25 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Zachary Scott gets his comeuppance once again.
30 March 2024
Zachary Scott, who was arguably the king of Film-Noir villainous cads, is up to his old tricks in this dark tale of humiliation and revenge. He seduces and abruptly fires his new secretary, a high strung, vulnerable Phyllis Thaxter. But then she valiantly plans and executes her special brand of retaliation. Her payback is possibly more degrading than the various and sundry ways old Zachary 'bit the dust' in those '40s movies, such as "Mildred Pierce" and "Flamingo Road." Both actors were nothing short of brilliant in their characterizations and the train ride was especially intense. This episode remains my favorite not only because of the story, but also because of the perfectly cast players for those two roles.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Criminal Intent: Cherry Red (2003)
Season 2, Episode 19
10/10
A Cohesive Story with an Awful Message
10 December 2023
Please don't get the idea that this review will be an awful one, due to using that word in the subject line. On the contrary, this episode has turned out to be my very favorite of the whole series. From the very beginning it captured my interest and as the plot unfolded all the elements involved flowed in a natural cohesive pattern. Unlike some of the others, this story was devoid of clever subterfuges that lead into convoluted labyrinths and then out again. There were no 'red herrings' or false leads and since the two guest stars were notable actors it was apparent, right from the start, who at least one of the perpetrators was. The acting was superb and their characters were as perfectly matched, as they were when together years earlier, in the terrific movie "Breaking Away," as father and son. This time, though, they brought a twisted malevolence, which fairly seethed of intense selfishness, greed and an almost palpable lack of humanity. Kudos to whoever thought of casting Dennis Christopher and Paul Dooley in the parts.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the Finest Movies Ever Made
8 July 2023
There aren't enough superlatives to describe what a brilliant film rendering this version, of the H. G. Wells classic novel, "The Time Machine" is. Rod Taylor and Yvette Mimieux were perfectly matched both acting their parts beautifully and believably well. The supporting cast complimented the stars admirably. The production values were excellent and George Pal's special effects were amazing, especially considering this motion picture was made in 1960. There was plenty of action, some sweet romance and even philosophical food for thought, in this realistic fantasy. I'm not much of a sci-fi aficionado, but this story is an exception. My 1st viewing of the movie was the year it was released. I was 10 and went to a childrens' matinee showing. Through the years I've had occasion to watch it several more times and it has always held up as a true work of cinematic art.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I Survived...: Maggie/Gary/Barbara (2009)
Season 3, Episode 3
10/10
Gary is a true life hero
21 May 2022
I was particularly moved by this episode primarily because of Gary's amazing story, although Maggie's and Barbara's ordeals were indeed horrific and they displayed incredible courage. That Gary used such ingenuity to not only save himself, but his bravery extended to helping his friend, was what impressed and effected me deeply. In my opinion he deserves a medal for his actions, as he's a bonafide hero.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
On My Hit List
9 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Well, what more can be said about this movie that hasn't already been said? I guess everyone recognizes the fable of a deceitful, opportunistic narcissist - who invariably gets his just comeuppance - as a familiar lesson...albeit in this case an especially horrific one. But, the particular act - of having given the doctor all of his money to hold onto - didn't make sense and was definitely a hole in the script, to my mind. As I see it, unscrupulous narcissists really aren't big on Trust, especially when it comes to money...

Don't get me wrong, though, this film is way up on my top 10 list of hits and I can watch it over and over again, for its superb production values, amazingly brilliant cast and overall the story is a very powerful morality tale. Tyrone Power, himself, considered this role his finest performance. However, using that particular device to lead to the con man's fall wasn't credible to me. I just didn't buy it...given his character, or rather his lack thereof, as depicted.

Maybe a series of nightmarish dream sequences, where he was shown to have a conscience - in regard to having accidentally caused the death of the original mentalist, who turned into a drunk - would have been more believable in illustrating how and why Stan ultimately hit the skids... That might have made me root for his eventual redemption, more, too. In any event, I took one star off a perfect score for what I determined was a flaw in an otherwise flawless motion picture classic.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Intensely Inspirational
1 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Most of the participants in the series of episodes dealing with so-called 'near death experiences' are totally believable. Overall the tales are very comforting as they provide a glimpse into the hereafter and mostly depict it as a serenely peaceful and gloriously beautiful place. However, a few of the contributors seemed to have simply slipped into a deep dream state and although their hearts stopped beating for a certain amount of time their brain waves hadn't actually stopped working.

For instance in one particular story, told by a man named Marcus, he described Satan as an enormous 12 foot, red colored creature, half man and half beast with large curved horns - like on a buffalo - protruding from his forehead and hooves for feet. I immediately pictured a total resemblance to Tim Curry's characterization, of the Devil, in the movie "Legend" that also starred Tom Cruise. Marcus might very well have seen that movie but had forgotten it and when in the deep dream state, of an induced coma - while on life support - a memory of Tim Curry's role was dredged up out of his unconscious mind... Another dealt with fairies and given the somewhat flighty personality of the young woman whose story it was I got the impression she had only been dreaming as well.

Otherwise, those who underwent traumatic incidents resulting in their deaths seemed to have truly made short but profoundly meaningful journeys out of this world, into the next level of existence and back again. Without exception their visits to the other side provided them with a keener sense of spiritual awareness and completely alleviated any former fear of dying.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Perfect Pitch Rendition of the Classic Hollywood Story
12 November 2019
What can I say to add anything that's not redundant to describe this remarkable cinematic achievement? I asked myself this question before endeavoring to review one of the most satisfying films I've ever experienced.

All I could come up with is that this is what excellent movie making is all about. It's an amalgamation of truly Great talent, magnificent production values and last but not least HEART. The emotion is real, so the story lives and freshly lives on never becoming dated or appearing merely topical.

Garland is at her pinnacle, her strong personality perfectly counterbalanced by Mason's amazingly distinguished and effective performance. They're believable and beautifully compatible as lovers as well as ultimately tragic star-crossed mates.

To go into the impersonal technical aspects of this conglomeration would only break the magic spell it casts. Suffice to say, including a flawless script, sensitive direction and everyone from the capable co-stars, Jack Carson et al, to the last 'extra' everything contributes equally to the wonderful final product.

The musical numbers are uniformly glorious possessing rarely seen honest emotion to rival the often understated, always sincere and genuine dialogue. All in all every element and component combined makes this version of A Star is Born the quintessential classic Hollywood story.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good Concept Flawed Delivery
10 November 2019
Being a big fan of the late great Judy Garland and James Mason it might not be fair for me to judge this version of the classic Hollywood story.

However, I also admire Streisand's early work before her monumental ego began to overshadow the unique conviction of her immense talent. Kris Kristofferson's rendition of his "Me and Bobby McGee" made a big hit by Janis Joplin still resonates when I hear it and I regard him as a very appealing performer, too.

With all that said my opinion of this movie may actually be unbiased and worth considering. So, here goes... As far as I'm concerned changing the story's basic concept, from actors to musicians, wasn't a bad idea. But, apart from a few good songs the film has very little to offer in the way of honest emotion and the two leads weren't compatible let alone believable as lovers.

I lost interest about a third of the way through and had to force myself, while repeatedly stifling the urge to yawn, to watch the rest. The production was unbalanced and severely flawed due primarily to Streisand's major domination of most scenes and Kristofferson seemed ill at ease pretty much throughout the proceedings. I rated it a (5) because of some of the music.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bizarre Murders (2018– )
7/10
Interesting Premise
25 September 2019
This rather amateurishly acted variety of less than usual murder stories could have made a really good series, if it had been written a bit better and shot with a more competent cast. Its episodes are presumedly based on actual crimes, but the factual details were purposely and I believe unnecessarily obscured for unknown reasons. The somewhat snarky comments - by the 'host' - add nothing positive to the proceedings and would be best dispensed with. However, after all is said and done, I enjoy learning about many of the cases themselves...
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Major Motion Picture Worthy Production.
5 July 2018
Why this absolutely - 1st Class - biopic was relegated to TV, instead of given a theatrical release, is unfathomable to me. It was a brilliantly acted, particularly by Judy Davis as the adult Garland, and well written, beautifully told story with excellent production values. Such a praise worthy rendering of the legendary singer/actress is certainly better than many, if not most, top notch major motion pictures I've ever seen. Maybe the producers didn't feel Garland's current fan base was substantial enough to warrant a klieg lighted premiere... Your guess is as good as mine. But, whatever the case may be, this is a film made with a great deal of care and genuine Love for its subject. I highly recommend it to any and everyone who enjoyed Garland's work, some of which is highlighted, and for those who are curious about her personal triumphs and tribulations.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautiful Scenery and Tragic Romantic Story Marred by Pretentious Music...
19 February 2017
I watched enthralled by the lush countrysides, wonderful production values, convincing and heartfelt acting, within the sphere of romanticized ironic events. However, the music, which was an ever-present distraction succeeded in drowning out the dialogue, at times, and when it wasn't doing so it seemed out-of-place in its purposeful attempt to add grandeur to scenes that needed no such addition. In fact, the music's loud volume was so off-putting, in its attempt to unnecessarily telegraph emotional content, that it only added an overblown pretentiousness to the proceedings. With that said, I gave this film a rating of 8, which - without the overwhelming musical score - probably would have netted a 10, for all the other elements it had going for it. Sometimes less is more and if the music had been a subtle background inclusion, rather than an overpowering entity unto itself, I believe this movie would have benefited rather than suffered as a result.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Mawkish and Needless Over-dramatization Ruined a Potentially Powerful Story.
16 May 2016
After watching the well-crafted and riveting "Judgment at Nuremberg," I was prepared for a worthy follow-up - companion piece - in "Schindler's List." This over-rated film was a dismal disappointment to me. Anyone with a heart and soul could have felt the suffering and tribulations - of the Jewish population - without the director resorting to heavy-handed dramatic subterfuge, telegraphed to elicit sympathy for their plight. Furthermore, the movie could have been cut by at least an hour and benefited from that alone. Conversely, Liam Neeson's final scene was so over-the-top and downright hammy that it was totally unbelievable to me. All in all I deeply resent this important subject matter treated in such a forced-fed or programmed manner that precluded the audience from forming their own conclusions and allowing us to arouse genuinely deep-felt compassion for the victims of these atrocities... If simplicity is elegance this lengthy, haphazard hodgepodge lacked the class it should have displayed and as a result left me cold. I unreservedly recommend those who actually liked this picture to view "Judgment at Nuremberg" to distinguish the difference between mawkish, self-indulgent directing and true art.
1 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Cheap and tawdry in every way.....
28 May 2014
This piece of awful tripe is not only the most cheap, tawdry, seedy and sordid mess I've ever had the misfortune to waste my time viewing, but it serves the added disgrace of discrediting, for me, every critique ever written by Roger Ebert. After seeing this mind numbing pile of trash, penned by him, how can anyone with any common sense, or even a modicum of good taste, consider his reviews remotely credible? I mean anyone responsible for writing such an unappealing and worthless script cannot possibly be qualified to pass judgment on other screenplays or on the filmed presentations of such. Furthermore, The actors, uniformly, suffer from the worst make-up and hairstyles of any movie I've seen and the costumes, as well as the production values weren't much better. The trite and overblown "message" at the end of the show literally made me shake my head in wonder. The bottom line is that this is the raspberry of all time, or the turkey of all turkeys...
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Run Lola Run (1998)
10/10
A Morality Tale
14 February 2014
Rather than reiterate what others have been lauding as the main strong points of this movie, such as frantic speed, pulsating soundtrack, etc., I want to muse on one particular facet. There is a message beyond the obvious one being made that each and every act we commit can have a direct impact and, essentially, has a domino effect on many lives.

It is introduced with the lyrics: "Do the right thing." to one of the songs within the movie, the exact piece and when it's played escapes me, now. This is a most uplifting and profound lesson I gleaned from the movie. While the first and second episodes were focused entirely on the breakneck quest for money, at almost any cost, the last segment concentrated on a higher force, which added humanity to the plot. Lola put her trust in something, or someone, beyond her realm - in a fervent prayer for help - and the scenario changed from base reality into reaffirmation of faith and thereby became inspirational.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"A Little Priest" wasn't religiously carried out, but otherwise...
17 October 2013
Apart from the "A Little Priest" scene, which was wasted, as the perverse humor that should have prevailed was completely missing, along with one of the stanzas, this was a gem of a movie. Depp's Sweeney Todd/Benjamin Barker although a bit one note and lacking in dimension was still compelling and who knew he could carry a tune? The duet he sang with Bonham Carter, in particular, was quite nicely done, in fact. I think a more boisterous and lusty rendering of Mrs. Lovett and an uplifting ending, with Anthony and Johanna escaping together, would have fared better and wouldn't have detracted from the overall Grand-Guignol theme. But, still, I enjoyed the film and most of the music, which is more than I can say about the majority of Broadway musical film adaptations.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Calculated Insanity
29 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A very fine neurosurgeon, impeccably portrayed by James Mason, who teaches criminology as a sideline, recounts a certain case study to a class during a lecture. The case deals with a man he deems to be sane, but who commits murder to avenge a murder. Mason, who has honed his great gift to heal, as a way of replacing the human connection his personal life lacks, has become detached and somewhat obsessive in his perspectives, as a result. Although he doesn't reveal it, to the undergraduates, we discover through the course of his story that he is the protagonist in the example he's presenting. He renders the murder as having been smoothly and successfully carried out, however we learn immediately thereafter that it actually has not yet been accomplished.

Mason's skillfully controlled persona, as the neurosurgeon, is letter perfect and one gets the feeling that his assumptions regarding the way in which a guilt ridden former lady love died are most probably true. Although an inquest rules it as an accidental fall, gossipy detractors place the blame on the woman's, self-centered, opportunistic sister-in-law, who has much to gain financially by the woman's death. Mason's doctor character feels compelled, out of vanity, to justify his revenge to the unwitting students and then sets out to put the final segment of the plot into action.

Murphy's law and irony prevail causing the retaliation to not come off nearly as seamlessly as planned. Moreover, while looking for a place to dispose of his murder victim's body Mason meets up with another more sardonic doctor, whom he's forced to give a ride to and is subsequently obliged to assist. Mason operates on and saves a young patient's life, only to be castigated and labeled, as mad, by the other doctor for his motives. The other doctor, who at one point is asked to fetch a medical supply from Mason's car, discovers the camouflaged body of his victim in the back seat but, without turning Mason in, rather asserts a moral dilemma, which figuratively then literally pushes Mason over the edge.

The title of the film comes into play in the form of an analogy the other doctor makes to a glass precariously perched to fall, crack and break, comparing it to Mason's unsound mind. Mason gets the point and abruptly does a swan dive over an abyss, into the sea. We are left to ponder whether it was a consequence of being faced with his monumental conceit, or hypocritical notion of altruism, that ultimately causes his undoing.

The noir aspects of its film techniques aside, this is a brilliant character study and Mason's superb achievement, alone, in creating a complex, sympathetic murderer makes the movie well worth viewing.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not all that it's cracked up to be...
1 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
In my opinion, after having seen the film, many of the reviewers - who gave it over 4 stars - were far too generous. Maybe they're rabid fans of Olivier's. But, whatever the case, only those devoid of common sense didn't realize, even before his Inspector decided to check, that there would be some record of Lynley's trip to England and that Dullea was the culprit. However, my first guess was that he had some incestuous love for his sister, which would have been more interesting than the over-the-top whacky nut job he turned out to be. The maniacal mess doesn't deserve more than the 4 out of 10 stars, at best, as far as I'm concerned...
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Role Reprisal
30 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Well, well, well, here we have the nasty novelist Catherine Tramell at it again. She manipulates everyone and everything she can, creating drama, so that she won't get bored. Her efforts result in art imitating life, or could that be vice-versa? This time around she's visiting England and her attitude is as hardened as her facial features. There's nothing, whatsoever, subtle about it. She sets her sites on an analyst, with a guilty conscience and spins a web of lies and deceit designed to drive the poor sucker mad. His friends and foes alike, as flies would do, get stuck in the sticky netting and die by way of her calculating strategies. It's all for the sake of a good storyline for her latest best seller, a thriller based on her victims and the circumstances she enmeshes them in. I'm purposely reserving my comments for Sharon Stone, since the film is really a showcase for her and she is the main focus around whom the first class production values and excellent soundtrack revolves. Aside from a few instances of unnecessary trite dialogue, for which I deleted one point, the acting and story are uniformly well done.

The only thing a bit difficult to understand is how Stone's Catherine manages to snow the seemingly intelligent women, as well as the vainglorious men she plays with. Apart from an initially sly, glib meeting with Charlotte Rampling's character, an analyst cohort of the 'leading man,' we aren't really privy to her approach, or technique, used on other females. Most of her motivation is predominately sexual, with violent undertones, so it's somewhat of a mystery as to how she manages to deploy the heterosexual women who are vital in her plot. Her quest for complete control, despite whatever risk involved, is rapacious and positively palpable. But the more mature ice-cold Catherine displays no hint of vulnerability, as she did in her earlier veneer and is seemingly guided by pure unadulterated hatred. Does she succeed in her Machiavellian treachery? It's worth the time spent watching to find out.

Sharon Stone portrays Catherine as a stylish, mockingly evil, villainess. Although I've read many negative critiques regarding her hair and overall appearance in terms of age, these comments are only opinions based on the superficial aspects of her physical presence. Since she is supposed to embody beauty, both of face and form, some reviewers have gotten caught up in their own personal estimations and judgments of what signifies beauty to them. The purposeful blunt hair cut is chic, modish and sophisticated, exemplifying Catherine's, sharpness. Her face, while more mature, still holds up to scrutiny as being extremely attractive. Her breasts are shown on a few occasions and appear to have been enhanced, to prevent sagging, but it was very good work if that's the case. All in all, as far as femme fatales are concerned, simply put, Stone is in the same class as the best of them...
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An Intelligent Romantc Comedy, with Heart
4 July 2012
Regardless of what some of the more jaded and pseudo sophisticated critics may say this little film is not only charming, but it has a significant message to impart. A woman, who believes that she should care enough about herself not to give her virtue away to any or every Tom, Dick and Harry, is faced with the dilemma that life is passing her by while she awaits the man of her dreams.

She's 25 and has not yet surrendered her virginity despite the fact that she feels passionate about wanting to find someone who cares about her and who she cares about, too. Furthermore, the element of physical attraction must also be present, in the equation, otherwise she knows it just won't be right. One can blame Disney's romantic renderings, of the happily-ever-after prince and princess fairy tales, for the high standards this woman has. However, by the same token, morals enter into her viewpoint, as well, when dealing with married men who hit on her.

She's simply an idealist who writes and performs music, with longing and intensity, about what she wants and doesn't want to have to settle for less than the beauty of true love. Experiencing one fiasco after another she begins to see how impossible the perfection she's seeking is to achieve. She learns the lesson: "Be careful what you wish for," first hand. And it finally dawns on her that the man she was searching for is not the dramatically handsome, charismatic type, oozing with finesse and savoir-faire, but -instead- the somewhat nondescript and stalwart, supportive friend she's loved all along...

The ensemble of actors are uniformly real and believable in their parts. Michael Harris, in particular, playing a famous composer who equates women with food, is very attractive and sensitively seductive as the engaging cad who deflowers the leading lady. The tunes and lyrics, to the songs Marla Schaffel sings, are soulfully written and performed movingly, with great pathos. I highly recommend this film to everyone who has ever yearned for love and for those who continue to do so.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jules and Jim (1962)
4/10
Another Drama Queen Bites the Dust...
4 September 2010
Despite the radiant beauty of its hopelessly misguided leading lady and solid performances by the entire cast I'm truly stumped as to why this film gained such popularity and a cult following. The story was, in my opinion, boring and overly long. The characters, other than the tortured husband, were a bunch of worthless nitwits, who lacked any dimension or depth of feeling. Why is it that instead of finding the ending tragic I simply felt that a couple of people, who caused a great deal of pain to others, wasted their lives and my time were put out of everyone's misery? What a dismal disappointment this film, which I had looked forward to seeing, turned out to be...
53 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Juno (2007)
1/10
Unreal Dialogue and Boring Story...
4 September 2010
I had heard so much hype about this movie and the leading character's performance. When I saw it I wondered what all the fuss was about. The dialogue was unrealistic, as young people in small rural towns do Not talk like that and the 'quirky' characters were boringly pretentious, rather than endearing. The sarcasm was Not clever or funny and the characters were strictly two dimensional. Ms. Page is very cute and spunky, so that must be why her less than stellar performance was lauded. Too bad the controversial out-take, with the neighbor, whose furniture was moved to Bleeker's lawn didn't make it into the film. It would have woken a few people up, but I guess most film makers take the safe route rather than boldly put themselves out on a limb. Refraining from rocking the boat seems to be the latest trend in churning out family fare, nowadays... Ugh!
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Will Shakespeare Must Be Rolling Over in His Grave...
1 May 2008
Well, with all due respect to the brilliant actors associated with this production I must heartily disagree with the previous good review, evidently penned by a rabid Tim Curry fan, of this disenchanting mini-series. I felt Ian McShane, in particular, was totally wasted in his role -as Marlowe- and although Tim Curry did the best that could be done, with the sub par material, he was altogether forgettable in the lead. The ambling, misguided, largely fictional account of William Shakespeare's life was aided somewhat by adequate production values, but was not worthy of being aired on prime-time TV, in the US. In fact the ABC network considered showing it, at one point, but was rightfully disappointed with its clumsy, substandard contents. View it if you must, Tim Curry aficionados, but everyone else, I just thought you should be warned...
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Inspector Poole, NOT Goole, can be considered our collective conscience.
16 December 2007
I have an excellent copy of this rare and wonderful film and Alastair Sim introduces himself -distinctly- as Inspector Poole, the daughter's fiancé asks a police officer about the Inspector using that name and the police officer repeats the name. Goole is a rather gruesome reference to ghoul, I think, and the benevolent Inspector was not at all depicted as a creepy or menacing man. J.B. Priestley meant this piece to be as much a morality play as a mystery, I believe. The Inspector was supposed to be either an angel on a mission or God himself giving these unconscious people a chance to redeem themselves for their thoughtless and compassionless actions... The performances are uniformly top notch and Alastair Sim's, in particular, rivals his unsurpassed portrayal of Scrooge in the finest version of "A Christmas Carol." I highly recommend this film as a first class lesson in the common foibles of human nature and how we have the ability to achieve salvation if we take responsibility for our faults.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth Winning (1989)
10/10
Well Worth Watching With Women
14 April 2007
The summary title alliteration is intended. Yes, this is a boy meets girl formula story, which starts off stereotypically in many respects. However, as the main characters start to develop and take shape, they become quite charming and actually fairly well rounded. There are several witty scenes and for an essentially fluffy romantic comedy it is better than most. I give it the highest rating for excellent casting, 1st class ensemble work and top-notch entertainment. All the ladies look gorgeous and Mark Harmon does, too. Eye candy and art, aren't these the main components of any and every outstanding film achievement? This engaging confection is beautifully rendered, skillfully performed and although not of hard hitting significance a classic of the light "feel good" genre.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fanny (1961)
10/10
In the French Style
3 January 2007
This motion picture contains all the requisite elements of a true Classic. It's a magnificent comedy/drama lovingly told, with superb performances by wonderful actors, and includes lushly gorgeous scenery as well as impeccable production values, all in perfect measure. Although "Gone with the Wind" has received far more hype since its creation, it never made me laugh and cry, or expressed love with such depth and heart. "Fanny" is a REAL epic film worthy of Genuine praise. Why this movie is not yet available on DVD is a mystery. Hopefully, this oversight will soon be rectified. Until then, my advice is to grab a scarce VHS copy while they're still being offered on the secondary market.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed