Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Competent Film That Could Have Been Better Given The Source Material
1 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I was at a midnight screening last night. My overall assessment was that it was certainly not the crap-fest Shyamalan is capable of making, but it wasn't the epic masterpiece it could and should have been based on the source material.

I should also predicate this review on a brief assessment of how I think other people in the theater reacted. When the credits rolled up, a lot of people applauded, but a lot of people booed. I saw it with a group of five (myself included); me being the only real fan of the show in that group. Most of them liked it, except one who hated it.

Now, on to the review. Warning: there be spoilers:

The Bad

Truncated storyline: Obviously, they needed to cut things out. But they should have made a two and a half hour movie. Many important plot details are left in or worked in clumsily (in the final scene, Ozai states several plot points that should have been revealed earlier), and they don't spend long enough in any location to develop much of anything. Some things that are put in from the series are not worked in well, either (the "we could be friends" line does NOT come after the Blue Spirit segment (which ultimately makes that sequence seem pointless) and is presented as a throwaway line that doesn't have nearly the impact it should have). And despite the promotional images and clips, Suki and the Kyoshi warriors are NOT in this movie.

Lack of character development: Only Zuko is truly realized from his TV series counterpart. Aang is reasonably developed but is conceived as pretty deadly serious, robbing him of much of the complexity he displayed in the series. Katara, Sokka, and especially Iroh are woefully underdeveloped.

Action sequences: One character throws something at another, and then just stands there waiting for them to block it and return fire. The action goes MUCH to slowly. The already revealed clip of Aang taking out several soldiers in a row with water and ice bending is probably the best action sequences, which is probably why that's the one they revealed.

Dialogue: While not consistently terrible, there are some moments that fall flat (most egregious is an over the top "Yes!" from Commander Zhao; whole theater laughed at that one. Expect that to become a meme), and Katara's narration often serves simply as a way to truncate the storyline even further. The dialogue is usually just as competent as it needs to be; nothing particularly stirring and not as quotable as the series.

The Good

Look of the film: They were definitely loyal to the series in terms of the look: if you take many individual frames of the movie, it really looks like it came right out of the series. It's beautiful to look at, though there are only a handful of sequences where the 3D adds anything.

Musical score: The music has been out for a while and most have already heard it, but it really is beautiful to listen to and helps make some sequences at least somewhat interesting that otherwise might not have been.

Acting: I still say racebenders can suck it. While the actors aren't given the time they deserved to develop their characters and won't win Oscars for their work, they nevertheless do a fine job with what they have, Patel and Ringer in particular. The one exception is Mandvi, who just isn't able to be as menacing as Zhao should be.

Basic story: The basic storyline of the original series remains intact despite the truncating, and it remains an interesting story. If you're not familiar with the series, you can still enjoy the world the movie creates and the journey that the characters take.

Bending effects: While the action sequences as a whole are often somewhat dull, the effects of the bending really do look good and stay faithful to the series.

Well, those are my thoughts in a nutshell. Enjoy!

And see the movie and make up your own minds.
13 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very Powerful - Everyone Should See This
16 April 2005
I had the privilege last night of not only seeing this movie, but having a Q & A session with the director as well. I've always supported homosexual marriage, but this film made me realize that we need to start pushing hard for it ASAP. Many people believe that homosexuals don't really "need" to marry, but this film completely dispels that myth. Homosexuals need the right to marry. And they need it as soon as possible. I'm not a big cryer in movies. Only one movie has ever made me cry (ironically, it was Homeward Bound: The Incredible Journey). But I came very, very close multiple times. Not only did I almost cry at the case studies, but also at the shear joy displayed by so many in the countries where homosexuals have finally been allowed to marry. A U.S. citizen, I love my country dearly, but it has its flaws. One of its major flaws is that we're never exactly ahead of the game on civil rights. This film reminded me of that in brutal honesty.

See this movie, and tell your friends and elected representatives to see it as well. This could, and probably should, ultimately be remembered as one of the most important films of the decade.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Much Worse Things Have Happened
8 December 2002
For a die-hard kiddie movie, Power Rangers: The Movie is pretty good. It's not annoyingly pacifistic like so many other kiddie movies. The movie's respectable sfx, decent action sequences, and quips from Ivan Ooze should keep adults being forced to watch the movie in an attempt to appease their toddlers from suffering too much. They probably will enjoy some of the scenes. Unfortunately, the fact that the storyline's pretty dumb and pretty much every bit of dialogue that doesn't involve Ivan Ooze is pretty awful keeps this movie from being a good film for the entire family like "E. T." or "Homeward Bound." So, if your kid wants to see it, don't fret. They'll enjoy themselves, and you will survive.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Outsiders (1983)
4/10
A Bad Book. An Even Worse Movie.
1 May 2002
Many times, a good book's name is soiled because it is turned into a bad movie. With The Outsiders, a bad book's name was soiled even further because it was turned into an even worse movie.

The Outsiders is about Ponyboy Curtis (Howell). He is a member of the Greasers, a gang that often fights with another gang called the Socials (Socs). Both gangs often get into some trouble, but one night a Greaser named Johnny Cade (Macchio) does something really bad and ends up on the run with Ponyboy.

I'm sorry if I'm making this movie sound interesting, because it's not. It consists of 91 minutes, each one of them a snore. It tells you about the grievances of each of the characters, but since each character is a complete idiot for keeping up this feud, you really can't sympathize for them.

Perhaps the worst aspect of this movie is the 'acting.' Not a single actor is any good. The worst of them is Matt Dillon (Dallas 'Dally' Winston). Normally he's a respectable actor (he was good in Crash, for instant), Whenever Dally begins to cry because he is sad, I begin to cry because I am doubling over with laughter. There's another part of the movie where his inept acting skills begin to shine, but I'm not going to tell you what it is because it would give away the movie's ending. Future big-name actors Tom Cruise (Steve Randall) and Emilion Estivez (Two-Bit Matthews) have small rolls and little chance to show off their talents.

A male-dominated movie, the only female with a part that has any significance at all is Diane Lane (Sherri 'Cherry' Valance). Because of this, and the fact that she is a talented actress, it's disappointing to realize that her acting, too, is inept.

For someone who's a great director, Coppola sure did a lousy job. The fist-fight scenes are amusingly phoney, and he has Dally put an open pocket knife to his forehead,not because he's suicidal, but because he's deep in thought.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Terrible!
22 April 2002
On how many levels does this movie stink? Ashley Judd is terrible and Tommy Lee Jones' talents are squandered. Plus, the movie has plot holes. Judd's character could be convicted because she had been convicted of killing Nick several years ago. If she killed Jonathan several years later, she could be tried again even though it's the same guy. Not to mention she engages in other illicit activities such as driving cars off ferries.

*Spoiler Ahead*

Also, five more minutes into the movie, and you would have seen Judd tell her little son that she had murdered his father. What sane person kills their son's father?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Snow Day (2000)
5/10
Chevy Chase Saves This Movie From Being Completely Bad
29 March 2002
Most of this movie is very stupid, and that's being subtle. However, most of the scenes when Chevy Chase is on the screen are actually pretty entertaining. Unfortunately, he's not the main character; this stupid teenage boy is. Had Chevy Chase been the main character, this movie could have at least been average, maybe even a tad above average.

*Spoilers ahead.

The ending was, to say the least, awful. The kids display mob violence in order to get a lousy snow day by tying the snow plow man to a street sign. Then, they steal his plow and, despite being 8 years old, are able to drive it. They set out to unplow the road (Umm...just how the hell do you do that, anyway?). When the previously mentioned stupid teenage boy sees them, rather than being responsible and telling them that it is wrong to mug people, tie them up, and steal their vehicles in order to gain snow days, is like "Duh, cool!" Oy vey.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed