Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Adventureland (2009)
Great movie! So watchable
17 April 2014
What makes this movie great is the acting. Kristin Stewart steals the show, and even I (a heterosexual woman) can see what a guy could fall in love with. She has such a weary beauty about her, and seems so much the "cool girl" that all the guys would have aspired for and the smarter girls would have tried to be like.

However, Jesse Eisenberg is a heck of an actor. He hit all the right notes, and managed to be funny and awkward without compromising the lead romantic role.

This movie was also an Easter Egg hunt of little surprises, like Ryan Reynolds, Bill Hader, and Kristen Wiig. Especially Martin Starr from Freaks and Geeks. Everyone did very well in their role and this movie was romantic, funny, and insightful.

The only quibble I would have is it is supposed to take place in the 80's, but the costuming/makeup/etc. does not necessarily scream 1987. No, I am not looking for sloppy gimmicks like The Wedding Singer, but much of this movie at sight looked a little too recent for 1987. If they really wanted to "date" this movie they might have tried a little harder I think.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Toast (2010 TV Movie)
Hmm...I don't know....
7 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I know this movie is based on true facts on Nigel Slater's life.

I can say that it is well acted, well shot, and has a compelling story line. All of the good "ingredients" (teehee) are here. However, it is very hard to figure out the message that this movie sends. It is clearly a coming of age tale but seems to lack the pride and triumph (although it attempts) that I usually see in movies like this.

If the directors and screenwriters wanted to show a complex tale about a complex man, they overcooked it. I believe the main problem is the characters themselves change too much over the short period of time, and too many scenes seem needless and pointless, muddying the central message about Nigel overcoming unhappiness and great odds.

Mrs. Potter may have had her issues with the ill advised competition with her stepson, but overall seemed to be a decent person. Nigel's attitude toward the end seems more jarring than triumphant.

Nigel's father is painted as very harsh and unsympathetic, yet becomes a very sympathetic person toward the end.

Nigel himself begins as innocent and very sympathetic, but is revealed fairly quickly on to be capable of some real nastiness.

I guess my problem with this movie is the fact that it seems like it wants to clearly delineate the bad guys vs. the good guys, but loses this among some pretty complicated characterization that leads nowhere.

For instance, why does Mrs. Potter cry to herself in the kitchen? What about Nigel's response then? This scene leads nowhere.

What about the quick little romance thrown in toward the end? That whole part seemed too hasty.

It's almost like this is attempting to be three movies in one, and failing at invoking any real passion or good feeling toward the main characters.

Here's the worst part to me: One of the worst offenses Mrs. Potter seems to have committed is to be "common." I believe that this movie really wants the audience to agree with this, and to sympathize with Nigel because of that.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tuff Turf (1985)
Piece of garbage! It's not even for a cozy night of wasted brain cells.
16 July 2013
Let me break this down quick for you if you are considering this movie (you may be snowed in, on hospital bedrest, stranded in a hotel in an unappealing place):

Positives 1. Kim Richards is pretty and is adorable in her urban clothes 2. Robert Downey Jr. and James Spader are also tasty 80's eye candy 3. Chuckles at watching 80's style urban rebellion...BRIEF! 4. Chuckles at watching 80's style discipline issues at school-MOMENTARY! 5. Chuckles at some cute and some outrageous styles (apparently male nipples were acceptable at urban California high schools in the 80's).FLEETING 6. A snicker at some of the badly executed dance moves, Flashdance couldn't save these moves.-SPORADIC MOMENT HERE OR THERE

Negatives

1. Oh wow, could this story be any sillier? So many silly details laying all over the place like cheap parade candy. Shooting cockroaches on bedroom walls, high school students moonlighting as armed muggers, friends who convince their friends to leave by shoving their food all over their faces)

2. Again with the storyline-very ridiculous and sometimes hard to believe or to even follow...some of this could be an editing issue.

3. Poor acting! This is clearly not the role for James Spader to shine his very considerable and worthy acting skills. Robert Downey Jr. is believable with his typical 80's style laid back guy...the rest are just fools in headbands.

4. Badly shot...apparent even to me, hardly an expert in this type of thing.

5. Seriously???? Do these movie makers think urban teens are psycho paths???

The overall film just looks dirty as well...not just the fault of the cockroaches. Instead of a vintage gem found at a cool little flea market...this gives of the feel of finding some dirty used old crap in your reclusive uncle's basement, the one with hoarding tendencies. UGH
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Lady Eve (1941)
just because something is old doesn't make it great...
3 October 2012
I have to keep reminding myself that this is supposed to be a comedy...but were people dumb back in 1941? I seriously doubt it. In order for the story's main premise to work Henry Fonda's character (as well as some others) have to be very very stupid, or Barbara Stanwyck has to be an amazing espionage style secret agent type...which she doesn't seem like she is. In other words, some serious disbelief has to be suspended. Maybe people were a lot easier on their expectations back then, before special effects and ultra realism took place? It doesn't translate well to today, especially when considering Barbara Stanwyck's efforts to entrap Henry Fonda. As adorable as he is in his sharp little sport coats he does not seem like the type who would attract a really sexy and intelligent woman.

I will say that it is worth watching, there are a couple lame chuckles, and it is well acted by both Stanwyck and Fonda. I am truly stuck between a 6-7. Another thing that does not stand up is Henry Fonda's reactions to some crazy stories Barbara Stanwyck tells him about her past. The modern viewer cannot help but ask him/herself "why him?"
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Reality Bites (1994)
to think I once felt guilty for being a little disappointed...
20 October 2009
I first saw this movie when it came out in the theaters and I was a teenager myself, and I remember feeling a just a little shortchanged and even dirty, like I'd been manipulated in a way. I did enjoy it, but the reasons for enjoying it do not hold up today. Watching it again has been fun because looking at it through adult eyes, I am having fun seeing how easy it is to spot the dated qualities and outmoded philosophies that, as one reviewer said, were pretty much defunct by 2000, or maybe even by 1995-6.

And it's not like I was some profound kid who had all this insight how mass media sells these ideas to young people...I bought into the whole "Seattle grunge" thing lock, stock and barrel, I thought guys with stringy unwashed hair and bad attitudes were totally hot, I wore crocheted vests, mood rings, and colored sunglasses with the best of them. So me thinking that something did not ring true must have been because it is pretty obvious that this movie is in essence a failure.

1. The characters-The movie works really hard to make Troy be the better option for Leilana. For teenagers, he was totally sexy to watch on screen and totally swoon worthy, but his utterly obnoxious attitude, his rudeness to Ben Stiller's character, and his bullying just came off as unpleasant at the least, and his philosophy for not working are textbook definitions of a narcissist. Hearing some of his pseudo intellectual discussions are painful and embarrassing, because it is clear that the movie feels that young Gen X'ers embrace and admire such outlooks unequivocally and at face value. And kids were supposed to identify with this person? What an inconsiderate person, to stand up Leilana's father for the job interview and lead her to blame herself, and to embarrass women around him for being attracted to him. Any good friend and countless therapists would advise against having him as a boyfriend. The sad few seconds devoted to his dying father are not enough to redeem him or "understand" him.

Bottom line, if Ethan Hawke was supposed to make this person somewhat sympathetic, he failed, or if he truly was supposed to be this unlikable, then good work.

Leilana did come off as sympathetic and overall was well played by Winona, and her beauty is the one of the few things in this movie with true staying power. Her character does some pretty awful things, though. When her boss rudely rebuffs her video ideas, she humiliates him on air. When her friend offers her a job, she snaps at her. Instead of swallowing her pride and working at the gap for a bit, she resorts to the embarrassing "gas card" scene, which we are supposed to think is cute and rebellious. It is totally unconvincing that a "valedictorian" would ever be so irresponsible and immature, even if she had fallen on bad times.

As for the other two, they are both well acted and likable, but seem to be added on simply to achieve a gritty "90's" edge, like HIV testing and coming out to your parents. Neither subplot is developed enough to give this movie the edge it craves. Both are attractive and funny, and Vicky especially projects a friendliness, sympathy, and is cute as hell in those throwback clothes.

2. The Michael stuff really is a failure. Ben Stiller did a good job acting in this movie and came across as warm and real, but this movie is his work too. I guess a simple plot device would have been to make him more arrogant from the get-go so that he could seem like the "bad guy" but that would have been cheap. Either way, the movie does seem like it's trying to convince you that he either "betrays" Leilana or "doesn't understand her" the way Troy does, and it doesn't work. Those two had a positive chemistry and seemed to complement each other as characters. To make this a true coming of age and growing up story, Leilana should have either chosen Michael, who emphasizes growing up, taking responsibility for your actions, and change for the better, or decided to be on her own for a while to become a more mature person.

3. The biggest failure of this movie, and in my opinion, the most dangerous, is how it elevates Troy's attitude as the noble one above all, as if being narcissistic and self-involved are desirable. Being that he is the hot guy of the movie and that the other characters seem to respond so positively to him, a young teenager is left with the message that this is the "new" way to be and that Michael's responsible and kind persona are "hypocritical" or "selling out." Leaving the theater back in '94, I was enjoying myself thinking about the romance between two good looking and stylish characters, but I couldn't really get into that part as much as I should have. Since I also really wanted to be cool and up to date, I was wondering if I should be acting or living like any of these characters, living in a flat with a guy who mooches off me, sleeping around with strangers, dancing at the gas station, etc. The movies have a lot more influence on young people than one thinks.

In my gut, I felt two things: a-My parents would be horrified if I brought friends like that around and more frighteningly, b-I secretly would agree with them.
58 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed