Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not As Good As Original, But Still Good 14 Years Later
16 November 2013
As an African-American professional it severely pains me that, in general, when people think of "Black Cinema" in today's society their minds immediately head in one of two directions; A Tyler Perry film or a film in which racism plays a key plot role. Rarely do we see African-American men and women, living professional lifestyle, or even everyday lifestyles. This is why, at least to me, "The Best Man" still holds up to this day some 14 years later. They weren't stereotypical African-American characters and you saw them as just that... characters. The relationships amongst the cast were very strong and it appeared in the dynamics of their friendships. Unfortunately, a lot of that is lost in this sequel that, although appropriate for the time, somehow simultaneously seems to come a few years too late.

It's great to see the exact same ensemble cast return 14 years later when many films fail to do so even a year or two later. The aging on them with such a time lapse also adds to the dynamic of the film as well. However, this dynamic feels very wasted. In having grown apart in the past 14 years the script does a minimal job of establishing that the characters are now distant of one another. Where as in "The Best Man" the relationships felt strong and genuine in this film it should seem much easier to convey that the characters are distant; and yet the film fails at doing this.

Perhaps the film could have overcome this with a more concise plot. But instead the film focuses on several, incredibly predictable, plot points to draw you in. What occurs is a sense of confusion as to why you are seeing what you are seeing. One second you find yourself cheering for a friendship, or a certain character, and the next that story disappears for 15 minutes only to reemerge. Unfortunately, in order to bring all of these stories together the writers rely on two easily foreseeable plot devices which I will not spoil for you but you will surmise what they are within 20 minutes of viewing.

That said, despite these obvious flaws I found myself enjoying this film. As I sat with my wife I ran the gambit of emotions. I laughed often - even if at times it was from very juvenile sex or race jokes - and I bordered on tears at points. Terrence Howard's "Q" steals the show again some 14 years later. Other than Sanaa Lathan I found every member of the principle cast to be good. It was very good to see a film that, although no where near the quality of it's predecessor, still portrays African-American professionals, and now families, in a light that isn't overly stereotypical. An enjoyable film that I might not add to my personal collection but will certainly watch when others want to.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
High School Musical (2006 TV Movie)
2/10
I honestly don't understand why it's a runaway hit...
17 July 2006
This movie serve as average at best, in my humble opinion. Let's be honest, everybody has been to high school, and everybody has been casted into some stereotypical mold, whether it be jock, geek, popular kid, or whatever. So it figures that everyone would relate to this, right? While the numbers in regards to sells says otherwise, it just doesn't ring true. While I applaud the effort, because who doesn't love a good musical, it just falls completely short of connecting to anyone, or even coming off as somewhat realistic.

For instance, let's start with one of the premier parts of the movie, the story revolving around the basketball team. Now, aside from lackadaisical acting on the "players" parts, to even begin to believe that this team would compete for a championship is laughable without a single person taller than 6 feet 2 inches. As for establishing the connection with athletes from high school, it is immediately lost with the inaccuracy of timing such as a basketball season finishing within 2 weeks of returning from winter break. With the athlete demographic gone, you would figure that the others would be reached, correct? However, for the rest of the movie the characters are relied on stereotypes.

Skaters who seem to be interested in nothing more than looking grungy and skating, artistic kids whom are "misunderstood", Advanced Placement kids who aren't supposed to be anything other than smart, and drama majors. Getting behind the stereotype, the movie continues not to connect with very few songs that actually draw the audience into them with some sort of relation. So with the music in a musical not drawing the watcher in, you would figure at least the choreography would, right? You'd be making an incorrect assumption. Once again, like the music the choreography only is good with the songs that fall under that category as well.

So throughout the hour, this movie of incorrect stereotypes, lackadaisical songs and choreography, and just plain inaccuracy towards both basketball and the theater the viewer is smacked in the face with the notion that high schoolers, no matter that aforementioned stereotype that they fall into should get along in one prosperous and 'nice' high school. Notice I said notion, because it's just not going to work. Better films have tried it and failed...

All that said, somehow the movie still manages to draw you in. I've viewed every showing on the air for some reason.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Sandlot 2 (2005 Video)
5/10
Not a bad movie... but not a classic.
7 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Alright, let's be honest The Sandlot is an American classic, and when we all saw the commercial for "The Sandlot 2" none of us where to thrilled. I however, decided to check it out with a rental to see how badly it would ruin the Sandlot's name. I was happily mistaken, as it turned out the movie wasn't too bad. While it has it's flaws, it's still a good movie in it's own right, and as the title implies, it wasn't a bad movie, but it however, is in no way a classic.

The first thing you will notice about this movie, is that it takes place ten years later, with a kid with the last named Smalls. How repetitive. It then however begins to show some originality when girls make an appearance and take the opportunity to join the guys team. After taking on the local little league team, the team is happy, and the story takes on some more originality in the form of a love story. However, any dreams of originality that we have are squashed by a repetitive story line, as it turns out, except for "Smalls", whom turns out to be Smalls' little brother, and the "new" Benny, none of the kids have been in the neighborhood more than three years. As a result only Smalls little brother knows about the story of The Beast. While, Hercules was good, he had puppies, but one of them was "evil", and became known as "The Fear".

Just like in the beloved Sandlot, Smalls messes up and sends something valuable over the fence, which is about 15 feet higher due to a scrap heap, and the Sandlot crew need to know how to get it back. What transpires is a series of attempts and annoyingly repetitive dialogue and even some repetitive scenes that took place in the original Sandlot. This takes away drastically from the film. I constantly found myself asking why I was watching this because it repeated so many things from the original Sandlot, from a stolen kiss to a heroic chase scene facing down the antagonist. This, and it's strive to be accurate to it's time(with constant reminding of Women's Lib, and the constant use of "Solid" by the "new" Demunez)take away from what is an enjoyable movie overall. Don't "not watch it" for the sake of it, because it's a good movie, just a little repetitive.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed