Die Another Day has everything anyone ever wanted from a Bond film. An interesting and unbelievable plot, a planet destroying super weapon, a genetically mutated baddie, great girls, great cars, great gadgets, bad one-liners and a few nods and winks to the audience who are all in on the joke.
But... but... it just doesn't quite deliver as a truely classic Bond film. It should do, just as "The World Is Not Enough" and "Tomorrow Never Dies" almost did (and "Goldeneye" utterly failed to do) but it doesn't.
An exploration into the darker side of the character is very well done and interesting. It is reminiscent of Sean Connery in a cell in Dr No having been roughed up after dinner ("tell me, does the toppling of American missiles really make up for having no hands?"). But the whole film is slightly "dark" in it's lighting and mood. Even scenes in Cuba manage to have a slightly dull glow. There's too much skulking in small spaces rather than expansive vast open shots. Even the wide shots of the car chase are more stylised that necessary.
Bond turns up in Havana... and he's wearing a Hawaian shirt? Where's the cream linen suit? Bond pulls off his skydiving kit and he's in commando battle dress. Where's the tux? Of course he wears a dinner suit for an evening ball, so does everyone else. The whole point is that Bond turns up in black tie in the middle of the Sahara, after four days on a camel, dusts down the jacket and asks a local peasant for directions to the nearest tailor. These are minor irritants but in other ways they symbolise that the essence of the character has been lost by writers who don't truely understand the concept of a "gentleman" spy (yes, even in 21st century).
Die Another Day is enjoyable, it's definitely a Bond film and not a bad Bond film but as with the previous two it is only almost a great Bond film. It could and should have been a great Bond film. Oh Michael and Barbara why did you let it happen? Oh Lee! Oh James...
But... but... it just doesn't quite deliver as a truely classic Bond film. It should do, just as "The World Is Not Enough" and "Tomorrow Never Dies" almost did (and "Goldeneye" utterly failed to do) but it doesn't.
An exploration into the darker side of the character is very well done and interesting. It is reminiscent of Sean Connery in a cell in Dr No having been roughed up after dinner ("tell me, does the toppling of American missiles really make up for having no hands?"). But the whole film is slightly "dark" in it's lighting and mood. Even scenes in Cuba manage to have a slightly dull glow. There's too much skulking in small spaces rather than expansive vast open shots. Even the wide shots of the car chase are more stylised that necessary.
Bond turns up in Havana... and he's wearing a Hawaian shirt? Where's the cream linen suit? Bond pulls off his skydiving kit and he's in commando battle dress. Where's the tux? Of course he wears a dinner suit for an evening ball, so does everyone else. The whole point is that Bond turns up in black tie in the middle of the Sahara, after four days on a camel, dusts down the jacket and asks a local peasant for directions to the nearest tailor. These are minor irritants but in other ways they symbolise that the essence of the character has been lost by writers who don't truely understand the concept of a "gentleman" spy (yes, even in 21st century).
Die Another Day is enjoyable, it's definitely a Bond film and not a bad Bond film but as with the previous two it is only almost a great Bond film. It could and should have been a great Bond film. Oh Michael and Barbara why did you let it happen? Oh Lee! Oh James...
Tell Your Friends