Reviews

25 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
James Cameron Delivers the Goods
17 December 2022
After 13 years James Cameron invites us back to theaters to catch us up with former Marine Jake Sully and his family as a familiar threat returns to the extrasolar moon, Pandora. In all honesty I wasn't overly excited to sit through this 3-hour 12minute of a film. Don't get me wrong, 2009s Avatar blew me away visually when it came out and while the story is fine it didn't leave me clamoring for more with its predictability. I remember figuring out the entire film within the first 15 minutes and was able to recite the accompanying dialogue more often than not. With over a decade to improve technology and film techniques, I expected the visuals to be even more outstanding and worthy of a view. As for the storyline itself I wasn't necessarily "feeling" the hype to see the newest film, Avatar: The Way of Water. The vagueness of the trailers kept me on the fence right up to an hour before movie time. Yes, I toyed with the idea of just getting a refund and waiting until I could stream this one at home.

Damn glad I didn't.

Avatar: The Way of Water is one of those rear sequels that is more of the same in many aspects, yet also manages to be entertainingly different. And better. Yes, much better than the original. I'm not sure how Cameron pulled it off, but he did so beautifully.

Much like Avatar, Avatar: The Way of Water is far from subtle or nuanced in its messaging or morality. The plot is straight forward and simple. The good guys are practically saintly, and the bad guys are purely, unabashedly evil. Very black and white, little to no shades of gray. The dialogue can be eye-rolling cheesy and pedestrian. Even some of the acting of a couple of the new characters is weak.

Here's the thing...

...None of those matters.

Avatar: The Way of Water works, nonetheless. It's as visually stunning as expected. I ended up seeing it in 3D and WOW. Just W-O-W. There's one underwater sequence alone where I felt completely submerged in the world of Pandora and its sea life and it was worth the price of admission alone. But yes, the visuals are spectacular and hold up throughout the entire film. Slow clap and a chef's kiss for all the artists that once again brought all the colors and textures of Pandora to life. And the underwater scenes? Mind blowing!

But TwoW happily delivers more than just pretty pictures.

The Soundtrack is as rich and dynamic as the visuals. The action is thrilling to edge of your seat intense. I found myself quite anxious and holding my breath numerous times. The familiar is interwoven with the new world building/expansion seamlessly. The characterization is meatier and makes for a more compelling story. The focus of family kept me fully invested in who these people are and what happens to them (for better or worse). At this point I just have to say, effing kids! Uggh. A phrase that became my personal mantra. There are also some nice surprises to be had not only in the characters that pop up but in the actors behind them.

Avatar: The Way of Water is not only worth the 13 year wait, but also definitely worth the trip to your local movie theater. Yes, it's a long film (skip the soda and get an Icee), but it certainly didn't feel like it. My interest never wavered; my eyes never left the screen. I never regretted seeing this one at the theater. Unlike so many of the highly anticipated, hyped films this year, Avatar: The Way of Water actually delivers an amazing, entertaining movie going experience. This is a film meant to be seen on the big screen and should be viewed accordingly. Can't emphasize that enough. Avatar: The Way of Water is good old movie magic and I thank James Cameron for delivering it to us once again. Like the Na'vi, I see you Cameron and your movie is as badass as feral Neytiri.

Can't wait to see the next installment in 2024!

Until then Avatar: The Way of Water gets a 9.5 from me.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Woman Who Should Be King
17 September 2022
It's been a minute since my last trip to the movie theater, there just hasn't been anything that sparked my interest. A sentiment apparently not just my own. The manager at my theater of choice told me they've been opening late in the day since there hasn't been anything to draw folks in. I fully expected this to continue to be the case unit at least next month until I stumbled across an Instagram post by Viola Davis for The Woman King about a 19th century elite group of female African warriors. Real life Dora Milaje, not only starring but also produced by Davis and her husband? No doubt I HAD to see this film.

The short and sweet of it? The Woman King is an exceptional movie.

Period.

Superb acting lead by the incomparable Viola Davis is just the start.

Rising star Thuso Mbedu, Sheila Atim, and Lashana Lynch match Davis' power, ferocity, humanity, and emotion creating the heart/soul/core of the film. Their chemistry and interaction are mesmerizing and the solid foundation that the film is built upon.

Dana Stevens and Maria Bello's script is rock solid and perfectly encapsulates all the strength, warmth, humor, pain, triumph, joy etc. That so many "female" based stories tend to lack and services both the story and actors beautifully. The richness this script has is a true rarity.

Having Gina Prince-Bythewood (Love and Basketball and The Secret Lives of Bees) in the director's chair is an added bonus. The opening sequence had me glued to the screen and I couldn't look away the entire film. Fair warning, the action sequences are brutal and glorious, completely unwavering in their ferocity.

The cinematography, musical score, sets, and direction all on point. The layering elevates the entire viewing experience.

The Woman King is not just 2 hours 15 minutes of Viola Davis and company kicking ass (thought that wouldn't be a bad thing) it's a grown up, character driven triumph that transports viewers to pre-colonial Benin in a fresh take on historical war films. I can easily risk over hyping from my own enthusiasm, and risk underselling for fear of saying too much. So, I say, if you have the slightest interest in this one, just go. The Woman King needs to be seen/experienced on the big screen. It has all the feels, powerful messaging, and humanity/community we can all use right now.

The Woman King is a 10.
114 out of 674 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Super-Pets Cute Fun
30 July 2022
In their fifth and latest collaboration, the dynamic team of Dwayne Johnson and Kevin Hart have gone animated with their bromance in Warner Bros. DC League of Super-Pets. Following the capture of the entire Justice League, Superman's dog Krypto (Johnson) joins forces with a group of super powered endowed shelter pets lead by Ace (Hart) on a rescue mission.

DC League of Super-Pets is a fairly cute, straight forward children's film that's action-packed, emotional, and overall enjoyable. While humorous the jokes are a bit of a crap shoot in terms of landing. Many honestly don't but there are some good chuckles and even laugh-out-loud moments. I found the pacing of the first half of the film a bit slow and the story a bit janky. A roller coaster of being drawn in then things flat lining. However, I never completely disengaged from the film or became outright bored.

A large part of that no doubt is a credit to the cast. I went for the team of Johnson/Hart, which is once more a successful pairing, but the stand outs for me were Kate McKinnon's Lulu and Natasha Lyonne's Merton. These ladies steal the show for my money. Big props especially among a cast of heavy hitters the likes of John Krasinski, Keanu Reeves, Daveed Diggs, and Alfred Molina to name a few.

The animation is good, reminds me of the "old school" Saturday morning cartoons. Good soundtrack. While DC League of Super-Pets isn't earth shattering with innovations, the film is what you expect, nothing more. Nothing less. Nothing inherently wrong with that. All told a pleasant way to spend an hour and forty-six minutes on a hot summer day.

I enjoyed this one.

The kids in the theater enjoyed this one.

I'm giving DC League of Super-Pets a 7.5.

And yes, least I forget, following the trend in films DC League of Super-Pets has 2 credit scenes. The first mid credits and integral to the film. The second post credits, possibly integral going forward. Definitely meta, fun, cross promotional, and a wink and nod to those who know.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Paws of Disappointment
16 July 2022
"As the summer temperatures continue to sizzle family friendly films are hitting the big screen as an enticement to lure folks back to the theaters. This week's offering is Nickelodeon's animated film, "Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank". The story of a dog with big dreams of becoming a samurai. I again ventured to my local theater with high hopes for an entertaining hour thirty-seven-minute viewing experience in air-conditioned comfort to check this one out.

I'll cut to the chase, the best part of this outing was indeed the AC and to a lesser degree the snacks. Neither of which was worth leaving home or burning gas for.

The sinking feeling began with the opening short film. I can't honestly remember the name of this one, but it still has me shaking my head wondering WTF. It was...bizarre and unsettling at best. I'm not sure what anyone was thinking with it, let alone why it was paired with "Paws of Fury", but it definitely set the tone for the lackluster main attraction because once "Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank" began, things didn't get much better.

"Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank" is one of those animated films we get every few years where all the time and money seems to have been spent on assembling a heavy hitting voice cast and little else.

Billed as an animated remake of "Blazing Saddles", with a healthy dose of "Kung Fu Panda" as well, "PoF" is more a POS that lacks the charm, originality, or entertainment value of either.

Slogging through the first half of the film was a joyless and mind-numbing endeavor that felt endless. Fortunately, the second half of the film was much stronger and was a better viewing experience. However, overall, it's a case of too little too late.

Samuel L Jackson is the best part of this film hands down. This is another Turbo situation. In addition, Kylie Kuioka (Emiko) also breathes much needed life into this story as well. As for the rest of the cast, there simply isn't much for them to sink their teeth into. No character development. Little story. Lots of pop culture references (heavy on all things Mel Brooks), dog and cat puns, and visual gags fell short as all indications is this film is aimed toward a younger audience and it was going over their heads. Being one of the oldest audience members I chuckled here and there, but the only laugh out loud moment for the entire audience, especially the kiddos, came at the end of the movie.

Positive messaging throughout while important/great is handled with all the subtlety as a hand grenade in a bowl of oatmeal in its heavy handedness and becomes tedious quickly.

"Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank" doesn't hold much to warrant a trip to the theater. The potential was there in the concept but fails in the execution. This one's a stream at home at best. If and when you do, don't forget to fast forward to the end of the credits for one last tiny scene. The sentiment captures this film perfectly.

"Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank" is a disappointing 3 for me.
17 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Quite Enough Love or Thunder
8 July 2022
Another week is under our belts and with it came the next big summer movie release. Marvel's Thor: Love and Thunder. My excitement following the success of 2017 Thor: Ragnarök and the return of Taika Waititi as not only director but also co-writer has been palatable as well as guarded. With only an hour fifty-nine-minute runtime, the return of so many established characters, along with the introduction of new storylines, combined with the "late in the game" onslaught trailers, clips, and other hype I was more than a bit fearful we would've pretty much seen the entire film before it actually hit the screen.

Both valid takes as it turns out.

Thor: Love and Thunder is indeed a fun, summer romp of a film that delights in many ways. The light-hearted to downright silly comedic beats, plenty of expected as well as unexpected call backs, fast paced action, and a storyline with heart at its core for my time and money put Thor: Love and Thunder in the same realm as Thor: Ragnarök.

Sweet.

Same realm but not quite the same level, however.

The less is more runtime definitely keeps TLT from hitting the full Ragnarök level of enjoyment. Not all the comedy is a solid hit, but more importantly the drama and the emotional elements aren't given the time to sit/breathe making for a less impactful viewing experience that's emptier than it should be.

Christian Bale delivers as the "Big Bad". I just wish there had been more Gorr to feast upon. The same can be said for Tessa Thompson's Valkyrie and Natalie Portman's Jane Foster/Mighty Thor. The chance to really delve into and expand on their characters never quite comes to fruition and while seeing them is enjoyable it's also frustrating as a result. The character development remains only skin deep here. A truly squandered opportunity.

Then there's Russell Crowe. I can't even begin to wrap my head around that one. Better than his outing as Henry Jekyll in 2017 The Mummy but still... If nothing else, what the hell was up with that accent? I'll leave it at that.

Moving on.

Good visuals. Strong direction. Then there's the soundtrack. Ahhh, the soundtrack. An around the world and back snap for certain. Guns N' Roses takes me back, ABBA makes me happy, Mary J. Blige is never wrong.

Thor: Love and Thunder as a whole is a bit of a mixed bag, not unlike all the Thor films. Fortunately, there's more good about it than bad.

Did I want more from it overall? Yes. Did I enjoy seeing it on the big screen? Yes, again. Can I recommend you head to the theater to check it out? Again, I'm going to say yes. Go for the fun, go for the joy of catching up with the familiar characters and for a glance of seeing where they may head in the future. Go with the right mind set for a summer movie experience but be sure to stay for the 2 end credit scenes.

Thor: Love and Thunder is a 7.5 for me.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lightyear (2022)
7/10
Not Quite to Infinity Let Alone Beyond
17 June 2022
Twenty-seven years, yes, twenty-seven, after the release of "Toy Story", Disney/Pixar has brought Buzz Lightyear back to the big screen in the "real life" story of the man, the myth, the legend himself in "Lightyear". To be clear, this is NOT your childhood's version of the popular character. In fact, if you haven't already checked out the "Beyond Infinity Buzz and the Journey to Lightyear" thirty-six-minute documentary on Disney+, I highly recommend you do so. I feel it important to emphasize this as it has a major impact on the film.

"Lightyear" is a darker, more mature, grittier film than any of the "Toy Story" films. Think more along the lines of "Up" in terms of tone and content. Less whimsical and more realistic. Something to keep in mind when viewing, so much so, while billed as the movie that Andy watched that made him want the Buzz toy so badly, Lightyear comes across more like the documentary of the man that inspired the film Andy loved more than the actual film he saw. Got it? If you do than you'll be in the correct mind set for what takes place in "Lightyear".

On to the actual film.

Disney/Pixar once again out does itself with the visuals. Absolutely stunning and a treat for the eyes. Attention to detail, textured, and the lighting is off the charts with this one as well. Good action sequences, some get a bit intense, but the kiddos in the audience didn't seem to have issue with them.

The story itself is rather simple and straightforward, pacing is good, and the voice acting, again, top notch. Chris Evans' Buzz works perfectly in this iteration of the character and while yes, I missed Tim Allen, I had no problems overall buying in and enjoying his performance. That's not to say that I was also frustrated and annoyed with the character (I didn't have an outburst but yeah, Buzz was pissing me off) as well. That's more of a writing/characterization issue than an acting one. While Keke Palmer, Taika Waititi, Dale Soules, and Uzo Aduba bring their A games as well their characters didn't quite light up the screen. They're fine, but don't pack much of a punch.

Not gonna lie, for me, when all is said and done, Lightyear is all about Peter Sohn's SOX. Think Rhino from "Bolt". This scene stealer brings the joy, humor, and relatability/likeability that's largely missing from the film. I'm going to tell you right now, parents, go ahead and get your SOX toys now for Christmas.

Did "Lightyear" knock my socks (no pun intended)? Not entirely, but it's definitely a solid and enjoyable film. I was never bored, but never "wowed" either. It's charming, emotional, and entertaining, but falls a bit flat overall. There's a certain lack of spark or "magic" to really stick the landing. This goes back to the disconnect between what's actually on the screen and the action/adventure Space Ranger that would make a 9-year-old (let alone the rest of the world) want a Buzz Lightyear. A divide I'm sure will be closed in a sequel. I'm sure there will be a sequel and I'm down for it.

"Lightyear" gets a 7 from me.

Oh, yes. Again, I warn you not to leave the theater immediately. There are 3 credit scenes (top, mid, and post) in this one.
17 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Time to go the way of the dinosaurs
10 June 2022
The summer box office continues to heat up with this weeks' release of Jurassic World Dominion, the sixth and final installment of the popular movie franchise based on Michael Crichton's novels. Twenty-nine years after Jurassic Park, dinosaurs are living and hunting alongside humans taxing the fragile balance of nature all over the world. Well, that's what we're led to believe is the setup for Jurassic World Dominion, however, the movie we actually get is an altogether different beast.

Jurassic World Dominion is essentially two different films with the original trio of Sam Neil (Alan Grant), Ellie Sattler (Laura Dern), and Jeff Goldblum (Ian Malcolm) reuniting in one story (the more interesting of the two in my opinion) and Chris Pratt (Owen Grady) and Bryce Dallas Howard (Claire Dearing) picking up and continuing their story from Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom. Eventually the two stories meet and everything is brought to a conclusion.

Sadly, the conclusion, as well as the ride leading up to it is far from spectacular or overall satisfying.

The pacing in Jurassic World Dominion is clunky and uneven, particularly in the beginning. Many of the themes are heavy handed and preachy to the point of making you feel you're sitting in a lecture hall. Oddly enough, Ian's actual lecture in the film is more entertaining and thought provoking than the bludgeoning messaging throughout the rest of the film. The call backs to previous films in many cases are stale. With the exception of the original Big Three, the returning characters are lifeless (in Pratt's case the film plays more like a contractual obligation) and uninspired. BD Wong's Dr. Wu takes an unexpected turn and the resolution of his story line feels unearned. New characters aren't fleshed out and act more as props to get from point a to point b than characters.

Worse still, Jurassic World Dominion, is a dinosaur movie that has little to do with dinosaurs. Again, Goldblum's Ian says it best when he goes off on the seduction of dinos excusing what's going on. A note that the writers should of taken when sussing out the story. Dinosaurs are freely living among humans, what's that like? Dunno, it's glossed over save for a few references. I mean at one point in this 2 hour 26 minute film you go a good half hour to forty minutes without seeing or hearing ANYTHING about the dinosaurs.

Serious bait and switch as well as a major disappointment.

The biggest saving grace of Dominion is the legacy characters, especially Goldblum's Ian. The wit, charm, and humor is classic. All three actors seem to be having a blast and it shows and you feel it ever time they're on screen. When you get the dinosaurs they look amazing. These bad boys never fail to delight.

All told Jurassic World Dominion looks great, has some shining moments, but ultimately is lifeless. If this is what the franchise has to offer, it's time to let it go the way of actual dinosaurs.

Jurassic World Dominion gets a disappointing 5 from me.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mach 10 Film Experience
27 May 2022
After 36 years, Tom Cruise returns in one of his most iconic rolls in an effort to satiate our need for speed. Straight to the point. It's hard enough to get a hit film, putting together a sequel that equals let alone surpasses the original is harder still. Cruise and company (Jerry Bruckheimer produces again but also credits former partner Don Simpson who died in 1996) have done precisely that in "Top Gun: Maverick".

In short:

Want nostalgia?

Got it!

Well timed humor?

Check!

Amazing practical visual effects?

Double check! The submersive cockpit camera is over the top. Tossing aside the green screen pays major dividends.

"Top Gun: Maverick" is a perfect blending of the original, from music, characters, and various call back/parallels and the next generation of Naval aviators. From beginning to end this film is a heart pumping thrill ride that keeps you on the edge of your seat combined with a high-stakes storyline filled with surprisingly emotional depth, heart, and relevance.

Incredible direction, stellar pacing, fantastic acting, extraordinary cinematography and sound, "TGM" is a 2-hour 11-minute triumph. "Top Gun: Maverick" has enough heart and soul for two films and satisfies in EVERY possible aspect.

So, dust off your Ray Ban Aviators, hit the highway to the danger zone and check out "Top Gun: Maverick" on the big screen the way it's intended. You won't be disappointed.

"Top Gun: Maverick" is a full throttle mach 10 film experience.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Raimi Returns and Brings the Madness
8 May 2022
Let's start with a little bookkeeping as it were. I don't know about other countries, but here in the US do yourself a favor and make sure you're in your seat and settled down by the time the trailers start (never ceases to amaze me the number of people that miss the trailers coming in late). Why? Going by Cinemark's showings, trust me. You DON'T want to miss the exclusive first look on the big screen of "Top Gun Maverick." My need for speed watching it took every ounce of restraint I could muster not to scream with excitement and stay in my seat. So glad I've already got my ticket. Second, in addition to many of the trailers you can currently see on my page we get to see the official first trailer for "Avatar: The Way of Water". Not a great deal of info in terms of story, but visually it looks stunning.

Moving on.

"Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness" doesn't mess around. You're thrown into the story as soon as the Marvel open finishes playing. So, it's an immediate snap to attention with the who, what, where, and whys of the film. A bit of a shock, but thankfully so. Given the magnitude of what the film is supposed to do both in and of itself as well as the MCU overall, I've been anxious about the mere two-hour and six-minute running time. It seems like a short time to accomplish its goals and also be entertaining. I admit sitting in the theater, "DSitMoM" feels longer than a couple of hours. Happily, in this case that's a good thing. The film felt neither rushed nor lagged.

Good pacing throughout.

Lots of action-packed moments from start to finish expertly interwoven with character development and exposition keeps the film moving and engaging.

"Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness" also does something that Marvel does best. Bringing back actors/characters from previous outings (love seeing not only primaries but also second and even third tier folks return) for continuity but also in new and exciting ways as well. Plus bringing in new characters that serve/enrich the story and get to shine even if they don't last long. I do feel a bit shortchanged on Xochitl Gomez's American Chavez character/back story although I'm sure moving forward that will be rectified. And of course, there are also others that I'm excited will no doubt be seen again as well. Again, an impressive balancing act of making sure characters film don't come off as throwaways and nothing more.

Also thumbs up for rewarding those of us that are current in our Marvel viewings without making the inaccessible to those that aren't. So yes, if you've seen "WandaVision", "What If...", "Loki", and "Spider-Man: No Way Home" in addition to the Phase I - III Marvel films, you're definitely going to be rewarded. If you haven't, why not? Seriously, why? But still, no worries, you won't be left in the dark.

Speaking of dark, for those that feel Marvel films aren't dark enough, here ya go. Having Sam Raimi as director pays off in my book. Marvel has done a wonderful job letting its films/shows have their own individual style, tone, and "feel". One of the strongest aspects in their productions. "Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness" definitely feels like a Sam Raimi production and has its own unique flavor. Heavy on the horror and easily one of the most violent of the MCU films, it's "The Evil Dead" meets "Doctor Strange", and it works. While this won't play for some, meaning "Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness" won't necessarily be a fan favorite, I'm glad to say I was one of the many in the theater cheering, ooohing, aaaahing, and ewwwwing.

Dark, creepy, and fun with a superhero twist!

Not surprisingly fantastic visual effects, wonderful acting, terrific Danny Elfman score, a nice smattering of humor. There's a ton of stuff to unpack in this film so I'm sure that future repeat viewings as well as time to "sit" with the film will color my perceptions, but as of now "Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness" does an amazing job thrilling, entertaining, and packs an emotional punch I found lacking in "Spider-Man: No Way Home" for instance.

Sam Raimi and company hit their mark.

It's a 9.5 from me.

And yes, there are two credit scenes in the film. For those with small bladders or didn't pace yourself for the trailers and credits, hold it long enough to see the first scene at least.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Morbius (2022)
7/10
I enjoyed it
2 April 2022
After countless delays and pushed back premiere dates, Morbius has finally hit the big screen, sadly without much interest or fanfare. Even worse, without many favorable reviews from critics. I was having second thoughts about going, but I had purchased my ticket a few weeks back. After all, for me an opportunity to take in a new Marvel film in the theater isn't something to bypass lightly. Not really knowing what I was in for, I grabbed my movie bag and venture to my favorite theater to see what's what.

Other than the few trailers I'd seen beforehand, I went into Morbius cold, never having read any of the comics and being completely unfamiliar with the character. I can't say anything about how the film holds up to "canon" as a result. I can say that Morbius the film is a straight up origins film and for my time and money a fairly solid one at that. I've definitely seen much worse.

While there's no deep dive into the character of Michael Morbius but we're given enough info (though some of it's vague) as to who he is, his motivations, and the type of person he is to make the film work. Morbius is heavily CGI, most of it well executed and effective, there is some overuse as well that becomes campy, but again nothing that's a detriment to the overall film viewing experience. The same holds true with the prosthetics as well, particularly in the case of Matt Smith's Milo (there a couple of scenes that made me laugh-out-loud when I shouldn't have).

Morbius is stunningly atmospheric and has plenty of good action, nice touches of humor, and humanity. A strong cast does there best and gives it there all to their credit. Due to the runtime of an hour fort-four minutes the character development is limited but leaves enough of an impression to want to see where they go next. The ending is also anticlimactic as a result as well. Quite abrupt to say the least.

Predictability/formulaic is also present, yet the film remains interesting and entertaining nonetheless. It's also clear that given the subject/plot that an R-Rated film would've been a better choice for this one than going the PG-13 route. Tempering the blood and violence to get the more kid friendly rating definitely impacted the handling of the film and toning it down didn't do anyone any favors.

From my viewpoint, Morbius isn't the greatest but it most certainly isn't the worse either. I was intrigued, never bored, an entertained the entire film. Yes, there are questions I have and holes that I want filled but I'm glad I went and saw it on the big screen. I most certainly want to see what's next for the characters/franchise as well. Do you NEED to see this one at the theater? No, waiting for a home viewing will probably work just as well. But, if you WANT to see it on the big screen, I say go for it. It's a fun little popcorn flick that doesn't deserve the haterade being thrown at it in my opinion.

Morbius gets a 7 from me.

Oh, don't bolt right away, you get a couple of credit scenes.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Lost City (2022)
7/10
Back on the Big Screen
26 March 2022
I've mentioned before I'm not a big "chick flick" rom com kinda gal by nature. In terms of romance novels, pfft even less so (the few I've read I've done so as comedies through and through). However, I am a big Sandra Bullock fan, have been for ages, and couldn't pass up the opportunity to see my girl back up on the big screen where she belongs. Yes, I've enjoyed seeing her tear it up the last few years in various streaming endeavors (personally I don't buy into her whole Netflix is the only reason she still has a career thing) but.. anywho, Bullock + Big Screen = 4evr for me!

Moving on.

In The Lost City (2022) Bullock plays a reclusive, broken-hearted romance novelist that gets kidnaped during a book tour and swept up in a jungle adventure with her cover model Channing Tatum. TLC is part Raiders of the Lost Ark, Romancing the Stone, and Baywatch to name a few all mixed together with an over-the-top sense of self-awareness and a banging soundtrack. Yep, there will be seat dancing.

In short, The Lost City is good stupid fun.

While not as hilarious as The Proposal or endearing as While You Were Sleeping, The Lost City is funny, sweet, and charming in its own right. I snickered, giggled, and laughed-out-loud start to finish. Thoroughly enjoyed the characters, Tatum's plays the clueless but loveable idiot brilliantly. Daniel Radcliffe's unhinged, billionaire baddie is pure over-the-top fun. Da'Vine Joy Randolph's put upon, stressed out, BFF delights. And then there's Brad Pitt's Jack Trainer. OMG, I can't even with this one. The proverbial cherry on top is of course Bullock's doing what she does best. That special blend of sweetness, awkwardness, sarcasm, charm, and je ne sais quoi, *chef's kiss*.

The Lost City is a solid, throwback rom-com, action adventure that's comforting and nostalgic in its familiarity, has enough twists and surprises to keep it fresh and engaging, and offers up an entertaining movie experience. Be it at the theater now or watching at home later, The Lost City is a pleasant way to spend a couple of hours.

As always, your heads up not to bolt at the start of the credits, there's a bonus scene that's sure to bring a smile to your face and tops off the film wonderfully.

The Lost City is a 7.5.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Batman (2022)
9/10
The Bat is Back Baby!
4 March 2022
I've made no secret to the fact that DC films have been extremely hit and miss with me over the last decade plus. 2016's Batman vs Superman: The Dawn of Justice to this day remains the superhero/comic book film nadir. As for Robert Pattinson, until his turns in 2020's The Devil All the Time and Tenet, ambivalence is the most accurate feeling I've had about him as an actor. The mixture of these elements in my mind didn't bode well for The Batman yet hope springs eternal so I still found myself excited enough to jump at the chance to see the movie early at a fan event. Swag in hand, properly bundled up, and with a solid plan for pacing my drink consumption, I settled in for the 2-hour 56-minute Matt Reeves (writer/director) reimagined/rebooted Batman saga.

Bottom line. Yes.

The Batman is far superior to the most recent Batman films and does a fantastic job taking the Affleck stank off the character. Sorry Ben, you're awesome, but your take on Batman did nothing but hurt me in ways I have yet to recover from.

Pattinson, however, nails this version of Batman wonderfully. You get the dark, brooding, anger as well as the serious butt kicking, but you also get the gullibility, naivety, desperation and even dare I say? Touch of stupidity of the Caped Crusader a mere two years into his journey. This stripped down, back to basics, DIY Batman/Bruce Wayne goes deeper, brings more to the character, and happily brings back the "oomph" missing since Christian Bale vacated the role. Batman is once again a flawed, tortured human being that engages, entertains, and even amuses instead of some chronically constipated animatronic suit. Thank you, Robert Pattinson, for making me give a damn about Batman once again.

Not for nothing, but the casting throughout the film is great. Zoe Kravitz's Selina Kyle is smart, brash, sexy, and complete badass without the cheese factor that's commonly attached to the character. A modern-day Cat Woman please and thank you. Jeffrey Wright (a bit underused perhaps) makes an honorable James Gordon. Andy Serkis establishes himself as a proper heir to the Alfred throne. Colin Farrell is as unrecognizable as he is delightful as Oz. Paul Dano? Crazy, creepy, excellence. John Turturro thank you for reminding me how much I like you as an actor.

Another relief this go around is not only NOT having to watch poor Thomas and Martha Wayne bite the dust again (hmmm, a little Marvel influence perhaps?), but an interesting twist to their overall story serves as the catalyst for the film's plot. Also having Wayne Manor actually in Gotham proper adds a nice touch and works well.

The Batman score/soundtrack is terrific. Nirvana's Something in the Way, absolute perfection every time. The cinematography is stunning. There are several scenes that are beyond gorgeous and not only brought a smile to my face just witnessing them but a tear to my eye. And yes, the film is dark (shocking, not) tonally as well as literally, but for once I never felt I was suddenly listening to a radio program instead of watching a movie! Huzzah! Also having some light to even amusing moments keeps The Batman from being an epic depressive episode. A blessing for sure.

A near three hour run time is a bit too long. The pacing, especially the first half lags on and off. As for the last half of the film, there are a couple of moments you think you're done, but you're not. Fortunately, neither of these are a complete detriment to the film. I never got bored or pulled out of the film completely, but felt the drags, nonetheless.

Bottom line? The Batman has come through and delivered a widely engaging and entertaining film that has me once again excited about DC and the prospects of their upcoming films. Well worth the trip to your local theater and the price of admission from my standpoint. Glad I went, look forward to seeing it again, and seeing where the franchise goes next. Also yes, there's one tiny little post credit scene at the very end of the film. It's nothing crucial and pretty predictable so stay or don't. The choice is really up to you and your bladder.

The Batman 9.5.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Tower of Power
5 August 2017
I've been a Stephen King fan since my sister introduced me to his writing more years ago than I care to admit. Ultimately, I loved the Dark Tower series. To say I had an initial bad reaction to the series ending (a twenty minute profanity laden tear) is something of an understatement. While some of the films based on King's work haven't lived up to their potential, I had high hopes that this one wouldn't fall into that category.

Sai, thanks.

Blessedly, the folks behind The Dark Tower haven't not forgotten the faces of their fathers and have delivered a spectacular film version of the novel. Breaking my movie curse and reigning supreme in the process!

Not surprisingly the film is quite different from the book. However, it perfectly captures the essence/spirit of the story, characters, and themes without missing a beat, in an expertly pared down amalgamated version of the original source material. Moreover, if you've never read the book(s), don't worry. You won't be lost, all the pertinent points are hit and you will enjoy the story. If you have read the book(s) and/or are familiar with King's other works, bonus!! You won't be disappointed and there's the added enjoyment of the film being chock-full of Easter eggs as a homage/reward to the Constant Reader.

The casting is perfect. Idris Elba as The Gunslinger and Mathew McConaughey as The Man In Black meet and exceed expectations in their respective portrayals. A pure delight to watch these two in this one. Going in my only worry was for the character of Jake Chambers, played by Tom Taylor. I'm unfamiliar with Taylor's work, but this kid delivers, big league.

The writing is A-rated. As is the editing, special effects, and cinematography. While the storyline is dark as most apocalyptic tales are, it's never brooding or depressing. It also contains a good amount of laugh out loud humor to keep things from becoming morose. I found this action packed film thoroughly enjoyable, entertaining, and thrilling from beginning to end. At a mere 94 minutes running time, I never felt rushed or cheated. In fact, I appreciate them not padding the film out and dragging it down as a result.

No, The Dark Tower isn't a direct adaptation of the book(s), get over it. However, I don't feel it suffers as its own film as a result.

I also love the fact the way things ended, it can be a standalone, one and done film, or we can delve back into the world of The Gunslinger. After all, there are other worlds than these. I for one am hoping for the latter. In the interim, I look forward to adding The Dark Tower to my film collection and many repeated viewings.

For your father's sake, cry off and see this in the theater. It's a 10 from me.
127 out of 269 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Reboot that Works
8 July 2017
:Slight Spoilers Ahead:

After 2014's rather dismal The Amazing Spider-Man 2, I've been rather sour on Spidey and the thought of yet another reboot of the character/franchise. However, Tom Holland's brief, but strong appearance as the character in Captain America Civil War, along with the current trailers renewed hope heart that the web slinger will once again fly high in geeky esteem.

So very happy and relieved to say that Spider-Man: Homecoming is definitely a reboot that works. Hands down this movie is firing on all cylinders.

It's a young, fresh and a refreshing take on Spider-Man.

No time is wasted rehashing the characters' origin story from the beginning. There's a brief mention well into the story and we move on. Personally, the best part of this is not having to see poor old Uncle Ben kick it, yet again. Yeah, yeah. Great power, great responsibility. Yadda, yadda, yadda. This gem of a life lesson comes harshly, but organically.

This go around, the backstory is broader and focuses on placing Spider-Man in the Marvel Universe that we've already seen from The Avengers through Civil War, giving us the "big picture" as well as this particular film's framework. This integration technique is also quite successful in establishing Michael Keaton's character in the film, making him one of the best villains out there.

Characters/characterization. Yes, yes, YES! They did this one right all the way around. Returning characters are built upon, new ones are nicely established and fleshed out, old faves pop up enlighten, delight, and amuse. One of the best parts of Hollands' Peter Parker/Spider-Man is the back to basics of him being a kid, a kid with amazing abilities and potential, but a kid nonetheless. And all the baggage that entails, including being/doing something stupid, repeatedly, even for the right reasons. While things do get heavy/intense the weight of the world hasn't dropped on Peter's shoulders, yet so there's still a light hearted, even naivety about him that's been missing from previous versions. All of which leads to this movie being fun and entertaining from beginning to end. The excitement, awesomeness of getting to be a superhero is infectious.

Overall, the story is solid, relatable and gratifying. The characters/acting is terrific across the board. The balance of action/humor/heart/angst is perfect. Nice soundtrack. There are even some surprising twists and turns. And let's be clear, this is the coolest, most bad@$$ version of the Spider-Man suit to date.

Fill up your webs lingers and swing to the nearest theater to catch this one. It's a 10 and you need to see it on the big screen. And be sure to ration your drinks, there's an additional scene after the credits.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Baywatch (2017)
6/10
Entertaining for all the wrong reasons
2 June 2017
I have neither been a fan of nor seen an entire episode of Baywatch. My limited exposure to the series was covering a weekend shift at work when it was still airing. And I am pretty sure every time that happened it was the same episode each time. Yet, I never did see the whole thing. So, when I first heard they were doing a movie based on the series, my knee jerk reaction was to snort and give it a hard pass. Then I saw that it was starring Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson and saw a trailer and I said, "Okay, now I have to see it!".

So, where to even begin on this one…?

WARNING: If you are lactose intolerant or suffer from dairy sensitivity, avoid, I repeat, AVOID this film at all costs. Content within contains extremely high levels of cheesiness. 5 times more that recommended USDA allowances.

Baywatch should also be avoided if you take life too seriously, have chronic uptightness, and are woefully lacking a sense of humor or appreciation for complete ridiculousness.

That being said, I confess Baywatch is an awful movie. Absolutely terrible. The plot is thin, the acting amateurish, the characters two dimensional, and with few exceptions the dialogue forgettable. In good conscious I cannot recommend seeing this film at all let alone in the theater except under the following condition. Baywatch is primo Mystery Science Theater 3000 fodder and should be approached accordingly. Even better if done so as a group.

You can neither take this film seriously nor should you try. You will find yourself crackin' on this bad boy and as a result, against all rhyme, reason, and self-respect enjoying yourself. This is one of those it's so bad it's good, train wreck of a film that while horrifying to watch, you can't tear your eyes away and secretly find entertaining.

At the end of the day, if you're looking for a good, quality film, let the sun set on Baywatch and see something else. If, however, you're up for complete, over the top, tripe and a guilty pleasure, brave the breakers, slather on the sunscreen, hit the beach and movie theater and check out Baywatch. It's awful. But, it's an awful 6.
5 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Out With a Bang, Not a Whimper
30 May 2017
It's summer time. The weather is hot. I have a half day off and enough money on my gift card for one more movie…Perfect time to hit the theater and the high seas to check out Johnny Depp's latest and (sniffle) last foray as Captain Jack Sparrow. I've been looking forward to this one and hoping against hope that Depp and crew end the franchise on a high note. I'll be the first to admit the Pirates franchise has been uneven in terms of quality. I maintain that Dead Man's Chest was just filler to get to At World's End, but maybe that's just me.

Anywho, I won't keep you in suspense.

To the haters, no, it's not Mutiny on the Bounty. It's not supposed to be. So lighten up.

This movie is good. Real good. Good as in I sat through the whole thing with a big, ear to ear, stupid grin plastered on my face I was enjoying it so much. Yes! Bruckheimer et al. did right by the franchise and audience and ended things on a high note.

Depp's Jack Sparrow is as drunk, incorrigible, and outrageous as ever. Javier Bardem's Captain Salazar is a worthy, relentless adversary. Geoffrey Rush's Captain Barbossa's continues to be the double dealing, opportunistic, untrustworthy scoundrel you can't help but adore. Newcomer Brenton Thwaites' Henry Turner proves a worthy successor to Orlando Bloom's Will Turner in look (he really looks like Bloom's kid) and demeanor. Kaya Scodelario's Carina falls a bit short for me (too much Scullyness that puts a damper on the fun), but isn't half bad. As for Paul McCartney's cameo, brilliant.

The story fits perfectly into the overall franchise and hits on all notes. There's plenty of over the top (borderline ridiculous, but that's half the fun) action and stunts. Tons of humor. Outstanding visual effects. Revealing backstory. And of course enough heart and sentiment to pull you in and keep you invested. Happily many of the recurring secondary characters are also featured and get a well- deserved final bow.

If you've enjoy the franchise and are looking for a fun romp, set sail for your local theater, plunk down yer doubloons and enjoy the final escapades of Captain Jack Sparrow and company. It's a solid 8. For you people that bolt as soon as the credits roll, I say once more, stay through the final credits. There's an additional scene after they run.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Kong is indeed King
21 March 2017
I was ecstatic 12 years ago when Peter Jackson revived the King Kong franchise with his remake. A feeling, sadly, that quickly faded and left me with a bad taste in my mouth upon actually viewing the film. A three hour movie about a giant ape and more than an hour and a half in you still haven't seen said ape?! Grrr. So, it was with muted expectations, fingers crossed, hoping for the best and fearing the worse I ventured to check out Jordan Vogt-Roberts latest installment of Kong.

Boy am I glad I did. Everything I hated about the last Kong movie starting with being halfway through the film and still not having a Kong sighting has been addressed and how. Vogt-Roberts and company waste no time setting up and getting to the crux of the story. Namely, Kong. After all, that's what made me want to see the movie.

And Kong: Skull Island is quite the movie. Part Apocalypse Now, part Heart of Darkness with a dash of Moby Dick beautifully blended with an A rate movie version of the classic B rated monster movie, Kong thrills, entertains, wows, and triumphs.

The star studded cast lead by the incomparable Samuel L. Jackson, John Goodman, and John C. Reilly, Brie Larson, and Tom Hiddleston ground this well written fantasy in reality and keep it riveting. While set in the past, this Kong is fresh and current. The characters are more than mere backdrops for the beast and are nuanced and three dimensional.

The directing and cinematography is beautiful. The music on point and serves the story well. The action and CGI work is stellar. CGI Kong is such a far cry from the slow, lumbering Kong of the past. The subtle expressions and emotions are and additional layer of delight.

Have a couple of hours? Take a trip to Skull Island, you won't be disappointed. I'm giving Kong a solid 9 so don't miss it on the big screen. Also, make sure you stay through the credits. Yes, after the complete credit roll things go to black for a few seconds, then more is revealed.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Tale Still Wonderful as Time
21 March 2017
I'm not sure why there's so much haterade surrounding this film, but here's my take...

Following the awful mess that constituted the live action version of Cinderella in 2015, I've been anxious for Disney to redeem themselves. What better place to do so than with one of my favorite fairy tales. So, with fingers crossed, I took them up on their invitation to be their guest at Beauty and the Beast . Redemption is a beautiful thing as is this thoroughly enjoyable tale as old as time.

The casting is practically perfect.

Lucy Bevan put together an ultimate check list for casting and checked off every actor/character pairing to near perfection. While I personally don't think anyone can top Angela Lansbury as Mrs. Potts from the 1991 animated film, Emma Thompson is a very close second. Kevin Kline is shines as Maurice, less dotty and more three dimensional doting/loving father. Luke Evans brings the bombastic buffoonery Gaston to life and the pairing with Josh Gad's LeFou is sensational. LeFou is as devoted as ever, but more thoughtful and considerate as well. Sir Ian McKellen is great as Cogsworth and Ewan McGrogor's Lumiere is perfectly charming (I only wish these two and their friendly adversarial relationship were featured a bit more). Dan Haller's Beast roars onto the screen does the character justice. Emma Watson simple radiates as Belle and has that great mixture of warmth, heart, and tenacity the character embodies.

The music is as enjoyable as ever and has a new freshness with the addition of some new songs and scenes. Added backstory and additional story lines ground the film in reality and bring more depth and maturity, but there's still a nice balance of fantasy and magic. The familiarity and nostalgia of this film is everywhere, but this new version made me smile (and sing along). Kudos Disney, for getting back into fighting form with this one and bringing back some great memories while creating new ones.

I'm giving Beauty and the Beast a solid 8.5. But, don't take my word for it though, be a guest and see it for yourself. I recommend 3D if you can.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Logan (2017)
Going out on top
21 March 2017
If this is indeed Hugh Jackman's last foray into the X-Men world as the title character Wolverine (which I'm strongly hoping it isn't. There are still many questions/stories after seeing this film), what a way to go out!

As expected, Jackman and Stewart own the characters they've been given guardianship in a gritty, raw, tour de force. The chemistry between the two has always been superb, but the interplay here is next level. Relative new comer to acting Dafne Keen as Laura is a marvel (no pun intended) to behold and more than holds her own on screen with these two veteran actors. Stephen Merchant as Caliban brings his A- game. And Boyd Holbrook's Pierce wastes no time establishing himself as the bad guy you love to hate. An added treat is Eriq La Salle as the very humanizing Will Munson.

The film starts rather unexpectedly with an inappropriately lighthearted and deliciously twisted vignette from a "guest" character. Once the laughs are over, however, $#@! Gets dark and real, real fast. To say that Wolverine has seen better days is an understatement and it looks like his days of reluctant hero are behind him for good. Patrick Stewart's Professor X isn't faring much better either. Due to the actions of one former nurse, both men are tasked with one more stab at heroism. What follows is a two hour dark, violent, graphically violent, action packed, touching, humorous, raw, introspective, emotionally charged, dramatic ride of a life time. An entertaining and compelling family road trip from hell from start to finish.

Don't just take my word for it. Make your own road trip to the theater and see this 10 for yourself.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautiful Story
3 January 2017
The trailers for this movie had me intrigued to say the least. Writing to Death, Time, and Love and getting an in person response?! And what is collateral beauty after all? Never heard of it. Collateral damage, yes, but collateral beauty..? Still can't say for sure, but, it packs a helluva punch.

The premise has tear jerker written all over it, however, the setup for the movie was still surprising. Things aren't as clear cut, black and white as they first seem. The surprises, twists and turn, (especially the last one) are artfully done and take this movie to a higher level, leaving you with a lot to think about.

Also surprising, much like life itself, especially during hard times are the moments of humor. Perfectly timed, executed, and organic.

The all star cast is unbelievable. The incomparable Helen Mirren, flawless. Kate Winslet emotional and compassionate. Edward Norton human and flawed. Michael Pena quality all the way. Keira Knightly funny, sweet, pained and beautiful. Relative newcomer Jacob Latimore is fierce in his portrayal and he delivers quite the slap in the face wake up call. This kid is someone to keep an eye on.

Finally, Will Smith... Damn.

This is a tour de force performance that reminds me just what an amazing actor Smith has become. Quiet, subtle, pained, raw, emotional, vulnerable. The first fifteen to twenty minutes of the film, Smith doesn't even speak, but you see and feel every bit of the hurt and turmoil his character is going through. I'm not gonna lie, every time he was on screen I had to fight back tears just looking at his eyes. It's simply heartbreaking and devastating. Once he does began to speak/engage the power of his performance became undeniable.

If you want to great writing/acting and a film that will make you think and feel this is the movie to see. Grab yourself a box of Puffs, you'll need them, and check out this 10 tissue beauty.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Almost there, but not quite
2 December 2016
This movie is one of those that should and will resonate with everyone. A heart filled, crazy, emotional, and tender look at family. How and why we can drive each other crazy, drive each other away, yet just as easily lift each other up, pull each other through, and make each other strong – when not trying to kill one another.

Danny Glover back on the big screen heads up the strong cast as the patriarch of the Meyer family as they deal with the loss of the beloved matriarch whom held them altogether. Mo'Nique brings her A game as the over the top, flamboyant, hard drinking, shoot from the hip, no bull@$#& aunt. J.B. Smoove is Uncle Lonnie, his typical fast talking shuckin' and jivin' self as only he can be.

The soundtrack is great. From the opening credit sequence it sets the perfect tone and pulls you into the story and is as impactful as a soundtrack should be.

For all the positives of this film, however, I found the pacing (especially the first half) extremely uneven. I found myself repeated pulled in and engaged in the fun/drama only to have punctuated drawn out moments of "meh" wash over me and my interest wane. Fortunately, the second half of the film hits its stride and the movie finishes strong, including some nice outtakes at the beginning of the end credits.

I did get some good laughs and even teared up a couple of times, but, I'm going to give this one a 5.5 and suggest it as a rental/stream.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fantastic, lives up to its name!
2 December 2016
This is another movie I've been champing at the bit to see and have high expectations. So, let's just get something out of the way from the get. Although, this is another J.K. Rowling creation directed by David Yates, Beasts is NOT Harry Potter. It's the wizarding world created by Rowling, but events take place in 1926 America. New country, new characters, new stories. That being said…

…For me, the movie started a little slow, only because I've been all over Pottermore devouring all the new info/material Rowling has released (while avoiding the actual book) with the run up to the film. As such, I was just impatient to get to the meat of the story without preamble. Not that the preamble itself is nicely done and quite enjoyable as far as origin stories go. Being a period piece, the creators have gone all out with ornate set design, costuming, and props all which suck you into the story that unfolds and adds to the magic and wonder.

The cinematography, lighting, editing, musical score, and visual effects are first rate and serve to create a world that feels real enough to actually step into. No small feat given the use of CGI in today's film. In particular the world where Newt's fantastical beasts resides is absolutely stunning and deserving of its own movie. I could easily get loss in exploring every nook and cranny.

Eddie Redmayne, as Newt Scamander is a joy to watch. No surprise given his recent turns in movies from Les Miserables to The Danish Girl. Quite the chameleon actor. Redmayne uses everything at his disposal: body language, awkwardness, and mannerism to create a charming, interesting, and endearing three dimensional character. I can't wait to learn more about/see him in future franchise films.

Dan Fogler is pure gold as Jacob Kowalski. A "no-maj" in the wrong place at the wrong (or is it right time?) that finds magic is real and is taken for the ride of his life far beyond anything he can conjure in his imagination. Fogler is perfectly cast. Extremely likable, funny, open, and amazed at the magical world unfolding around him, makes for the ideal surrogate for the audience.

The story itself is deceptively straight forward on the surface (magical creatures get lose in New York and need to be captured before the non-wizarding world discovers magic is real), but like other/best epic films such as Harry Potter or Star Was is merely the seed for a more encompassing, far reaching, adult tale that will fire the imagination and entertain for years to come.

Wands at the ready and head to the theater. This one is a solid 9 and needs to be seen and enjoyed on the big screen.
27 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Moana (I) (2016)
10/10
Must See Disney Original
26 November 2016
First things first.

Disney once again gives us an original short prior to the feature called Inner Workings. It picks up where Inside Out left off, whereas we get to see how the human mind/body works. I'm not entirely convinced kids, especially younger kids will appreciate this one, but it hits a powerful chord with every working adult. Boring, Boring, and Glum resonates to the point where I laughed almost as much to keep from crying as I did from the pure humor.

As for the newest Disney Original feature film of Moana, words like beautiful, delightful, funny, exciting, thrilling, action packed, innovative, charming, mesmerizing, emotional, and inspiring leap to mind. While for the most part, I'm loving the sequels the company has been doing, Moana recaptures the magic and wonder of Disney original stories and makes me extremely happy this is the course they'll be pursuing again. I'm a fan!

The largely Pacific islands cast with the exception of Dwayne Johnson as the voice of Maui, Nicole Scherzinger, and Alan Tudyk is unfamiliar to me. However, the perfection in the casting is undeniable. The characters these actors create are comforting, warm, three dimensional.

The musical score, includes songs by Lin-Manuel Miranda (of Hamilton fame) perfectly accentuates and punctuates the story elevating the level of entertainment. Plenty of toe tapping and seat dancing to be had. While none of the songs will most likely reach Let I Go proportions, I defy you not to laugh, hum along and get You're Welcome stuck in your head.

Others have tried, maybe even come close, but no one tops Disney/Pixar animators when it comes to water animation. No one. The overall animation is also out of this world. There's great us combined 2D and 3D animation to make the story pop, especially the mythology sequences. The research done to capture the vivid colors and textures of the Pacific Islands flora and fauna gives Moana an unsurpassed tactility. I wanted to jump on the next plane to see islands myself.

I thoroughly enjoyed myself and can't give Moana anything but a 10 and look forward to adding it to my personal movie collection to enjoy for years to come.

ALERT for you folks that dash out as soon as the credits roll. Stick around to the end. Enjoy the closing credits music because there's a final scene when all is said and done that will make you smile.
4 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Doctor is in...real in
10 November 2016
Doctor Strange is another Marvel superhero I've heard of, but am largely unfamiliar. However, given the studios recent track record, the intriguing trailers, and Benedict Cumberbatch in the starring role, I've been salivating in anticipation of seeing this film.

WARNING: Anyone prone to or sensitive to motion sickness may want to forgo seeing this in 3D (especially IMAX 3D) or at least pop a Dramamine prior to viewing.

First things, first. The visual effects in this movie are simply amazing and lend themselves to IMAX 3D if you can handle it. I'll say they're along the lines of Inception although I haven't actually watched that movie. I admit, the opening sequence gave me a little tummy trouble, but fortunately I soon adapted and was able to submerge myself and enjoy the film. The idea of a new twist on reality takes new meaning and boggles the mind.

Secondly, the cast is perfect.

Tilda Swinton as The Ancient One? What a badass and a delight to watch. She's one of those actors I normally don't think of until I happen to see her in something, then can't be more thrilled with her performance.

Mads Mikkelsen, still gives me chills from his take as Hannibal Lecter from the defunct NBC series Hannibal and again delivers as our baddie Kaecilius. Brilliant, talented, but oh so misguided. Looking forward to seeing him in Rogue One.

Ahhh, Benedict Cumberbatch. I count myself among the Cumber...well I'll go with Collective for the sake of this review and my fandom just went up another notch with his portrayal of the title character, Dr. Stephen Strange. Brilliant, egotistical, talented, and let's face it a bit of an a-hole, Cumberbatch's journey from the top of the world/his profession to the lowest depths of the gutter is a roller coaster of emotion and a pure joy to watch unfold. The man was born to play this part.

Third, the writing. Once again the folks at Marvel have created a dramatic, engaging, action packed, funny three dimensional story that just also happens to have the fantastical elements of magic and superheroes. This is one of those films if you lose the fantasy elements actually still works as a story. So, even if you aren't a fanboy/fangirl of comics and superheroes the story resonates and you will enjoy. And if you are a fanboy/girl you'll enjoy the ride even more.

I've got to go all in on this M.C. Escheresque thrill ride and give this one an around the world and back snap. A ten in my book. Don't wait, definitely see this one on the big screen, IMAX 3D if you can.

One last word of CAUTION: STAY until the very end of the credits. As is Marvel's modus operandi there are not one, but two additional scenes in the closing credits. Don't gyp yourself by missing them.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Magnificent live up to its name
2 October 2016
I'm a fan of the good old fashioned westerns, including the original source material of this film, Akira Kurosawa's 1954 masterpiece Seven Samurai as well as the John Sturges' 1960 The Magnificent Seven remake starring Yul Brynner, Steve McQueen and company. So, all things being equal, Antoine Fuqua has some big shoes to fill with this 2016 remake.

And fill them, Fuqua did. The Magnificent Seven is more The Equalizer than Training Day (thankfully), and the word magnificent sums things up nicely. Honestly, if the movie had only been as long as the opening sequence and ended, I would have said, "money well spent" and left happy. It was that good. The remaining 2 hours are the icing on the proverbial (death by chocolate) cake and just as indulgent to the movie goer.

Like its 1960s counterpart, the all star cast of Denzel Wahington, Ethan Hawke, Vincent D'Onofrio, and Chris Pratt bring all their combined and considerable talents to bear and deliver stellar performances. While lesser known (to me anyway) Byung-hun Lee, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, Martin Sensmeier, and Haley Bennett rise to the challenge and hold their own against the "big boys." Peter Sarsgaard puts the bad and @$$ in bad@$$. One of the best, unrepentant, villains and complete s.o.b.s to come out the chute in ages. You fear and loathe this mother from the get and want him to get his in the worse way possible.

Squee!

The cinematography is outstanding. I saw this in IMAX and talk about feeling like you're in the movie. The vistas are stunning, the dust and sweat is almost palatable. The grit and harshness of the frontier leaps off the screen. You don't just watch this movie, you experience every thunder of horse hooves and spray of bullets. Speaking of bullets, the sound mixing add another rich layer of texture to this film. Every gun shot is like a canon blast and had me jumping and dodging in my seat.

The Magnificent Seven is action packed, dramatic, tense and intense, introspective with touches of well placed/timed heart and humor. This is a modern day throw back to John Ford westerns and the like at their best.

Gather up your posse, saddle up and mosey on down to the theater for this one. This film is time and money well spent.
17 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed