Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Footsteps (2006)
9/10
Brutal and beautiful
14 June 2006
Bloody, brutal and disturbingly beautiful, Footsteps' blend of taut psychological horror and unflinching graphic ultra-gore is definitely not for the squeamish. G.H. Evans's innovative thriller is infinitely clever (with artistic nods to Toshiaki Toyoda's Pornostar and flashes of the inimitable Takashi Miike at his darkest and most violent) but also visually gorgeous: the composition and imagery is beguilingly rich and compelling. In particular, the opening sequence ranks among the most uncomfortable and harsh beginnings to any movie I've seen and immediately draws the viewer into the grim world of Evans' nightmare urban dystopia.

The soundtrack suits the mood and visuals perfectly, matching ear-battering electronica to eye-watering gore and elegant, melancholic strings to passages of raw emotion, and occasionally interspersed with long moments of silence which serve to heighten the main character Andrew's obvious social isolation and introversion.

Evans' love for and expert knowledge of Japanese extreme movie-making has clearly informed Footsteps, and he has applied that dynamic to an inherently Western tale of societal breakdown, which will be familiar to anyone who lives in the UK in particular. The plot also faintly echoes Joel Schumacher's Falling Down as well as Martin Scorsese's seminal Taxi Driver, as a morality tale of an ordinary working joe who is given more than adequate incentive to revenge himself on society.

As for the performances, they are never anything less than intriguing and fully credible. Nicholas Bool is stunningly charismatic and powerful in the role of Andrew, portraying him as a somewhat sympathetic hero of sorts, an ingenue out of his depth in the criminal underworld, with just the right mix of aloofness and alienation: his lack of social skills is so accurate, it's almost painful to watch at times. Also of note is Mads Koudal, who delivers a superb, standout performance as the charmless, ruthless and utterly evil Paul.

Set in a clever and complex narrative structure of flashbacks and flashforwards (which occasionally recalls Japanese director Shinji Aoyama's equally intricate plotting), the story follows the failing fortunes of a depressed, uncommunicative young man named Andrew (Nicholas Bool), who is an unskilled factory worker by day and a lonely loser by night. He comes from a broken home - his mother died when he was young, and his father married a much younger woman - and has next to no emotional connection with his long-suffering girlfriend, Sera, who leaves him because he just won't talk to her.

It's not long before Andrew's fragile world is broken down even further by the death of his father, leaving him with no surviving family. The final straw comes at almost exactly the same time, when he is made redundant only days after his dad has died.

Reeling from this final tragedy, he goes home - but instead of unlocking the door and going inside to continue his life of loss, pain, being ground underfoot by Lady Luck, and honest graft being rewarded by nothing but poverty and misery, he makes a snap decision, he loses his last marble, and embarks on a very different life path indeed - one steeped in violence, rage and brutality.

In doing so, Andrew is discovered by a gang of snuff filmmakers, who organise and carry out real-life beatings, murders, sex and drugs, which they then capture on DV camera, and he begins his journey into the filthy underworld of criminal society - and into more danger than he could possibly ever have imagined.

Footsteps presents a disturbing portrait of a bleak, doomed society filled only with drudgery, the threat of imminent redundancy, living on or beneath the poverty line, joyless sex, vicarious thrills and the possibility that at any time, one might get one's head stove in with a baseball bat by someone with no motive other than to make money and get kicks out of your suffering. It's profoundly affecting and edgy, and will strike a deep chord with anyone who's ever felt that British society was going to the dogs thanks to binge drinking, late-night violence, the ever-darkening world of reality TV, and boredom. Yet in Evans' vision, even in the darkness there is still a glimmer of hope for redemption.

This brooding, nihilistic and enigmatic depiction of Britain's vile criminal underworld - or indeed, an extension of its mainstream Saturday night vicious chav culture, come to that - replete with sex, drugs, more drugs, in-your-face violence, amorality and no respect for human life is a highly accomplished and self-assured work and places G.H. Evans right at the forefront of young, cutting-edge British film-making.
19 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tokyo 10+01 (2003)
8/10
A sense of humour a definite requirement for this spoof
17 December 2003
Personally, I found Tokyo 10+01 to be a funny, cartoony, lightweight, cute and trashy bit of fluffy nonsense. As cheaply made as it undoubtedly is (and looks it, much like most of his other movies such as Nagai Yume (Long Dream) which was still very much a triumph despite its costing limitations), Higuchinsky is fast proving himself to be the master of how to take a 100-yen budget and stretch it to its absolute limit whilst still maintaining a stylish aesthetic, in keeping with the character of the stories he is handling.

The acting quality is utterly over-the-top, mischievous and silly - Masanobu Ando in particular appears to be having great fun messing with the role of Fake, a master fine-art forger whose portraits unfortunately look like they were painted by a monkey with two left hands. This is *clearly* not a movie made to be taken in the slightest bit seriously, referencing with a knowing wink many contemporary classics, including Ando's most Western-mainstream movie Battle Royale, and taking the mickey out of them quite mercilessly.

I enjoyed this movie greatly, but don't watch it thinking you're going to be getting anything as unique or profound as Uzumaki or Long Dream, otherwise you *will* be disappointed. Just enjoy it for what it is: a silly, lightweight spoof with no money behind it, but a great sense of humour.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
If you've bought the first movie, you may feel a little cheated...
26 June 2003
... mainly because Ju-on 2 boasts an outrageous FORTY minutes' worth of material literally taken straight out of the first Ju-on - and when you consider that the sequel only runs for 76 minutes, that leaves you with 36 original minutes' worth of film. Ho-hum. I found that deeply irritating - as if viewers simply wouldn't remember the same stuff! - not to mention dull, having to watch it all over again.

OK, that complaint aside, the byline for Ju-on 2 was that it was supposed to explain a lot of the unanswered questions from the first movie, which frankly, over 36 minutes, simply doesn't go far enough to making any kind of sense of the original's highly convoluted storyline.

There are, however, some really nice new horror sequences which show how good the film might have been, had it had some time to develop; and some of the questions raised by the original - some, but not all - are answered.

So in conclusion - if you loved the first original movie and want to see some further developments on the story, go for it - but just remember to keep your remote control to hand with your finger on the fast-forward button for forty minutes.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ju-on: The Curse (2000 Video)
9/10
Creepy, atmospheric story despite budget limitations
3 June 2003
I don't often recommend TV movies, but I thought that Ju-on was a real corker. Despite an almost-zero budget and an extremely slow pace, Takashi Shimizu still managed to produce a very edgy and eerie ambience, not unlike Kiyoshi Kurosawa's 'Kourei', which really sucks you in and builds gradual tension beautifully.

The acting quality is pretty darn good too, with some reasonably big names (Yuurei Yanagi, Chiaki Kuriyama, Yoriko Douguchi), all of whom do a very fine turn, and the soundtrack was very reminiscent again of 'Kourei', which doesn't exactly surprise me, knowing that Kiyoshi Kurosawa participated in the production of the much-anticipated 2003 remake of Ju-on...

Basically, if you're a fan of that kind of slow-moving, atmospheric horror that Kurosawa and Nakata Hideo do so well, you'll love this too... now I just want to compare this one with the remake! ;-)
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Anaza hevun (2000)
6/10
Not bad, not good...
7 May 2003
Personally, I came to 'Another Heaven' with serious misgivings, particularly noticing that after the enormous turkey that was 'Rasen', 'Joji Iida' had magically changed his name to 'George Iida'... sorry, but you're not fooling us with that one ;) However, having heard that this movie made a killing at the Japanese box office, I was interested to see if it was in any way an artistic improvement on 'Rasen'.

