Reviews

81 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Elvis (2022)
10/10
If you're looking for trouble, you came to the right place...
23 June 2022
One of those movies where right after the first sequence you know that you will watch it again and again.

Movie lasts almost 3 hours but feels like only a few minutes have gone by. Right from the start you are on a roller coaster and there is no getting off till the end of the movie That's typical Luhrmann that once again hasn't disappointed.

I am glad this this music icon, the man who practically invented rock n roll, the King, was shown in a respectful way and with the credit that this legend deserves, and that the actor has not gone into caricature. By the way, acting is brilliant! The moves, the walk, the voice- that's the closes to Elvis as you can get, without looking as Elvis impersonator.

Movie is complex and yet very simple, with the moral point - listen to yourself. Be yourself. That's the only way you will be happy.
397 out of 603 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Joker (I) (2019)
10/10
The Movie
20 June 2022
Hmm, where do I start? This movie is perfect in every single little detail - so I can just write the word - "perfect".

But I will write a few words anyway.

I will start with color, cause it's the aspect I understand maybe the most. Let me just say - well done. I have seen a few movies from the late 70's and early 80's, and this is just the right tone and filter, which extends through the entire movie, bringing that unmistakable late 70's atmosphere.

That blue! That dark blue that comes up every now and then in the movie (usually it's the color of the furniture, but also pops up here and there). That pink! Light pink/apricot pink wallpaper with the distinguish 70s pattern. We had the wallpaper with just the similar pattern, cca 1976.

All the shades of brown! Brown, brownish, brown with the grey undertone also present trough the movie. Works very well with the contrast of light blue, the colour of the police car in those days.

Bright red and bright yellow. The first two colours that hits you from the movie poster, but surprisingly they appear only later on in the movie, at the time when Arthur turns into the Joker. Prior to that, the general colour palette colours are toned down, darkened. Colour is here well used to build the story, to build the character. The power of colour should not be underestimated, I wish it is used more in the movies in such a powerful way as it is done here. Colour is building the character. Or the other way around, character finally shows his true colours which correspond to his mental state.

Joker makeup, or the clownish makeup. I love how he once again used the dark blue, instead of black for his "working makeup" on the eyes. Who knew that the dark blue can be more powerful then black? Makeup is perfect in unperfect way- looks like he's done his own makeup, which is of course more realistic. When the clown has the perfect makeup, it looks as it is a doll, a puppet. Here, it brings out the human side of the clown, and also brings you closer to the character.

I can go on and on about the colors, but there are also few other aspects of the movie worth mentioning.

Besides great directing and acting, the most striking one for me was the cinematography.

The camera! The movement of the camera. Brings you right into the center of the character. Camera is constantly right where is should be. Static or moving. Thankfully there is no shaky camera, which makes the movie very easy to watch. Perfectly shot in the subway.

Scenography. Tunnels all the time. Tunnels or hallways, or busses, narrow staircases, elevators, metro trains, cramped rooms, in short- tight spaces. Garbage on the streets, untidy and cluttered rooms. Makes you want to run out for the fresh air. But there is no fresh air. You can almost smell the garbage, since the scattered garbage and garbage bags are everywhere on the streets. There is no escaping the smell, the stink of the city and with the unemployment and crime and tension rising, it can drive everybody insane. Especially the physically unstable individual who was cut short of his medicine.. and turn him into the Joker..
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hollywood (2020)
7/10
It's ok, and very watchable
25 April 2022
When I want to give my brain a rest from hard day at work- I turn to this show.

When I want something shiny, polished, it's also- time for this show.

The story is not so interesting and gripping that you become instantly addicted to this show, but it is a nice filler when you have no idea what else to watch. Can't miss with this one. Beautiful scenography.

The final verdict is- the show is watchable.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Batman (2022)
2/10
I have expected too much
20 April 2022
Robert Pattinson as Batman? Could work! Or maybe not?

He is not the only miscast. Z. Kravitz as Catwoman- too miniature to even lift a cat, not to kick all those bad guys. By the way, cats are so cute and fluffy in this movie!

Something is missing in the overall movie. Couldn't quite figure out- what?

Story is a bit loose. Not interesting to grab your attention like the great story should.

This is an action movie, but there are just a few action scenes, and those are directed worse then the other, non-action parts of the movie.

Main character- Batman is trying to be mysterious. He's in black all the time, which has no contrast with black background that he is constantly set in.

He doesn't talk. Just observes.

He is shot from the same angle the entire movie, which makes it flat and boring.

It's the half portrait slightly from below angle.

I wish there was the other side of him- the "human", Bruce Wayne side. Just for a few minutes.

You can surely spare a few minutes of something different in the 3 hour movie which is constantly the same.

C. Farrell is the most interesting character in the movie. His mask is great.

I was expecting more of this movie, since it was shot for so long.

I feel it is comprised of many mini movie trailers which are not connected properly, which is strange because in general it is not badly directed or edited.

I guess I have expected spectacle, an blockbuster.

Instead, I fell asleep in the middle of the movie, continued watching it the next day, only to find myself constantly thinking- "How much longer? This movie never ends!".

I'm sure I will erase it from the memory in the few days.

I wish to see Robert Pattinson in some good drama, to correct the injustice on this fine actor.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
80's vibe
6 April 2022
In two words- great movie!

Acting is stunning, especially Richie Merritt. Matthew McConaughey is always great, so there is no surprise here.

Story is very interesting and 80's vibe was accurately presented. Based on a true story.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wish there were more movies like this
7 March 2022
I recently re-found this beautiful movie, the pink gem from the early 2000's, with the late 90's vibe.

Funny, lovely and free of politics.

But don't underestimate this one! It sends the most important message- don't judge the book by its cover! You see the beautiful blond dressed in pink and immediately place her in the "dumb blond drawer".

You see a man dressed in the suit, with glasses on- you immediately place him in the "successful businessman drawer". Who made those rules anyway?

Also, if you are smiling and friendly to everyone- people also think you are dumb and limited. If you are frowning, that means you are serious and you are taken seriously.

Remember this nonsense next time you put someone in a drawer based on the looks.

Anyway, this movies is always watchable. Any time of day, any season.

Casting is perfect and Reese is totally in the role.

And the dog- the cutest thing ever! Melts your hart!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Clock on the wall is more interesting
7 March 2022
Another disappointment in so many ways.

First and the most important- boring script, boring story.

Further on, stiff acting. Nicole Kidman doesn't know how to act any more. Only her lips move, other parts are cemented in plastic surgery.

Secondly, Javier Bardem is not a good choice, he is too old and too of the caricature to play Desi. Nominated for Oscars? Haha.

Altogether casting is not good. There are plenty of other actresses who could be more similar than Lucy. Maybe Amy Adams?

Overall verdict- bad.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Hurry up to the finish line!
5 February 2022
The thing that irritated me the most about this show is when they needed to be somewhere in 2 seconds, and they would stand in front of the building and talk.

Like, we made it this far, and made it on time- why would we wanna enter the finish line on time?

If you wanna get upset, watch this unrealistic show.

It is supposed to be suspension and tense but it is just annoying.
22 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Perfect 10
5 February 2022
This is a nice refreshment, old school comedy like we used to have in the 90's.

Location: New York Period: 1950's Main character: Jewish housewife turned pro stand up comedian.

Charming, great humour, some drama, beautiful people, beautiful scenography.

Say no more! Give it a go!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disqusting
5 February 2022
Quit watching after five minutes when there was a scene with the man biting a live chicken' head off.

I just cannot comprehend so called "vegan" actors acting in such a movie.

Disgusted and appalled.

Big pass!
11 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
60's- only in those days you could fall in love in 10 days
24 January 2022
I guess I would give this movie a higher mark, if there wasn't unrealistic behavior of Joey Drayton (played by Katharine Houghton).

I mean- what is that- the 23 year old woman giggling and jumping around the house! It draw too much attention, and she was not the main character, so I guess it was a flop. It totally messed up the entire movie. She was so irritating, I wanted to throw her out of the house, and let the grown up talk. No wonder her father told her at the end of the movie to shut up, I wish he had done it at the beginning of the movie.

All the other actors are great, as well as the story.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Remarkable movie
24 January 2022
Indeed, a proper movie!

Story, casting, directing.. not to mention the cinematography! Drama, tension and suspense to the maximum.

If you wanna see THE movie from the 90's- I guess this one would be on the top of the list!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hail, Caesar! (2016)
1/10
Hail no!
30 December 2021
Sadly, another boring movie. Good actors, but boring story. Dialogues makes you yawn. Hardly made it to the half of the movie and the fell asleap.. Another one to pass.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The movie poster is better than the movie
30 December 2021
This poster and the strong cast made me interested in watching this one.

Turns out the poster is way better than the movie. Boring and not so well directed.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No thank you
13 November 2021
Something that cannot be watched for more than 5 minutes can be marked only 1/10. I have tried to watch it twice withouth being able to pass more than 5 minutes..
6 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fire that changed everything
8 November 2021
Wow! Well done with depicting the look and the atmosphere of the late 19 century Paris!

Story is not bad either!

The true historical events- the fire that occurred in Le Bazar de la Charité, killing over 100 people with many more injured, served as the backbone for his story. Bit by bit the story is built and more an more factors come into the scene. Location is a melting pot of politics, murders, corruption, the new working middle class. Ordinary people, as well as the political elite are both influenced by this historical event.

Recommended!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Perpetuum Copy Paste
26 October 2021
Another Woody Allen movie with same characters.

Timothee Chalamet- small replica of Allen's hysterical "young artists". Makes you nervous. Fast talking about nothing. Headache approaching.

Couldn't watch it for more then 10 minutes.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Package (1989)
7/10
"What did you do? Read a book, Walter?"
21 October 2021
Include Gene Hackman and you'll have a great movie, that would otherwise be a mediocre one.

Great actors, ok story, nicely directed. All in all-crime and action in the late 80's style. Recommended.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Present is just as precious as the past
5 October 2021
In the second half of 19th century, the technical issues about colour wheels and optics were raised and discussed.

The particular painter, the one that is mostly connected to that topic- is Georges Seurat. He studied at the famous Ecole des Beaux-Arts, founded by Louis XIVth in 1648 in Paris. It is a historical location, not so modern. But two years that the painter spent there, had a huge influence on his later work. In 1886, he was invited by Pissarro to exhibit in the last impressionist exhibition, which he did, with his large-scale painting- Sunday Afternoon on the Grande Jatte. Basically, Seurat mixed the influence of the grand masters, such as Piero della Francesca, with the new painting technique that he "invented"- the pointillism. He wanted to prove that the modern world could be just as monumental, heroic and beautiful as the ancient one.

Seurat was secretive, there is not so much knowledge about his private life. He experimented with colour. There is a difference between colour the pigment and colour the light. So, he mixes colour not on the canvas, but "in your eyes" by placing tiny dots of different, scientifically calculated colours, next to each other.

Vincent van Gogh, everybody knows the name, even people completely uninterested in art. He made a huge impact on the young artist, lived in Paris in 1886. But was studying in the bar, and not for the law degree. 😊 He was a difficult man, with no personal hygiene and drank like a fish. With huge talent and long working (painting) hours. Vincent was interested and influenced by Japanese prints, popular at that time.

Japonisme, a phenomenon that occurred at that time, was the result of Japan being closed for centuries, and as the Japan opened its borders for foreign trade in 1858, Europe was flooded and fascinated by the beautiful art of ukiyo-e, Japanese woodblock prints. Artists copied it, and so did Vincent.

Claude Monet, a true hero of impressionism, moved to Giverny, where he painted haystacks and garden, but mostly- the water. In his old age, to commemorate the end of WWI, he offered a French state to paint a grand scale painting of water lilies. Musee de l'Orangerie holds this circular larger than life painting and is called "Sistine of Impressionism". The painting captured the shimmering and reflecting water, kind of shifted reality.

So, to summon in one sentence those beautiful four episodes, the author took the impressionism out of the chocolate box and brought it back into the furnace. Because the impressionism was just that- brave, fiery, inventive and revolutionary.

Waldemar Januszczak: "This art will never be tamed"
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
...they were watched, categorized and judged...
2 October 2021
In the third episode, the author describes the kind of new phenomenon that occurred at the second half of the 19th century- painting of people. But what kind of people? Ordinary people. People in the café bars, in the concert halls, or in theatres.

Degas was the pioneer of this type of painting. He studies ballerinas and painted them all the time. Both on the stage, as well as behind it. He also made a wax statue of the 14-year-old girl, a ballet student, so called ballet rats. It was shockingly realistic, made out of wax, and with the real ballet tutu and hair band, the actual hair band that the 14-year-old model gave to Degas.

It's no secret that the Britain's influence on impressionism is crucial- horse racing and boating.

So, Degas, who was always trying to find a new subject to paint, went to Hippodrome de Longchamp, a horse-racing facility located in the Bois de Boulogne in Paris. He was not so interested in parade and strolling, but more into jockeys and their horses. He was fascinated by the movement of the body. At that time there Eadweard Muybridge photographed a horse in different stages of its gallop. Actually, it was in 1878, when Muybridge captured motion. He showed the world what could be guessed but never seen-every stage of a horse's gallop when it sped across a track. He used a multiple cameras to capture motion in stop-motion photographs. Degas certainly saw Muybridge's photo sequence of a moving horse and was influenced by it.

Degas, who displayed on 7 out of 8 impressionist exhibitions, also painted women bathing. It was done from the weird angles, and it looked like they were watched through the keyhole- by that time it was never done in art. The artist also displayed one groundbreaking painting, as the result to Darwinism, called 'Spartan girls provoking the boys'.

Another French artist worth mentioning, who has the huge influence on history of art and development of modern art movements, was Gustave Caillebotte. He was very rich and really, really talented, but unfortunately died young, age 45. He was also the patron of Impressionists, bought a bunch of their paintings, and in that way kept them safe from destruction.

His painting The Floor Scrapers (1875) was one of his earliest masterpieces, and the first depiction of urban workmen.

Berthe Morisot, was one of "les trois grandes dames" of Impressionism, alongside Marie Bracquemond and Mary Cassatt, all three talented ladies were discussed in this episode.

Also, at the end of this episode, author talks about Paul Gauguin, and how he was a people painter, and talks about Gaugin's family portraits.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Seine - the most painted river ever, anywhere in the world
29 September 2021
Second episode of this wonderful documentary covers the beauty and hardship of painting outdoors. When we see those beautiful landscape paintings, it doesn't occur to us that they were hard and difficult to paint. Standing and working for hours in weather conditions like heat, cold, snow, or rain sure have been difficult and exhausting for painters.

Monet painted water. It was his main obsession, and he painted it from every angle. The problem with water is that it constantly changes. It is never the same.

So, he constructed a special boat, to be on the water while painting it. Manet painted Monet on this floating studio.

Author describes the way the painters were dressed at that time, when painting outdoors. They used dark clothes, not to throw reflection from the clothes to the canvas. Also, they had to protect (themselves and) the paint from direct sunlight, so they were wearing hats. Fully equipped artist. Also, they had to take into the account that when you paint in the direct sunlight, the painting will look different when you take it home. It is certainly darker.

Renoir went to paint the hustle and bustle of modern life. He had a garden behind his studio in Paris, where he painted models. His grand scale painting "Bal du moulin de la Galette" was introduced in the impressionist exhibition of 1877. It perfectly captures joie de vivre, but also gives us the snapshot of that particular period in that particular place. This Impressionism' masterpiece perfectly captures the late 19 century working class having fun, drinking, relaxing and dancing in their free time, in the Moulin de la Galette. It was something more, it was a statement of the social changes. New working class, working girls and chaps with attitude are the future.

How was it possible for Renoir to capture the light, the shadows and affects that light produces? Because shadows, like the water surface, changes quickly. He had to paint quickly. He also had to use the right tools-new type of brush- the brush made of coarse pig hair. By that time, the brushes were made of Kolinsky sable/weasel hair, which are of fine texture and usually in round shape. With innovation of new flat brushes, made out of pig hair, everything changed. This gave the painting a new language.

So those painters in the late 19century France finally realized that the modern world is also a fit subject for art. That the art is not reserved only for painting kings and queens, but also for middle class, the working people, and everyday life.

Landscape covered in snow is one of the most beautiful subjects in art. On snow, the shadows have different colours, depending on the colour of light, which some of the impressionists captured in in detail. The author demonstrates this effect in situ, on the snow, and show us what it's all about.

Also, in the last part of this episode, he mentions Paul Cezanne, and his transformation from the dark-coloured beginnings to the painter of light colours, as he transited to be the landscape painter, and painter of still life.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A "sugary" art movement
27 September 2021
Waldemar Januszczak in a funny and witty way introduces this series. You can both learn and have a laugh watching this documentary.

The author shows us a bunch of chocolate boxes, puzzle boxes and umbrellas with the impressionist images printed on them, a tourist souvenirs; highly commercialized art. This art nowadays seems sweet and pleasant - sweet enough to put in on the chocolate box. But is it really? Was it really so sweet and innocent? Are we looking at it the wrong way? We clearly are!

Back when those paintings were made, some 150 years ago, they were artistically dangerous and revolutionary. As the author said, rather than on the box of chocolate, they belong on the box of dynamite!

Camille Pissarro (1830-1903) was born Jacob-Abraham-Camille Pissarro in Virgin Islands, then in the Danish West Indies. He is the only artist to have shown his work at all eight Paris Impressionist exhibitions, from 1874 to 1886. His father was of Portuguese Jewish descent and held French nationality. His mother was from a French-Jewish family from the island of St. Thomas. The Jewish religion forbids art, so in that way, he was also revolutionary. He came to Paris in 1855 and found that the city has undergone a big changes. Everything was changing and moving rapidly, so art also had to follow this fast- pasted speed.

In 1841 a significant invention made that possible- in England John Rand invented and patented the first collapsible artist's paint tube, so it made the paint portable! - Which led to more painting outdoors.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919), also witnessed that Paris was changing rapidly (Napoleon IIIrd rebuilt of Paris), and figured that art had to change as well.

Claude Monet (1840-1926), wanted to paint the real world. The real people, the new working class, his neighbours. His brushstrokes show the spirit of revolution.

Generally, if you want to see the rebellion and fire of Impressionist painting, you have to stand really close to the painting to see the brushstrokes- as close as the museum lets you.

Renoir and Monet went boating together on the Seine, and on one of those boating trips in 1869, they discovered La Grenouillere, a floating bar on the river. There the Parisians, the working class, were drinking and dancing and enjoying Sunday afternoons. Weekends as we know them were invented approximately at that time. So Monet and Renoir, both there, painted it, capturing the people, light and the water. They captured both the reflection on the water, as well as the spirit and atmosphere of the people. By watching the painting you can almost hear their song and laughter, and smell the nature and river surrounding them. Monet was constantly painting water, from the Seine, to the lily pond in Giverny at the end of his life.

Another great innovation made all this fast painting possible- the invention of flat brush. Before that, the painters used the round brush, which made the painting surface smooth and precise. This flat brush revolutionized art. With the expressive brushstrokes and quick painting, the artist could capture the elusive effect, the passing moment, the song, the laughter, generally- the atmosphere of the moment. They capture both the look and spirit of that age.

Also, the invention of new portable travelling easel made it perfect for outdoor painting, as well as the rapid expansion of French railway network- so that the nature could be approached easily, simpler and cheaper.

Frederic Bazille (1841-1870), is maybe the "least known" of the Impressionist founders, but was probably the most talented one. He was the first who suggested forming the art group. And it was done in 1873, the first exhibition was held in 1874 in the studio of the famous French photographer- Nadar. At that time a group was called "Cooperative and Anonymous Association of Painters, Sculptors and Engravers", name far too long and not too catchy, but the art critic Louis Leroy, writing about the first exhibition, named the article with mockery "The exhibition of the Impressionists", based on the name of Monet's painting "Impression, Sunrise". However, the term Impressionist gained favour with the public; it was certainly shorter than the official name of the group. The rest is (art) history.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It's a story of rebellion and courage.. the days when everything changed..
27 September 2021
In this four-part documentary, the author, Waldemar Januszczak, introduces us to the particularly interesting movement in the history of art - The Impressionism.

He covers the movement itself, and the artists - the Impressionists; both their professional and private life curiosities.

I highly recommend this series to all art lovers, since it is out of the covers.

You cannot find these facts in a classic art book, and it is especially good because author leads you to the places of interest - where artists lived, or locations from which they painted a particular painting. Author also covers the "why and how" this painting techniques where possible only then and not in some previous time in history, he tells us about the materials and conditions which made it possible.

I cannot believe nobody reviewed this beautiful documentary yet, so I am going to do it in more detail, and write a review on each episode, because it certainly deserves it!
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cinderella (I) (2021)
3/10
..I've seen the dresses, I've drank the bubble drink, and now I'm gonna go..
27 September 2021
Millennial Cinderella.

Why have I've even watched it? It's a movie for teenagers! Simple answer: I love musicals, and cannot miss the musical for the whole world!

And the musical it is! Great songs, preproduced by lovely voices! Songs that we all know and love.

The movie itself is not that bad either. It is a modern presentation of the classical story, with the modern popular things in it.. Things that no one cannot avoid in todays movies. Sentences like: "You are beautiful from the inside.", or "Find your own way in life", or "Don't let anyone tell you what to do with your life", "You can do anything", etc.

Now in my time, in my youth, in movies like that there was only a story.

Evil stepmother, sad and lonely stepdaughter, mean stepsisters.. There were none of that "You can make it girl, you are the best" sentences that we hear all the time. In fact we hear it so much, that we stop hearing it at all. Wish there is just one movie without those inspiring sentences. I think teenagers know that stuff by themselves, without somebody constantly telling them that they are the best and that they can do anything.

Movie is nicely directed and the casting is great. Billy Porter is especially funny and I didn't know that he is such a good singer, Camila and Nicholas are beautiful.

Scenography is perfect and as I already said- song are great.

Judging by the other user reviews, I was expecting a lot worse movie, but all in all, I was positively surprised.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
It's Maurice! My name is Maurice!
17 September 2021
They don't make movies like this any more:( This is a type of movie that you have to watch at least once a year! To remind you of the fact that late 90's/early 2000's were fun fun times!

It has plot, it has drama, it has action, it if funny, great music! What else do you need?

It's a feel good movie with a happy ending.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed