Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Average TV movie, though not a factual source
7 April 2004
I have watched this a few times on Lifetime when I was bored and there was nothing else on. The acting is okay. It is interesting to see Holly Marie Combs play a murderess and she does a decent job. The movie tries to hard to make David look sympathetic and Diane look evil. Cassidy Rae does a fair job as Adrienne however based on this film and other performances I feel her acting talent is limited.

In someways the film, except for the end where you see Adrienne's mother, makes it more about how sorry we should feel for David as opposed to the girl who was brutally murdered. The film makes David out to be a victim who didn't want to kill but was forced to. Which is complete garbage. He was a willing participant who even came up with the story to get Adrienne out of the house. I suppose this is because the film relies heavily on David's confession and not as much on news sources as it should have. The writing suffers from this lack of credible sources.

If looking for accurate information about this case, this film is not where you should be looking. Too much information came out in the trial that disproves significant issues.

While the film goes along with David's confession that he and Adrienne slept together after a track meet, this is not true. On A & E's American Justice it was told that it came out in the trial that this never happened. In fact someone else gave Adrienne a ride home that day. Since the trial happened after the film was made, the film is not at fault for this error, it would have made more sense to make a film after the trial. David even later admitted that he lied about sleeping with Adrienne. Given this information it leads one to believe that she rejected him and he decided to enact revenge on her. Thus he lied to his girlfriend and they decided to kill her. While this is merely speculation it is food for thought.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Suzy (1936)
7/10
Clothing?
10 March 2004
This was a decent film. Though this is not the best film that any of the actors ever did. The plot is fairly predictable but it is okay.

Franchot Tone's fake accent was amusing and seemed to come and go. While I much prefer Jean Harlow in comedy she does well enough with drama. Cary Grant was okay but why they cast him as a Frenchman I'll never know.

My main gripe with the film was using 1930's clothes for a film that was supposed to take place during World War I. While it is not that obvious with the men's clothing, but the women's clothing really stands out. Not having period clothing really takes away from the film. You would think that a wardrobe person or the producers or director or someone would have caught how out of place the clothing is.
25 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Dust (1932)
Harlow shines in a flawed film
25 June 2003
Red Dust contains a wonderful performance from Jean Harlow. The Chemistry between Harlow and Gable is undeniable. And the plot for the most part is decent and flows well.

However there are serious flaws which hurt what could have a great film. The racism toward Asians is awful and makes the film difficult to watch. Mary Astor, while a competent actress over acts in the scene with Harlow during the storm.

Though this is a film for any and all Harlow fans to watch.
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed