Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Butler (I) (2013)
8/10
A Necessary Reminder of the Civil Rights Movement
28 August 2013
"The Butler", Lee Daniel's new offering starring Forrest Whitaker and Oprah Winfrey (among many others) has its flaws and might be 20 minutes too long. One could quibble with the accuracy (and the unique casting) of the presidents portrayed and the butler himself (based on a real White House butler who served eight of them) but these are minor points.

The power of this film lies in how it portrays and honors the Civil Rights Movement at a time when Americans could use a reminder as to how necessary, heroic and dangerous it was to challenge American apartheid in the South. Most of us remember episodes from it as black and white images from either television or LIFE magazine. To see the Freedom Rides, lunch counter sit-ins and lynchings in true color is a more visceral experience. As is the sheer inhuman hatred of white Southerners whose vicious reaction to their established order being overturned might shock those born after 1960. Their faces contorted in venom could be viewed as an exaggeration. It isn't. The scene of the sit-in volunteers being brutalized at the Woolworth lunch counter is one of the rougher scenes in the movie and based on actual fact. When I was in elementary school, my best friend's father, a Freedom Rider, was beaten half to death by a Klan mob in Alabama.

"The Butler" shows accurately the tension between a new generation of African-Americans defying the system and their parents who were conditioned by decades of oppression to not rock the boat. David Oyelowo, as butler Cecil Gaines's militant son, Louis, deserves the acting kudos he is receiving as do all the major characters of this potent story. Some viewers might shun the glowing references to the election of Barack Obama but this film highlights how black and white Americans have a jarringly different view of our national history. For whites, it is the Land of Free. For blacks, it has been an uphill battle against legally-sanctioned hatred, violence and servitude and as we have seen from Trayvon Martin, the Supreme Court and recent efforts to hamper minority voting rights, the battle is far from over. Those who forget their history are indeed doomed to repeat it.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Planes (2013)
7/10
It's a Movie for KIDS!
27 August 2013
Maybe there should be a law that only children should review movies for children. Asking some adult critic to get off his/her lofty perch and roll around in the mud of childhood might be a bit of a stretch.

Is "Planes" bland, derivative pablum with a "feel-good" message? Sure, if you are over 30. I was lucky to see it with my 8-year-old grandson and his two similarly aged friends. They loved it and talked about the characters all evening.

Being Disney, it had excellent graphics, funny sight gags and naughty references that flew (literally at times) over the heads of the kiddies (vasectomies figure big here). If you are an adult who loves airplanes, there are cartoon versions of some real beauties especially the Gee Bee Super Sportster, a barrel-shaped monster from the 1930's, and the stolid F4U Corsair, modeled after WWII ace Ira Kepford's bird.

As far as the plot; that's unimportant. It is indeed boilerplate but for kids, it's the sheer thrill of watching an action-packed Saturday matinée, laps adorned with popcorn and soda containers, that matters. Let the critics sip Chardonnay over their computers in disdain. The kids don't care.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hannah Arendt (2012)
8/10
A Story with Relevance Today
28 July 2013
Chances are only the high-brow crowd will see "Hannah Arendt" in their regional art theater, not at the multiplex where films without car chases, explosions and sexy babes rarely are screened. The fury of intellectuals is hardly the stuff of popular drama.

But the recent firestorm over the Rolling Stone magazine cover of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev mimics the issue Arendt brought up, namely the odd diametric quality of appearance and evil. People were outraged that Tsarnaev resembled a nice young man, someone you would love your daughter to date. Had he appeared with a turban, demonic eyes and fangs dripping blood, would that have satiated the public's taste for bad guys looking like bad guys, not rock musicians?

Arendt did a similar thing covering the Eichmann trial in 1961 for the New Yorker. She subsequently wrote "Eichmann in Jerusalem", the Banality of Evil", positing that the monster was in fact, a man and a bland mediocrity at best. This, too, outraged those who wanted Eichmann to be portrayed as the devil incarnate.

Recent history has proved that atrocities, whether the holocaust in Rwanda, the Newtown Massacre or other acts of horror, are committed by people we wouldn't look twice at if we met them on the street. That maybe everyone has a Heart of Darkness that can be accessed under the perfect storm of conditions. It's all a matter of choice.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Wolverine (2013)
7/10
A Warning for Parents
26 July 2013
As fun as this movie is, don't be misled by its PG-13 rating. The "F-Bomb" is dropped quite often in this film along with other words of the obscene variety. If you can duct tape your children's ears, they will love the visuals which fortunately are fairly bloodless. Otherwise, this is a comic book come to life with Hugh Jackman channeling Clint Eastwood and following the standard Marvel script of a mighty industrialist/genius either using his powers for Good or surrendering to the Dark Side. The ending, in which we are treated to some sort of Samurai-Voltran almost ruined the movie but not quite. Check your brain at the door, ogle at Jackman's ripped physique and enjoy the ride.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flight (I) (2012)
8/10
A Superb Character Study
21 November 2012
Chances are you will not see this film as your in-flight movie the next time you fly the friendly skies. And for good reason, too. The opening sequence includes perhaps the most hair-raising plane crash scene ever, so spectacular that even if you know what to expect, that won't prevent you from crushing your popcorn box from the tension of it. This scene alone is worth the price of admission.

At the wheel of the stricken jet is Captain William "Whip" Whitaker (Denzel Washington) who pulls off a landing only less miraculous than the real life exploit of Chesley Sullenberger who landed his own craft in the Hudson River in 2009, losing not a soul aboard. There is one major difference however. Whitaker is both drunk and stoned when he is piloting the craft although his condition is not the reason the airliner malfunctions.

It is the twin truth, acknowledged by all involved (including the viewer,) that Whitaker is both a self-centered alcoholic AND the only pilot with the chops that could have saved the 96 passengers on Flight 227. However, six others perished, including a crew member with whom he was having a fling with, and so the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is called in to investigate.

Despite his heroics, Whitaker is under suspicion for the high level of alcohol found in his system and the two empty vodka bottles retrieved from the airliner's trash compartment. It having been a non-beverage service flight, only the crew is suspect although we had seen Whip empty them into an orange juice container right before the airplane lost control.

As Whitaker waits for the NTSB hearing that will either clear his name or place him in prison for manslaughter, the audience is torn between sympathy and revulsion. Sympathy because he did indeed save the plane and revulsion because he is a classic addict, living a life encumbered by lies and excuses.

What transpires at the hearing and the night before is the watershed moment of both the movie and the life of Whip Whitaker. The subsequent ending, based on what transpires, contains an ambiguity that is both justified and satisfying.

Washington is flawless here, his acting abilities never put to better use. He is ably aided by John Goodman (as a jolly scenery-stealing drug pusher), Don Cheadle as his hard-pressed lawyer and a sweet turn by Kelly Reilly as the waif-like heroin addict who is Whitaker's moral conscience. Melissa Leo appears at the conclusion in a somewhat muted role as the main NTSB investigator.

In conclusion, there are many movies out this holiday season. "Flight" is worth the hype as long as you aren't about to board an airliner to spend Christmas with your far-off relatives.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Right-Wing Racist Trash
31 October 2012
Just when you think the right-wing can't sink any deeper into the gutter, they surprise you. This "documentary" will take its place in history alongside every pseudo-scientific film Joseph Goebbels and the Nazis created to "prove" Jews were a sub-human species. The "plot" of "Dreams From My Real Father" is not worth discussing because it lacks any facts whatsoever. It is an election prompted piece of character assassination.

The good news is that when screened to un-decided voters at various focus group gatherings in the swing states, the response was universal revulsion. The vast majority of Americans are decent people and were justifiably repelled by the blatant lies, racism and sexism that is on display here.

It is interesting that Amazon and Netflix both categorize this film in the same genre as Dinesh D'Souza's laughable "2016" and docs about the mentally unbalanced Ayn Rand whose philosophy of greed and selfishness is a favorite of the Tea Party movement. If they included documentaries denying the Holocaust, it would be complete.
18 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Argo (2012)
9/10
Well Paced and Well Done
20 October 2012
"Argo" could have descended into the kind of explosions and car chase thriller one would expect from such a topic, namely the successful extraction of 6 US Embassy workers from Tehran at the beginning of the Islamic revolution in 1979. Based on a true account, Ben Affleck (who deserves all acting and directing kudos) maintains a tight leash throughout, using tension and what-if dread as the main adrenaline builders. It is a testament to his ability that even knowing the outcome does nothing to keep you from the edge of your seat. The CIA operative he plays, Tony Mendez who masterminded the plot, is no James Bond. He uses his brains, not his gun to achieve his goal, one that seems insane to his superiors.

The acting is precise and realistic. Comedy relief is provided by John Goodman as Hollywood special-effects guru who has all the good lines. He and Alan Arkin as producer Lester Siegel have a rollicking good R-rated banter together. This being a suspense thriller, there are some fabricated scenes of last-minute miracles (phones picked up at the last second, etc)but they can be forgiven considering the excellence of the whole.

Sharp viewers will be treated to modern Iranian history at the intro and it doesn't put the United States in a good light. When the freely elected Mohammad Mosaddegh nationalized the Iranian oil industry in 1953, he was overthrown by a CIA coup and replaced with the Shah of Iran. The Shah was a dictator as brutal and bloody as Saddam Hussein but as one of the CIA bureaucrats in "Argo" suggests, he was a tyrant, but he was OUR tyrant. In short, you can violate human rights all you want as long as you don't mess with our oil supply.

The only things that redeem the CIA in this film are that the Islamic revolutionaries were just as brutal and the bravery of Mendez and his team.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed