Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Intrigueing But Flawed Documentary.
26 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Just a quick review after watching this documentary, to express enjoyment and dissatisfaction.

Initially, there are loads of moments to enjoy. The insights by friends, associates, and a couple of American writers appears insightful. Until you realise everyone is just telling their own story from rubbing shoulders with The Fab Four, having a book store frequented by them, being a chum in the case of one, or talking about them in general terms. It is the footage that is compelling, and there are better documentaries out there that include these, such as "The Beatles: The Touring years".

So, why the lower score?

There is no mention of Pete Best, even though he can be seen clearly playing the drums at The Cavern. There is no mention of the one Beatle who initially outshone all the rest, until he suffered a head injury, attributed to a physical argument with John Lennon, one documentary focused on the Hamsburg years, and his then partner claim. An injury which he was to later die from - Stuart Sutcliffe. Everyone wanted Sutcliffe on the magazine covers, and he was recognised as the most photographed, until he left to pursue his art career till his death.

They gloss over the films The Beatles made, light comic musical romps, but failed to say how the band hated them, and refused to do another, though pressured.

Finally, for me the biggest problem I have with this documentary, is one of the 'talking heads' mentions the last concert played in America, and we are told this is the last time The Beatles ever played live together. Rubbish! The story then skips to McCartney's marriage to Linda Eastman and the formation of Wings.

What about "Let It Be", one of the best of the band's later albums and where they DO play together live for the last time, on the roof of Abbey Road studios with keyboardist Billy Preston? Where the very song "Let It Be" is later claimed by Lennon to be McCartney launching his solo career, feeding a bitter relationship between the two until Lennon's murder.

Take it for what it is - some friends and associates sharing their recollections and narratives, but missing a lot of important information, and just plain omitting m important stuff.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Original Concept; Cliched, Shallow Characters and Story.
9 December 2022
What put me most off from the very start is the dropping of the "F" Bomb in every line by almost every character. I gave up counting them as no ore than three short sentences passed before it was dropped again. Personally, I find the "F" Bomb a useful and impactful device in the right circumstance, but when it is used for adjective, verb, noun and everyone's second name it just becomes tiresome. Lost interest in the film by the ten minute film solely because of this. Talk about loathesome characters on top of that.

Couldn't wait for them all to be killed off as there was zero tension, just a sad attempt at character development through the use of foul language and nothing else.
35 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Simply Appalling.
10 July 2022
As an Australian actor/director I found navigating this appalling piece of melodrama a tiresome trek With a cast straight out of "Home & Away", with their whitened teeth, manicured beards and hair and make-up that is atrocious, the film gets off to a bad start. I haven't seen such dreadful acting on the Aussie big screen since "Red Billabong", another shameful melodrama attempting to be a horror film, and missing widely.

Perhaps I've been spoilt by "Mystery Road", ""High Ground", "Sweet Country", "The Proposition" and lately "The Drover's Wife", but this is horrendous. Heath Ledger's legacy with "Ned Kelly" is safe, even with the sidetracking romantic sub-plot that threatened to derail that film.

Bottom Line: If you like the now ended "Neighbours" and the endless "Home & Away" melodramatic TV shows, and the level of so-called 'acting' involved, you'll feel right at home. Everyone else will turn this tripe off after ten minutes, or like me will follow through to the end just for the story, ultimately feeling empty and desiring of a real bushranger film.

Terrible make-up and hair.

Very good cinematography, never put to the good use encompassing Australian flora and high angle shots it should have.

Noteworthy dreadful acting: "Happy" Jack and Ben Hall. Guys, a bit of advice. Pay for some serious acting courses if this is what you want to do, or just go back to waiting tables.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bumblebee (I) (2018)
2/10
A step back in time, best left there.
4 September 2019
Spoilt brat can't make her own breakfast but wants a new car for her brithday. A tale of throughly dislikable kids and poorly retrograded Transformers (ie. from the cartoons). Shame as I enjoyed the others and where they might have headed. Then again, I was never a fan of the cartoons and comics so obviously not made for me.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Appalling end to a great franchise.
30 August 2019
Okay, so there were some great, and not so good entries in the series so far but this is not just the worst X-Men film, but one of the worst films I've ever seen. Not only does the Female-foucsed Hollywood rear it's ugly again head yet again (appealing to fringe minorities only) but the entire production is rubbish. James MacEvoy does a great job, as only the best professionals can with limited and bland material and that's where it ends. Sophie Turner, cast only because of her link to "Game of Thrones" (where she needed acting lessons badly) is dreadful. I hope to never have to see her limited skills on display again. She can cry on cue - that's it. She cannot act to save herself, or the film which is so badly written and directed as be to from film school. In fact the film is all about Sophie Turner, hoping perhaps to launch a Hollwywood career as with the blondie in the last "Terminator" film. It fails. The entire film is about how weak the X-Men are (or X-Woman, as Raven would have it) and just keeps falling after that. Do yourself a favour and watch the original films again...even "X2", perhaps the worst, even after "Last Stand". Such a great opportunity to reboot the "X-Men" franchise, with such a wealth of background material thoroughly wasted just to promote Sophie Turner.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Appalling.
25 August 2019
I love the original. It is definitely a niche horror film, but so well written, directed and cast. You felt the horror the character of Jacob (Tim Robbins) was going through. Supporting cast were great as well, maing it a well-rounded uniqe experience. So, what would happen in a remake...I was excited to find out. Well, with many plot changes and character changes as well it started on the wrong foot. Without spoiling the film, it went so off course from the original premise as to actually be another film entirely. They could have named this another title and it might have been received more forgivingly (though the story was rubbish). Avoid it at all costs and stick with the oiginal. The acting was appalling, the direction confused and the writing....well, I don't know what the writer was thinking.
107 out of 121 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Billabong (2016)
1/10
Appalling!
30 January 2017
What begins as a promising premise, and remains so is immediately hampered by Dan Ewing and Tom Pockock's meeting. These ex-"Neighbours/ Home & Away" actors, and I use the term 'actor' loosely, undo any hint at danger in this dreadfully written script. The photography is good, the music quite good, but the 'acting' is absolutely appalling. Seriously, these guys and gals need to take some acting lessons or better still, spend some time on stage in the theater where actors learn how to act, not just pose for the camera. If they are graduates of established drama schools like NIDA or WAPA, then these schools have failed and should be treated as "Soapies feed factories. They sure as Hell don't teach acting skills. Dreadful script predictable to the end; characters so 2D they don't need to open their mouths; acting - just appallingly bad. what an abysmal entry that could have been so much more. Alas, it is a SyFy Channel movie transplanted to Australia at best. To think Dan Ewing is considered "an up and coming star". If he is, we're in trouble. He cannot, I repeat cannot act to save himself....or indeed this film.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tasmanian Devils (2013 TV Movie)
1/10
Appalling rubbish!
1 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
From a ridiculous plot to outrageously bad 'acting' this trash should be burned and buried. A few tips to follow, but aside from a terrible beginning that just spirals downward there is nothing redeemable in this mess. As for the so-called "Legend" - rubbish. Do some reading on real Tasmanian myths and legends - there are plenty of stories, and some truly frightening ones.

Tip 1: Hire Australian actors. Nothing worse than Americans trying to do Aussie and failing hugely. At least they die fairly quickly.

Tip 2: Research. Australian Park Officers don't carry handguns nor zip-tie anyone for any reason. It's illegal.

Tip 3: Tasmanian Devils. So small they're rarely bigger than a small domestic cat, and just as dangerous (i.e. not at all). C'mon cobbers, get real.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed