Reviews

23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Damsel (2024)
8/10
Beautiful and tragic - and Games of Thrones-esque
9 March 2024
Ok, first thing's first: yes, Damsel quite obviously is inspired by and even borrows direct shots from Game of Thrones. Putting it here up front because it's apparent from the start that the director is enamored with GoT. But, if you can get past that...

Damsel is a tragic requiem for girlhood, and a beautiful tribute to womanhood. It subverts trope after trope, carried on the back of one of the finest actors of her generation in Millie Bobby Brown, and manages to genuinely surprise at least twice. It's the reverse of a fairy tale - the prince does not get the princess - and a reverse of so many similar fantasy movies - the heroine does not "save" the day.

The music is exceptional, the special effects are above average, and there is one scene that will pull tears from your eyes. Overall it's a little rushed and there are a few clear continuity errors, but for a movie where there is essentially one person on screen for 80% of the runtime, it works really well. Credit to Millie for her ability to play fierce and vulnerable at the same time, especially with the after-effects of dragon fire.

Highly recommended for those of you looking for something just a little bit different. International Women's Day indeed.
20 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mesmerizing
14 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
It's a celebration of music, a celebration of being a person in the universe! Even for the 'sad' songs, it's joyful and happy and makes you feel all the feels. Badass, sexy, fun, amazing - take your pick!

It starts off in the Lover Era and finishes in the Midnights Era. And in between? Christian Louboutins, incredible bass in IMAX, and some very emotional moments with Cruel Summer, champagne problems, and marjorie.

The audience was respectful! Sang and danced in their seats but, mostly, no scream-singing or standing and blocking views.

Stay around for the end credits. Taylor cut the live performance of Long Live (one of my faves) but it plays over the credits and it def brings tears. Plus the bloopers/wardrobe malfunctions...

You're on your own kid. You always have been.
36 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's...fine.
13 July 2023
First things first: this is a competently made, well-filmed, well-paced, and nice looking and sounding movie. Seeing it on the biggest screen near you is certainly worth it one time.

That said - overall, it's a pretty standard action movie, and most of the plot "twists" and beats were quite predictable. The whole "entity" malarkey is the McGuffin the entire movie rests upon, and it's not explained in any reasonable or sensible fashion. It just makes vaguely threatening digital noises... And the film's other villain is a James Bond-esque escalation/callback which made me roll my eyes. Tom Cruise is good, as usual, but the rest of the cast isn't given too much to do - except for Atwell, who does fine until the end, when the climax on the train really pulls the rug out from her characterization.

I wish it was better. But, worth it to see it one time in PLF. Otherwise, I don't care too much about Part 2 anymore.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Extraction II (2023)
4/10
Had me until Vienna
21 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I really enjoyed the first half of this movie and thought it was better than the first. Good action, great filming, interesting lighting choices, and the acting was better too. And while we need to suspend some disbelief at how remarkably lethal Tyler is, I never felt completely taken out of the first movie or the first half of this one. That all changed with the Vienna sequence, which was incredibly unrealistic and dumb in the way it was portrayed. An unknown helicopter crossing into Austria from Slovakia and then using a minigun on the most recognizable skyscraper in the city would bring much more of a response and much more quickly too, particularly if this movie is set in time present of the real world.
147 out of 183 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Shockingly bad
24 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I don't even know where to start. I love John Wick 1-3 and saw all three of them 2-3 times in theatres, with more repeat viewings at home.

John Wick 4 is an awful mockery of everything that made the franchise good. It is far too long and overindulgent - some filler shots go on for 20-30 seconds when they could have been 5 - and the movie lacks the kinetic realism of all the previous entries. The acting is bad, the dialogue is bad and even unnecessary at times, and plot is completely nonsensical.

WHY does he drive in circles around the Arc de Triomphe when he could just drive Montmarte? He later drives the motorcycle there...

How is the Eiffel Tower the closest the Bowery King can get him to Montmarte? That's where he was right before that!!

Ugh, and don't get me started on the Marquis nonsense. It's the worst kind of one-up-manship - illogical, unfounded, and a pure plot contrivance.

Hard pass.
44 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Jim
18 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Wow. I think the final v/o letter made me shed the most tears since A Star Is Born. I wasn't crazy about ep 7, but ep 8 totally redeemed s3. So powerful...

Dear Jim,

I kept my door open three inches. You can ask anyone! Joyce, Will, Jonathan...

We're here. There's no mind flayer. I don't have any powers. But I don't miss them. I just miss you.

Why? Why did you have to do that? Don't be stupid, right? I'm sure you weren't stupid but I'm not sure you were smart either.

I miss you. I hope the mind flayer is gone forever. I don't want to be a weapon anymore. I think you gave me that chance.

I love you, dad.

El.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The White Lotus: Arrivederci (2022)
Season 2, Episode 7
4/10
Poor conclusion to a great show
22 January 2023
Wow! Where to start. Episodes 1-6 were incredibly well-acted, well-written, and the sound and cinematography were great. Sort of ambiguous but identifiable characters (for the most part) and a whole bunch of a really impressive mise-en-scène that will take your breath away - not the least of why is because of the on-location shooting.

But...what happened in this last episode?? Everything that was good before, and everything that you were looking forward to about the conclusion just falls flat. The end of the Palermo storyline is complete nonsense and is literally disengaging, and our foursome main characters are reduced to caricatures.

Watch eps 1-6. Skip ep 7.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Glass Onion (2022)
7/10
Very enjoyable except one major plothole
29 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Funny, well made, well acted! Except, there was one major plothole that was really hard to get past...

What happened to the gun? It doesn't make sense they'd confront the murderer like they did (and then just be comfortable in their presence at the end) after the murderer proved they had the will and intent to murder two people. That whole end scene didn't ring true.

Otherwise, a good follow up to Knives Out, with strong performances from several of the actors. I'd recommend seeing it, but maybe temper your expectations a bit for the end, which isn't nearly as good as the rest of the movie is.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Exciting action, beautifully shot, but...
2 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This episode contains some great action and beautiful shots, and the amount of time and skill it took to train for and shoot the horse scenes is obvious to anyone. And the final scene is mesmerizing, particularly as you consider the future of Middle-Earth. However, the scene between Galadriel and Adar strikes absolutely the wrong note, and it does make me worried for the future of this series if the writing can get it SO wrong for such important scenes.

Yes, we know Galadriel is tormented by the guilt of her brother's death; and yes, we know she has been hunting the shadow of Sauron for a VERY. LONG. TIME. And yes, we know she hasn't exactly been treated well by the rest of her people, who haven't sought to understand her at all, but rather sharpened her into an arrow and pointed her at something. What did they expect would happen to her? Unfortunately the writers of Rings of Power think that means she should be a stubborn bully that sucks all the joy of the room. But as if that weren't enough, in the scene 1:1 scene with her and Adar, she responds to his mention of a place for his people to call home with a genocidal rant. I'm not naive enough to think Adar is good or that his intentions are truly about all of his "children," but Galadriel's response is such an unnecessary escalation it almost amounts to a war crime. And it does nothing to build any sympathy or good feeling for her character.

It took me out of the scene, and it took me out of the episode, and it got me thinking about the future of the show. I know I was supposed to be shocked and afraid for Galadriel at the very end, but quite frankly I couldn't bring myself to care. Both she and Adar could be lost to the fires of Mount Doom at this point.
6 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bullet Train (2022)
5/10
Funny, stupid, pointless
13 August 2022
I'll admit, the film is quite funny in spots - in an aburdist style - but ultimately it seemed like pointless and vapid violence. I love the John Wick franchise, so spent a little time trying to understand why I walked out of the theatre feeling "meh" about Bullet Train, and I think it comes down to world-building for me. Bullet Train doesn't have any; or any of consequence, at least. Give it a pass if you're not too interested in it.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sing 2 (2021)
8/10
Don't believe the critics
24 December 2021
This movie is wonderful, gorgeous, sad, sweet, and entertaining. You can't help but shed a few tears and bob your head with the beat. It's a feel-good experience without much substance but a ton of joy! Please go see it and feel again :)
68 out of 81 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Turned it off after 40 minutes
9 August 2021
Plot, what plot? Didn't care about any of the characters either. After the nonsensical garbage that was Black Widow, and now this travesty, I'm starting to feel like the superhero genre is dead in the water for now.

This movie is neither fun, nor funny, nor coherent. Waste of time and money.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black Widow (2021)
2/10
Nonsense
20 July 2021
I really wanted to like this movie - Florence is a fantastic actress and I've always loved Scarlett in this role - but no amount of fine acting could save this one for me. The plot is so convoluted and disjointed as to be almost nonsensical, and there are so many plot holes and retcons with respect to the rest of the MCU. This movie is too little, too late. I'd give it a skip or at least wait for non-premium viewing.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hateful and exhausting
7 February 2021
This is a beautifully made film with a few scenes of excellent acting... but the script entirely misses the moment and the relationship is both artificial and exhausting at the same time. No one would say "solipsistic" while arguing, and that's the least of the film's faults. I wanted to turn it off three separate times, but forced myself to stick it out in hopes of some sort of resolution. Fool me twice and all that...

Give this one a skip.
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointingly mediocre
29 December 2020
Wonder Woman was so full of hope and wonder with the promise of something more sublime to come... WW84 isn't a bad movie but it's not a good one either. It's full of tired superhero tropes, literal wish fulfillment, and a deus ex machina (both literally and figuratively) that will leave you stunned with its stupidity. But it is funny at times and Gal Godot still embodies the character quite well. Some of the visuals and music are nice too. Would I see it again? No. Do I regret seeing it once? Not really.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Inception (2010)
10/10
Outstanding and Thought-Provoking
22 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
As a pretentious graduate student of English literature, pseudo-intellectual movies—especially ones disguised as blockbusters (or vice-versa)—immediately turn me off. I can smell a movie that is in way over its head from a mile away, and my biggest fear going into Inception was that it would be just that: pop entertainment that thinks it's smarter than it actually is. And while Inception is pop entertainment at its finest, it also offers the viewer two hours and twenty minutes of cinema that is complex but not convoluted, surprising but not full of gimmicky Shyamalan-esquire twists, and intelligent until the very end. I have never really been disappointed by Christopher Nolan, and Inception is certainly not an exception. That said, there are of course many other redeeming qualities about this movie, so many, in fact, that this review could go on for ages and ages. From the sound design and the original score by Hans Zimmer to the cinematography by Wally Pfister, all technical aspects of this film are above industry standard. Nolan knows well enough to surround his director's chair with well-qualified cast and crew, and, again, Inception is no exception. Performances are good across the board, with Cillian Murphy as the corporate heir and Marion Cotillard as the mysterious wife standing above the rest; DiCaprio is great as always, but in Inception he melts effortlessly into the ensemble, giving others numerous chances to shine. Perhaps the only legitimate criticism of Nolan has been his rather cold perfection; his movies seem to lack a certain emotional core, even though they are made with precision and care. This is not the case with Inception. The core plot of the movie revolves around Cobb's relationship with his dead wife, both within his own memory and also within his subconscious's projections in the dream worlds. Mal (Marion Cotillard, pronounced "mall") constantly encroaches upon his team's efforts, and she represents a force of nature whenever she appears on screen. Her cool, statuesque demeanor is a sharp contrast to the warmer tones of some of the dream worlds, and as soon as she appears, we wait with a collectively drawn breath to see what havoc she might wreak. This damaged relationship drives the movie forward through all of its complexity and rules, and never once is it lost within the kinetic or intellectual layers of the script. So the critics who have taken Inception to task for its lack of emotional content clearly watched a different movie, because there would be no Inception without Cobb's emotional confusion and turmoil.

With all of that said, Inception's strongest attribute is its potential to incite active, engaged, and intellectual dialogue between movie-goers. Dreaming is something we all share (though obviously not in the same way as the characters of Inception), and the exploration of the natural dreamscape within the world of the movie is thought-provoking and stimulating. If dreaming is simply a simulacrum of reality, Inception does an outstanding job focusing our eyes on the potentials for dreams to be an escape—if not crutch—from the pain and sameness of reality. Cobb uses the dream world to return to his most cherished (and most regretted) memories of his late wife, though as Ariadne (Ellen Page) points out, this is futile and ultimately damaging to his subconscious. The fact that his repression of past traumas in his relationship keeps manifesting itself in the day-to-day activities of his extraction job is perhaps the movie's most salient point, because even though Cobb deals with these incursions effectively, there is still a trace of doubt in his eyes. Credit DiCaprio for completely selling Cobb's insecurity, albeit maintaining a sense of calm and control his leadership requires.

The last hour of Inception is quite simply virtuoso film-making, at all levels of the process. A van falls backward off a bridge for literally 45 minutes, but it makes complete sense within the story; in fact, the image of the van falling is something to which we consistently return, reminding us of the outer layers of the dream worlds even as we lose ourselves in the action and plot happening at deeper levels. When Ariadne regresses from Limbo to the top layer of the dream world, we are suddenly sucked back up through the various layers as the audience, and it is so like waking up from a dream that I cannot even describe it properly. We are thrust back into our seats, waiting for the last dream to fall away… waiting for the real world to fall back upon us. It is bittersweet and almost unwelcome, because we know the movie is ending, and to be so completely transported for two hours is quite a feat. Inception is much like a good dream: you do not want it to end.

The last shot of the film is no less than one of the most brilliant last shots in the history of mainstream cinema. I am resorting to this hyperbole because it pulls off the inception of the movie: Christopher Nolan implants an ambiguity into our heads with the final few frames (both visually and aurally) that simply will not go away. Not only is this because the entire movie can be reinterpreted depending on how the ending is viewed, but also because in our hearts we have already decided what we want out of the ending. For the director to leave the ending mostly open to interpretation—and Cobb's fate, as well—is probably the most brilliant thing he could have done with this movie. As Cobb says, "An idea is the most resilient parasite," and the final few seconds of Inception will stay with you for days and weeks to come. Highly recommended.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spider-Man 3 (2007)
5/10
Waste of talent and money
11 May 2007
Considering the film's 258 million dollar budget and the fact that Raimi, Maguire, Dunst, and Franco have stayed on for this third film, it's quite a shock how far and fast it falls. The special effects are worse than the first film at times, the romance between Maguire and Dunst takes several steps back and is arguably again somewhere within the first story, there are THREE, yes THREE villains in this movie...

So, what happened? It almost seems like everyone involved either became complacent or bored. They know the movie will break the bank, as can be seen by its opening weekend, so are they just not putting forth the same effort? Spider-Man 2 was more than a comic book movie - it was a genuine film with ethos and pathos. Spider-Man 3 is computer schlock fest...two of the three villains are completely CGI 95% of the time. Where is the humanity? Where is the care factor?

The only things this movie has going for it are its humor and one emotional scene on a bridge. While funnier than the first two films combined, is humor a substitute for the brilliance of SM2? And the bridge scene between Maguire and Dunst almost redeemed their entire relationship in my eyes, but the intensity doesn't last and is almost forgotten toward the end of the movie. Honestly, I'd recommend waiting for the DVD, if you haven't already seen it in the theatre.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hounddog (2007)
4/10
Ultimately very disappointing.
24 January 2007
This is a bad film. It is not really Dakota's fault, but to be honest I wasn't really impressed with her this time around. I felt like she was a little too much, a little too melodramatic, and definitely not as real as she is in her other films. The real problems with this film lie in the directing, the script, and the pacing. It's poorly filmed (though beautifully lensed), the script panders to too many stereotypes to even enumerate, and even though it's very short, it crawls along.

All the controversy about the rape is unfounded, too, because it actually is only a very small piece of the movie. You see her face twice and her hand once, and you hear her. I'd say it was 45 seconds. Maybe not even that long.

Anyways, color me disappointed. Definitely not worth all the hype, and I really wish Dakota could have found a better filmmaker(s) and film(s) during all the time she wasted as this film sat in preproduction. I hope this doesn't affect her career too much.
107 out of 186 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
ER: On the Beach (2002)
Season 8, Episode 21
10/10
Beautiful
16 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
There really is no other word for this episode. If "ER" has a climax - emotional or otherwise - this episode is it. It has actually very little to do with the ER itself, but that's OK. This episode is more about the end of a journey, of a character we've all come to know and love. Perhaps the most telling moment in this episode is when Greene falls out of bed and curses. You know it's over for him at that point. And the end of the episode, with that damn fine song, made me cry so hard. "ER" has never been a bad show, or even a mediocre one, but as the screen fades to black at then end of this particular episode, the show loses something it never regained. Dr. Greene's humanity. His unflinching humanity.

Television at its finest.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Moulin Rouge! (2001)
10/10
The Saddest Movie Of All Time
20 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Who knew that such a visually and aurally stunning movie would also be the saddest movie of all time? Bahz Luhrmann (Romeo + Juliet) explores and expands his colorful, manic, and at times overwhelming style in Moulin Rouge!, but he also has learned how to create a coherent narrative.

Moulin Rouge! tells the story of Christian (McGregor), a young quasi-Bohemian in Paris near the turn of the century. He becomes fascinated with Moulin Rouge!, the club in which streetwalkers become celebrities and the rich and the poor mix in a kind of decadence that the club is now internationally famous for. The object of his affection is Satine (Kidman), the premier attraction of the club. She can only be bought for the highest of prices.

Seems like a clichéd plot, doesn't it? Well, any one new to this film will be in for a surprise. The sets are absolutely ravishing, the production and sound design are unparalleled even to this day, and the pure pathos exhibited in this film hits right to core. McGregor and Kidman do their singing on the actual set...none of what is in the final film is prerecorded. It has been polished...but their original work is there. And it is stunning. Who knew the two of them had such huge voices? McGregor especially is an eye-opener here. We knew he could act, but to sing like that? Amazing.

The lovers live in bliss for a short time, but like all good things that has to come to an end. Passion, lies, murder...again, more clichés, but it works here because we are so emotionally invested in these characters by the end of the film. The tragedy is so overwhelming at the end that many of the people I've watched this film with were literally sobbing by the conclusion. My eyes weren't dry either. There is something so elemental about how love is portrayed in this film--"The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love, and be loved in return." And that is the greatest thing we have learned. Then that is shattered, stripped from us in the final moments. The end of this film is so cathartic that it leaves you breathless. Moulin Rouge! is easily the saddest film ever made.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Babel (I) (2006)
8/10
The Quintessence of Intensity
12 November 2006
I was unprepared for the emotional intensity of this film, and it was better for it. Please, try and see this film with as little pretense as possible, because the visceral impact of the pain and hope on the screen before you will be magnified because of it. Inarritu, perhaps one of the most interesting visual storytellers of the past few decades, goes beyond anything we have seen from him to date. Babel is the outstanding example of emotion, the raw feelings that drive all human beings--love, anger, humiliation, sadness, pain...

I'm purposely leaving any talk of the plot out of this review because I don't want to ruin ANY of the multitude of nuances Inarritu has in this story...suffice it to say that time coalesces in this movie, and something that happens near the beginning plays out again near the end, although from a different perspective. And I'm giving this an 8/10 because I feel that there is more potential here. Given another thirty minutes, minus the constraints of the MPAA, I think Babel could be a masterpiece. Summarily, Babel is the quintessence of intensity, and you would have to be inhuman to be unmoved by its content.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Highly Underrated and Under-appreciated.
15 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Whenever conversations about the Godfather movies come up, most people are so surprised that I regard this, the third of the trilogy, the best of them all. They all automatically assume that anyone who has seen the entire trilogy likes the first one the best. The first one is spectacular film-making, there's no denying that, but the Godfather Part III is not only more epic, but also more emotional, more resonating, and more poignant.

The entire Godfather saga, in my mind, is not about crime or the Mafia - at the heart of these movies lies one major conflict: Michael Corleone is trying desperately to keep his family from disintegrating around him. At some points, he perpetuates it out of some misplaced pride (such as with Fredo), and at other points, he does in fact hold it together, such as with his children. The first movie is all about how he's drawn into the web of lies and corruption, and how he sees that his family is slowly dying because of it. He enters the business because he feels like he has to in order to preserve the sacred honor of his family. The second movie is perhaps the worst (if any of them could be called 'worst'), simply because it meanders when it should be propelling the story along. The second movie is about how, over everything that he's done, he still can't stop the ball from rolling over his family. The end of Part II - that single shot of Michael sitting in the chair - is one of the best single shots in film history.

That brings me to Godfather, Part III, which probably has some immediate (and rather shallow) detractors because from the outset it feels like an epilogue. That's just the initial impression, though, and then we, the moviegoers, realize that a lot has happened since we last saw Michael. He's guilty over what he's done, especially how he's been unable to save his most precious possessions, and he's trying to change his ways. This Michael is older, more mature, and not as naive about the machinations of worldly men. The fact that the setting changes so much in this film is showing that he has sins to atone for all over the world, and that subconsciously he's maybe reaching out to these past grievances and trying for some closure.

What makes Part III so good, though, is that underlying all of that is a sense of desperation. He knows his time is running out - we all know it as well. It's with morbid fascination that one looks at the running time, especially toward the end, because he hasn't achieved his personal atonement yet. And then...and then the final twenty minutes comes, and we see what Michael's life has been leading up to. All of it - all of his greed, murders, passion - have been futile. His atonement is naught but a passing gesture, because it comes back and haunts him at the end of it all. His family, or what's left of it, is shattered and fragmented in the final scenes.

And where does that leave him? Alone. Absolutely alone. The final scene, in which Michael simply falls over, dead, is the perfect post-script to a brilliant movie, and the end of a truly exquisite saga. Part's I and II are excellent, but they feel incomplete without Part III, and that is because the entire story hasn't been told.

10/10 - Most underrated movie of the 90's.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wolf Creek (2005)
9/10
Surprisingly effective and chilling.
14 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Let me preface this by saying that I did not view the trailer before I saw this movie, nor did I really know anything about it. I do not know if that will lessen the impact at all, but it might (not sure what they show in the trailer).

Writer/producer/director McLean shot this movie on a digital HD handy cam, giving it an amateurish feel - but it is far from amateur. The first 45 minutes feel like a completely different movie than the last hour or so, and that is one of this movie's many strengths. McLean spends time letting the audience get to know the three main protagonists, who are Liz, Kristy, and Ben. They girls, who are both from Britain, are nearing the end of their Australian excursion, and they set off with their new Aussie mate, Ben, on a road trip/backpacking trip across the country.

McLean has an eye for the unsettling, even in the mostly warm first minutes, and he uses the stark colors and landscapes of the deepening outback to give it a slowly building sense of dread. Their are a few ominous signs - a dog barking viciously at something off screen, a rather unpleasant encounter in an out of the way gas station, and an awkward conversation about UFOs and aliens. I knew it was a horror movie, and the slow buildup is a wonderful way to create true and genuine tension.

Another thing that creates tension is the fact that the three main characters are so well fleshed out, and feel so real, that the audience begins to care for them. Knowing it is a horror movie, we know that something is eventually going to happen, and beginning segment, in its quiet, tender moments, make you wonder when that is going to happen. It's all part of the extremely good package.

Another thing to like about this horror movie is that the characters, for the most part, do not do any stupid things or horror clichés; rather, they are trying to survive and they do respond in believable ways to the horrors around them. And when those horrors finally come, after an particularly amazing segue (going to sleep...sunset...waking up hogtied), they do not let up.

Part of the criticism of this movie is that it is realistically violent and brutal, but it's a juxtaposition from the first half. It's also a juxtaposition of civilized vs. uncivilized, and the sterile, uncompromising landscape of the Outback is the perfect place for this to occur. There wasn't an over the top amount of gore, which is good, because the cruelty of what the three endure is enough to churn anyone's stomach. However, the movie is not just simple exploitation - far from it, actually. It's about that deep-seated fear of the unknown, and what could happen in an unfamiliar place.

McLean, while following a somewhat formulaic idea, stays far away from the usual stupidity. The fact that we have grown to care for the three main characters is why the second half is so effective, because there are things that happen to them that are so brutal that you feel it right with them.

'Wolf Creek' is one of the few good/great horror movies I've ever seen.
258 out of 332 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed