Change Your Image
emiliovelia22
Lists
An error has ocurred. Please try againReviews
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008)
Oh come on...
I hate how many people say how implausible this movie is . Isn't this what the Indiana Jones movies are about? A man surviving from totally impossible situations where only Superheroes can? I mean, we have somebody ripping a still beating heart, a knight who protects the holy grail for more than a 1000 years, Somehow surviving FALLING OVER A CLIFF WITH A TANK, jumping out of a plane with a rubber raft and landing perfectly fine and many more. All of these moments have appeared in all previous Indiana Jones movies. So you people have a problems with aliens? Surviving a nuclear explosion by just hiding in a fridge? You have problems with gophers and monkeys that appear on-screen for less than 10 seconds? Just calm down. Take it for what it is and don't nitpick on whatever you don't find realistic. It's a tradition in the Indy series. Imagine if this film series was completely realistic. It would have been boring and just another generic action film. So please, just enjoy the action and the fact that Harrison Ford is still the man.
A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
A Nightmare on Lame St.
Where to begin
First of all, its confirmed that the original movie with Robert Englund is by far superior, there is no doubt about that but for a remake you would expect it to be a LITTLE good, but this is one of the remakes that are promising by cover art, but they don't deliver at all.
This is one of those movies. A good idea poorly executed
First the good 1.Robert Englund is easily the superior Freddy but Jackie Earle Haley, the actor who plays the character ,despite given poor material to work with, he delivers his lines and scenes perfectly and hes the only one here trying 2. The camera effect does a good job to give that horror feeling and Freddy's ''1,2 Freddy's coming for you'' song is well remade
Now the bad 1.JUMPSCARE, talking... JUMPSCARE, talking... the movie goes on that pattern over and over again, up to the point that it gets repetitive, boring, non scary, and ridiculous. If the movie had 2 or 3 jumpscares only it would be OK but for a horror movie that is supposed to scare the audience,its ALL THEY USED. For starters, jumpscares in horror movies are barely used nowadays. Jumpscares today, are only videos on YouTube that just want to scare for fun with simple jumpscare example.
There's like hypnotizing wheel and the creator of the video tells you to stare at the dot in the center of the screen. Then, you stare at it and suddenly scary face appears right in front of you with a scream.
This movie tries to scare the audience with a silly jumpscare which is not even as scary as a cartoon scare. It just tricks you into thinking that you're going to watch a well made horror movie and to satisfy the fans of the NOES franchise, but it just in the purpose of them stealing your money. Its the definition of an extremely LAZY movie, and unbelievably LAZY movie creators 2. The new Freddy face is one of the most disappointing things about the movie. It doesn't look anything like a burned person, the original makeup should be left as it is it should not be changed A BIT 3. The rest of the characters. Like I said, Jackie Earle Haley was a perfect choice and does a great job but I cant say the same for the supporting cast. Why does the movie in the begging have Kris as the main hero of the story and after she gets killed off, Nancy takes her place in the middle of the movie. Automatically, Nancy is the main character, she's the one Freddy is targeting from a young age, shes the one that has to stop the nightmare, so why Kris has to take her place for a the first half of the movie? But... I don't like to criticize actors that i have never seen before in movies but Nancy is by far the most BORING character of the whole movie. The original version of Nancy was kind and you actually cared about her and was a strong character.
Great Horror movies have been remade. Why do filmmakers do it? because they want your CA$H. The cash that people get to live. People like Michael Bay want your cash to become filthy rich. They remake great classics poorly and they get people to see the movie because of its name, because it carries the name "A Nightmare On Elm St.". It sucks you in, because they know that people out there are fans of the franchise and they know that people are going to go and watch their movies and like that, easily your money that you spent time and effort to get, go to their hands.
Its sad.
Overall, the movie was a big disappointment, just not what it should be.
Daybreakers (2009)
A vampire flick, you don't wanna miss
To enjoy this movie you have to be in the right mood. A very creative way from the Sprieng brothers to bring us the future of the human race. Brilliant camera filter. You need to be a HUGE bloody horror freak to enjoy this. Comparing it with Twilight, Daybreakers definitely is the superior one From the trailer I thought there wouldn't be much blood, I was thinking of a flick like Blade with slightly less blood, but I was wrong Overall, this movie entertains you, With its gore. In my opinion this movie is totally an underrated horror movie, there are some silly lines and moments but still, very cool special effects, the feeding parts were disgusting as they should be.
I recommend this movie for sick bloody horror fans