And surprisingly, it was. OK, so it's over-long at more than 2 hours, which means it gets a bit meandering in the middle, and it has a ponderous and superfluous ending, not to mention the gigantic plot-holes, but for all that, 'Another Heaven' has infinitely better visuals, has a more interesting and involving storyline, and is at times severely gruesome, particularly with the cannibalistic element - a word of warning: do NOT eat during the first half of the film, it put me right off my breakfast ;)

All in all, though, it's pretty mediocre, despite some quality acting. It's unfortunate that the pace gets bogged down in the middle section, because otherwise it would have been a real cracker. I've seen worse, but I've also seen better... you might be better off watching Kiyoshi Kurosawa's 'Cure' or Sion Sono's 'Suicide Circle' if you fancy a supernatural-type murder drama, because both of those movies are superior products to this film.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kokkuri (1997)
3/10
This movie is NOT Dark Water 2!!!
20 February 2003
... despite what it says on the cover of my copy. Quite apart from anything else, Dark Water (Honogurai mizu no soko kara) was made in 2002, and Kokkuri was made in 1997. However, that said, there *are* definite similiarities in the cinematography, although Dark Water is an infinitely superior movie in almost every way.

I found this film to be pretty atmosphere-free, with dull acting and a half-baffling, half-teen-screamer plot, not even remotely scary. You don't even get to see very much in the way of supernatural manifestations: a few glimpses of a frankly ordinary kid in a red dress is about all. The supposedly climactic final scenes are limp and half-hearted, although the locations are quite nice. I'd save your money for the real sequel if I were you.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Phone (2002)
4/10
Highly derivative made-for-TV-style movie
26 January 2003
I really didn't enjoy Phone at all, for several reasons.

To start with, it just contained far too many elements we've already seen in previous modern Asian horror movies - check out the hair coming out of the tap (lifted straight from Nakata Hideo's infinitely superior movie Dark Water), the haunted technology (from Kurosawa's Kairo, from Nakata's Ring), the ghost with long black hair (from just about every Asian horror film since Ring)... simply pinching bits of other movies and putting them together doesn't make it more frightening than all the aforementioned movies put together.

I think that's sad as I did find the storyline engaging and involving, yes, but about as scary as a Hallmark Channel offering. Not for nothing was it made by Buena Vista - it really comes across as a Disney stab at horror. It's also rated PG, therefore the shocks are few and far between.

And don't even think about getting an atmosphere of tension: everything is just thrown in together, with no build-up possible because the pace of the first half of the movie is just way too fast to allow any. When the second half of the movie kicks in, it gives the fairly decent storyline time to develop, and improves considerably towards the end (though its attempt at a shocker-ending like Ring is daft, to put it mildly).

Maybe if you haven't actually seen Ring, The Eye, Kairo and Dark Water, you might find this scary - but I thought it was a rip-off and a waste of time and money, when there are far superior movies in this style already on the market.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Suicide Club (2001)
10/10
Absolutely brilliant, scathing satire
17 January 2003
I have to say, I totally loved this film... after having waited for over a year to see it, it really did not disappoint. IMHO, it is at heart a really biting, gallows-humoured satire on Japanese youth, with special emphasis on how they embrace any old fad, and how becoming famous is everything.

It kind of reminds me of that old adage "If all your friends decided to jump off a high building, you wouldn't do it, would you?" According to Sion Sono, Japanese teenagers *would* - that's how easily swayed they are, even to the point of starting up copycat 'suicide clubs' across the country - at one point, one of the detectives assigned to try to halt the mysterious wave of suicides says explicitly, "Better not let the idea of 'Suicide Club' get out, otherwise kids all over Japan will be killing themselves".

It's a complex film with many different themes which stands up to multiple viewings very well, and the performances (especially Ryo Ishibashi) are excellent. It's also very resonant and will leave you thinking for several days afterwards. Plus, it's very... VERY gory in places, but not unnecessarily so, and the cinematography for the most part is beautifully shot and understated. I recommend this film very highly indeed!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Funny blood'n'guts shocker
23 December 2002
I thought this film's obvious brutal violence was lifted by two things:

1) the fact that unlike most other Ginipiggu films, the gore was all self-inflicted by the lead character, Hideshi, and 2) it really is a funny film. Seriously! I think the weird experiment of trying to make what is after all an incredibly manic and extreme film into a laff riot actually paid off. Not only does it lessen the nastiness to a tolerable excess, but it forces you to have sympathy with Hideshi and giggle along with him at his daft predicament. By the end credits, everyone involved is unable to keep a straight face. Easily my favourite of the series.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Memento Mori (1999)
8/10
Pretty good, but not as good as Yeogo goedam I / Whispering Corridors
12 December 2002
I actually kind of enjoyed this film - I thought it was pretty brave and tackled some traditionally "awkward" issues such as lesbian relationships between schoolgirls very sensitively. The horror aspect of the story was pretty well lost under the romance/tragedy part though, unlike in Whispering Corridors, where it was more of a mystery-thriller type story throughout.

That said, it's well worth watching, though I seriously recommend you see Whispering Corridors first.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scarecrow (2001)
Slow, but sensitive
7 November 2002
I haven't read the Kakashi manga by Junji Ito that this movie is based on, but I've never known Ito to put a foot wrong yet. I've read a lot of fairly awful reviews of this film - slow, boring etc. - but I kind of have to disagree with them. Yes, Kakashi is a slow-paced film, not much in the way of horror... but it does work very well as a kind of weird drama, although some of the scarecrow scenes are a little... silly, perhaps?

The cinematography is lovely, the story is sensitively handled, and the soundtrack is beautiful... and Kou Shibasaki is even more evil than her role as Mitsuko in Battle Royale ;)

I enjoyed it a lot and I'd definitely recommend it, but more on a drama basis than a horror - it's really not very scary IMHO, compared to some other Japanese films.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Eye (2002)
9/10
Beats The Sixth Sense into a bloody pulp
2 November 2002
I really enjoyed 'The Eye'; considering the quality of most HK films as compared to their Japanese counterparts, it seems that the Pang brothers have kept a pretty close eye on what's been going down over there. Yes, it has elements which are close to 'The Sixth Sense', but it works on so many deeper levels, closer to Ringu and Kairo than that piece of Hollywood tat. The camerawork is stylish and there are several serious creep-out moments. I fear that Tom Cruise has already optioned this one for a Hollywood-glitz remake (apparently it's all the rage to rip off Asian classics right now :oP), so see it while you can.

My one concern is that some of the cross-cultural referencing might get some viewers a little confused, if this is the first Asian film they've seen. Other than that, I thought Lee Sin-je turned in a lovely, understated performance (can you imagine *Nicole Kidman* doing it a fraction as well?) and the acting was generally of really great quality. IMHO, 'The Eye' is a keeper rather than a renter.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pulse (2001)
10/10
This is a fantastic film...
2 November 2002
... I'm a big, big fan of Kiyoshi Kurosawa, and I think this is the best film he's made to date, maybe even better than 'Cure'. Awesomely disturbing, with beautiful filmography, great acting and a nice apocalyptic feel. Possibly my joint favourite of all the Japanese modern horror films (along with 'Ringu'). Essential viewing.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Audition (1999)
8/10
3/4 dull, 1/4 extreme
4 October 2002
Odd movie, this one.... quite downplayed, by Takashi Miike's standards. The acting is great and the cinematography is very classy, as you'd expect from Miike. However, he has said in an interview that he intended the first 3/4 of the film with its blackly comic love story to be snoozingly dull so that the extremely bloody and insane last half-hour would seem even more extreme than it really is.

Unfortunately, I feel that it makes Audition not really worth watching more than once or twice, mainly because the main body of the film really is tedious... still, definitely worth renting, or buying if you're a big Miike fan.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I hate this film as bad as Police Academy 6
3 October 2002
IMHO, this film sucks so hard compared to the so-called New Wave of Japanese horror. Lame acting, ripoffs of other genre flicks eg Evil Dead, Suspiria, even the bloody Omen, special effects done on a budget of about 175 yen (for the ketchup).... the only horrifying thing about this film is its cheesy Goblins-in-synth-hell soundtrack. Save your money for Ichi The Killer if you want gore.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed