fvault_dweller Reviews

Looper (2012)

Nothing special

[5/10 · 13 October 2012]

Looper is a soft SF based on time travel, set in the near future and featuring many of the premises and light-motives common to this genre. Which would not be bad in itself, if the script had more common sense and unpredictable twists. As it is, Looper does not stand out from any point of view, except the utter neglect of any logic regarding time travel (and lack of any argument which would justify such a treatment).

You can expect to see a lot of action, which looks pretty conventional (no laser guns here). You may also appreciate a few of the future-world shots, suggesting a polarized society and building on a few pure-American elements. However, most of the movie takes place at a constant pace, with no big surprises. Bruce Willis makes a not-so-vivid appearance, so don't count on him to light things up. In his defense, it can be said that the script did not offer him a truly leading role, to begin with.

All in all, a shallow SF with very few memorable features. Since I was a bit confused by the time setting, I'll specify the the film's "present" is in 2044, so the "future" is in 2074. A bit confusing, because the "present" is also 30 years away from our present. Could have gone 10 years more or less, to make it more straightforward.

The Nutcracker: The Untold Story (2010)

A waste of time

[2/10 · 4 December 2010]

Disappointing in most respects. Inconsistent plot, poor lyrics, poor music adaptation, unconvincing acting for most of the movie. Like most reviewers will probably acknowledge, the visual effects are OK, but have no cause to serve. The film is a waste of nice animation, exactly what I wouldn't have expected from Koncealovski. And now, for a few upsetting details...

It is very difficult to become attached to any of the characters, because they are so superficially introduced. I don't get the real feeling of a backstory, which actually damages the whole universe of the film. Mary is the only character which seems alive, for better or worse. Otherwise, they are all pale and unconvincing.

The techno-fairy tale / political satire mix doesn't help either. I'm thinking of loads of splices you'd be able to make, starting from an original fairy tale, and I can't understand why you'd combine a Disney style dramatization with an oppressed-toys(and humans)-against-evil-nazi-rats uprising. It's not fun enough for adults, it's not simple and clear enough for children. And it doesn't have so much to do with the original...

And talking about the original, the use of Tchaikovsky's music is uninspired, to say the least. The adaptation sounds simplistic, and voices may not have been a good idea. First of all, because it used to be a ballet and, call me a rigid type, but I'd have loved to see it developed on this line. Second, because the lyrics are dull, and the actors' voices sound really bad at times (ok, try to make it sound natural but do follow the notes!). Third, because the modern orchestration further reduces the charm of the original, turning it into a sort of kindergarten party song. As far as the musical part goes, I'm taking Sweeney Todd as a reference. And, compared to this, Nutcracker is way below.

Bottom line? Don't see it, even if the other guy is paying. It's plain loss of time and a poor reference about the classics, if you have any children.