First off, the premise of the movie is interesting enough - heist gone wrong, art thief stuck inside a luxury penthouse. Willem Dafoe gives a great performance and the cinematography is nicely done, but overall the movie leaves more to be desired.
One thing that I find hard to disregard is logical errors. The wealthy owner of the penthouse shuts off his water and gas while he is away on a business trip, but has a projector in his theater running non-stop? Would someone this wealthy really care about the utility cost? The owner is paranoid enough to have access to the camera system for the whole building but doesn't have interior cameras he can monitor remotely? Why is the irrigation for the plants still working, how is that on a different system than the rest of the unit? While trying to open a can of food, he claims he cannot find a can opener leading him to cut his hand, but later when he is making a shrine in the living room there is a can opener as part of the decoration. He starts a fire to set off the sprinkler system but not to cook the fish or other food? Neither the security alarm or the fire alarm alerts the owner, the building staff, or emergency services. Instead of chiseling away at the doorframe or a window on the wall he chooses to build a makeshift scaffolding and focus on the skylight. Working over your head would be way harder and more dangerous as you see when he falls and injures his leg. Lastly, HOW did he manage to climb out of that window?
Now you can say that I am nitpicking but when a movie doesn't explain any of this stuff it personally takes my attention away from the story. I am much more likely to forgive movies not being completely accurate if there is a good storyline. This one didn't really have any climax or overall arc to it. It feels like it doesn't fully commit to the art house genre or a suspenseful heist movie. Overall, it just wasn't as satisfying as I was hoping for.
One thing that I find hard to disregard is logical errors. The wealthy owner of the penthouse shuts off his water and gas while he is away on a business trip, but has a projector in his theater running non-stop? Would someone this wealthy really care about the utility cost? The owner is paranoid enough to have access to the camera system for the whole building but doesn't have interior cameras he can monitor remotely? Why is the irrigation for the plants still working, how is that on a different system than the rest of the unit? While trying to open a can of food, he claims he cannot find a can opener leading him to cut his hand, but later when he is making a shrine in the living room there is a can opener as part of the decoration. He starts a fire to set off the sprinkler system but not to cook the fish or other food? Neither the security alarm or the fire alarm alerts the owner, the building staff, or emergency services. Instead of chiseling away at the doorframe or a window on the wall he chooses to build a makeshift scaffolding and focus on the skylight. Working over your head would be way harder and more dangerous as you see when he falls and injures his leg. Lastly, HOW did he manage to climb out of that window?
Now you can say that I am nitpicking but when a movie doesn't explain any of this stuff it personally takes my attention away from the story. I am much more likely to forgive movies not being completely accurate if there is a good storyline. This one didn't really have any climax or overall arc to it. It feels like it doesn't fully commit to the art house genre or a suspenseful heist movie. Overall, it just wasn't as satisfying as I was hoping for.
Tell Your Friends