, heavyweight actors Hardy and Pryce give bucketfuls of gravitas to their roles, even if Hardy's wavering Bane-like accent and ridiculous hat are sometimes unintentionally humorous. Other characters, including Chaplin's Zilpha, have had very little to offer just yet, mainly thanks to the camera barely leaving Hardy's face. It is his show, after all, yet some extended breaks from his intense performance could be beneficial.

At its conclusion, Taboo left me in a strange place. While I'm curious to see what happens to the grizzled Delany, there's a frustration knowing so little about these characters after an hour's viewing. The pace is slow and the payoff, which has barely been hinted at, could be minimal, leaving me to question whether the show is worth investing further Saturday nights into.

Hopefully, as things pick up, Taboo will reveal a solid storyline to anchor down these so-far loosely fitting plot-lines. For now, though, without offering any real sense of adventure, I can't help thinking there are more worthwhile shows to be watching.

+great acting by tom hardy and writing by knight

+rightly dramatised

+pacing was good

-little was told about characters was mainly focused on hardy(maybe good thing for hardy fans)...
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Taboo: Episode #1.1 (2017) - Review
The-Social-Introvert17 January 2017
From the creator of Peaky Blinders and Locke, Taboo concerns James Keziah Delaney, played by Tom Hardy at his creepy-weirdo best, who returns to 1814 London in order to claim a legacy left by his father after a mysterious 10 year absence spend in Africa. He finds himself at odds with the greedy East India Company, who want the land that Delaney has inherited, amid a war between the British and the Americans.

Episode 1 had an enigmatic and eerie atmosphere, personified by the spooky James Delaney who brings with him not only shovels and keys but a mysterious past. The question on all the characters' lips are "Is it true?" in references to numerous, freaky rumours about his activity in Africa. He's a most intriguing character who is shown to be haunted by actions he committed whilst working in the British army and in his time in Africa but is also well informed of the political climate and unwilling to let go of his inheritance. Heads are turned and knives are being sharpened by not only the East India Company but by Delaney's own half sister and her husband, a man who wants the contents of the will for himself. It is also revealed that James and his sister had adulterous relations.

Delaney works fast. Within the first episode he has already made a few enemies for himself and discovered that his father was poisoned into madness. Now he seeks revenge.

Al in all, I found the opener to this series to be very engaging and I'll definitely be continuing the series. Just one thing I want to talk about is the special effects and the cinematography. I thought the CGI was terrific. There's a lot of landscape and background shots of buildings and ships that don't stick out at all and they genuinely look real. They also don't draw attention to themselves; there's no cheap zooming-in of the CGI, which would only serve to distract the viewer and ruin immersion. Shows like Game of Thrones could learn from this.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed