When I first heard they were making a sequel to one of my favourite, child-hood chillers, I also heard they were going to use a continuity, of the lead being the son of the woman from the first film (became pregnant with Wolf-Dude). I have no idea why they didnt go with that pitch, as it seems the most common sense if your going to follow-up the best horrors of the early 80's.
As it is its awful. The acting is far below-par (Ton Scott is a good actor, but I dont know what the hell happened) all the Americans come off as incredibly annoying and anal, the SFX, while OK, dont reach the glorious "Physical" pitch reached 20 years ago, the story is just uninteresting, and overall, even as a first off it doesnt cut it, and is impossible to not compare it to its predeccesor.
I give it 4/10, if only for the beautiful Julie Delpy.
As it is its awful. The acting is far below-par (Ton Scott is a good actor, but I dont know what the hell happened) all the Americans come off as incredibly annoying and anal, the SFX, while OK, dont reach the glorious "Physical" pitch reached 20 years ago, the story is just uninteresting, and overall, even as a first off it doesnt cut it, and is impossible to not compare it to its predeccesor.
I give it 4/10, if only for the beautiful Julie Delpy.
Tell Your Friends