Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Flawless comedy, sadly underrated.
7 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I imagine the handful of other people who have watched this film were largely, like myself, drawn to it by the desire for something - anything - that could possibly be as good as Withnail and I.

This is BETTER.

The premise is quite simple. Richard. E Grant plays a disenchanted, unenchanting advertiser, who is not only struggling with his social life, but also with his latest pitch - a new cream to cure boils. After spending a weekend frying his brain over it, he has an epiphany (or a breakdown) and decides that he has finished with advertisement. He shows this by removing every object 'corrupted,' by the industry. Chickens are thawed in the toilet, and televisions drowned in the bath.

If any other writer worked with this plot, the film would be much less interesting. We would see the protagonist discovering what really matters. Love. Giving money to the poor. He would decide to go back to advertising - but this time, with integrity. The last scene would have him doing an advertisement for a charity, before stepping into the loving arms of his wife, Julia.

Of course, it's not any other writer. It's Bruce Robinson. This means insanity. This means genius. This means...talking boils? Yes, that's right. A talking boil. This character - played by Bruce Robinson - hangs about on Richard. E Grant's neck, slowly destroying his life. No one else could lend so tragic an edge to this farcical comedy. Richard E Grant does another effortlessly beautiful turn as the supplanted husband, forced into submission by the malignant pustule controlling his life.

I won't spoil the ending for you - but you must see this film. Like Withnail and I, it only has a couple of large characters. The setting is small and the plot strange. Not an awful lot happens, but you will feel every beautiful insult or idiom sinking into your brain, ready to be used on the next person who cheeses you off.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Hobbit (1977 TV Movie)
2/10
A truly vile rendition.
7 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
When I was a little girl, my father would read chapters of The Hobbit to my sister and I, and subsequently Lord of the Rings. His work shifts changed, and soon he had no time to finish the series. So my mother, feeling sorry for us, bought the VHS of this monstrosity.

Words cannot describe the horror.

While largely true to the book, the voice acting is poor, the songs are badly sung, and the animation is dreadful enough to be considered traumatising.

This is NOT worth watching. Wait for Peter Jackson and del Toro to finish, and if that's too hard, then READ THE BOOK AGAIN.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed